
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Stop chasing blitz rates. Defensive efficiency isn’t dictated by how often you send extra bodies; it is defined by the mechanism of the rush and whether you can hit the 40% pressure rate benchmark. If you aren’t affecting the quarterback, your “face melter” pressures are just creating vacated windows for elite passers to exploit.
In this episode, we break down the shift from rigid 5-man structures to the “glitch blitz” world of simulated pressures. We evaluate why Oregon’s quarter-based pressures failed, while Georgia and Indiana found efficiency by manipulating defensive schemes.
In this episode:
The 40% Standard: A 40% pressure rate is the upper echelon of modern defense. If you can’t reach this with four, your blitz package must manufacture one-on-ones, not just volume.
Oregon’s Spacing Issues: The Ducks struggled with 5-man pressures because their quarters shell was disjointed from the front, leading to the highest touchdown rate allowed on blitzes in the P4.
Indiana’s Sim Philosophy: The Hoosiers led the country in simulated pressure rate (57%) by using “pick” pressures to isolate defensive linemen on running backs.
Strategic Layering: Data suggests running Quarters on early downs and Fire Zones on third down is a more efficient “change-up” than traditional single-high philosophies.
2026 NFL Draft Profiles:
TJ Parker (Clemson): High pressure rate with Wide-9 utility.
Emmanuel McNeil-Warren (Toledo): Elite pressure rate for a down-safety or nickel role.
Kayden McDonald (Ohio State): Quick-three interior disruptor.
Peter Woods (Clemson): Interior force built for heavy stunt usage.
Dillon Thieneman (Oregon): Hybrid safety with sideline-to-sideline tracking.
Timestamps:
00:00 - The 40% Pressure Rate Benchmark
01:34 - Pressuring with Four: Chiefs and Giants Lessons
08:11 - Line Play and Condensing Decision Time
14:45 - Cowboys and Eagles Pressure Analysis
17:29 - Oregon vs. Georgia: Quarters vs. Fire Zones
27:31 - Indiana and the Rise of Simulated Pressures
34:25 - Flip the Script: First Down Quarters and Third Down Fire Zones
46:17 - Top 5 Draft Prospects for Pressure Rate
55:03 - Conclusion: Affecting the Quarterback
—
» Join Felix and Cody each Wednesday as we dive deep into the game we love!
MatchQuarters is a reader-supported publication. So, make sure to subscribe.
—
© 2025 MatchQuarters | Cody Alexander | All rights reserved.
By Cody Alexander & Felix Johnson4.7
3333 ratings
Stop chasing blitz rates. Defensive efficiency isn’t dictated by how often you send extra bodies; it is defined by the mechanism of the rush and whether you can hit the 40% pressure rate benchmark. If you aren’t affecting the quarterback, your “face melter” pressures are just creating vacated windows for elite passers to exploit.
In this episode, we break down the shift from rigid 5-man structures to the “glitch blitz” world of simulated pressures. We evaluate why Oregon’s quarter-based pressures failed, while Georgia and Indiana found efficiency by manipulating defensive schemes.
In this episode:
The 40% Standard: A 40% pressure rate is the upper echelon of modern defense. If you can’t reach this with four, your blitz package must manufacture one-on-ones, not just volume.
Oregon’s Spacing Issues: The Ducks struggled with 5-man pressures because their quarters shell was disjointed from the front, leading to the highest touchdown rate allowed on blitzes in the P4.
Indiana’s Sim Philosophy: The Hoosiers led the country in simulated pressure rate (57%) by using “pick” pressures to isolate defensive linemen on running backs.
Strategic Layering: Data suggests running Quarters on early downs and Fire Zones on third down is a more efficient “change-up” than traditional single-high philosophies.
2026 NFL Draft Profiles:
TJ Parker (Clemson): High pressure rate with Wide-9 utility.
Emmanuel McNeil-Warren (Toledo): Elite pressure rate for a down-safety or nickel role.
Kayden McDonald (Ohio State): Quick-three interior disruptor.
Peter Woods (Clemson): Interior force built for heavy stunt usage.
Dillon Thieneman (Oregon): Hybrid safety with sideline-to-sideline tracking.
Timestamps:
00:00 - The 40% Pressure Rate Benchmark
01:34 - Pressuring with Four: Chiefs and Giants Lessons
08:11 - Line Play and Condensing Decision Time
14:45 - Cowboys and Eagles Pressure Analysis
17:29 - Oregon vs. Georgia: Quarters vs. Fire Zones
27:31 - Indiana and the Rise of Simulated Pressures
34:25 - Flip the Script: First Down Quarters and Third Down Fire Zones
46:17 - Top 5 Draft Prospects for Pressure Rate
55:03 - Conclusion: Affecting the Quarterback
—
» Join Felix and Cody each Wednesday as we dive deep into the game we love!
MatchQuarters is a reader-supported publication. So, make sure to subscribe.
—
© 2025 MatchQuarters | Cody Alexander | All rights reserved.

8,247 Listeners

2,772 Listeners

1,630 Listeners

4,498 Listeners

654 Listeners

401 Listeners

292 Listeners

3,678 Listeners

473 Listeners

3,066 Listeners

21 Listeners

18 Listeners

212 Listeners

239 Listeners

635 Listeners