
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Recently, Bill Gates very publicly pivoted on climate change, rejecting “doomsday” predictions and calling for a more pragmatic, human-centered approach.
Is that a sign that the era of climate alarmism is coming to a close?
That’s what I wanted to find out when I sat down with Michael Shellenberger, author of “Apocalypse Never” and founder of Public.news and the nonprofit Environmental Progress.
From rising sea levels to surging forest fires to dying polar bears to disappearing coral reefs, much of what we’ve been told about climate change is not true, he says.
The rising sea level narrative, for example, rests entirely on computer models that were manipulated to produce the desired outcome, Shellenberger says.
“It’s clear that the activist scientists were manipulating models to show an acceleration in sea level rise when the only long-term, reliable source of data, which is called tide gauge data ... shows no acceleration from the 1850s on,” he says.
How is data cherry-picked or skewed to create misleading narratives when it comes to climate change? What’s behind the sudden embrace of nuclear energy—after it had been demonized for decades? How might it be related to the global AI race?
Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
By The Epoch Times4.9
11561,156 ratings
Recently, Bill Gates very publicly pivoted on climate change, rejecting “doomsday” predictions and calling for a more pragmatic, human-centered approach.
Is that a sign that the era of climate alarmism is coming to a close?
That’s what I wanted to find out when I sat down with Michael Shellenberger, author of “Apocalypse Never” and founder of Public.news and the nonprofit Environmental Progress.
From rising sea levels to surging forest fires to dying polar bears to disappearing coral reefs, much of what we’ve been told about climate change is not true, he says.
The rising sea level narrative, for example, rests entirely on computer models that were manipulated to produce the desired outcome, Shellenberger says.
“It’s clear that the activist scientists were manipulating models to show an acceleration in sea level rise when the only long-term, reliable source of data, which is called tide gauge data ... shows no acceleration from the 1850s on,” he says.
How is data cherry-picked or skewed to create misleading narratives when it comes to climate change? What’s behind the sudden embrace of nuclear energy—after it had been demonized for decades? How might it be related to the global AI race?
Views expressed in this video are opinions of the host and the guest, and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.

3,314 Listeners

2,096 Listeners

1,393 Listeners

658 Listeners

232 Listeners

1,460 Listeners

1,823 Listeners

567 Listeners

6,568 Listeners

2,362 Listeners

6,974 Listeners

2,497 Listeners

8,588 Listeners

1,249 Listeners

237 Listeners

71 Listeners

18 Listeners

28 Listeners

16 Listeners

103 Listeners