“In films, either you’ve got a face or you don’t got a face. You've got a face. Can I have it, please?”
A Comedic Heist Caper from an Unlikely Collaboration

In 1966, Peter Sellers sought to work with renowned Italian neorealist director Vittorio De Sica, bringing aboard playwright Neil Simon to pen his first screenplay. Despite De Sica's reported gambling debts motivating his involvement, the collaboration proved challenging. De Sica struggled with Simon's script and Sellers' performance style, while conflicts arose over casting choices, including Sellers' then-wife Britt Ekland. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Heist Films series with a conversation about De Sica’s 1966 film After the Fox.

Breaking Down This Fox's Complicated Hunt

The film weaves together elements of heist capers and Hollywood satire, following master criminal Aldo "The Fox" Vanucci as he poses as an Italian film director to orchestrate a gold heist. While the premise shows promise, the movie struggles to balance its dual identity as both heist film and industry commentary. However, the stellar performances, particularly from Sellers and Victor Mature (playing a delightfully self-aware version of himself), help elevate the material beyond its structural issues.

Key Elements of This Unique Crime Comedy

• Peter Sellers' multiple disguises and his protective relationship with his sister (played by then-wife Britt Ekland)
• Victor Mature's comeback performance lampooning his own image
• The film's satirical take on moviemaking and celebrity culture
• Burt Bacharach's memorable earworm title song
• The clever setup of the heist using a film production as cover
• A somewhat disappointing climactic car chase that fails to deliver on the film's early promise

While After the Fox may not fully succeed as either a heist film or industry satire, it offers enough charm and laughs to warrant attention. The film's unique blend of crime caper and showbiz satire, combined with Sellers' comedic prowess, makes it an entertaining entry in both his filmography and the heist genre. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

Film Sundries

• Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatch
• Theatrical trailer
• Letterboxd

Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.

Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:

• Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and Movements
• The Film Board
• Movies We Like
• Sitting in the Dark

Join the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!

Here’s where you can find us around the internet:

• The Web
• Letterboxd
• Facebook
• Instagram
• Threads
• Bluesky
• YouTube
• Flickchart
• Pinterest
• Pete 
• Andy

What are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!

• You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.
• Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.
• Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.
• Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.
• Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“A perfect hit! And no pain for the target. Too bad the guy was only 38; just two years older, he'd have been worth three times the points.”
Roger Corman's Vision of a Dystopian Future

In 1974, Roger Corman learned about Norman Jewison's upcoming film Rollerball and decided to capitalize on its publicity by producing his own futuristic sports film. Based on a short story by Ib Melchior inspired by his experiences at the Indianapolis 500, Corman brought on Paul Bartel to direct what would become a satirical commentary on violence in entertainment and totalitarian control. With a budget of just $300,000, Corman assembled a cast including David Carradine and a pre-Rocky Sylvester Stallone to create this violent vision of America's future. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Roger Corman series with a conversation about Bartel’s 1975 film Death Race 2000.

Racing Through the Film's Key Points

The film's unique blend of dark comedy and social commentary creates an engaging discussion about its place in both exploitation cinema and political satire. We explore how Corman's influence shaped the film's development, particularly his push to emphasize comedy and include gratuitous elements that became his trademark. The movie's transformation from a serious script to a more satirical piece showcases Corman's understanding of what would appeal to audiences.

Additional Pit Stops in Our Discussion

• The cultural context of car-themed movies in the 1970s and their connection to American car culture
• David Carradine's performance as Frankenstein and whether he was the right choice for the role
• The film's commentary on media manipulation and fan culture
• How the limited budget affected the scale of the cross-country race
• The surprising franchise legacy, including multiple sequels and remakes
• Tak Fujimoto's cinematography and how it enhanced the racing sequences

A Victory Lap Worth Taking

Despite its low budget and exploitation elements, Death Race 2000 succeeds as both entertainment and satire. While some critics initially dismissed it, including Roger Ebert who gave it zero stars before later acknowledging its merits, the film has earned its place as a cult classic. Both hosts thoroughly enjoyed the film, with Andy giving it four stars and Pete giving it three stars with a heart on Letterboxd. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

Film Sundries

• Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatch
• Script Options
• Theatrical trailer
• Original Material
• Letterboxd

This is a member bonus episode. We'd love it if you became a member to support our show, but you’d love it because of everything you get. We have monthly member bonus episodes that only members can access. You also get other monthly member bonus episodes, access to members-only Discord channels, and early releases for every episode. Plus, no ads! And you get to vote on the movies we discuss in our members only episodes! What can we say? It pays to be a member. Learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership — visit TruStory FM.

“This was not intended to be a book-of-the-month club lunch.”
A British Heist Film That Set Early Genre Standards

In 1958, John Boland published his novel The League of Gentlemen, which quickly caught the attention of British filmmakers. Director Basil Dearden, known for his work with Ealing Studios, saw potential in this story of ex-military men planning an elaborate bank robbery. Working with screenwriter Bryan Forbes, who also took a role in the film, Dearden assembled an impressive cast including Jack Hawkins, Richard Attenborough, and Nigel Patrick. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we return to our Heist Films series with a conversation about Dearden’s 1960 film The League of Gentlemen.

Breaking Down This Military-Precision Heist

The film follows a group of former military officers who, feeling cast aside by society (and kicked out of the military), band together to execute a sophisticated bank robbery. As we discuss the film, we explore how it handles character development within its large ensemble cast. While some characters receive more attention than others, the film mostly effectively balances its numerous players. Furthermore, we examine how the film's visual elements, particularly the smoke-filled heist sequence with gas masks, create memorable and striking imagery in black and white.

Exploring Themes and Cultural Context

Throughout our discussion, we delve into several fascinating aspects of the film:

• The military hierarchy that naturally reasserts itself among the characters
• The film's commentary on post-war soldiers struggling to find their place in society
• The blend of comedy and crime elements that would influence future heist films
• The impressive performances, particularly from Jack Hawkins and Richard Attenborough
• The film's innovative use of practical effects, especially during the climactic heist sequence
• The cultural attitudes and gender relations reflected in the film

A Must-Watch Early Heist Film

The League of Gentlemen stands as an important early entry in the heist film genre, arriving the same year as the original Ocean's 11. While some character development opportunities may have been missed due to the large cast, the film succeeds in delivering both entertainment and social commentary. We both thoroughly enjoyed this British crime caper, particularly appreciating its technical achievements and ensemble performances. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

Film Sundries

• Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatch
• Script Options
• Theatrical trailer
• Original Material
• Letterboxd

Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.

Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:

• Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and Movements
• The Film Board
• Movies We Like
• Sitting in the Dark

Join the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!

Here’s where you can find us around the internet:

• The Web
• Letterboxd
• Facebook
• Instagram
• Threads
• Bluesky
• YouTube
• Flickchart
• Pinterest
• Pete 
• Andy

What are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!

• You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.
• Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.
• Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.
• Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.
• Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“When I asked for your advice, I didn't mean that you should actually speak.”
Rebooting the Jack Ryan Franchise

After the success of Patriot Games and Clear and Present Danger, Paramount Pictures aimed to continue the Jack Ryan franchise with an adaptation of The Sum of All Fears. Initially, Harrison Ford was set to reprise his role as Jack Ryan, but he and director Phillip Noyce dropped out due to script issues. Paramount then decided to reboot the franchise with a younger actor, offering the role to Ben Affleck, who received blessings from Ford and Alec Baldwin. With director Phil Alden Robinson on board, the stage was set for a new era of Jack Ryan. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about Noyce’s 2002 film The Sum of All Fears.

A Bold Adaptation Filled with Fascinating Political Intrigue

In this episode, we delve into the daring choices made in adapting Clancy's novel, particularly how the film allows Jack Ryan, the embodiment of institutional intelligence, to fail. The movie's second half, focusing on the aftermath of a devastating bomb blast in Baltimore, surprised us with its engaging portrayal of escalating tensions between the U.S. and Russian presidents. We appreciate how the film questions the intelligence and diplomacy machine by highlighting Ryan's struggle to convey crucial information to decision-makers.

(Mostly) Great Performances and Controversial Villains

Throughout our discussion, we praise the performances of James Cromwell as President Fowler, Morgan Freeman as CIA Director William Cabot, and Liev Schreiber as John Clark. However, we do struggle a bit with Affleck playing Ryan. We also express disappointment in the film's decision to replace the Islamic terrorists from the novel with neo-Nazis, feeling that it weakens the story's impact and makes the villains less compelling.

Other points:

• The challenges of adapting Clancy's novel and the script issues that led to the reboot
• Ben Affleck's performance as a younger Jack Ryan
• The film's depiction of the U.S. and Russian presidents' responses to the crisis
• Alan Bates and Colm Feore's roles as tepid neo-Nazi villains and their impact on the story

A Thought-Provoking Entry in the Jack Ryan Series

While The Sum of All Fears may not be the most celebrated entry in the Jack Ryan series, it offers a thought-provoking exploration of political intrigue and the consequences of intelligence failures. Despite some weaknesses in its adaptation choices and the lead casting choice, the film's second half delivers a gripping narrative that keeps viewers engaged. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

Film Sundries

• Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatch
• Script Options
• Theatrical trailer
• Original Material and on Audible
• Letterboxd

Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.

Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:

• Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and Movements
• The Film Board
• Movies We Like
• Sitting in the Dark

Join the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!

Here’s where you can find us around the internet:

• The Web
• Letterboxd
• Facebook
• Instagram
• Threads
• Bluesky
• YouTube
• Flickchart
• Pinterest
• Pete 
• Andy

What are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!

• You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.
• Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.
• Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.
• Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.
• Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“The course of action I’d suggest is a course of action I can’t suggest.”
The Road to Clear and Present Danger

After the success of Patriot Games, Paramount Pictures was eager to continue the Jack Ryan series with another adaptation of a Tom Clancy novel. With Harrison Ford set to return as the intrepid CIA analyst and Phillip Noyce back in the director's chair, the stage was set for Clear and Present Danger. The film, released in 1994, brought a new level of complexity to the series, delving into the murky world of covert operations and political machinations. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about Clear and Present Danger.

Navigating the Murky Waters of Clear and Present Danger

In our discussion, we dive into the intricacies of Clear and Present Danger, exploring how the film captures the complexities of the political landscape and the moral ambiguity of covert operations. We examine Harrison Ford's portrayal of Jack Ryan, noting how he brings a different energy to the character compared to his performance in Patriot Games. The film's ability to balance the high-stakes political drama in Washington with the intense action sequences in Colombia is a point of interest, as we analyze how these two seemingly disparate storylines ultimately converge.

Uncovering the Layers of Corruption

Clear and Present Danger takes us on a journey through the labyrinthine world of government corruption, where personal agendas and political maneuvering take precedence over the greater good. We discuss:

• The performances of Henry Czerny and Harris Yulin as the villainous Ritter and Cutter
• Willem Dafoe's role as John Clark and the film's portrayal of covert military operations
• The emotional impact of James Earl Jones' character, Admiral Greer, and his relationship with Jack Ryan

A Thrilling Addition to the Jack Ryan Series

While Clear and Present Danger may not be perfect, it remains a compelling entry in the Jack Ryan series. The film's ability to tackle complex themes and its unflinching look at the darker aspects of government operations make it a thought-provoking and engaging watch. Harrison Ford's performance as Jack Ryan, coupled with the strong supporting cast, elevates the material and keeps the audience invested in the story.

Clear and Present Danger stands as a testament to the enduring appeal of Tom Clancy's novels and the Jack Ryan character. Its exploration of political corruption, moral ambiguity, and the consequences of unchecked power remains as relevant today as it was upon the film's release. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

Film Sundries

• Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatch
• Script Options
• Theatrical trailer
• Original Material or on Audible
• Letterboxd

Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.

Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:

• Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and Movements
• The Film Board
• Movies We Like
• Sitting in the Dark

Join the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!

Here’s where you can find us around the internet:

• The Web
• Letterboxd
• Facebook
• Instagram
• Threads
• Bluesky
• YouTube
• Flickchart
• Pinterest
• Pete 
• Andy

What are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!

• You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.
• Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.
• Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.
• Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.
• Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“You walk into a bar, half of whose customers want you dead. You walk up to the IRA's bagman, and in front of his guys, you threaten him? You're not a field man, Jack. You never were. You are an analyst. Analyze that.”
The Second Chapter in Jack Ryan's Journey

After the success of The Hunt for Red October, Paramount Pictures faced challenges bringing the next Jack Ryan story to the screen. The situation with Alec Baldwin's departure proved contentious, with Baldwin claiming Paramount "cut his throat" by negotiating with another actor (presumably Ford) while still in talks with him. The studio allegedly used Baldwin's Broadway commitment to A Streetcar Named Desire and script approval demands as leverage to make the switch. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about Phillip Noyce’s 1992 film Patriot Games.

Playing Both Sides of the Game

The transition from Baldwin to Ford fundamentally changes the character's dynamics, shifting from a younger analyst to a more seasoned veteran. We explore how this affected the film's tone and action sequences, particularly discussing whether some of the more intense scenes feel appropriate for Ryan's character. The film presents an intriguing mirror story between Ryan and Sean Miller - both men driven by family, albeit in opposing directions. While Ryan fights to protect his family, Miller seeks revenge for his brother's death, creating parallel narratives that drive the story's conflict.

Elements That Drive the Action

• The controversial casting change and its implications for the franchise
• The mirrored narratives of family protection versus family revenge
• Sean Bean's memorable performance as vengeful terrorist Sean Miller
• The innovative satellite attack sequence that showcases '90s military technology
• Debate over the film's balance between analysis and action
• The political dynamics of presenting IRA terrorism to American audiences
• Discussion of whether the finale's boat chase sequence serves the story effectively

Patriot Games successfully continues the Jack Ryan franchise while charting its own course, though some creative choices push the character in new directions that don't always align with his analytical roots. The film proves entertaining even as it diverges from the more cerebral approach of its predecessor. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

Film Sundries

• Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatch
• Script Options
• Theatrical trailer
• Original Material and on Audible
• Letterboxd

Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.

Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:

• Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and Movements
• The Film Board
• Movies We Like
• Sitting in the Dark

Join the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!

Here’s where you can find us around the internet:

• The Web
• Letterboxd
• Facebook
• Instagram
• Threads
• Bluesky
• YouTube
• Flickchart
• Pinterest
• Pete 
• Andy

What are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!

• You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.
• Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.
• Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.
• Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.
• Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“You’re in a house of desperate women here, and a long, long way from home.”
Roger Corman's Exploitation Cinema: The Story Behind Caged Heat

In the early 1970s, Roger Corman was producing a slew of women-in-prison films, capitalizing on the exploitation genre that had been popular then. When wannabe director Jonathan Demme approached Corman with the idea for Caged Heat, Corman initially declined, believing the subgenre had run its course. Undeterred, Demme raised the funds independently and eventually secured Corman as the distributor. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we continue our member bonusRoger Corman series with a conversation about Demme’s 1974 film Caged Heat.

Exploring the Depths of Women's Incarceration in Caged Heat

In our discussion, we delve into the themes and statements Demme makes about institutional oppression, mental health, and unethical medical practices within the prison system. We also examine how the film attaches power to sexuality, potentially empowering the female characters in a way that was uncommon for the era. Additionally, we touch on the interesting casting choices, particularly Barbara Steele as the prison warden and Warren Miller as the sociopathic doctor, and how these decisions subvert audience expectations.

Caged Heat: A Closer Look at the Characters and Filmmaking Techniques

Throughout the episode, we discuss:

• The relationships between the various inmates and how Demme allows time for character development
• Tak Fujimoto's cinematography and the effective use of tracking shots
• The film's balance between comedy and serious moments
• The shocking and powerful sequence involving shock therapy

While Caged Heat may not be a perfect film, it offers an intriguing look at the women-in-prison subgenre through the lens of Jonathan Demme's early directorial work. The movie's exploration of serious themes, combined with its exploitation elements, makes for an engaging and thought-provoking viewing experience. Although we have some reservations about the film and the subgenre as a whole, we appreciate the conversations it sparks. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

Film Sundries

• Watch this on Amazon or find other places at JustWatch
• Theatrical trailer
• Letterboxd

This is a member bonus episode. We'd love it if you became a member to support our show, but you’d love it because of everything you get. We have monthly member bonus episodes that only members can access. You also get other monthly member bonus episodes, access to members-only Discord channels, and early releases for every episode. Plus, no ads! And you get to vote on the movies we discuss in our members only episodes! What can we say? It pays to be a member. Learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership — visit TruStory FM.

“Andrei, you've lost another submarine?”
From Novel to Box Office Success

In 1984, Tom Clancy published his first novel The Hunt for Red October, which garnered attention from military officials for its technical accuracy. Despite the book's success, Hollywood struggled to adapt it. Producer Mace Neufeld optioned the rights but faced resistance from studios who considered the story too complicated. It wasn't until 1990, after six years of development, that the film finally made it to theaters. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we kick off the Jack Ryan series with a conversation about The Hunt for Red October.

Diving Deep into Cold War Tensions

The film introduces us to Alec Baldwin as Jack Ryan, a CIA analyst who finds himself thrust into an intricate game of cat and mouse when he discovers that Soviet submarine commander Marko Ramius (Sean Connery) might be attempting to defect. We explore how Baldwin embodies the reluctant hero aspect of Ryan's character more effectively than subsequent actors in the role. The film's deliberate pacing and focus on intellectual strategy over action sequences sets it apart from typical action films of its era and beyond.

Breaking the Surface with McTiernan's Direction

Director John McTiernan, fresh off the success of Die Hard, brings his expertise to create tension through careful character development rather than relying solely on action sequences. The film's innovative language transition technique and strong performances from the international cast contribute to its enduring appeal.

Other Discussion Points:

• The film's groundbreaking $30 million budget and its box office success
• Sean Connery's commanding presence despite his Scottish accent playing a Lithuanian
• The technical accuracy and military support in production
• Courtney B. Vance's standout performance as Sonar Operator Jones
• The film's clever handling of submarine warfare technology
• The evolution of Jack Ryan as a character across different actors

The Hunt for Red October stands as one of the strongest entries in the Jack Ryan series, masterfully balancing intellectual intrigue with taut action sequences. The film maintains suspense through character development and strategic narrative choices rather than relying on conventional action tropes. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

Film Sundries

• Watch this on Apple or Amazon, or find other places at JustWatch
• Script Options
• Theatrical trailer
• Original Material and on Audible
• Letterboxd

Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.

Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:

• Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and Movements
• The Film Board
• Movies We Like
• Sitting in the Dark

Join the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!

Here’s where you can find us around the internet:

• The Web
• Letterboxd
• Facebook
• Instagram
• Threads
• Bluesky
• YouTube
• Flickchart
• Pinterest
• Pete 
• Andy

What are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!

• You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.
• Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.
• Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.
• Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.
• Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“The heavens have never seen such an ignominious Patsak as you, Violinist. It grieves me deeply.”
A Satirical Take on Soviet Society

Kin-Dza-Dza!, a 1986 Soviet science fiction comedy film directed by Georgiy Daneliya, was initially met with skepticism by Soviet authorities due to its satirical nature. However, Daneliya persevered and managed to get the film made, despite the challenges of filming in the hot Turkmenistan desert and dealing with bureaucratic red tape that delayed production. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we wrap up this return to our Soviet Sci-Fi series with a conversation about Daneliya’s 1986 film Kin-Dza-Dza!.

Diving into the Absurdist World of Kin-Dza-Dza!

We explore the film's absurdist humor and how it effectively satirizes various aspects of Soviet society, such as the rigid caste system, the limitations on free speech, and the devolution of language. We discuss how the film's low-budget, dystopian aesthetic contributes to its commentary on consumerism and environmentalism, drawing comparisons to other works like Idiocracy and the films of Terry Gilliam and Jean-Pierre Jeunet.

The Strengths of Soviet Science Fiction

Throughout our discussion, we highlight how Kin-Dza-Dza! exemplifies the strengths of Soviet science fiction in its ability to critique contemporary society through a futuristic lens. We also touch on:

• The performances of the actors and their commitment to the absurdist tone
• The film's clever use of practical effects and production design
• The recurring jokes and their cultural significance, such as the "match math"

Kin-Dza-Dza! stands as a unique and entertaining entry in the Soviet science fiction canon, successfully blending biting social commentary with absurdist humor. Its ability to critique Soviet society while still being an engaging and entertaining film is a testament to Daneliya's skill as a filmmaker and the power of science fiction to reflect on contemporary issues. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

Film Sundries

• Buy the Blu-ray from Deaf Crocodile, See where they’re streaming it, or find other places at JustWatch
• Script Options
• Theatrical trailer
• Letterboxd

Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.

Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:

• Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and Movements
• The Film Board
• Movies We Like
• Sitting in the Dark

Join the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!

Here’s where you can find us around the internet:

• The Web
• Letterboxd
• Facebook
• Instagram
• Threads
• Bluesky
• YouTube
• Flickchart
• Pinterest
• Pete 
• Andy

What are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!

• You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.
• Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.
• Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.
• Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.
• Or sign up for AUDIBLE.

“I don’t want to live among the fishes anymore. I’ll die of loneliness.”
A Soviet Sci-Fi Fairy Tale of Love and Science

In the 1960s, during the Khrushchev Thaw, Soviet filmmakers were given more creative freedom to explore stories beyond the typical Stalinist propaganda. This period saw a surge in sci-fi films, including the 1961 classic Amphibian Man, directed by Vladimir Chebotaryov and Gennadiy Kazanskiy. Based on the novel by Alexander Beliaev, the film tells the story of a man with surgically implanted shark gills who falls in love with a young woman, despite the disapproval of her capitalist suitor. Join us – Pete Wright and Andy Nelson – as we kick off a short return to our Soviet Sci-Fi series with a conversation about the 1961 film Amphibian Man.

Diving Deep into the Story's Themes and Motifs

In our discussion, we explore how Amphibian Man weaves together elements of science fiction, romance, and social commentary. The film's protagonist, Ichtyandr, embodies the Soviet ideal of scientific progress, while his love interest, Gutiere, represents the allure of a world beyond his underwater utopia. We also examine the film's villain, Don Pedro, as a classic capitalist exploiter, showcasing the Soviet critique of Western values.

Throughout our conversation, we delve into the fairy tale aspects of the story, the believability of the romance, and the tragic ending that subverts expectations. We also discuss the technical achievements of the underwater cinematography and the film's influence on modern directors like Guillermo del Toro.

Other Topics Covered in the Episode

• The film's original title, "Tarzan of the Sea," and its copyright issues
• The dream sequence and its role in the narrative
• The ambiguity surrounding Ichtyandr's abilities and the dolphin scene
• Accusations of plagiarism against Guillermo del Toro's The Shape of Water
• The changing perceptions of ocean exploitation in Soviet cinema

A Timeless Tale of Love and Progress

Amphibian Man may not be a perfect film, but it remains a fascinating example of Soviet sci-fi cinema during a period of creative liberation. Its blend of science, romance, and social commentary creates a timeless fairy tale that continues to captivate audiences decades later. Despite some plot inconsistencies and missed opportunities, the film's core themes and visual splendor make it a worthwhile entry in the genre. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel – when the movie ends, our conversation begins!

Film Sundries

• Watch this on Amazon or find other places at JustWatch
• Theatrical trailer
• Original Material
• Letterboxd

Learn how to support our show and The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts by becoming a member. It's just $5 monthly or $55 annually. Learn more here.

Follow the other podcasts in The Next Reel’s family of film podcasts:

• Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and Movements
• The Film Board
• Movies We Like
• Sitting in the Dark

Join the conversation with movie lovers from around the world in our Discord community!

Here’s where you can find us around the internet:

• The Web
• Letterboxd
• Facebook
• Instagram
• Threads
• Bluesky
• YouTube
• Flickchart
• Pinterest
• Pete 
• Andy

What are some other ways you can support us and show your love? Glad you asked!

• You can buy our movie-related apparel, stickers, mugs and more from our MERCH PAGE.
• Or buy or rent movies we’ve discussed on the show from our WATCH PAGE.
• Or buy books, plays, etc. that was the source for movies we’ve discussed on the show from our ORIGINALS PAGE.
• Or renew or sign up for a Letterboxd Pro or Patron account with our LETTERBOXD MEMBERSHIP DISCOUNT.
• Or sign up for AUDIBLE.