We’ve talked in our “Charlotte Mason Primer Series” about the idea that children are born persons, and so their minds are able to deal with knowledge that is proper to them– as long as it’s presented in the form of living ideas. So we can just sit down with a nice big book stack we saw online, read it aloud, narrate and then call our kids educated, right?
Still no. That is where we meet the science of relations, an absolutely vital part of education. The science of relations is the idea Miss Mason put forth that all knowledge is connected because of “Those first-born affinities that fit our new existence into existing things.”
Why the science of relations? And how do we fit this…science into the ordinary moments of our homeschool?
And first and foremost…what does she mean?
Books Mentioned: Home Education | A Philosophy of Education (*affiliate links)
Join the Ordinary Matters Community: The Ordinary Matters Patreon
Connect with us elsewhere:
Instagram | Email us at [email protected]
“All knowledge, dealt out to us in such portions as we are ready for, is sacred; knowledge is, perhaps, a beautiful whole, a great unity, embracing God and man and the universe, but having many parts which are not comparable with one another in the sense of less or more, because all are necessary and each has its functions.” –A Philosophy of Education, page 324
We begin to see what we want. Children make large demands upon us. We owe it to them to initiate an immense number of interests. Thou hast set my feet in a large room; should be the glad cry of every intelligent soul. Life should be all living, and not merely a tedious passing of time; not all doing or all feeling or all thinking––the strain would be too great––but, all living; that is to say, we should be in touch wherever we go, whatever we hear, whatever we see, with some manner of vital interest. We cannot give the children these interests; we prefer that they should never say they have learned botany or conchology, geology or astronomy. The question is not,––how much does the youth know? when he has finished his education––but how much does he care? and about how many orders of things does he care? In fact, how large is the room in which he finds his feet set? and, therefore, how full is the life he has before him? - School Education, pg. 170-171
“What we are concerned with is the fact that we personally have relations with all that there is in the present, all that there has been in the past and all that there will be in the future--with all above us and all about us--and that fulness of living, expansion, expression and serviceableness for each of us, depend upon how far we apprehend these relationships and how many of them we lay hold of…Every child is heir to an enormous patrimony, heir to all the ages, inheritor of all the present. ” Education is the Science of Relations, PR article
“We do not talk about developing his faculties, training his moral nature, guiding his religious feelings, educating him with a view to his social standing or his future calling. The joys of "child-study" are not for us. We take the child for granted, or rather, we take him as we find him--a person with an enormous number of healthy affinities, embryo attachments; and we think it is our chief business to give him a change to make the largest possible number of these attachments valid.” Education is the Science of Relations
“Their relations with God, of prayer, praise, love and duty; their moral relations with their fellow-creatures, including history, literature, duties of a citizen, etc.; their relations with Nature and the world around them; their relations with the earth, including all sorts of bodily exercises; their relations with materials, in handicrafts, etc.” –Education is the Science of Relations