In this podcast Michael Liebowitz explores the ongoing debate surrounding the philosophical theory of objectivism and whether it should be considered an open or closed system of thought. Objectivism, as developed by Ayn Rand, is a comprehensive philosophical system that emphasizes reason, individualism, and laissez-faire capitalism.

Those who argue that objectivism is a closed system contend that it is a self-contained and self-justifying worldview that does not allow for the possibility of revision or improvement. They argue that Rand's philosophy is based on a fixed set of axioms and principles, and that any attempt to modify or question those principles would be seen as a betrayal of the philosophy itself.

On the other hand, those who argue that objectivism is an open system contend that it is not a closed and dogmatic worldview, but rather a set of ideas that can be subject to revision and expansion based on new evidence or insights. They argue that while objectivism is based on certain fundamental principles, it is also a dynamic and evolving philosophy that can adapt to new circumstances and challenges.

In this video, we will examine the arguments made by both sides of the open vs. closed debate on objectivism, and consider the implications of each perspective for the continued development and relevance of Rand's philosophy in contemporary discourse.