The Ayn Rand Institute Podcast

Ayn Rand famously held Aristotle in high regard, describing him as a “philosophical Atlas who carries the whole of Western civilization on his shoulders.” Given such a statement, it’s not surprising that there are rich connections to be found between Aristotle’s philosophical system and Rand’s, which she called Objectivism. Scholars of Aristotle and Rand have found deep connections between the two in metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics.

In this episode of the Ayn Rand Institute podcast, Tristan de Liège, Jim Lennox, and Greg Salmieri explore some of these connections, discussing issues such as the nature of logic, how humans form universal knowledge, and what it is to live a good life.

Topics include:

• Axiomatic concepts and the laws of logic

• The problem of universals

• Scientific knowledge as fixed versus dynamic

• What biology can tell us about ethics

• Nobility and virtue

• Convincing academia to take Objectivism seriously

This episode was recorded on October 19, 2026.

Recently, author and ARI’s VP of Fundraising and Marketing Don Watkins was interviewed on the Texas Talks podcast, where he discussed Ayn Rand’s unique moral admiration for productive work, her new conception of self-interest, and ARI’s work to preserve and spread her philosophy today.

Topics include:

• Why Ayn Rand has an enduring appeal
• The morality and spirituality of wealth creation
• Working, marketing, and fundraising at ARI
• News about the Ayn Rand Center in Austin
• Why we need a new conception of self-interest to defend capitalism
• ARI’s work and programs

Bradley Swail is the host of the Texas Talks podcast, not an employee of the Ayn Rand Institute.

Recently, ARI Senior Fellow Ben Bayer was interviewed on the Texas Talks podcast, where he discussed Ayn Rand’s unique approach to philosophy as a practical means for living, the life-promoting philosophy she developed as a result, and how her idealist-realist heroes dramatize it. Bayer contrasted Rand’s approach and views with the dominant ones in today’s culture, focusing specifically on Stoicism and altruism.

Bradley Swail is the host of the Texas Talks podcast, not an employee of the Ayn Rand Institute.

Topics include:

• The essence of Rand’s philosophy.
• Why today’s philosophers don’t dramatize their philosophies in stories.
• Why Rand’s heroes resonate with so many people.
• How the philosophy in The Fountainhead compares to that in Atlas Shrugged.
• How Objectivism differs from Stoicism.
• Today’s confused oscillation between Judeo-Christian altruism and pragmatism.
• Bayer’s forthcoming book, Breaking Free from Faith-Based Morality.

In her recent book The Mattering Instinct, philosopher Rebecca Newberger Goldstein argues that much of what human beings do is driven by a universal need to matter — to prove to ourselves that we are worthy of consideration. She argues that efforts to fulfill this need are responsible for a wide range of human projects, from the greatest achievements of scientific discovery and artistic creation, to the worst atrocities of murder and genocide.

On this episode of ARI Bookshelf, Greg Salmieri, Ben Bayer, Mike Mazza and Sam Weaver discuss Goldstein’s book. The episode includes discussions of the merits and limitations of Goldstein’s account of mattering and her emphasis on the idea that life involves resisting entropy. They also comment on the book’s brief mention of Ayn Rand and relate her ideas to Goldstein’s.

Topics include:

• Goldstein’s basic account of why people have a need to matter
• Her conception of what constitutes objective mattering
• The absence of businessmen and entrepreneurs from her categories
• The book’s quotation of Ayn Rand in a section about intolerance
• How Goldstein uses the concept of entropy in her account of mattering
• Her apparent unwillingness to radically rethink conventional ideas about morality

This episode was recorded on September 19, 2026.

Recently, Professor Greg Salmieri, an Objectivist philosopher, was interviewed on the Texas Talks podcast, where he discussed Ayn Rand’s ideas and their relation to the ideas of other thinkers, including Aristotle, Marx, and “libertarians.” He also discussed Rand’s influence on his own work and interest in philosophy. Salmieri is a senior fellow at the Civitas Institute and teaches in the philosophy department at the University of Texas at Austin. He often speaks at ARI conferences and teaches courses for ARI’s educational programs.

Bradley Swail is the host of the Texas Talks podcast, not an employee of the Ayn Rand Institute.

Topics include:

• How Salmieri became interested in Ayn Rand
• Rand’s view of “libertarianism”
• Rand’s admiration of Aristotle and her improvements to his philosophy
• What Objectivism as “an ordinary, high-powered philosophy” means
• The Ayn Rand Center and Austin’s intellectual scene
• Rand’s view of religion

For over 40 years, ARI has preserved Rand’s legacy through archival and educational activities. Two years ago, ARI announced it would cement that legacy in actual concrete by building the Ayn Rand Center in Austin, Texas. Earlier this month, the Institute broke ground on the building. The Center will house the Ayn Rand Archives, classrooms, event spaces, studios, public gathering areas, a state-of-the-art immersive educational experience, and the home campus of ARI’s education program, ARU. It will play a vital role in preserving Objectivism and in spreading it to ever-larger audiences. To learn more about the groundbreaking event, the Center’s inspiring vision, and the founders behind it, watch our special Ayn Rand Institute Podcast episode with CEO Tal Tsfany and Senior VP Elan Journo. In addition to the discussion, the episode includes building simulations and video clips from the groundbreaking event, best viewed on YouTube.

Topics include:

• The plan for the Ayn Rand Center and the strategic vision behind it
• The architect and architecture of the Center
• Inspiring anecdotes on the building process and the Center
• Mailchimp founder Ben Chestnut’s donations and vision
• Tal Tsfany’s remarks at the groundbreaking event

Resources:

• Website of the Ayn Rand Center

In this episode, Robertas Bakula and Onkar Ghate commend Disney for making their case on fundamental constitutional grounds rather than settling behind closed doors. Too few of Disney’s defenders ever dare to challenge the FCC's underlying licensing authority or the employment mandates that also violate freedom of association. They warn that Carr is trying to reinvigorate and expand the FCC’s power over speech and argue that no depoliticized FCC is possible. The only real solution is privatizing the spectrum.

Topics Include:

• Disney's lawsuit against the FCC for violating the First Amendment
• How self-censorship works in practice
• Broadcaster’s historical complicity in creating the FCC
• Brendan Carr’s goal to expand the FCC’s power
• Why defenders of free speech do not challenge the FCC and its DEI policies as violating intellectual freedom
• The only way to remove the FCC’s ability to chill speech is to privatize the broadcast spectrum

This episode was recorded on September 16, 2026.

In this video, Elan Journo interviews Brandon Lisi about Ayn Rand's 1947 essay Screen Guide for Americans. The interview explores the historical circumstances that led Rand to write the essay, the deeper philosophical ideas behind her analysis, and the significance of ARI Press’s new authoritative edition. They also discuss Michael Berliner’s new afterword and the archival materials that illuminate Rand’s work in Hollywood, including additional documents now available through the Ayn Rand Archives.

Topics Include:

• What’s new in ARI Press’s authoritative edition of Screen Guide for Americans
• Why Ayn Rand wrote Screen Guide for Americans in 1947
• Communist influence in 1940s Hollywood
• How propaganda can influence a culture without explicit political slogans
• How to access additional archival materials related to the “Screen Guide” online

Resources:

• Ayn Rand, Screen Guide for Americans
• Archival Supplement: Screen Guide for Americans archival supplement

Recorded on August 25, 2026.

9/11 was one of the most consequential events of the 21st century. Yet twenty-five years later, the attacks and their aftermath are still widely misunderstood. In two consecutive talks at our student conference in Austin, Onkar Ghate and Elan Journo analyzed America’s failures before and after 9/11, drawing on more than two decades of work on the subject. They show how the self-abasing morality of altruism shaped American policy, leading the US to betray its ideals, appease its enemies, sacrifice its soldiers, and lose its wars. This double lecture is a must-watch for anyone who cares about America and wants to make it secure.

Topics include:

• Introduction by ARI’s CEO, Tal Tsfany
• How 9/11 was experienced and perceived in the immediate aftermath
• The religious, modernity-hating motivation behind 9/11
• America’s emboldening of Islamists in the decades before 9/11
• America’s abject, craven response to the Danish cartoons of Muhammad
• The intellectual rot 9/11 exposed and Objectivism’s potential to change it
• How American altruism crippled its troops’ ability to fight
• How America refused to recognize or defeat its enemies
• The devastating consequences of our altruistic approach to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars
• Q&A

Resources:

• Onkar Ghate and Elan Journo, Failing to Confront Islamic Totalitarianism: What Went Wrong After 9/11.

After the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy released its entry on capitalism, critics online slammed it for apparent Marxist bias. However, if there is a scandal here, it is not merely that one entry is lopsided; it is that contemporary academic philosophers are willfully blind to the real-world phenomenon of capitalism, seeing it only through the unquestioned lens of the altruistic morality.

In this episode of the Ayn Rand Institute podcast, Robertas Bakula, Ben Bayer, and Onkar Ghate discuss the entry’s Marxist leaning, Ayn Rand’s absence from the entry, and more broadly the failure of academic philosophy to understand the subject. They argue that Ayn Rand’s view of capitalism should have played a more prominent role in the entry, and how Rand succeeded in defining “capitalism” while the entry does not bother trying. They conclude that the entry should give more serious attention not only to Rand, but also Locke, Smith, and economic scholarship more broadly.

Topics include:

• The Stanford Encyclopedia’s cultural impact
• Marxist dominance in academic philosophy
• Academic philosophy’s economic ignorance
• The failure to define capitalism
• Ayn Rand vs. intellectuals
• Ayn Rand’s definition of capitalism
• How to reform the SEP entry

Resources:

• Ayn Rand, Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal
• Ayn Rand, “What Is Capitalism?” in Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal
• Ayn Rand, “ For the New Intellectual” in For the New Intellectual
• The Ayn Rand Lexicon entry on "Capitalism"

This episode was recorded on August 24, 2026.