
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Ken and Josh discuss an apparent agreement for Pat Cippolone (or “Patsy Baloney,” if you ask an auto-transcription system) to talk with the January 6 committee, and why his interview will be a little complicated because of privilege issues — both attorney-client privilege and executive privilege. We look at how that might matter, and what he might say that’s of interest. Plus: grand jury subpoenas in the Atlanta DA’s investigation, what happens when an interested third party is paying your legal expenses, and a Washington Post op-ed claims it’s easier than people say to show Donald Trump had the requisite intent to commit certain crimes. Is that true? We don’t think so, and we’ll address why.
For a transcript of this episode and other resources, go to www.serioustrouble.show.
By Josh Barro and Ken White4.7
415415 ratings
Ken and Josh discuss an apparent agreement for Pat Cippolone (or “Patsy Baloney,” if you ask an auto-transcription system) to talk with the January 6 committee, and why his interview will be a little complicated because of privilege issues — both attorney-client privilege and executive privilege. We look at how that might matter, and what he might say that’s of interest. Plus: grand jury subpoenas in the Atlanta DA’s investigation, what happens when an interested third party is paying your legal expenses, and a Washington Post op-ed claims it’s easier than people say to show Donald Trump had the requisite intent to commit certain crimes. Is that true? We don’t think so, and we’ll address why.
For a transcript of this episode and other resources, go to www.serioustrouble.show.

8,486 Listeners

5,107 Listeners

3,513 Listeners

6,295 Listeners

32,359 Listeners

24 Listeners

12,649 Listeners

4,611 Listeners

5,787 Listeners

16,290 Listeners

2,612 Listeners

455 Listeners

3,198 Listeners

3,474 Listeners

784 Listeners