
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Ken and Josh discuss an apparent agreement for Pat Cippolone (or “Patsy Baloney,” if you ask an auto-transcription system) to talk with the January 6 committee, and why his interview will be a little complicated because of privilege issues — both attorney-client privilege and executive privilege. We look at how that might matter, and what he might say that’s of interest. Plus: grand jury subpoenas in the Atlanta DA’s investigation, what happens when an interested third party is paying your legal expenses, and a Washington Post op-ed claims it’s easier than people say to show Donald Trump had the requisite intent to commit certain crimes. Is that true? We don’t think so, and we’ll address why.
For a transcript of this episode and other resources, go to www.serioustrouble.show.
By Josh Barro and Ken White4.7
415415 ratings
Ken and Josh discuss an apparent agreement for Pat Cippolone (or “Patsy Baloney,” if you ask an auto-transcription system) to talk with the January 6 committee, and why his interview will be a little complicated because of privilege issues — both attorney-client privilege and executive privilege. We look at how that might matter, and what he might say that’s of interest. Plus: grand jury subpoenas in the Atlanta DA’s investigation, what happens when an interested third party is paying your legal expenses, and a Washington Post op-ed claims it’s easier than people say to show Donald Trump had the requisite intent to commit certain crimes. Is that true? We don’t think so, and we’ll address why.
For a transcript of this episode and other resources, go to www.serioustrouble.show.

8,489 Listeners

5,119 Listeners

3,566 Listeners

6,317 Listeners

32,358 Listeners

1,060 Listeners

12,558 Listeners

4,650 Listeners

5,823 Listeners

16,223 Listeners

2,594 Listeners

336 Listeners

3,159 Listeners

3,535 Listeners

766 Listeners