
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Ken and Josh discuss an apparent agreement for Pat Cippolone (or “Patsy Baloney,” if you ask an auto-transcription system) to talk with the January 6 committee, and why his interview will be a little complicated because of privilege issues — both attorney-client privilege and executive privilege. We look at how that might matter, and what he might say that’s of interest. Plus: grand jury subpoenas in the Atlanta DA’s investigation, what happens when an interested third party is paying your legal expenses, and a Washington Post op-ed claims it’s easier than people say to show Donald Trump had the requisite intent to commit certain crimes. Is that true? We don’t think so, and we’ll address why.
For a transcript of this episode and other resources, go to www.serioustrouble.show.
By Josh Barro and Ken White4.7
413413 ratings
Ken and Josh discuss an apparent agreement for Pat Cippolone (or “Patsy Baloney,” if you ask an auto-transcription system) to talk with the January 6 committee, and why his interview will be a little complicated because of privilege issues — both attorney-client privilege and executive privilege. We look at how that might matter, and what he might say that’s of interest. Plus: grand jury subpoenas in the Atlanta DA’s investigation, what happens when an interested third party is paying your legal expenses, and a Washington Post op-ed claims it’s easier than people say to show Donald Trump had the requisite intent to commit certain crimes. Is that true? We don’t think so, and we’ll address why.
For a transcript of this episode and other resources, go to www.serioustrouble.show.

8,482 Listeners

5,102 Listeners

3,522 Listeners

1,942 Listeners

2,008 Listeners

6,296 Listeners

1,065 Listeners

12,443 Listeners

4,640 Listeners

5,800 Listeners

93 Listeners

2,582 Listeners

336 Listeners

3,125 Listeners

755 Listeners