
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Please join my mailing list here 👉 https://briankeating.com/yt to win a meteorite 💥
In this episode, I revisit my podcast with Sam Harris. At the end of our discussion, Harris abruptly cut things short after we debated the meaning of slavery in the Bible and Talmud. Was this an honest philosophical disagreement, or an example of intellectual overstatement and rhetorical sleight-of-hand?
Sam Harris is widely regarded as a leading public intellectual, yet during our 3.5-hour dialogue, I encountered a curious blind spot he consistently sidesteps.
We cover:
This isn’t about attacking Sam Harris — it’s about testing the limits of rationalism, confronting blind spots, and asking whether even the most brilliant thinkers can fall into ideological echo chambers.
Watch the full original conversation here: • Sam Harris: The TRUTH About Consciousness ...
👉 Subscribe for more debates with leading scientists, philosophers, and iconoclasts.
-
Join this channel to get access to perks like monthly Office Hours: / @drbriankeating
📚 Get a copy of my books:
Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner, with life changing interviews with 9 Nobel Prizewinners: https://a.co/d/03ezQFu
My tell-all cosmic memoir Losing the Nobel Prize: http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA
The first-ever audiobook from Galileo: Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems: Ptolemaic and Copernican https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un
📺 Watch my most popular videos:📺
Follow me to ask questions of my guests:
#universe #podcast #briankeating #intotheimpossible #science #astronomy #cosmology #cosmicmicrowavebackground #intotheimpossible #briankeating #NikolayKukushkin
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By Big Bang Productions Inc.4.7
10471,047 ratings
Please join my mailing list here 👉 https://briankeating.com/yt to win a meteorite 💥
In this episode, I revisit my podcast with Sam Harris. At the end of our discussion, Harris abruptly cut things short after we debated the meaning of slavery in the Bible and Talmud. Was this an honest philosophical disagreement, or an example of intellectual overstatement and rhetorical sleight-of-hand?
Sam Harris is widely regarded as a leading public intellectual, yet during our 3.5-hour dialogue, I encountered a curious blind spot he consistently sidesteps.
We cover:
This isn’t about attacking Sam Harris — it’s about testing the limits of rationalism, confronting blind spots, and asking whether even the most brilliant thinkers can fall into ideological echo chambers.
Watch the full original conversation here: • Sam Harris: The TRUTH About Consciousness ...
👉 Subscribe for more debates with leading scientists, philosophers, and iconoclasts.
-
Join this channel to get access to perks like monthly Office Hours: / @drbriankeating
📚 Get a copy of my books:
Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner, with life changing interviews with 9 Nobel Prizewinners: https://a.co/d/03ezQFu
My tell-all cosmic memoir Losing the Nobel Prize: http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA
The first-ever audiobook from Galileo: Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems: Ptolemaic and Copernican https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un
📺 Watch my most popular videos:📺
Follow me to ask questions of my guests:
#universe #podcast #briankeating #intotheimpossible #science #astronomy #cosmology #cosmicmicrowavebackground #intotheimpossible #briankeating #NikolayKukushkin
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

14,362 Listeners

26,394 Listeners

1,348 Listeners

323 Listeners

838 Listeners

564 Listeners

550 Listeners

946 Listeners

4,174 Listeners

2,371 Listeners

1,662 Listeners

507 Listeners

325 Listeners

20 Listeners

384 Listeners