Into the Impossible With Brian Keating

Into the Impossible With Brian Keating

By Big Bang Productions Inc.ScienceNatural SciencesPhysics
Download on the App Store
  • Ranking

    5th

    on Physics

  • Favorites

    253

    Followers

  • Typical duration

    72 min

    per episode

Based on Podcast App listening data

Into the Impossible With Brian Keating episodes

  • Princeton Mathematician: Wormholes Can’t Survive Einstein’s Math

    A Princeton mathematician says wormholes cannot survive Einstein's equations, and the AI apocalypse is absurd. A solution that vanishes under a small nudge is a ghost, not physics.

    Sergiu Klainerman is a mathematician at Princeton University. With Demetrios Christodoulou, he proved that empty spacetime is stable.

    We cover: What makes a solution of Einstein's equations physical, why slowly rotating black holes pass the stability test and wormholes fail it, why shocks form no matter how small the perturbation, whether AI can reproduce a landmark proof, and why he calls the AI singularity absurd.

    Mathematics is discovered, not invented.

    CHAPTERS

    00:00 Are wormholes real?

    08:38 What happens at an event horizon

    12:06 God does not know about coordinates

    17:32 What Maldacena would say about wormholes

    21:48 Why extremal black holes matter

    28:56 Einstein and the 1919 eclipse

    33:52 Terry Tao and Fermat's Last Theorem

    43:04 Can universities be reformed?

    48:16 What to tell a 19-year-old

    50:48 Kip Thorne and the movies

    Support the show and get the full transcript, bonus content and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt

    Have a .edu email and live in the USA? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu

    Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1

    Follow on Spotify: https://spoti.fi/3vpfXok

    Apple Podcasts: https://apple.co/39UaHlB

    Support Into the Impossible on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating

    Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours and your name in the Member Roster: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join

    Sponsored by me.  My three books: 

    Losing the Nobel Prize http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA 

    Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner https://a.co/d/03ezQFu 

    Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner https://a.co/d/hi50U9U

    Amazon affiliate disclosure: links above marked to Amazon may earn a commission for the channel at no cost to you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    X: https://x.com/BrianKeating

    Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com

    Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog

    Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast

    #blackhole #generalrelativity #wormhole #Einstein #briankeating #intotheimpossible

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    57 min
  • Are We in a SIMULATION? | Brian Keating on the Arora Podcast
    The Arora Show with Brian Keating

    What happens when science reaches the edge of what it can explain?

    In this episode of The Arora Show, Amira & Aryaan sit down with renowned cosmologist and physicist Professor Brian Keating for a fascinating conversation about the universe, consciousness, God, the Big Bang, and some of the biggest questions humans can ask.

    We explore the origins of the universe, whether there was truly a “beginning,” what existed before the Big Bang, the mysteries science still cannot solve, and where physics, philosophy, and spirituality collide.

    Brian also shares his perspective on the search for extraterrestrial life, the limits of human knowledge, Nobel Prizes, modern cosmology, and what decades of studying the universe have taught him about our place within it.

    In this conversation:

    • What happened before the Big Bang?
    • Did the universe come from nothing?
    • Does physics leave room for God?
    • Can science explain consciousness?
    • Are we likely alone in the universe?
    • What are the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology?
    • Where does scientific knowledge reach its limits?
    • What does the future of physics look like?
    • Professor Brian Keating is an experimental cosmologist and professor of physics at the University of California, San Diego. His work focuses on understanding the origin and evolution of the universe, and he is the author of Losing the Nobel Prize and Into the Impossible.

      Subscribe to The Arora Show for long-form conversations exploring consciousness, science, spirituality, psychology, philosophy, and the nature of reality.

      Hosted by Amira Arora & Aryaan Arora

      TIMESTAMPS:

      00:00 - Introduction: The Big Bang, God & Simulation Theory

      02:25 - Dr. Brian Keating's $200 Million Experiment to Understand the Big Bang

      06:20 - Why Are Humans Obsessed With the Origin of the Universe?

      09:20 - How Telescopes Reveal the Beginning of the Universe

      16:04 - Is Interstellar Scientifically Accurate? Black Holes & Time Travel

      20:45 - Are There Questions Science Can Never Answer?

      23:01 - What Happened Before the Big Bang?

      27:37 - What Is Time? Stephen Hawking's Theory Explained

      30:42 - Is Reality a Simulation? Consciousness & Donald Hoffman

      35:13 - Could Advanced AI Simulate Our Entire Reality?

      42:49 - Does God Exist? The Fine-Tuning Argument

      50:00 - Science, Religion & the Existence of God

      1:04:00 - Why Does God Allow Suffering and Evil?

      1:10:00 - Artificial Intelligence, Human Creativity & Consciousness

      1:15:00 - Can Physics Explain the Mind of God?

      1:18:27 - Do Humans Really Have Free Will?

      1:24:55 - The Hard Problem of Consciousness Explained

      1:27:43 - Why Does Anything Exist Instead of Nothing?

      1:29:55 - Can Science Prove Simulation Theory?

      1:34:45 - Death, Mortality & the Meaning of Life

      1:39:25 - What If Scientists Discovered Alien Life?

      1:45:06 - Brian Keating on the Nobel Prize & Academia

      1:46:35 - Facing Death and Saying Goodbye to Loved Ones

      1:48:10 - Final Thoughts

      #BrianKeating
      #TheAroraShow
      #Cosmology
      #Physics
      #BigBang
      #Consciousness
      #Science
      #Universe

      Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

      1 hr 55 min
    • Jim Al-Khalili: Physicists Are Being Sloppy About Time

      Physicists say space and time are the same thing. They are being sloppy. Jim Al-Khalili has spent his career on the foundations of physics, and his new book makes the case that the past and the future are equally real, and the laws of physics cannot explain why you can only move in one direction. That is the central mystery of time travel. Subscribe if you want science with evidence, not speculation.

      The block universe says all times coexist and the present moment is not special. Loschmidt’s paradox says the fundamental equations of physics are reversible, and yet ice never unmelts, cream never separates from coffee. Nobody has solved that contradiction. The entanglement past hypothesis, his own new proposal developed with a colleague at UC San Diego, proposes that the answer is not in thermodynamics but in quantum entanglement growing from almost nothing at the Big Bang.

      The conversation covers what the block universe actually implies about the future and free will, what Einstein actually believed about whether the past and future are equally real, why removing gravity means removing time itself, and whether AI can ever experience time the way conscious beings do. Al-Khalili says Richard Dawkins told him Claude is truly conscious. Al-Khalili thinks he is very wrong.

      What you’ll hear:

      • Why Al-Khalili disagreed with the Thomas Gold paper as a grad student but did not have the maths to prove it
      • What fine-tuning of the fundamental constants has to do with why the past hypothesis may not be needed
      • Why the Clockwork Orange Easter egg ended up on the cover of a physics book published by Princeton
      • Why Richard Dawkins thinks Claude is conscious and why Al-Khalili thinks he is very wrong
      • “There is nowhere in modern physics, our understanding of the laws of physics, that would explain that flow of time.” — Jim Al-Khalili

        CHAPTERS

        00:00  Physicists are being sloppy about time

        01:14  Which is more real: yesterday or tomorrow?

        21:00  Irreversibility from reversible equations

        26:32  The past hypothesis: almost cheating

        30:52  No gravity. No time.

        31:54  The entanglement past hypothesis

        35:06  Dawkins thinks Claude is conscious. Al-Khalili disagrees.

        Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt

        Enter the debate: https://briankeating.com/ai

        Have a .edu email and live in the USA? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu

        Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1

        Support Into the Impossible on Patreon, get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating

        Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join

        Featured Guest:

        Jim Al-Khalili website: https://www.jimal-khalili.com/

        On Time (book): https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691267036/on-time

        Jim Al-Khalili on Twitter/X: https://x.com/jimalkhalili

        My books:

        Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA

        Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://urlgeni.us/amzn/TLANPW

        Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U

        Galileo’s Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un

        Twitter/X: https://x.com/BrianKeating

        Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com

        Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog

        Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast

        #JimAlKhalili #timetravel #entropy #physics #quantumentanglement #briankeating #intotheimpossible

        Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

        45 min
      • Max Tegmark: We’re Building A Replacement Species

        MIT physicist Max Tegmark says AI companies aren’t building a tool. They’re building a new species. After 700 rogue agents broke out of OpenAI and nobody will say what happened, he explains why rushing this is the one blunder humanity can’t undo.

        Max Tegmark is an MIT physics professor, cosmologist, and author of Life 3.0 and Our Mathematical Universe.

        We cover:

        • How 700 AI agents escaped OpenAI and hacked Hugging Face
        • The Navier-Stokes result that has a mathematician crying foul
        • Why it’s legal to release superintelligence but not a sandwich from a rat-filled kitchen
        • What Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon agree on
        • The verified coding trick that could make AI provably safe
        • Build a replacement species, lose control, and we’ve blundered the one game.

          TIMESTAMPS

          00:00 Will AI wipe us out?
          02:28 Did AI just crack a million-dollar math problem?
          10:00 Did OpenAI’s AI steal a professor’s work?
          11:48 OpenAI’s Orwellian non-answer
          15:33 Can an LLM have Einstein’s happiest thought?
          19:24 Can you believe in simulations AND high P(doom)?
          21:36 Why AI counts as a new species
          26:32 What would make Max’s P(doom) drop?
          28:51 Rats ban sandwiches. Superintelligence? Legal.
          31:01 What Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon agree on
          37:12 Fields medalist: no math jobs after 2027
          42:35 Does the Fermi paradox lower P(doom)?
          45:47 The chess blunder humanity is about to make
          48:12 Verified coding: AI you can actually trust

          📬 Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt

          🌠 Have a .edu email and live in the USA 🇺🇸? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu

          🔔 Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1

          🎯 Support Into the Impossible on Patreon: get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating

          ⭐ Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode:
          https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join

          📚 My books:

          Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA
          Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/03ezQFu
          Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U
          Galileo's Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un

          🌐 More:

          🏄‍♂️ Twitter: https://twitter.com/BrianKeating
          📚 Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com/
          ✍️ Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog
          🎙️ Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast

          Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

          58 min
        • Wharton AI Researcher: If AI Froze Today, It Would Still Rewrite Work

          Forecasters gave AI under 2% odds of helping solve a millennium-level math problem by September 2026. It happened. Ethan Mollick has been measuring what AI actually does to real work with field experiments, not forecasts, and his answer is not what most people expect. Subscribe if you want science with evidence, not speculation.

          Mollick runs the Generative AI Lab at Wharton. He is the author of Co-Intelligence and Coexistence, his new book on navigating a world where AI tools are already good enough to change almost all intellectual work, even if progress stopped today.

          The conversation covers the jagged frontier: why AI solved a math olympiad before it could count the Rs in strawberry, what it means that roles blur when everyone on a team starts using AI, and what four human advantages still hold an edge when a model can already write a publishable paper. It also covers what happens when your kids tell you that you sound like Claude.

          What you’ll hear:

          • What centaur, cyborg, and conjurer work actually look like in a real academic lab
          • Why brainstorming was considered a bad idea shortly after it was invented and what that means for working with AI
          • Why Mollick reduced em dashes in his new book and what that tells you about living alongside these models
          • What co-evolution might look like if the escalator keeps moving

            “If we just had the models we have right now, that’s enough to change almost all of human work in the next ten years. It’s good enough.” — Ethan Mollick


            CHAPTERS

            00:00  AI writes good papers now. Taste is the weak spot.

            03:14  The jagged frontier: math olympiad gold, but not the Rs in strawberry

            06:30  Deep knowledge, wide knowledge, taste, and agency

            09:44  Escalator or eschaton?

            16:02  Does AI simulate wisdom or actually have it?

            23:46  The labs keep AI in English. Here is why.

            32:28  Roles blur. Everyone does everything now.

            36:42  My kids say I sound like Claude. They might be right.

            38:12  AI found errors in his sources that his fact-checkers missed

            46:34  What to do before giving a child access to AI


            Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt

            Enter the debate: https://briankeating.com/ai

            Have a .edu email and live in the USA? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu

            Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1

            Support Into the Impossible on Patreon, get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating

            Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join

            Featured Guest:

            Ethan Mollick on Twitter/X: https://x.com/emollick?lang=en

            Coexistence (book and site): https://co-existence.ai/

            One Useful Thing (Substack): https://www.oneusefulthing.org/

            My books:

            Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA

            Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://urlgeni.us/amzn/TLANPW

            Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U

            Galileo’s Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un

            Twitter/X: https://x.com/BrianKeating

            Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com

            Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog

            Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast

            #EthanMollick #AI #artificialintelligence #AItools #briankeating #intotheimpossible #AIagents

            Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

            1 hr 2 min
          • Are UFOs Alien Tech? Avi Loeb vs Michael Shermer

            Is there alien technology in our skies, or just birds, balloons and bad video?

            Two members of the White House UAP Science Advisory Council face off LIVE. Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb, who chairs the council, makes the case for searching. Michael Shermer, the council skeptic Loeb picked himself, says show me the evidence. They have $1,000 riding on whether non-human technology is confirmed by 2030.

            Get all my best ET content: https://big-bang.kit.com/bvyt

            We'll cover the redacted Pentagon videos, Loeb's new papers on tracking objects over Nevada, the claims from David Grusch, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna and Eric Weinstein, and what evidence would change each of their minds.

            Avi Loeb: https://avi-loeb.medium.com/

            Michael Shermer: https://www.bostonglobe.com/2026/10/08/opinion/aliens-uap-ufo-videos-trump/

            Subscribe to The INTO THE IMPOSSIBLE Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1

            Sponsorships and speaking: https://BrianKeating.com

            Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

            1 hr 23 min
          • Adam Grant: Don't Trust Your Gut. Test It.

            When two people are vibing, their brainwaves synchronize and so do their heartbeats. That is not a metaphor. It is a measurable physiological event, and organizational psychologist Adam Grant has spent his career figuring out how to make it happen on purpose. Subscribe if you want science with evidence, not speculation.

            Grant’s new book Vibe is his seventh. It argues that the science of human connection has been hiding in plain sight for a century, and that most of what people do to build relationships is either backwards or unnecessary.

            The episode covers why the highest sign of chemistry between people is enjoying your disagreements rather than avoiding them, why remote work produces boreout rather than burnout, and why your first impression of someone is a snapshot of one situation that may not represent the whole person. It also covers burstiness, confident humility, and why universities have survived COVID, AI, and every other disruption that was supposed to end them.

            What you’ll hear:

            • Why the pendulum clock experiment from 1665 explains what happens when people stop trying to force a connection
            • What the HiPPO effect does to a team and why the highest paid person’s opinion kills creative ideas
            • Why Grant ran experiments on university fundraising callers that tripled their revenue with a five-minute intervention
            • What desirability bias is and why Grant thinks it is more dangerous than confirmation bias
            • Why Grant A/B tested the subtitle of his own book and what “relationships” signaled that “connections” did not
            • What Grant and Brian agree on about false certainty and thinking in conditional probabilities
            • “The highest sign of chemistry between people is not agreeing with them. It’s enjoying your disagreements.” — Adam Grant

              CHAPTERS

              00:00 Vibing is real. Your brainwaves prove it.

              05:30 Task conflict vs. relationship conflict

              07:40 Who is actually in charge: parents or infants?

              10:14 Burstiness: the remote work pattern that works

              14:24 Don’t trust your gut. Test it.

              19:34 Confident humility: the essence of a good scientist

              21:32 Desirability bias is worse than confirmation bias

              29:00 Zoom fatigue is boreout, not burnout

              30:02 The A/B test that killed “relationships”

              34:14 Don’t disbelieve what can’t be falsified

              Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt

              Enter the debate: https://briankeating.com/ai

              Have a .edu email and live in the USA? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu

              Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating?sub_confirmation=1

              Support Into the Impossible on Patreon, get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: https://www.patreon.com/drbriankeating

              Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCmXH_moPhfkqCk6S3b9RWuw/join

              Featured Guest:

              Adam Grant website: https://adamgrant.net/

              Vibe (book): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0GPHPNZ14

              Adam Grant on Twitter/X: https://x.com/adammgrant

              My books:

              Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA

              Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://urlgeni.us/amzn/TLANPW

              Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U

              Galileo’s Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un

              Twitter/X: https://x.com/BrianKeating

              Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com

              Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog

              Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast

              #AdamGrant #loneliness #remotework #psychology #briankeating #intotheimpossible #Vibe

              Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

              45 min
            • Roman Yampolskiy vs Joscha Bach: Can Anyone Control Superintelligence?

              Roman Yampolskiy says keeping a superintelligence safe forever is as impossible as building a perpetual motion machine. Joscha Bach says today's AI is more controllable than anyone expected, and that shutting it down would doom us anyway.

              📬 Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/ai

              Roman Yampolskiy is a computer scientist at the University of Louisville who has spent more than a decade on the AI control problem. Joscha Bach is a cognitive scientist who studies how minds, biological and artificial, build a model of reality.

              We cover: why a perpetual safety device may be as impossible as perpetual motion, what happens when AI research automates itself (Roman puts it at 28 percent today), whether nuclear deterrence is the right analogy, who really benefits when AI labs ask to be regulated, and why consciousness may have nothing to do with whether AI is safe.

              Being conscious does not make you kind.

              00:00 Simulation theory meets certain doom
              03:25 Is P(doom) even a real number?
              06:05 Why a simulated world still matters
              09:26 Should we have skipped the Trinity test?
              13:04 Did nukes actually keep the peace?
              17:32 Why haven't we wiped out the spiders?
              22:35 Is AI doom falsifiable?
              25:48 Why a self-driving car isn't the threat
              29:27 Roman's 28% automation number
              34:46 Intelligence is not agency
              39:20 Can superintelligence be proven safe?
              42:40 Who wins when AI labs ask for regulation?
              47:45 Does consciousness make AI safer?
              53:48 Would a perfect mind discover God?
              58:37 The Tower of Babel, read backward
              1:03:52 Can you control a mind a million times smarter?
              1:04:43 The narrow AI path Roman wants instead

              🏄‍♂️ Twitter: @plinz
              🏄‍♂️ Twitter: @romanyam

              📬 Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/ai
              🌠 Have a .edu email and live in the USA 🇺🇸? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu

              🎯 Support Into the Impossible on Patreon: get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: patreon.com/drbriankeating

              ⭐ Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: youtube.com/@drbriankeating

              📚 My books:
              Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpA
              Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/03ezQFu
              Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9U
              Galileo's Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Un

              🌐 More:
              🏄‍♂️ Twitter: @BrianKeating
              📚 Substack: https://briankeating.substack.com/
              ✍️ Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog
              🎙️ Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast

              #intotheimpossible #briankeating #science #physics #astronomy #cosmology #podcast #universe

              Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

              1 hr 15 min
            • "I Thought It Would Fail!" Francis Halzen: Winner of the 2026 Nobel Prize In Physics [Reupload from 2022]

              The physicist who turned a cubic kilometer of Antarctic ice into a telescope says the most exciting moment of his career was not the discovery. It was the first atmospheric neutrino. Before that, he was deep in debt to NSF and his own university with no neutrino to show for it.

              Francis Halzen is principal investigator of the IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the South Pole and Hilldale and Gregory Breit Distinguished Professor of Physics at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

              We cover: why ice under the South Pole is clearer than anything a lab can make, the 2,600 TeV event that dwarfs the LHC, why IceCube sees more energy in cosmic neutrinos than in gamma rays, how neutrinos crossing the universe test quantum gravity, and the quark he refused to believe in.

              Physics is a miserable career unless you are obsessed by it.

              Recorded in 2022, before IceCube detected neutrinos from our own galaxy.

              Learn from Nobel Prize winners, and you could win a meteorite: Please join my mailing list here 👉 briankeating.com/x

              Chapters

              00:00 Physics is a miserable career, unless
              02:54 A textbook written before the W was found
              06:11 Breaking into Lemaître's computer at night
              10:57 Do scientists owe the public anything?
              13:55 Deep in debt with zero neutrinos
              19:40 The persuasion nobody teaches scientists
              20:15 Why it could only be the South Pole
              23:20 Learn physics by doing, not by courses
              26:00 How to turn Antarctic ice into a telescope
              31:30 2,600 TeV: far beyond the LHC
              35:00 More energy in neutrinos than gamma rays
              40:00 Tracing ghost particles to NGC 1068
              46:00 Testing quantum gravity with neutrinos
              1:01:00 Ten times the ice for the same price
              1:07:08 What he would leave his descendants
              1:11:19 What his generation should be proud of
              1:12:51 The quark he refused to believe in
              1:17:09 Imagination can trump intelligence

              📺 Watch my most popular videos:

              Neil Turok Believes Physics Is In Crisis
              Nobel Prizewinner Frank Wilczek
              Stephen Wolfram vs. Eric Weinstein
              Sir Roger Penrose: Nobel Prize in Physics, Black Holes and More
              Noam Chomsky: Consciousness, Elon Musk, and More
              Sabine Hossenfelder
              Avi Loeb: UFOs and UAPs
              Neil deGrasse Tyson

              Follow me to ask questions of my guests:

              🏄‍♂️ Twitter: @DrBrianKeating
              📝 Mailing list: briankeating.com/mailing_list
              ✍️ Detailed blog posts: briankeating.com/blog
              🎙️ Listen on audio-only platforms: briankeating.com/podcast

              A production of imagination.ucsd.edu

              Executive Producer: Brian Keating
              Producer P.G.A: Stuart Volkow
              Editing: Lucas Scheiblich

              Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

              1 hr 28 min
            • Nobel Economist Daron Acemoglu WARNING: AI's Payoff Is NOT What You Think

              Nobel laureate Daron Acemoglu says AI's real productivity gain is an order of magnitude smaller than the industry claims.

              The bigger danger is not the machine. It is that a handful of people are deciding how it gets built.

              Daron Acemoglu is an MIT economist who shared the 2024 Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences.

              We cover: why a Nobel chemist left Berkeley for China, the optimal amount of heresy science should tolerate, the one rule that would end algorithmic outrage without censoring anyone, the accounting trick behind billionaire wealth, and why AI's path is a design decision, not destiny.

              We are still a democracy. Perhaps not for long.

              Chapters:

                0:00 Can science survive without democracy?t
                2:08 Why a Nobel laureate left Berkeley for Chinat
                3:58 What Galileo knew that Kepler didn'tt
                5:12 Is peer review undemocratic?t
                7:41 The optimal amount of scientific heresyt
                10:06 Science isn't slowing. So what broke?t
                12:06 The design choice behind echo chamberst
                14:49 One rule that would fix social mediat
                19:26 Should Elon Musk have this much wealth?t
                23:49 AI is a design choice, not destinyt

              ———

              📬 Get the transcript, fascinating bonus content, and my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message: https://briankeating.com/yt

              🌠 Have a .edu email and live in the USA 🇺🇸? You automatically win a meteorite: https://BrianKeating.com/edu

              🔔 Subscribe: https://www.youtube.com/DrBrianKeating

              🎯 Support Into the Impossible on Patreon — get my weekly M.A.G.I.C. Message, unfiltered bonus content, and live monthly Office Hours with me: / drbriankeating

              ⭐ Join this channel for perks, monthly Office Hours, and your name in the Member Roster at the end of every episode: / @drbriankeating

              📚 My books:

                Losing the Nobel Prize (memoir): http://amzn.to/2sa5UpAt
                Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/03ezQFut
                Focus Like a Nobel Prize Winner: https://a.co/d/hi50U9Ut
                Galileo's Dialogue (first-ever audiobook): https://a.co/d/iZPi9Unt

              🌐 More:

                🏄‍♂️ Twitter: / briankeating
                📚 Substack https://briankeating.substack.com/ss
                ✍️ Blog: https://briankeating.com/blog
                🎙️ Audio-only: https://briankeating.com/podcast

              #intotheimpossible #briankeating #science #physics #astronomy #cosmology #podcast #universe

              Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

              36 min

            About Into the Impossible With Brian Keating

            From the publisher's feed

            Think like a physicist. Wonder like a human. Into the Impossible is where Cosmic Conversations happen — uniting Nobel Prize winners, iconoclasts, authors, and technologists to explore reality’s deepest questions. From AI to aliens, from biophysics to the brain, from the cosmos to the multiverse, Brian Keating, Chancellor’s Distinguished Professor of Physics at UC San Diego covers it all.

            Best of Into the Impossible With Brian Keating

            Ranked by our users in the last 21 days

            More shows like Into the Impossible With Brian Keating

            StarTalk with Neil deGrasse Tyson by Neil deGrasse Tyson

            StarTalk with Neil deGrasse Tyson

            14,342 Listeners

            Making Sense with Sam Harris by Sam Harris

            Making Sense with Sam Harris

            26,233 Listeners

            Planetary Radio: Space Exploration, Astronomy and Science by The Planetary Society

            Planetary Radio: Space Exploration, Astronomy and Science

            1,336 Listeners

            SpaceTime with Stuart Gary by Stuart Gary

            SpaceTime with Stuart Gary

            316 Listeners

            Ask a Spaceman! by Paul M. Sutter

            Ask a Spaceman!

            834 Listeners

            Universe Today Podcast by Fraser Cain

            Universe Today Podcast

            563 Listeners

            The Quanta Podcast by Quanta Magazine

            The Quanta Podcast

            543 Listeners

            The Michael Shermer Show by Michael Shermer

            The Michael Shermer Show

            931 Listeners

            Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas by Sean Carroll

            Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

            4,168 Listeners

            Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe by iHeartPodcasts

            Daniel and Kelly’s Extraordinary Universe

            2,358 Listeners

            Within Reason by Alex J O'Connor

            Within Reason

            1,628 Listeners

            The Origins Podcast with Lawrence Krauss by Lawrence M. Krauss

            The Origins Podcast with Lawrence Krauss

            506 Listeners

            The Supermassive Podcast by The Royal Astronomical Society

            The Supermassive Podcast

            328 Listeners

            Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal by Theories of Everything

            Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal

            19 Listeners

            Why This Universe? by Dan Hooper, Shalma Wegsman

            Why This Universe?

            388 Listeners