The True Crime Tapes

Ever since the arrest of Rex Heuermann, we have been finding out more and more about the man that the authorities say is the Long Island serial killer. Heuermann ,an unassuming architect from Long Island was nabbed after an extensive operation that included the collection of pizza crust and hours of surveillance which eventually led to the bombshell arrest.


In this episode, we take a look at the 20/20 special that aired on Friday September 8th, and some of the new revelations that were revealed in it.




(commercial at 11:45)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

'The Long Island Serial Killer': How cell phones and a pizza box led to a suspect in 3 cases - ABC News (go.com)

According to one of the lawyers representing family members of the slain victims, Rex Heuermann might have been working with an accomplice and that accomplice he says, is a female. Authorities have said the oppositte however, and that they believe that Heuermann was working alone.

In this episode, we explore the possibility that Heurermann was working with an accomplice and if there is any evidence to back up such an assertion.




Rex Heuermann was looking at some very, very disturbing content according to his google search history and as the investigation moves forward, it is gong to provide a road map into the mind of Rex Heuermann as he was being hunted as the alleged Long Island Serial killer.

In this episode, we take a look at that search history and how it relates to another man convicted of being a serialk killer, John Bittrolff.

John Bittrolff is an American serial killer who was convicted of the murders of two women in New York during the 1990s. He was born in 1966 and worked as a carpenter.

Bittrolff's crimes went unsolved for many years until advances in DNA technology led to his arrest in 2014.In 2017, John Bittrolff was found guilty of the murders of two women, Rita Tangredi and Colleen McNamee, who were both sexually assaulted and killed in the early 1990s. The trial revealed that DNA evidence linked him to the crime scenes, leading to his conviction.

Bittrolff was sentenced to 50 years to life in prison for each murder, with the sentences running consecutively.

Bittrolff's case gained attention due to the lengthy time between the murders and his arrest, as well as the use of DNA evidence to solve the cold cases. His conviction highlights the role of forensic technology in solving crimes that might have otherwise remained unresolved.



to  contact  me:

[email protected]

After the initial interest in the discovery of the remains of the Gilgo 4, the coverage around the case dwindled over the years, besides an update every now and then from the authorities about here the investigation currently was at.


There were a few journalists that kept the story alive and then, in 2020, the Netflix film Lost Girls helped to bring the story back into the headlines. Fast forward a few more years and the shocking arrest of a suspect, Rex Heuermann has brought the story right back to the front page.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

How investigative journalists and a Netflix film kept the focus on the Gilgo Beach victims over a decade | CNN

A multiple serial killer theory suggests the possibility that more than one individual is responsible for a series of murders that share certain patterns or characteristics. In cases where multiple victims have been killed in a similar manner, by the same means, or within a specific time frame, investigators might entertain the idea that more than one person is involved. This theory can emerge when there are variations in the victims' profiles, crime scenes, or methods of killing that suggest the work of different individuals.Key points of a multiple serial killer theory:

1. Distinct Patterns: Instead of attributing all the murders to a single perpetrator, this theory posits that there could be multiple killers operating independently or collaboratively.
2. Diverse Victimology: Different victims with varying characteristics, such as age, gender, socio-economic background, and lifestyle, might be linked to the same series of murders.
3. Varying Methods: The murders may have been committed using different techniques or weapons, indicating the involvement of more than one person with different preferences or modus operandi.
4. Geographic Variation: The locations of the crimes might be dispersed across a wide area, making it unlikely for a single individual to cover such ground, leading to the speculation of multiple perpetrators.
5. Copycat Killings: In some instances, a well-publicized series of murders might inspire other individuals to commit similar crimes, thereby creating confusion as to whether a single or multiple killers are responsible.
6. Complex Investigations: If law enforcement agencies entertain the multiple serial killer theory, investigations become more complex as they need to simultaneously track and analyze the activities of potentially different individuals.

In this episode we explore the possiblity that there might be more than one killer responsible for the remains that have been found in and around Gilgo beach.

(commercial at 15:37)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Gilgo suspect Rex Heuermann's full body count may never be known & his Google searches point to two killers, expert says | The US Sun (the-sun.com)

Attorney John Ray has made some pretty big accusations against Rex Heuermann's wife and kids since the arrest, even going so far as to say that his wife, Asa Ellerup, was in on the whole thing. He has not provided any proof to back these statements up however. Now, the lawyer for Heuermann's daughter Victoria and son Christopher has responded.



Let's dive in and see what he had to say!



to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Attorney for Gilgo Beach murder suspect’s children hits back at claims family knew about alleged crimes | The Independent

An organized serial killer is a type of serial killer who exhibits a high degree of planning, control, and premeditation when committing their crimes. Unlike disorganized serial killers, who tend to act impulsively and leave chaotic crime scenes, organized serial killers are methodical and strategic in their approach, making it challenging for law enforcement to apprehend them.Key characteristics of an organized serial killer include:

1. Methodical planning: Organized serial killers carefully select their victims, often based on specific criteria such as appearance, occupation, or vulnerability. They may stalk potential victims to learn their routines and habits before carrying out the murders.
2. Controlled crime scenes: These killers go to great lengths to minimize evidence left behind at the crime scenes. They may bring tools, restraints, or other items to help facilitate the killings and dispose of evidence thoroughly.
3. High intelligence and social skills: Organized serial killers often have above-average intelligence and can be charming and manipulative. This enables them to gain the trust of their victims, making it easier for them to lure them into dangerous situations.
4. Lack of remorse: Organized serial killers typically show little to no remorse for their actions and may even take pleasure in the suffering of their victims.
5. Cooling-off periods: After each murder, organized serial killers usually experience a "cooling-off" period where they maintain a relatively normal appearance and behavior. This period allows them to avoid suspicion and plan their next attack without drawing attention to themselves.
6. Often follow media coverage: Organized serial killers may closely follow news reports and police investigations related to their crimes, sometimes even involving themselves in the investigation to elude capture.
7. Long-lasting crime sprees: Due to their calculated and organized nature, these killers may continue their crime sprees for extended periods before being caught or stopped.

In this epsiode, we hear from several experts who explain what makes a serial killer and some of the basci psyche that goes into how a profile is built when investigating serial murders.



to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

What causes someone to become a serial killer? Criminology experts explain | CNN

George Mitchell, the former Senate Majority Leader and respected peace negotiator, was named under oath by Virginia Giuffre as one of the men Jeffrey Epstein trafficked her to. Despite the gravity of the allegation, Mitchell’s name was quietly pushed aside, his denial accepted without serious challenge, and the story faded from public discourse. Unlike figures such as Prince Andrew or Donald Trump, who were relentlessly scrutinized, Mitchell received soft handling from the media and political class, his ties to Epstein treated as an uncomfortable detail best ignored. His presence at Epstein’s townhouse and social connection to the disgraced financier raised obvious questions, but few dared to pursue them. The result was a glaring double standard that exposed how power and prestige protect certain names from accountability.

This selective amnesia reveals how the Epstein scandal has been weaponized rather than fully exposed. Survivors’ testimony is amplified when it serves partisan purposes, but buried when it implicates figures like Mitchell who belong to the establishment’s “safe” circles. The hypocrisy is stark: those screaming about “the other team’s” monsters go silent when their own are implicated. Mitchell’s erasure from the mainstream narrative shows how survivors were betrayed not just by their abusers, but by a system that cherry-picks justice. His story underscores the bipartisan rot at the core of the Epstein saga—proof that truth has been traded for theater, and survivors’ voices have been muffled in service of political convenience.


to contact me:

[email protected]

Bill Richardson’s ties to Jeffrey Epstein highlight the grotesque double standard that protects the powerful. Despite being named under oath by Virginia Giuffre as one of the men she was trafficked to, Richardson—former New Mexico governor, U.N. ambassador, and establishment insider—faced almost no scrutiny. His denials were delivered with the bland, calculated tone of a man confident that his reputation and connections would shield him. The media, which treats lesser figures with endless outrage, politely buried his name, turning what should have been a career-ending scandal into a forgotten footnote. That silence was not oversight—it was a deliberate choice by the same machine that has long protected Epstein’s orbit of elites.


Richardson’s case is especially damning because Epstein’s Zorro Ranch, rumored to be a hub of trafficking and secrecy, sat in New Mexico under his watch as governor. The coincidence is staggering, yet no questions were asked, no investigations launched, and no accountability pursued. His inclusion in Virginia’s sworn testimony wasn’t random—it fit a consistent pattern of Epstein surrounding himself with powerful, insulated men unlikely to face consequences. Richardson’s polished career may remain intact in polite circles, but his name is forever entwined with the Epstein scandal, serving as a perfect example of how justice bends when it brushes up against the untouchables.


to contact me:

[email protected]

The Epstein–Maxwell prosecutions stand out less for what was done than for what wasn’t. Despite running what clearly looked like an organized criminal enterprise—complete with recruitment networks, financial laundering, and systemic intimidation—neither faced RICO charges, the statute designed specifically for dismantling such operations. Prosecutors routinely use RICO against gangs, cartels, and fraud rings far smaller and less sophisticated, but in this case, they chose narrow charges that framed Epstein as a lone predator and Maxwell as his assistant, rather than leaders of a syndicate. That omission not only limited the narrative but also shielded institutions, banks, and high-profile associates from exposure.


This deliberate restraint strengthened suspicions that Epstein was more than just a criminal—that he may have been an asset whose utility outweighed the government’s appetite for full justice. A RICO case would have forced prosecutors to map out the entire enterprise, exposing networks and potentially implicating powerful figures. By avoiding it, the system preserved secrecy, contained fallout, and maintained protection for those in Epstein’s orbit. In the end, justice was partial, and the silence around RICO became the loudest clue of all.


to contact me:

[email protected]

The Epstein–Maxwell prosecutions stand out less for what was done than for what wasn’t. Despite running what clearly looked like an organized criminal enterprise—complete with recruitment networks, financial laundering, and systemic intimidation—neither faced RICO charges, the statute designed specifically for dismantling such operations. Prosecutors routinely use RICO against gangs, cartels, and fraud rings far smaller and less sophisticated, but in this case, they chose narrow charges that framed Epstein as a lone predator and Maxwell as his assistant, rather than leaders of a syndicate. That omission not only limited the narrative but also shielded institutions, banks, and high-profile associates from exposure.


This deliberate restraint strengthened suspicions that Epstein was more than just a criminal—that he may have been an asset whose utility outweighed the government’s appetite for full justice. A RICO case would have forced prosecutors to map out the entire enterprise, exposing networks and potentially implicating powerful figures. By avoiding it, the system preserved secrecy, contained fallout, and maintained protection for those in Epstein’s orbit. In the end, justice was partial, and the silence around RICO became the loudest clue of all.


to contact me:

[email protected]