The True Crime Tapes

Bryan Kohberger and his defense team are setting themselves up for an epic battle in the courtroom with the prosecutors over the DNA evidence and whether or not that DNA belongs to Bryan Kohberger.

According to a new documentary, the fact that the house on King Road was a "Party House" and that there was other DNA of unknown males found at the house, Kohberger's team could sink their teeth into that and try to harness it in their favor.


In this epiosde, we take a look at that as a strategy and how Kohberger might atempt to harness it and what the proseuction might do to shoot it down.


(commercial at 8:18)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Idaho murders suspect Bryan Kohberger could claim in his trial that home where four students were murdered was 'party house' which would explain why his DNA was found there | Daily Mail Online

From the archives: 3-28-23





We've heard numerous times now about Bryan Kohberger and his newfound glory in God. Beyond the fact that he had been meeting with a pastor and exploring his faith however, we didn't know much else.


In this episode, we are learning more about his visits to the pastor from the man who runs the ministry who is in charge of providing services to the incarcerated in Idaho.

(commercial at 7:44)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Brian Kohberger pastor tells how he prays with the quadruple murderer | Daily Mail Online

According to the lawyer representing Bryan Kohberger in Pennsylvania, he intitally waived his right to a lawyer in the direct aftermath of his arrest. After speaking with the police at the local police station for roughly 15 minutes, he changed his mind and evoked his right to counsel.


In this episode, we hear from the man representing Bryan Kohberger and get a little more context about the the arrest.


(commercial at 7:52)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Lawyer: Bryan Kohberger Initially Agreed To Talk to Police (lawandcrime.com)

The similarities between the indictment and conviction of R. Kelly and the indictment of Sean "Diddy" Combs are indeed striking and noteworthy.   In this episode we take a look at some of the core parallels. 


Both R. Kelly and Diddy have been indicted under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act. This is significant because the RICO statute was traditionally used to prosecute organized crime but is now being applied to individuals accused of long-term patterns of sexual abuse. Prosecutors argue that both men ran "enterprises" through which they were able to commit and conceal their crimes. In R. Kelly's case, his team—managers, bodyguards, and assistants—helped him recruit, exploit, and silence victims. Similarly, Diddy is accused of using his business empire and staff to coerce women into sexual activity and to cover up the abuse.


In both cases, the allegations point to systemic, decades-long abuse. R. Kelly’s sexual abuse spanned decades, involving minors, child pornography, and coercion. Diddy’s indictment, while focused on adult women, similarly accuses him of long-term, repeated abuse, where he allegedly leveraged his power and wealth to manipulate victims​.

Both R. Kelly and allegedly Diddy used their status as powerful figures in the music industry to facilitate their crimes. Their fame afforded them protection, access to vulnerable individuals, and influence over those around them, including their teams, who allegedly helped perpetuate and cover up the abuse. This exploitation of celebrity status is a central theme in both cases, as both men allegedly relied on their empires to intimidate victims and prevent them from coming forward.

Both men are accused of manipulating and coercing victims into sexual activities. R. Kelly used coercion, often involving minors, to control and sexually exploit young women. Similarly, Diddy is accused of coercing adult women, with allegations of threats, violence, and manipulation, including using drugs to maintain control. In both cases, the prosecution has built a narrative that emphasizes the use of power to force compliance

Both cases involve sophisticated efforts to conceal the abuse. R. Kelly used his wealth and influence to silence victims and avoid legal consequences for years. Diddy's case also alleges that he used his network of business connections and financial resources to pay off victims, keep his actions hidden, and control the narrative around his conduct. Both men are accused of orchestrating a broad network of people and resources to maintain their abusive activities and evade justice.

The similarities between the R. Kelly and Sean "Diddy" Combs cases lie in the pattern of long-term, systematic abuse, the use of celebrity status to facilitate and cover up crimes, and the application of RICO charges to hold these individuals accountable. 


In this episode we take a look at those similiarities.

(commercial at 10:08)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:


The Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs case brings to mind R. Kelly criminal case | CNN

In the case of United States v. Combs (24-cr-542), attorney Teny Geragos submitted a declaration supporting a motion for an evidentiary hearing regarding alleged government misconduct. The declaration outlines instances where federal agents purportedly leaked confidential information to the media, including details about search warrants and witness interviews. Geragos contends that these actions have compromised Sean Combs' right to a fair trial by influencing public perception and potentially tainting the jury pool.

Additionally, the declaration highlights the release of a 2016 hotel surveillance video involving Combs and his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Geragos argues that the video's leak to the media was orchestrated by government agents, violating grand jury secrecy rules. The defense asserts that such leaks are part of a broader pattern of misconduct aimed at prejudicing the case against Combs. Consequently, they request an evidentiary hearing to investigate these allegations and seek appropriate remedies to ensure a fair judicial process.

(commercial at 7:48)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.81.0_1.pdf

The process for obtaining a warrant to raid someone's home by federal law enforcement agencies generally follows these steps:

1. Investigation: Law enforcement agencies conduct an investigation to gather evidence that suggests criminal activity is occurring at the target location.
2. Probable Cause: Law enforcement must establish probable cause, meaning they must have sufficient evidence to believe that a crime has been committed and that evidence of the crime is likely to be found at the target location.
3. Affidavit: A law enforcement officer presents an affidavit to a judge or magistrate. This affidavit outlines the facts and evidence supporting the request for a search warrant. It typically includes details about the suspected criminal activity, the target location, and the specific evidence or contraband believed to be present.
4. Review by Judge: The judge or magistrate reviews the affidavit to determine if there is probable cause to issue a search warrant. The judge may ask for additional information or clarification before making a decision.
5. Issuance of Warrant: If the judge finds sufficient probable cause, they will issue a search warrant authorizing law enforcement to conduct a raid on the target location. The warrant specifies the scope of the search, including what areas of the premises can be searched and what items can be seized.
6. Execution of Raid: Law enforcement officers execute the raid in accordance with the terms of the warrant. They must conduct the search within the parameters set forth in the warrant and may seize any evidence or contraband found during the search that is within the scope of the warrant.

Regarding the evidence needed to obtain a search warrant, it typically includes specific information that establishes probable cause, such as:

• Witness statements
• Surveillance footage
• Physical evidence
• Financial records
• Information obtained from informants
• Results of undercover operations
• Expert testimony

The evidence presented must be reliable and credible enough to persuade a judge that there is a fair probability that evidence of a crime will be found at the target location. The level of evidence required is higher than mere suspicion but lower than beyond a reasonable doubt, which is the standard of proof required for a criminal conviction.


In this episode we take a look at the raid and what the feds were hoping to find during the execution of the warrant.   


(commercial at 9:46)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Inside the raids at Sean 'Diddy' Combs' estates - Los Angeles Times (latimes.com)

The situation Diddy finds himself in is not getting better anytime soon, especially considering the massive amount of evidence that was collected by the Feds during the raid on Diddy's properties.   

According to sources, not only was the CCTV system tapped into, the hard drive from multiple computers was seized as well as documents that were removed from a safe (s). 

In this episode, we get an update on the latest developments and breakdown where things might go from here.

(commercial at 8:40)

to contact me:

[email protected]


sourcce:

Diddy's LA home surveillance footage SEIZED by federal agents amid sex trafficking probe - as lawsuit alleges rapper 'paid Instagram model Jade Ramey stipend for sex work' | Daily Mail Online

The situation Diddy finds himself in is not getting better anytime soon, especially considering the massive amount of evidence that was collected by the Feds during the raid on Diddy's properties.   

According to sources, not only was the CCTV system tapped into, the hard drive from multiple computers was seized as well as documents that were removed from a safe (s). 

In this episode, we get an update on the latest developments and breakdown where things might go from here.

(commercial at 8:40)

to contact me:

[email protected]


sourcce:

Diddy's LA home surveillance footage SEIZED by federal agents amid sex trafficking probe - as lawsuit alleges rapper 'paid Instagram model Jade Ramey stipend for sex work' | Daily Mail Online

The WSU police department has released more information about Bryan Kohberger and also some more footage. In this new clip, we see Bryan Kohberger, who is pulled over and speaking to an officer have a back and forth conversation about why he was pulled and him asking for more clarity about the law.

Let's dive in!


(commercial at 7:21)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Bryan Kohberger seen in new bodycam video as Washington State University releases additional videos, documents | Fox News

There have been several theories that include Bryan Kohberger as the person behind the noise complaints called in on the house on King road in Moscow.


In this episode, we take a look at this theory and what might have prompted it and see the evidence that debunks it.


(commercial at 7:08)

to contact me:

[email protected]



source:


Bryan Kohberger case: Theory Idaho suspect was behind party house noise complaints debunked | Fox News