The True Crime Tapes

The True Crime Tapes

By Bobby CapucciNewsNews CommentaryDaily News
Download on the App Store

The True Crime Tapes episodes

  • The Diddy Trial: Breaking Down The Regina Ventura Testimony On Day 7 (5/21/25)
    On Day 7 of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial, Regina Ventura, mother of singer Cassie Ventura, delivered compelling testimony that bolstered the prosecution's case. She recounted a distressing incident from December 2011, when Cassie informed her via email that Combs had threatened to release explicit videos of her and to harm both her and her then-partner, rapper Kid Cudi. In response to these threats, Regina and her husband took out a home equity loan to pay Combs $20,000, as he claimed he wanted to recoup money he had spent on Cassie. Although the money was returned a few days later, Regina testified that the ordeal left her physically ill and deeply concerned for her daughter's safety. She also provided photographs of bruises on Cassie's body, which she had taken during that period, to document the alleged abuse.


    Regina's testimony corroborated earlier statements made by Cassie, highlighting a pattern of coercion, intimidation, and abuse. The defense chose not to cross-examine her, allowing her account to stand unchallenged. Her statements added weight to the prosecution's narrative of Combs' alleged manipulative and abusive behavior, reinforcing claims of a broader pattern of misconduct.


    to contact me:

    [email protected]



    source:

    Cassie Ventura's mother testifies about Diddy's alleged abuse and blackmail | Fox News
    18 min
  • The Diddy Trial: David James Resumes His Testimony On Day 7 (5/21/25)
    On Day 7 of Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial, former personal assistant David James provided detailed testimony about his time working for Combs from 2007 to 2009. James described a demanding work environment, stating that he was responsible for preparing hotel rooms with specific items, including a toiletry bag containing 25 to 30 pill bottles—some unmarked—and personal items like baby oil and condoms, which he purchased with cash provided by Combs' security team. He testified that Combs carried pills shaped like former President Barack Obama's face and consumed drugs daily, including ecstasy and Percocet. James also recounted being subjected to lie detector tests on two occasions when items went missing, feeling he couldn't refuse.


    James further testified about an incident in 2008 involving Combs and rival music producer Suge Knight. He recounted that after a confrontation at a Los Angeles diner, Combs armed himself with three handguns and ordered James to drive him back to the location to confront Knight. James expressed fear for his life during this event, stating it was the first time he felt truly endangered while working for Combs. This incident led him to resign from his position.


    to contact me:

    [email protected]



    source:

    Diddy trial live updates: Regina Ventura gives testimony after David James in Sean Combs’s case - The Washington Post
    17 min
  • Tyrone Blackburn And The Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Sanctions (Part 6) (5/21/25)
    A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:
    1. Purpose:
      • Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.
      • Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.
    2. Content:
      • Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.
      • Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.
      • Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.
      • Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.
      • Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.
    3. Common Arguments:
      • Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.
      • Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.
      • Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.
      • Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.
    4. Supporting Evidence:
      • The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.
    5. Legal Standards:
      • It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.

    In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.


    (commercial at 8:13)

    to contact me:

    [email protected]



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:
    1. Purpose:
      • Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.
      • Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.
    2. Content:
      • Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.
      • Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.
      • Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.
      • Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.
      • Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.
    3. Common Arguments:
      • Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.
      • Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.
      • Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.
      • Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.
    4. Supporting Evidence:
      • The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.
    5. Legal Standards:
      • It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.

    In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.


    (commercial at 8:13)

    to contact me:

    [email protected]



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    11 min
  • Tyrone Blackburn And The Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Sanctions (Part 5) (5/21/25)
    A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:
    1. Purpose:
      • Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.
      • Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.
    2. Content:
      • Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.
      • Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.
      • Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.
      • Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.
      • Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.
    3. Common Arguments:
      • Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.
      • Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.
      • Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.
      • Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.
    4. Supporting Evidence:
      • The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.
    5. Legal Standards:
      • It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.

    In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.


    (commercial at 8:13)

    to contact me:

    [email protected]



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:
    1. Purpose:
      • Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.
      • Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.
    2. Content:
      • Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.
      • Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.
      • Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.
      • Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.
      • Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.
    3. Common Arguments:
      • Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.
      • Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.
      • Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.
      • Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.
    4. Supporting Evidence:
      • The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.
    5. Legal Standards:
      • It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.

    In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.


    (commercial at 8:13)

    to contact me:

    [email protected]



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)

    14 min
  • Tyrone Blackburn And The Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Sanctions (Part 4) (5/21/25)
    A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:
    1. Purpose:
      • Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.
      • Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.
    2. Content:
      • Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.
      • Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.
      • Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.
      • Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.
      • Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.
    3. Common Arguments:
      • Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.
      • Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.
      • Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.
      • Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.
    4. Supporting Evidence:
      • The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.
    5. Legal Standards:
      • It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.

    In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.


    (commercial at 8:13)

    to contact me:

    [email protected]



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    16 min
  • Tyrone Blackburn And The Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Sanctions (Part 3) (5/21/25)
    A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:
    1. Purpose:
      • Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.
      • Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.
    2. Content:
      • Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.
      • Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.
      • Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.
      • Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.
      • Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.
    3. Common Arguments:
      • Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.
      • Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.
      • Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.
      • Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.
    4. Supporting Evidence:
      • The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.
    5. Legal Standards:
      • It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.

    In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.


    (commercial at 8:13)

    to contact me:

    [email protected]



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    12 min
  • Tyrone Blackburn And The Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Sanctions (Part 2) (5/21/25)
    A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:
    1. Purpose:
      • Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.
      • Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.
    2. Content:
      • Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.
      • Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.
      • Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.
      • Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.
      • Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.
    3. Common Arguments:
      • Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.
      • Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.
      • Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.
      • Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.
    4. Supporting Evidence:
      • The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.
    5. Legal Standards:
      • It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.

    In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.


    (commercial at 8:13)

    to contact me:

    [email protected]



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    11 min
  • Tyrone Blackburn And The Memorandum Of Law In Opposition To Sanctions (Part 1) (5/21/25)
    A memorandum in law in opposition to a motion for sanctions is a legal document filed by a party in a lawsuit to argue against the imposition of sanctions that have been requested by the opposing party. Here are the key components and purposes of this document:
    1. Purpose:
      • Counter Argument: The memorandum aims to counter the claims made in the motion for sanctions, presenting reasons why the court should not grant the requested sanctions.
      • Defense: It serves as a defense against allegations of improper conduct or violations of court rules or orders.
    2. Content:
      • Introduction: An introduction that outlines the context and purpose of the memorandum.
      • Statement of Facts: A section that provides a factual background, often challenging or clarifying the facts as presented in the motion for sanctions.
      • Legal Arguments: Detailed legal arguments explaining why the motion for sanctions should be denied. This includes citing relevant laws, rules, and case precedents.
      • Justification of Conduct: Explanation and justification of the actions or behavior that led to the motion for sanctions, demonstrating that there was no misconduct or that any alleged misconduct does not warrant sanctions.
      • Conclusion: A conclusion summarizing the main points and reiterating the request for the court to deny the motion for sanctions.
    3. Common Arguments:
      • Compliance: Demonstrating that the party has complied with all court orders and procedural rules.
      • Lack of Harm: Arguing that the alleged conduct did not cause any significant harm or prejudice to the opposing party.
      • Good Faith: Showing that any actions taken were in good faith and not intended to obstruct or delay the legal process.
      • Proportionality: Arguing that the proposed sanctions are disproportionate to the alleged misconduct.
    4. Supporting Evidence:
      • The memorandum may include supporting evidence such as affidavits, exhibits, and other documents that back up the arguments presented.
    5. Legal Standards:
      • It will address the legal standards that the court must apply when deciding on a motion for sanctions, explaining why those standards have not been met in this case.

    In this episode, we dive back into the Diddy situation and this time we are taking a look at Tyrone Blackburn's memorandum in law in opposition to sanctions.


    (commercial at 8:13)

    to contact me:

    [email protected]



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.0.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    14 min
  • Tyrone Blackburn And The Affidavit In Opposition To The UMG/Diddy Sanctions (5/20/25)
    A declaration in support of dismissing a Rule 11 sanctions motion is a formal statement, usually made under oath, that provides evidence and arguments to counter a motion for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 11 sanctions can be sought by a party if they believe that the opposing party has filed a frivolous lawsuit, made legal arguments without proper basis, or submitted filings for an improper purpose.Here are the key elements typically included in such a declaration:
    1. Personal Testimony: The declarant, often an attorney or party involved in the case, provides their personal account and context related to the filing in question. This may include explanations of their actions, decisions, and intentions.
    2. Factual Evidence: The declaration will include factual evidence supporting the claim that the filing was made in good faith, based on reasonable inquiry, and with a legitimate legal basis. This can involve referencing specific documents, communications, or events.
    3. Legal Arguments: It will contain legal arguments demonstrating that the original filing was justified and that the motion for sanctions is unwarranted. This includes citing relevant case law, statutes, and procedural rules.
    4. Refutation of Accusations: The declaration will specifically address and refute the points raised in the Rule 11 sanctions motion, providing counterarguments and evidence to show that the accusations of frivolousness or improper conduct are unfounded.
    5. Supporting Documentation: Any relevant documents, affidavits, or other evidence that bolster the declarant’s statements and arguments are often attached as exhibits to the declaration.
    6. Conclusion: The declarant will typically conclude with a request for the court to deny the motion for Rule 11 sanctions.

    (commercial at 8:16)


    to contact me:

    [email protected]



    source:

    gov.uscourts.nysd.616406.58.2.pdf (courtlistener.com)
    20 min
  • UMG/Diddy And Their Motion For Sanctions Against Rod Jones (Part 3)
    memorandum of law in support of a motion for sanctions is a legal document submitted to a court that outlines the legal arguments and relevant facts supporting a party's request for the court to impose penalties or corrective measures against an opposing party for misconduct or violation of court rules. Here’s a detailed breakdown of what it typically includes:Structure and Content:
    1. Title and Caption:
      • The document begins with a title that clearly states it is a "Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Sanctions."
      • The caption includes the name of the court, the parties involved in the case, the case number, and other identifying information.
    2. Introduction:
      • A brief overview of the nature of the motion and the sanctions being requested.
      • A summary of the key points that will be elaborated on in the memorandum.
    3. Background and Factual Context:
      • A detailed explanation of the facts that led to the motion for sanctions.
      • Specific instances of the opposing party’s misconduct or violation of court rules.
      • Any previous warnings or attempts to resolve the issue without court intervention.
    4. Legal Standard:
      • An outline of the legal standards and rules governing sanctions (e.g., Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, Rule 37, or other applicable state or federal rules).
      • Discussion of the authority and discretion of the court to impose sanctions under these rules.
    5. Argument:
      • A comprehensive legal argument detailing why sanctions are appropriate in this case.
      • Citation of relevant case law, statutes, and rules that support the request for sanctions.
      • Analysis of how the opposing party’s conduct fits within the legal framework warranting sanctions.
      • Discussion of the specific type of sanctions being sought (e.g., monetary penalties, dismissal of claims, striking of pleadings, etc.).
    6. Conclusion:
      • A concise statement reiterating the request for sanctions.
      • A summary of the key reasons the court should grant the motion.
    7. Certificate of Service:
      • A statement verifying that the memorandum and the motion for sanctions have been properly served on the opposing party.
    Purpose and Importance:
    • Accountability: It seeks to hold the opposing party accountable for improper conduct, such as frivolous filings, failure to comply with discovery obligations, or other abuses of the judicial process.
    • Deterrence: Imposing sanctions serves to deter similar conduct in the future by the offending party or others.
    • Compensation: Sanctions can compensate the moving party for expenses incurred due to the misconduct, such as attorney fees and costs.
    • Efficiency: It helps maintain the integrity and efficiency of the judicial process by discouraging actions that waste court time and resources.

    (commercial at 8:31)

    to contact me:

    [email protected]


    source:

    2024.05.17 MOL ISO Motion for Sanctions(8677390.10) (courtlistener.com)
    20 min

About The True Crime Tapes

From the publisher's feed


The True Crime Tapes pulls you into the shadowy depths of the criminal underworld, where the line between justice and chaos is razor-thin. Each episode dissects the minds of history’s most…

More shows like The True Crime Tapes

In The Dark by The New Yorker

In The Dark

28,745 Listeners

Heavyweight by Pushkin Industries

Heavyweight

17,665 Listeners

Crime Junkie by Audiochuck

Crime Junkie

369,502 Listeners

Police Off The Cuff/Real Crime Stories by Bill Cannon Police off the Cuff/Real Crime Stories

Police Off The Cuff/Real Crime Stories

860 Listeners

The Standard by The Evening Standard

The Standard

20 Listeners

The Binge Cases: Doctor Billions by Sony Music Entertainment

The Binge Cases: Doctor Billions

4,387 Listeners

Unraveled by ID

Unraveled

10,531 Listeners

Game of Crimes by Game of Crimes

Game of Crimes

1,459 Listeners

Matthew Cox | Inside True Crime Podcast by Rhapsody Voices

Matthew Cox | Inside True Crime Podcast

445 Listeners

The Epstein Chronicles by Bobby Capucci

The Epstein Chronicles

230 Listeners

The Connect- with Johnny Mitchell by Johnny Mitchell

The Connect- with Johnny Mitchell

568 Listeners

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles by Bobby Capucci

Jeffrey Epstein: The Coverup Chronicles

13 Listeners

Sit Down with Michael Franzese by Michael Franzese

Sit Down with Michael Franzese

84 Listeners

Adrift by Apple TV / Blanchard House

Adrift

804 Listeners