The cultural tide in America is turning, and this episode of The WallBuilders Show captures the momentum of traditional values making a powerful comeback across the nation.

Texas has claimed a monumental victory with the passage of the largest school choice program in the country. After decades of advocacy, Governor Abbott signed into law a $1 billion educational savings account that will provide approximately $10,000 per student. Though this breakthrough program currently reaches only about 1.4% of Texas students, it represents a crucial first step in breaking the public education monopoly and expanding educational freedom for families.

A refreshing cultural shift is underway as June transitions from "Pride Month" to "Family Month." Congresswoman Mary Miller has introduced a resolution in Congress officially recognizing the family as society's foundational building block. This coincides with major corporations quietly dropping their rainbow logos and Americans increasingly celebrating traditional family values. The WallBuilders team encourages listeners to intentionally prioritize family time this month, suggesting shared meals, outdoor activities, and meaningful family experiences.

Legal and technological developments further signal this return to traditional values. A Texas DOJ official now faces murder charges for secretly administering abortion medication to his pregnant girlfriend—a landmark case recognizing the humanity of unborn children. Meanwhile, Texas has joined Utah in requiring parental approval for minors downloading apps, with Governor Abbott signing legislation that protects children from online predators despite opposition from tech giants.

Perhaps most revealing is Politico's comprehensive study showing young men abandoning the Democratic Party in droves. Only 27% view Democrats favorably compared to 43% for Republicans, with participants describing the left as "weak" and "dismissive of their concerns" while preferring the GOP's embrace of traditional masculinity.

What cultural shifts have you noticed in your community? How are you celebrating family values this month? Join the conversation and subscribe for more updates on how traditional values are making a comeback across America.

Support the show

Stepping into our studio for the first time, Israeli archaeologist, tour guide, and IDF soldier Omer Eshel brings firsthand perspective to the complex realities unfolding in the Middle East. This rare in-person conversation takes us beyond headlines into the heart of Israel's current challenges with Iran, Gaza, and internal politics.

Omer draws a striking biblical parallel when assessing Prime Minister Netanyahu's leadership, comparing him to King Solomon—"someone who started really well but became corrupt." This candid evaluation reveals nuances in Israeli politics often missing from international coverage, where Israelis themselves are debating their leadership during crucial times.

The discussion turns sobering as Omer frames the current standoff with Iran as a dangerous dispute between nuclear powers. He reminds us of Israel's 2007 bombing of Syria's nuclear reactor—heavily condemned internationally but potentially preventing catastrophe when ISIS later swept through the region. "What would happen if ISIS would have held that nuclear reactor?" he asks, highlighting Israel's existential calculations when facing threats.

Perhaps most revealing is Omer's compassionate perspective on Gaza's civilians. While leading tours that connect biblical sites with archaeological evidence, he regularly prays not just for Israel's safety but for Gaza's children. "Ninety percent of Israelis want this war to be over," he explains, echoing Golda Meir's wisdom that peace will come "when Palestinians love their children more than they hate us."

For those seeking deeper understanding of both ancient biblical history and today's Middle East complexities, this conversation connects the dots between archaeology, faith, and current events. How does your perspective on Israel's situation change when hearing directly from someone living these realities daily?

Support the show

The federal government controls a staggering one-third of all American land, including half of everything west of the Rocky Mountains. But does this massive federal land ownership align with our founders' vision for America?

Ken Ivory, a longtime advocate for constitutional land management, takes us deep into this overlooked but critical issue. Drawing from constitutional text and founding history, he explains how Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 specifically limits federal land ownership within states to land purchased with state legislature consent for military installations and other specific purposes. During constitutional debates, Elbridge Gerry warned that allowing broader federal land powers would enable government to exercise "undue awe" within states – precisely what we're witnessing today.

The conversation unveils what Ivory calls "the first great compromise" that preceded the more famous Connecticut Compromise. Land-poor states like Maryland refused to join the Articles of Confederation for five years over fears that land-rich Virginia would sell western territories, forcing Maryland to raise taxes. The resolution came through establishing a constitutional trust whereby federal lands would be transferred to create "distinct republican states with the same rights of sovereignty" as existing states – a promise ultimately broken for Western territories.

Beyond constitutional concerns, the podcast explores practical impacts of federal mismanagement: catastrophic wildfires from poor forest maintenance, economic opportunities squandered, and state tax bases artificially constrained. While hunters and outdoor enthusiasts often fear losing access under state control, Ivory makes a compelling case that states have every incentive to maintain recreational opportunities while implementing better management practices responsive to local needs.

Ready to understand a constitutional issue that affects millions of acres of American land? Listen to discover how returning to our founders' vision of state sovereignty could create an "economic, constitutional, environmental renaissance" benefiting all Americans. Follow Ken Ivory's work at nationalfederalisminitiative.org and join the movement to restore proper constitutional governance.

Support the show

Senate Bill 1027

liberty pastors

WallBuilders Teachers Conference

Senator David Bullard of Oklahoma delivers a masterclass in constitutional governance with his groundbreaking reform of the state's initiative petition process. Having identified how progressive groups exploit ballot initiatives to liberalize conservative states, Bullard crafted Senate Bill 1027 to restore republican principles and strengthen pro-life protections.

The ballot initiative system, a Progressive Era remnant that creates direct democracy within states, has become the preferred weapon for liberal organizations seeking to bypass conservative legislatures. As Bullard explains, outside money and professional signature gatherers have previously succeeded in Oklahoma with measures for medical marijuana and Medicaid expansion. Now, they're targeting abortion rights.

Bullard's reform requires remarkable transparency and genuine grassroots support for any initiative. Petitions must use Oklahoma volunteers and Oklahoma money only. Critically, signatures must come from at least 20 counties rather than just Oklahoma City and Tulsa, preventing the 2.5% of counties from dictating policy to the other 97.5%. The bill ensures that truly statewide issues have statewide support.

Drawing from his background as an AP history teacher, Bullard articulates why this matters fundamentally to our system of government. Citing Article 4, Section 4 of the Constitution, he reminds us that America guarantees each state a republican form of government—not a democracy. The Founding Fathers "despised democracy," preferring representative government where elected officials make laws on citizens' behalf.

What makes this reform particularly impactful is the progressive reaction. Their fierce opposition to gathering signatures beyond urban centers reveals their strategy: using coastal money and urban voters to force policy changes on conservative states. As Bullard notes, "If they really want to know the truth, I would completely remove the initiative petition process."

This legislation presents a model for conservative states nationwide facing similar progressive tactics. By requiring initiatives to demonstrate broader geographic support and relying on in-state resources, states can better preserve their values against well-funded outside influences determined to reshape state policy through direct democracy—a concept our founders rejected.

How will you help preserve republican government in your state? Consider supporting candidates who understand these constitutional distinctions and recognize the progressive playbook targeting conservative strongholds.

Support the show

https://millionvoices.org/

When titans clash, nations tremble. The recent public dispute between Elon Musk and Donald Trump represents more than just a personality conflict—it embodies a fundamental tension between principled idealism and political pragmatism that could reshape American politics for generations.

Against the backdrop of D-Day's anniversary, we explore how this modern conflict mirrors historic challenges that required both strategic compromise and unwavering purpose. David Barton shares fascinating insights about how D-Day's success hinged on elaborate deception, with General Patton serving as a crucial decoy that drew German forces away from the actual landing sites. Just as those coordinated tactics changed the course of World War II, today's political battles demand similar strategic thinking and unity of purpose.

The heart of the Musk-Trump disagreement centers on America's fiscal future and how to achieve meaningful reform. Musk, the world's richest man and a brilliant business innovator, approaches government spending from a principled stance rooted in fiscal responsibility. His frustration with Washington's inability to address the national debt resonates deeply with many Americans. Trump, having grown through his first term, now navigates the practical realities of a narrowly divided Congress where the recent spending bill passed by just one vote (215-214).

Most concerningly, history warns us about the devastating potential of this rift. John Graves of Million Voices draws powerful parallels to Ross Perot's third-party campaign, which split the center-right vote and delivered the presidency to Bill Clinton—twice. Yet there's hope in that painful lesson: following Perot's failed presidential bid, his supporters helped Republicans gain 54 House seats in 1994, delivering many of Perot's policy goals including a balanced budget.

Rather than choosing sides in this conflict between powerful allies who have both made extraordinary sacrifices, we explore how their complementary strengths could unite for greater impact. The wisest path forward may be channeling reform energy toward competitive congressional races, creating the legislative majority needed for meaningful fiscal discipline while maintaining executive leadership committed to conservative principles.

Join us for this timely conversation about principles, pragmatism, and the prayer-centered leadership that has carried America through its greatest challenges.

Support the show

America is witnessing a remarkable turnaround that defies mainstream narratives but confirms what many citizens have long known—when we return to foundational principles, society thrives.

Across the nation, murder rates are plummeting in cities once synonymous with violence. Baltimore's homicide rate has fallen by 31.6%, St. Louis by 34.5%, and Denver by a staggering 63%. This transformation coincides with executive orders that restored the federal death penalty for heinous crimes and empowered law enforcement to "relentlessly pursue criminals." The simple truth emerges: when we hold criminals accountable rather than releasing them without consequences, communities become safer.

Meanwhile, the pro-life movement continues gaining momentum. Texas has achieved 30 consecutive months without a single elective abortion, while Indiana has reduced procedures from 3,000 annually to just 22 in a three-month period. Beyond prohibitions, states like Arkansas have appropriated millions to support pregnancy centers and adoption services, demonstrating a holistic approach to valuing life at all stages.

Cultural shifts are equally noteworthy. Pride Month celebrations face dwindling support—even in liberal strongholds like Boise, Idaho, where insufficient ticket sales forced event cancellations. Nine NFL teams have declined to participate in Pride promotions, while major retailers like Target have replaced rainbow displays with patriotic American imagery. The White House itself has announced no plans for Pride Month proclamations, marking a significant departure from previous administrations.

These developments reflect a profound realignment with values that have sustained America throughout its history. By enforcing laws, protecting the innocent, supporting families, and honoring life, we're witnessing the rebuilding of cultural foundations that create prosperity and genuine freedom for all citizens.

Join us in spreading this message of renewal by visiting wallbuilders.com for resources that will help you become part of the solution in your community.

Support the show

Constitutional confusion runs rampant in America today, with progressive reinterpretations threatening the very foundation of our republic. In this thought-provoking episode, we tackle listener questions that cut to the heart of our governing structure, revealing truths that many Americans have never been taught.

When examining the 14th Amendment and its application to modern immigration debates, we uncover how dramatically its original purpose has been distorted. This amendment—created specifically to secure equal rights for freed slaves following the Civil War—has been weaponized to support concepts like "anchor babies" that the founders would have found utterly foreign. The crucial phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" was deliberately included as a limitation, not an expansion of citizenship.

Perhaps most eye-opening is our discussion of the three branches of government. Contrary to what's taught in most classrooms, these branches were never designed to be co-equal. Drawing directly from the Federalist Papers, we demonstrate how the legislative branch was intended to "predominate" while the judiciary was described as "beyond comparison the weakest." This hierarchy is reflected in the very structure of the Constitution itself—with Article I (Congress) being the longest, Article II (President) second, and Article III (Courts) the shortest.

The judiciary's modern power grab becomes even more apparent when we consider that Supreme Court decisions are merely opinions without any enforcement mechanism. As Andrew Jackson famously noted, "The Supreme Court has made their decision, now let them enforce it." This fundamental constitutional understanding has been lost in our era of judicial activism.

We also explore how the branches differ in their relationship to the people. Legislative and executive branches are directly elected by citizens, while judges are appointed by the other two branches—a clear indication of the founders' intent regarding their relative authority.

If you've ever wondered about the original meaning of constitutional provisions or questioned why government seems to function differently than intended, this episode offers illuminating insights straight from founding documents. These aren't just academic points—they affect everything from border policy to presidential authority, and understanding them is essential for preserving our republic.

Support the show

Dr. Jim Garlow takes us on a profound journey examining the state of the American church, revealing both encouraging revivals and concerning trends that deserve our attention. 

Drawing from decades of pastoral experience and global ministry, Garlow diagnoses a troubling shift in church structure - our congregations increasingly resemble corporations rather than New Testament communities. When church boards operate like executive committees and pastors become employees rather than shepherds, something essential is lost. This corporate model, largely shaped by modern tax regulations, stands in stark contrast to the relational, apostolic patterns we see in scripture.

While celebrating the vibrant worship movement sweeping through modern Christianity, Garlow points to an unintended consequence: we've sacrificed theological depth for emotional experience. Previous generations absorbed rich doctrine through hymns, building resilient faith capable of weathering cultural storms. Today's believers, while passionate, may lack the theological foundation needed for challenging times ahead.

Perhaps most troubling is the church's muted response to rising anti-Semitism. The horrific attack in Boulder, Colorado, where an elderly Holocaust survivor was burned with Molotov cocktails, exemplifies growing hostility toward Jewish people. Yet many pastors remain silent. Garlow suggests this stems partly from ignorance and partly from dangerous theological frameworks like replacement theology that wrongly suggest the church has superseded Israel in God's plan.

The conversation provides a compelling reminder of Christianity's inseparable connection to its Jewish roots. As Jesus himself affirmed, he didn't come to abolish the law but to fulfill it. When Christians neglect this foundational truth, we weaken our understanding of God's redemptive story.

How might your faith community be strengthening or drifting from biblical patterns? Listen now to challenge your thinking about worship, church structure, and our responsibility toward God's chosen people.

Support the show

https://www.andthentheyprayed.com/

Prayer isn't just a footnote in American history—it's been the decisive factor in our nation's most pivotal moments. As we approach America's 250th anniversary, we're witnessing potential signs of spiritual awakening across the country: record-breaking baptisms at Huntington Beach, campus revivals at major universities, and an 11 million increase in active Bible readers after years of decline. Could these indicators signal a return to the spiritual foundations that shaped our nation?

The role of prayer in American history extends far beyond religious sentiment. From the Continental Congress opening with a two-hour prayer and Bible study to George Washington kneeling in the snow at Valley Forge, prayer has been the secret weapon of America's strongest leaders. What's particularly compelling about these historical accounts is that prayer wasn't a passive activity for the weak—it was the strategic advantage employed by those who thoroughly prepared, trained, and acted with courage.

Congressman Barry Loudermilk joins us to discuss his newly updated book "And Then They Prayed," which documents numerous instances where prayer decisively influenced American history. His ten years of research reveals extraordinary stories spanning from the founding era through World War II, the Civil War, and even the Apollo 8 space mission. As General George Patton astutely observed to his chaplain, "We prepare, we train and we arm ourselves, but then the deciding factor when it comes to who wins and who loses is that power of prayer."

The mainstream narrative often minimizes or entirely omits the role of faith in American history, making resources like Loudermilk's book vital for understanding our authentic heritage. Whether you're planning to visit historical sites during the 250th celebrations, looking for meaningful family discussions, or seeking inspiration for today's challenges, these documented stories of prayer's impact provide a blueprint for combining action with divine guidance—a timeless formula that remains just as relevant today as it was at our nation's founding.

Pre-order "And Then They Prayed" at andthentheyprayed.com before its July 4th release, and rediscover how prayer has shaped America's most consequential moments.

Support the show

https://wallbuilders.com/teachers-conference/

https://sacred.science/

What if the divide between science and faith is artificial—a modern invention rather than a timeless truth? Dr. William West tackles this question with surprising clarity and scientific rigor in our fascinating conversation about his new book, "Sacred Science: Understanding Divine Creation."

As an oncologist trained at Harvard and Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Dr. West wasn't setting out to reconcile faith and science. His journey began when he discovered that the fastest-growing religious group in America—the "nones"—were choosing science over faith. This prompted him to examine what science these individuals were embracing and whether it truly contradicted biblical understanding.

What he discovered was remarkable. The eight fundamental blueprints of our universe—mathematical equations describing space-time, quantum mechanics, and forces governing existence—all point to superintelligence rather than random chance. These equations, which scientists discover rather than invent, seem to exist in what mathematicians describe as an eternal mathematical landscape.

The Higgs field, confirmed in 2012, gives particles mass and allows for a physical universe. DNA's complexity led even Francis Crick, who helped discover its structure, to conclude it must have "come from outer space." The greatest scientific minds throughout history—Newton, Copernicus, Kepler, Boyle—approached their work not as secular endeavors but as explorations of God's creation, "reading the thoughts of God" through scientific discovery.

Dr. West reminds us that the opening of Genesis stated "In the beginning, God said 'Let there be light'"—a declaration aligning remarkably with modern physics, written thousands of years before scientific academies existed. For anyone seeking to bridge the divide between faith and science, this conversation offers a refreshing perspective that sees scientific discovery not as a threat to faith, but as another beautiful revelation of divine intelligence.

Explore more at sacred.science and discover why even secular voices now acknowledge it often requires more faith to believe in purely materialistic explanations than to recognize the possibility of divine design in our universe.

Support the show