
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Now that our audience are masters of rights analysis after last week’s overview and framework presentation, we turn to the current SCOTUS gun rights case, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen. Consistent with Professor Amar’s approach, we begin with the text of the 2nd and 14th Amendments, along with a fascinating historical analysis. When that is complete, the questions the Justices asked during oral argument take on a whole new meaning, both in seeing clearly the points they were emphasizing, and perhaps in some cases, those they were missing.
By Akhil Reed Amar4.5
375375 ratings
Now that our audience are masters of rights analysis after last week’s overview and framework presentation, we turn to the current SCOTUS gun rights case, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen. Consistent with Professor Amar’s approach, we begin with the text of the 2nd and 14th Amendments, along with a fascinating historical analysis. When that is complete, the questions the Justices asked during oral argument take on a whole new meaning, both in seeing clearly the points they were emphasizing, and perhaps in some cases, those they were missing.

3,554 Listeners

669 Listeners

1,102 Listeners

2,011 Listeners

6,308 Listeners

32,346 Listeners

6,609 Listeners

7,210 Listeners

4,656 Listeners

5,816 Listeners

3,914 Listeners

3,344 Listeners

16,145 Listeners

744 Listeners

8,773 Listeners