TonioTimeDaily

TonioTimeDaily

By Antonio MyersSociety & Culture
Download on the App Store

TonioTimeDaily episodes

  • Ambiamorous - What is it? What does it mean? Gynesexual - What is it? What does it mean?
    "Terminology

    The word stems from the Latin prefix ambo which stands for "both". According to the Urban Dictionary website, ambiamorous meaning is:

    “noting or relating to ambiamory, the state or practice of being comfortable in both monogamous and polyamorous, reciprocal relationships”

    It is important to note that ambiamory should not be confused with other similar terms. For example, people who are ambiamorous create long-term committed relationships with one partner, they may also have a great match and value partnerships with multiple partners.

    Despite the limited resources on ambiamory, most people link it with being able to be happy in either relationship depending on the situation. Ambiamory may involve sexual, platonic, romantic, queerplatonic, or any other aspect relevant to monogamy as well as polygamy. It can also represent other forms of attractions which can all be grouped under one category.

    Terminology

    The definition of gynosexuality is derived from the prefix "gyne," which is Ancient Greek for "woman," "feminine," or "female." Literally, then, the term gynesexual means someone who is sexually attracted to women, femininity, or females. This means that, for example, in contrast to a sexuality like gay, straight, or lesbian, this sexual orientation basically focuses on feminine presentation, rather than whether someone identifies as female.

    Who can be gynosexual?

    This also means that anyone can be gynesexual, regardless of their gender. However, it should be noted that, for straight men, gynesexuality is not the same as being heterosexual. Conversely, for women, being gynesexual is not the same as being lesbian.

    Similar terms

    There are also a few other names for gynesexuality. Some of these have the same or similar definitions, others imply a slight difference. There are also other related terms. Here, we list a few examples.

    Femsexual

    Femsexual is a word that is not in use anymore. It used to be defined the same way gynesexual is now but its usage has been discontinued.

    Gynophilia

    Gynophilia, or gynephilia, is a contraction of the Ancient Greek  prefix"gyne" and "philia," meaning love. The term is defined on WebMD's website as "the love of femininity." The difference between gynesexual and gynephilia is that the former has a stronger physical and/or sexual association, whereas the latter refers only to romantic love and attraction.

    Gyneromantic

    Gyneromantic is the purely romantic version of gynesexual and is, as such, quite similar to gynephilia. The main difference between these two labels is that the scope of different kinds of love of gynephilia is broader than for gyneromantic.

    Womasexual

    Womasexual and womansexual describe the sexual attraction to women. As opposed to gynesexual, this does not include attraction to female-presenting individuals who do not identify as a woman. This word is often used by those attracted to women without wanting to connect their sexuality to their own gender by attaching a label like homosexual or bisexual. Womansexual can definitely be used to describe the attraction to trans women.

    Androsexual, androphilia, androromantic, and masexual

    Androsexuality, androphilia, androromance, and masexuality are the masculine/male counterparts to the four terms described above, respectively gynosexuality, gynophilia, gynoromantic, and womasexual."

    ---
    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/antonio-myers4/support
    36 min
  • Gender fluidity and sexual fluidity

    "A person who is gender fluid is flexible in regard to the sex with which they identify. They believe that gender is non-binary, meaning that not all humans fit squarely into either the male or female category. Gender, then, is different from biological sex, which refers to the genitalia with which you are born.

    "Being gender fluid means that you don’t have a set gender or set place on the gender spectrum," says Margaret Seide, MD, a Board-certified psychiatrist.

    She adds, “The term is an acknowledgment that there is a spectrum and that gender is not binary. How you experience your gender can change over time or depending on the situation.”

    The History of Gender Fluidity

    Gender fluidity is a fairly new term and, to that extent, concept. That doesn’t mean that gender fluid people didn’t exist until recently; in fact, there are many examples of people throughout history who fell outside of binary sexual identification. The difference is that the topic simply was not widely discussed. Even today, the term gender fluid is fairly uncommon in certain communities.

    “There are socio-cultural norms, some of which have their basis in religion. Also, almost every society we know of has some sort of societally imposed gender-normative expectations, whether that is dress, relationship roles, or general behavior,” says Dr. Seide.

    “As you experience the world, you are exposed to these social constructs that define masculinity and femininity and that shapes our expectations of our own behavior.”

    All that said, since about the mid-2000s, conversations about sexuality and gender identity have started to trickle into mainstream. Though gender is still quite rigid in our culture, we are now seeing increased sensitivity around the topic."

    "At this point in time, experts have disproved many of the myths surrounding sexual orientation.

    Like the color of your eyes or the shape of your nose, orientation is a trait many are born with or grow into over time.

    Maybe in high school, for example, you developed crushes on people of one gender only. In college, you found yourself attracted to people of different genders.

    Now, as an adult, you mostly date people of one gender but occasionally feel a flash of sexual attraction for people of other genders.

    Does that mean you’re confused? Can’t make up your mind? That your college attractions were just a phase? No, no, and absolutely not.

    No one can define your orientation for you, but the concept of sexual fluidity can help explain your experiences."


    ---
    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/antonio-myers4/support
    31 min
  • July 23rd 2022, Skoliosexual and Androsexual!
    "First things first: What’s the exact definition?

    Someone who’s androsexual is attracted to men and masculine people.

    Although the “-sexual” suffix suggests that it refers exclusively to sexual attraction, the term can include people who are romantically or physically attracted to men and masculine people.

    Some androsexual people are exclusively attracted to men, while other androsexual people might be attracted to anybody who’s masculine in their identity, gender expression, or appearance.

    It’s possible to be androsexual while also identifying with another term, like heterosexual, bisexual, or pansexual.

    The key difference between terms like “androsexual” and terms like “heterosexual” is that androsexual focuses on the gender of the person you’re attracted to as opposed to your own gender.

    While “homosexual,” for example, means that you’re attracted to people of the same or a similar gender as you, “androsexual” can apply to anyone who’s attracted to men, no matter their gender.

    What does this term mean?

    Skoliosexual is a relatively new term that refers to people who are attracted to people who are transgender or nonbinary.

    According to one source, the term dates back to 2010 and has mostly been used in LGBTQIA communities and on websites like Tumblr and Reddit.

    Somebody who is transgender has a different gender identity than the one assigned to them at birth.

    Nonbinary refers to someone who doesn’t identify solely as a man or a woman. They might identify as multiple genders, no gender, or another gender entirely.

    It ultimately means different things to different people

    Words change over the years, and even relatively unknown words like skoliosexual mean different things to different people.

    Some define it as only being attracted to nonbinary people.

    Others feel that it means attraction to anyone who isn’t cisgender. People who are cisgender identify with the gender they were assigned at birth.

    Still, others feel that this sexual identity can include cisgender people that are genderqueer in their expressions.

    In other words, this interpretation includes people who don’t conform to gender expectations. For example, cisgender men who wear makeup and nail polish or cisgender women who wear so-called men’s clothes.

    Skoliosexual people might find themselves attracted to people who play with gender norms regardless of whether that person is cisgender."

    ---
    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/antonio-myers4/support
    26 min
  • I am all-around quality over numerical quantity when it comes to sex (July 21st, 2022)

    "Be Clear About Your Intentions

    It is crucial that you and the other person are on the same page about the one-night stand. If you think it is just a temporary thing, but the other person thinks it’s something more, it could lead to misunderstanding. That is why you must be vocal about your intentions, so there is no confusion.

    For this purpose, a whole online dating niche was created, catering to the needs of those who seek short-time encounters. For example, if your intention is to have a one-night stand nearby, you can register on a dedicated dating platform and get access to thousands of singles seeking the same, with no strings attached, no hassle, and stress. This way, your new match knows beforehand that you plan nothing more than just a brief encounter to have some fun, meaning no drama after you both go separate ways. On the other hand, if you met them the traditional way, it is crucial to clarify in person before initiating anything physical. Just remember to do it politely.

    Discuss the Boundaries

    Boundaries are healthy in one-night stands. They help us define our limits and protect us from things we don’t want. For example, you might think something is okay while intercourse, but they might construe it as assault or physical harm.

    After all, you don’t want a court case on your hands if you get violent and the other person thinks they have been assaulted. In the same way, if you have any personal boundaries, you must discuss them with the person. Be sure to ask them about theirs so you can understand the limits none of you can cross."

    ---
    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/antonio-myers4/support
    40 min
  • There Are No Monotheistic Religions (Educating monotheists to their polytheist beliefs)

    "In everyday life, we non-theists may find ourselves in discussions with theists. Have you noticed that these discussions often go around in circles and achieve nothing? Why is that?

    Let me suggest that one reason is because we are using their framework in which to discuss and argue. In this article, I will explore some practical ways to stay out of their framework. Who says they have the sole right to define the terms of engagement? For this discussion, we will focus on monotheism, but other areas might be just as interesting.

    Many modern-day theists seem to consider the so-called monotheistic nature of their religions as a sign of legitimacy, at least when compared to other openly polytheistic religions. The gods of ancient Greece and Rome were many, each with their own unique powers and niches in the nether world. It is no problem to see these as polytheistic religions but interestingly it is almost as easy to identify so-called monotheistic religions as polytheistic. If we expose the propaganda of these religions by challenging this key concept, we shift the frame, and open the door for a different kind of discussion. We don’t have to acquiesce to their definitions of their invisible friends.

    Let’s explore. To be a monotheistic religion, a religion must have only one god in its lexicon. Zeus may have been the highest and most powerful god in the Greek pantheon, but he was certainly joined by many other lesser gods. In Christian mythology, the gods are no less than four, sometimes more. The Father, Son, Holy Ghost and Satan are certainly gods. For whatever the Christian apologist wants to say, these four certainly function as much like individual gods as any Greek gods. The Yahweh figure may be more powerful than the Son, Satan or Holy Ghost, but so too was Zeus or Thor. All move in mysterious ways and while three are allied against one, so too were there alliances among Greek and Norse gods. In addition, Catholics have Mary, who seems to have special powers and access to the other gods in remarkable ways. Then we have all the saints of both Catholic and Orthodox traditions. How convenient that each of them seems to have special powers, not unlike the demigods and lesser gods of other polytheistic religions."


    ---
    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/antonio-myers4/support
    23 min
  • I fully support The Equality Act, The Respect for Marriage Act, and The Right to Contraception Act
    “The Equality Act is a bill in the United States Congress, that, if passed, would amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (including titles II, III, IV, VI, VII, and IX) to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, housing, public accommodations, education, federally funded programs, credit, and jury service.[1][2] The Supreme Court's June 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia protects gay and transgender people in matters of employment, but not in other respects. The Bostock ruling also covered the Altitude Express and Harris Funeral Homes cases. The bill would also expand existing civil rights protections for people of color by prohibiting discrimination in more public accommodations, such as exhibitions, goods and services, and transportation.
    Much like the Bostock v. Clayton County decision, the Equality Act broadly defines sex discrimination to include sexual orientation and gender identity, adding "pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition of an individual, as well as because of sex-based stereotypes". The bill also defines this to include the intersex community. The intended purpose of the act is to legally protect individuals from discrimination based on such.”
    ---
    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/antonio-myers4/support
    14 min
  • My thoughts on Agnosticism part 4 (final part)
    “Lawyer up with the right lawyers before signing any contracts, never do what you don’t want to do, don’t be a doormat under any and all circumstances, and associate yourself with wholesome entities.” -Antonio Myers “ I am all for polygamy, polyamory, and polygyny as long as there is gender and sexual diversity equality to all three forms of non monogamy.” -Antonio Myers. “I am willing to porn perform with the entire human adult diversity including doing https://xconfessions.com/categories/taboo, senior citizens, middle-aged persons, young adults, the entire gender and sexual diversity of adults, adults of all races, all ethnicities, all nationalities, etc. all harmless porn categories, and https://store.erikalust.com/categories/taboo!” -Antonio Myers “There is no scientific evidence of people being older than centenarians in The Bible nor having any Old Testament plagues. “Why should be invisibility applied to supernaturalism?” -Antonio Myers
    ---
    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/antonio-myers4/support
    48 min
  • My thoughts on Agnosticism part 3
    “The truth is that monogamy is only one way to have a relationship. There are plenty of other relationship dynamics out there.
    These different types of nonmonogamy may include:
    Monogamish. This is where someone is mostly monogamous but might be open to sex or romantic relationships with others.
    Polyflexible. This is when someone is happy with being in a monogamous or a nonmonogamous relationship. They’re satisfied in both situations.
    Polyfidelity. This is where all partners in a group are equal and agree not to have sexual or romantic relationships outside of the group.
    “Casual” sex. You’ve heard of this one before! Casual sex, where your sexual partners have no expectations about monogamy or exclusivity, can be a form of ethical nonmonogamy because you’re consensually having encounters with multiple people.
    “Casual” dating. Similar to casual sex, this is where you date multiple people while clearly stating that there are no expectations about monogamy.
    Triad. Also called a “throuple,” this is where three people date each other.
    Quad. Like a triad, a quad is a relationship involving four people.
    Vee. Also known as a “V,” this is where one person is dating two people but those two people aren’t dating one another.
    Relationship anarchy. This is less of a relationship structure and more of a philosophy or approach to relationships. This is where the rules and expectations for relationships aren’t determined by assumptions, but by specific agreements with those specific people. For example, two friends might have sex. Although sex isn’t commonly a part of what we call friendship, they might agree that it’s something they want in their relationship.
    Open relationships. This is where a couple has sex with other people (but usually not romantic relationships).
    Unicorns. Sometimes considered an insult, the word “unicorn” is used to describe a person who has sex with couples. This is usually a bisexual or pansexual woman who has sex with a couple that includes one man and one woman. The unicorn isn’t usually considered a part of the couple, but a sexual partner.
    Solo polyamory. This is where someone has intimate relationships with many people but lives an independent life. They might not want to intertwine their lives with a partner — for example, through marriage, living together, having children, moving abroad together, and so on.”
    ---
    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/antonio-myers4/support
    20 min
  • My thoughts on Agnosticism part 2
    “Can any rational person believe that the Bible is anything but a human document? We now know pretty well where the various books came from, and about when they were written. We know that they were written by human beings who had no knowledge of science, little knowledge of life, and were influenced by the barbarous morality of primitive times, and were grossly ignorant of most things that men know today. For instance, Genesis says that God made the earth, and he made the sun to light the day and the moon to light the night, and in one clause disposes of the stars by saying that "he made the stars also." This was plainly written by someone who had no conception of the stars. Man, by the aid of his telescope, has looked out into the heavens and found stars whose diameter is as great as the distance between the earth and the sun. We now know that the universe is filled with stars and suns and planets and systems. Every new telescope looking further into the heavens only discovers more and more worlds and suns and systems in the endless reaches of space. The men who wrote Genesis believed, of course, that this tiny speck of mud that we call the earth was the center of the universe, the only world in space, and made for man, who was the only being worth considering. These men believed that the stars were only a little way above the earth, and were set in the firmament for man to look at, and for nothing else. Everyone today knows that this conception is not true.”
    ---
    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/antonio-myers4/support
    59 min
  • My thoughts on Agnosticism part 1
    “Qualifying agnosticism
    Critics of the term "agnostic" claim that there is nothing distinctive in being agnostic because even many theists do not claim to know god(s) exists -- only to believe it. Under this asserted distinction between the words "belief" and "knowledge," agnosticism has recently started suffering from terminological ambiguity. While critics maintain the distinction is not contrived; others reject the distinction as trifling. By contrast, compare:
    "I believe god(s) exist(s)" means that "I know god(s) exist(s)".
    "I believe god(s) exist(s)" can still mean "I don't know if god(s) exist(s)".
    If this distinction is accepted, the term agnostic becomes orthogonal to theism without further qualifiers, and many qualifiers become contradictory unless the distinction is accepted. If this distinction is ultimately accepted by the larger public, the group formerly described by the term will again find themselves without a label, because the qualifiers provided would be inappropriate for their philosophy.
    Recently suggested variations include:
    Strong agnosticism (also called hard agnosticism, closed agnosticism, strict agnosticism, absolute agnosticism)—the view that the question of the existence or nonexistence of god(s) are unknowable by nature or that human beings are ill-equipped to judge the evidence.
    Weak agnosticism (also called soft agnosticism, open agnosticism, empirical agnosticism, temporal agnosticism)—the view that the existence or nonexistence of god(s) is currently unknown but is not necessarily unknowable, therefore one will withhold judgment until/if more evidence is available.
    Apathetic agnosticism—the view that there is no proof either existence or nonexistence of god(s), but since god(s) (if exist) appear unconcerned for the universe or the welfare of its inhabitants, the question is largely academic.
    Ignosticism—the view that the concept of god(s) as a being is meaningless because it has no verifiable consequences, therefore it cannot be usefully discussed as having existence or nonexistence. (See scientific method)
    Model agnosticism—the view that philosophical and metaphysical questions are not ultimately verifiable but that a model of malleable assumption should be built upon rational thought. This branch of agnosticism does not focus on a deity's existence.
    Agnostic theism (also called religious agnosticism)—the view of those who do not claim to know existence of god(s), but still believe in such an existence. (See Knowledge vs. Beliefs)
    Agnostic spiritualism—the view that there may or may not be a god(s), while maintaining a general personal belief in a spiritual aspect of reality, particularly without distinct religious basis, or adherence to any established doctrine or dogma.
    Relative Agnosticism-This is similar to Agnostic spiritualism, but with the added view that if it was empirically proven that god(s) do or do not exist, it would not affect the beliefs of the Relative Agnostic.
    Agnostic atheism—the view of those who do not know of the existence or nonexistence of god(s), and do not believe in god(s).”
    ---
    Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/antonio-myers4/support
    44 min

About TonioTimeDaily

From the publisher's feed

Autism is my super blessing! I'm a high-school valedictorian, college graduate, world traveler, disability advocate. I'm a Unitarian Universalist. I'm a Progressive Liberal. I'm about equal rights, human rights, civil & political rights, & economic, social, &cultural rights.