Truth Jihad Radio

Rumble link Bitchute link FFWN link

This week Israel accelerated its genocide of Gaza, intensifying the ongoing mass starvation, shooting hundreds of starving people as they lined up for food, attacking the last standing city in Gaza, Deir al-Balah, and shocking even Caitlin Johnstone by having snipers shoot kids in the genitals one day, the head in the next, and so on. These people have a genius for being cartoonishly evil.

Bibi thinks he’s accelerating towards some kind of victory. But he’s actually zooming off a cliff. As the reality of the Gaza genocide sinks in, the people of the region, and the world, will find a way to excise the Zionist cancer from West Asia and the planet. It could come through the ongoing Resistance strategy of imposing death from a thousand cuts, as the world collectively withdraws support from Israel and throws its weight behind Palestine. But we might also see nukes going off in Occupied Palestine, or the release of biological weapons targeting Ashkenazi Jews. By now, people are angry enough to try just about anything.

Israel’s genocide strategy is accelerationist in the sense of “let’s make things worse in hopes that it will somehow magically make things better.” The original accelerationists were left-wingers who wanted to intensify the ravages of techno-capitalism in hopes of provoking revolution. In recent decades the alt right has appropriated the concept to mean “let’s burn down society so our ethnonationalist utopia can emerge from its ashes.” Israel, for its part, wants to burn down West Asia, and with it the world, so Biblical prophecy can be fulfilled as a Jewish Messiah arises to rule the world from a rebuilt blood sacrifice temple in Jerusalem.

This kind of millennialist messianic madness isn’t new. Historian Norman Cohn’s The Pursuit of the Millennium gives us the pro-Jewish version, casting Christians as the main villains and Jews as innocent scapegoats. But since Christian and Muslim millenarianists agree that Jesus, the Prince of Peace and avatar of pure spirituality and universalist brotherly love, is the one true Messiah, whereas Jews loathe Jesus and yearn for a bloody Jewish conquerer to subjugate, exterminate, and enslave all non-Jews under a global Jewish dictatorship, it’s easy to understand why the Jewish version of messianic millenarianism is even more toxic than the Christian cults analyzed by Cohn.

About 375 years ago, Zionism was born in the ravings of the lunatic satanist Shabtai Tzvi as polished by his publicist, Nathan of Gaza. Together, the pair convinced the plurality of European, North African, and West Asian Jews to at least provisionally accept Tzvi as the Messiah who would lead them to conquer the Holy Land and following that, the world. While Tzvi’s career culminated ignominiously in the propitious year 1666, when he led his followers into nominal conversions to Islam in a successful attempt to convince the Ottoman sultan to spare his life, Tzvi’s brand of satanic antinomian Zionism sparked the movement that unleashed genocide on Palestine in 1948 and is accelerating it today.

Tzvi’s movement crashed and burned. Unsurprisingly, it elicited “persecution” of Jewish communities. (Naturally enough, Christian and Muslim rulers were wary of maniacal outbreaks of Jewish fanaticism, especially since the fanatics’ goal was to conquer and exterminate Christians and Muslims and enslave the survivors.)

There have been countless similar cases of Jewish excesses leading to “persecutions.” When Jewish predation (or parasitism if you will) reaches a certain point, the victims have nothing to lose and rise up in pogroms. If usurers who are also tax collectors and blackmailers and sellers of alcohol, drugs, and w****s reduce whole communities to penury, those communities have been known to respond, naturally enough, with torches and pitchforks. Throw in the minoritarian but very real practice of black magic using the blood of Christian children, among other abominations, and you have a perfect blueprint for becoming the world’s most unpopular minority.

When Bibi’s genocidal plan to conquer West Asia river-to-river fails, and Jews return to the status they have always enjoyed (barring a brief post-World War II interlude) as the most hated people on the planet, there will doubtless be wailing and gnashing of teeth. But maybe that’s the whole point. Maybe tribalist Jews are actually masochists who love being hated, and who torment the goyim precisely so they can find themselves “persecuted.” That’s what one of my favorite ex-Israelis, Alon Mizrahi, suggests in his latest Substack note:

In case you were wondering what the Israeli plan was, let me share with you that plan in great detail: it doesn't exist.

There is no Israeli plan. There is no future arrangement they seek to achieve, or a finite situation.

Their plan is to keep escalating until they are forced to stop either by a devastating war, crippling sanctions, internal collapse, or a civil war (preferably: all at once).

That is the plan. Believe me: this, and only this, is the plan.

-

Zionists are notoriously braindead, souldead, and deluded, but they know that they cannot take over the Middle East and subjugate all of humanity to their rule, which is the only way they could censor 'criticism of Israel' and contain resistance forever. They know it's impossible (unless god steps in and intervenes on their psychopathic behalf).

Their plan is not to achieve this; the plan is to die or get arrested trying. It is not a plan, but a yearning that cannot be controlled to fail in something big and then mourn the destruction and failure, like Ashkenazi Jews love to do so much.

They made mourning and complaints against humanity the center of their culture and identity, and that's precisely the mental space they want to return to. This is the only space where they will feel safe and at home: when they are hated and everything they built has been destroyed. For them, a scenario like this is the ultimate proof that they are really god's chosen.

I know it sounds psychotic, and it is. Nevertheless, that's the collective yearning: to try big, to fail big, and to fall back to the comforting sense of persecution and hate.

-

This is why they're doing all these counterintuitive things (from a self-preservation point of view). They want to be stopped. They long to be vilified and hated. They relish that hatred. It comforts and soothes them. When they are hated, in their mind, they become eternal Jews, fulfilling the decrees of an ancient Jewish existence.

They don't hate being hated. They love it. Once you realize this, things will start making sense to you.

-

God bless Alon Mizrohi for escaping from the Israeli prison, and the Jewish-tribalist mind-prison. Like Gilad Atzmon and Miko Peled, he’s living proof that being born Jewish in Israel doesn’t necessarily prevent a person from uttering prophetic truths.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or the free speech platform SPdonate.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Has the risk of nuclear war been rising? Are we approaching "permanent Cuban missile crisis" territory? K. Barrett Bilali of the Bilali's Call Substack discusses his recent essay "Nuclear War: A Scenario by Annie Jacobsen.”

Excerpt:

Nuclear War: A Scenario is a nonfiction thriller that details how a nuclear war would unfold – second-by-second – based on current military protocols for nuclear engagement, declassified documents and interviews with top US officials.

The 300-page book by investigative journalist Annie Jacobsen dives into the scenario: a North Korean ICBM with a nuclear warhead is launched towards the US Capitol triggering a US retaliation and the end of the world as we know it. In gripping detail, she breaks down the scenario to the first, second, and third 24-minute segments.

In the lead up to this horrific scenario, Jacobsen makes a shocking revelation from her research.

In December 1960, the US Secretary of Defense and a host of top military officials met in a deep bunker in the Strategic Air Command Center in Omaha, Nebraska. Their plan: the execution of a preemptive strike on the Sino-Soviet Bloc and surrounding countries. Moscow was to be hit with a thermonuclear warhead 4,000 times the power of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

“Defense scientists had carefully estimated that 275 million would be killed in the first hour, and that at least 325 million more people would die from radioactive fallout over the next six months or so,” notes Jacobsen.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

It’s the first anniversary of The Ear Nick Heard Round the World. And “Desperate Donald” Trump has a skeleton in his closet, a monster that just won’t die. The national B-grade horror flick we’re watching might as well be entitled Mad King Trump vs. Return of Son of Jeffrey Epstein.

Trump’s embarrassment at being at the top of Epstein’s client list—the two were “closest friends,” and Trump’s reputation as a pussy-grabbing rapist and out-of-control sexual predator is well-documented—is driving him even madder than he already was. As if POTUS-putz’s hilariously self-incriminating blurt-out during a press conference with Attorney General Pam Bondi wasn’t enough, the Mad Monarch of MAGA topped it off by staying up late last night, no doubt strung-out on Diet Coke, composing an even loonier, more self-incriminating tweet:

Council Estates Ricky aptly summarizes:

Not only is the US president a paedophile, but his reading and writing level is lower than that of his youngest victims. Honestly, his post can be summarised as "I'm guilty as hell and I'm scared".

But it’s worse than that. Trump isn’t just a scared, guilty, barely-literate pedophile. He’s absolutely unhinged. The Maga Monarch’s ranting tweet leaps from one irrelevant topic to the next, hysterically discombobulated, frenetically thrashing at ostensible enemies here, randomly tossing out hyperbolic empty boasts there, without making any coherent points about anything whatsoever, except one: “Forget Jeffrey Epstein! Forget his clients list! Thank you for your attention to this matter!”

If “Hairsniffer Joe” Biden had tweeted anything half this crazy, we’d have assumed he was senile. If Bill Clinton had ejaculated a late-night blurt-out even a quarter this nutty, we’d have figured he’d been snorting too much coke while being serviced by Monica Lewinsky. And if Richard M. Nixon had stayed up late ranting and raving with even a fraction of Trump’s overwrought incoherence—which in fact he occasionally did—we would have assumed he was drunk…which he often was.

The worst of Nixon’s boozy midnight rants came towards the end of his presidency, as he was being taken down by the Watergate scandal. Do Trump’s tirades signal something similar? Does Trump, like Nixon, know his days in the White House are numbered, as an ineluctable scandal explodes in slow-motion? Will Epsteingate finish Trump off in somewhat the same way that Watergate finished off Nixon?

A crazed self-pitying self-destructing out-of-control president is a threat to national and global security. The Joint Chiefs of Staff, in coordination with the National Security Council, responded to Nixon’s drunken threats to nuke the world by removing the president’s finger from the nuclear trigger. Will something similar have be done to Trump, who—we just learned— profanely threatened to nuke Moscow in a face-to-face with Putin, and to nuke Beijing in a face-to-face with Xi?

“Henry, We’ve Got to Nuke Them”

Nixon’s inebriated nuclear threats, coupled with his propensity to drink himself into unconsciousness at the very moment the US went on high nuclear alert, alarmed his colleagues:

At Key Biscayne, according to a Secret Service source, Nixon once lost his temper during a conversation about Cambodia. "He just got pissed," the agent quoted eyewitnesses as saying. "They were half in the tank, sitting around the pool drinking. And Nixon got on the phone and said: 'Bomb the s**t out of them!'"

"If the president had his way," Kissinger growled to aides more than once, "there would be a nuclear war each week!" This may not have been an idle jest. The CIA's top Vietnam specialist, George Carver, reportedly said that in 1969, when the North Koreans shot down a US spy plane, "Nixon became incensed and ordered a tactical nuclear strike... The Joint Chiefs were alerted and asked to recommend targets, but Kissinger got on the phone to them. They agreed not to do anything until Nixon sobered up in the morning."

The allegation of flirting with nuclear weaponry is not an isolated one. Nixon had been open to the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Vietnam as early as 1954 and as president-elect in 1968 had talked of striking "a blow that would both end the war and win it". A Kissinger aide who moved over to the White House, David Young, told a colleague "of the time he was on the phone [listening] when Nixon and Kissinger were talking. Nixon was drunk, and he said, 'Henry, we've got to nuke them.' "

Is Trump already well past that Nixonian point when his finger needs to be forcibly removed from the nuclear trigger? Those who argue that the current president is less loonie than “late Nixon” might point out that Trump merely swills two six-packs of Diet Coke per day, as opposed to Nixon’s penchant for dry martinis supplemented by scotch. But does Trump even need booze to reduce inhibition and behave (and tweet) in madly inappropriate ways? Frankly, I’d take a drunk Nixon over a sober Trump in terms of both IQ points and common sense.

Trump lacks the self-awareness to realize that his “forget Epstein” tirades are born to backfire. You don’t need to have read George Lakoff’s Don’t Think of an Elephant to know that when someone says that, you can’t help thinking of an elephant. Nor do you have to have heard of the Streisand effect to realize that hysterical efforts to convince everyone not to look at something are the best possible way of getting them to look at it. (And if Q tells you that Trump knows this, and is only pretending to exude guilty-demeanor-up-the-wazoo as part of his 3D chess campaign to get the Epstein files released, you can safely assume that Q is at least as crazy and/or controlled by Mossad as Trump himself, who is plainly no 3D chess master but an incorrigible imbecile.)

And while we’re speculating about unsubstantiated conspiracy theories… Has anyone considered the possibility that Trump’s epic Epstein eruption is being manipulated by Mossad in such a way as to force Trump to play along with an upcoming false flag blamed on Iran? Trump doesn’t seem especially eager for all-out-war with Iran. But pushed to the edge of political and mental annihilation, Trump may have no choice but to recite whatever lines Bibi feeds him after an “Iranian dirty bomb” makes much of Manhattan uninhabitable, or an American aircraft carrier gets sunk by an “Iranian missile.”

The Yes-Kings Movement

Trump may be a malignant sociopathic narcissist idiot and ever-more-unhinged cornered-rat pedophile, but that hasn’t stopped Congress and the Supreme Court from relinquishing their Constitutional duties and assigning dictatorial powers to the presidency:

The Supreme Court last week sharply curtailed the ability of federal judges to block a presidential action nationwide, even if they find it unconstitutional. That followed its decision last year granting the president broad immunity from prosecution for crimes committed in the course of his core duties.

The Senate several days ago rejected a resolution that would have let Congress decide, under its war powers, if President Donald Trump can strike Iran again. And Congress in recent months has repeatedly declined to assert its constitutional authority over spending or tariffs.

In a striking dynamic of the Trump era, analysts say, the judicial and legislative branches have been steadily transferring many of their powers to the executive — or at least acquiescing in the transfers.

It seems the American Republic has thrown in the cards, remaking itself as an autocratic empire under the absolute authority of a madman. The worst of patients has been handed all power over the asylum. What could possibly go wrong? We just anointed as our new Caesar a guy who makes future President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Camacho look like a very stable genius.

Incidentally, during the same week that Trump underwent his epic Epstein meltdown, and his profanity-laced face-to-face nuclear threats to Putin and Xi came to light, our preposterous peabrained POTUS was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by none other than Benjamin “Wanted for Genocide” Netanyahu:

Netanyahu: Ah, I mean, I sent a letter to the organization here. So I want to present to you, Mr. President, the letter I sent to the Nobel Prize Committee. It's nominating you for the Peace Prize, which is well-deserved.

Trump: Well, thank you very much. Coming from you in particular, this is very meaningful.

“Coming from you in particular.” Very meaningful indeed. It’s like getting nominated for a humanitarianism prize by Jack the Ripper.

E. Michael Jones says when he first saw that he thought it was one of my satires. Leave it to Trump and Bibi to satirize themselves even more outrageously than I can.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or the free speech platform SPdonate.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Alexander Wolfheze discusses his article “The Heresiarchs:Traditionalist Thoughts on the Deeper State of the West.

Is an age-old antinomian heresy responsible for the current state of extreme decadence afflicting Western so-called civilization? Are the “Jews” behind the genocidal messianic-millenarian Zionist project really heretics, not actual Jews? And are people who blame “Jews” and “boomers” just adding to the confusion?

—

Alexander Wolfheze: We must understand that a heresy can take on such forms that it’s not recognizable anymore. It becomes mainstream. The moment heresy becomes mainstream, you don’t call it heresy anymore. But from a traditionalist perspective, looking from a traditionalist frame and following events that happened throughout history, we can say that modernity, especially in its neoliberal and its totalitarian liberal forms—We are now living in a totalitarian liberal epoch in certain ways, which may also be called globalist, nihilist.

The origins of this state are in heresy. From a traditionalist perspective, it can be discerned as a form of antinomianism. So that means opposition to nomos, of course, being the law. Antinomianism is the state opposed to the law.

And here I like to make a clarification as far as the word Jew is concerned, because of course, Jews are associated as arch heretics in Western tradition: The people that deny Christ, the people that deny later revelations. In their habits, they are closed. But the original and I think more proper way to describe heresy is not by associating it with one nation, however much people might find that convenient. The term Jewish gives you a blank check from history at the moment. I do not think we should fall into that trap.

(Read the full transcript at my Substack by clicking on “transcript” above the video image.)

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Cat McGuire: “I’m honored to have been doing False Flag Weekly News for five years now, since about August 2020. And starting now, I’m not, because I have been declared terminally ill.” Cat reflects on her info-activism, which continues in different forms—emphasizing the spiritual—and describes her healing journey.

Cat’s Substack

False Flag Weekly News

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

On the occasion of the 20th anniversary of the false flag London bombings, and in honor of Anthony Black’s terrific review of Nick Kollerstrom’s book Terror on the Tube, I’m replaying my November 25, 2009 with Kollerstrom and his publisher John Leonard. Below is the original posting. Above is the audio of the interview, and a video of Peter Power’s 7/7 interview referencing the “amazing coincidence” that the bombings happened at exactly the same times and places as had been envisaged in pre-scheduled drills

For the transcript of my interview with Kollerstrom and Leonard click “transcript” above the video image. -KB

Live Interview with Controversial U.K truth-seeker Nick Kollerstrom & his publisher John Leonard

Nick Kollerstrom is the author of Terror on the Tube: Behind the Veil of 7/7. Contributing to the conversation will be his publisher, Progressive Press publisher John Leonard. Nick has been scheduled twice recently but prevented from appearing due to technical difficulties etc. Third time’s the charm?

From Progressive Press author bios:With a Cambridge science degree, Nick Kollerstrom has worked as a professor of physics. “Independent scholar and peace-activist Nick Kollerstrom has been working to tell the sober truth about the crimes of the powerful since his involvement in the Belgrano Enquiry and the London Nuclear War Tribunal in the eighties, and the Institute for Law and Peace and the World Court Project in the nineties. Terror on the Tube flows directly out of this same commitment to defend our diverse worldwide ‘Motherland’ of harmless noncombatants against terroristic fraternies of whatever nationality or ideological stripe.” — Keith Mothersson

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

In 2006 I was for all intents and purposes expelled from the American academy as a 9/11 heretic. The ADL was already calling me an antisemite, though at that point I was downplaying Israel’s role in the attacks on New York and Washington.

During the six-month media firestorm, ignited by Rep. Steve Nass and the Wisconsin Republican Party’s demand that the University fire me outright, U.W.-Madison Provost Patrick Farrell repeatedly advised me to decline interviews and lay low. I refused, instead opting to accept most interview requests and court controversy. I hoped that intelligent people in general, and academicians in particular, would hear about my academic freedom fight, support it, and take a second look at the self-evidently ridiculous official story of 9/11.

Though plenty of intelligent people did wake up to the 9/11 problem after seeing me debate Sean Hannity, I was disappointed by the tepid reaction of the professoriat. Most offered halfhearted support for my academic freedom, but few were willing to openly challenge the official story of 9/11. I suppose they didn’t want to find themselves in my position, raked over the coals of mostly-negative mainstream media attention. The few who did speak out, like William Woodward, also endured media attacks, albeit on a smaller scale than mine.

By the time Rep. Steve Nass and Fox News ambushed me in early July, 2006, over 100 professors had already signed on to Scholars for 9/11 Truth. I hoped and expected that the controversy over my case would quickly bring hundreds more onboard. Based on my experience with academic colleagues, I believed that more than a few of them were smart, cantankerous, and (hopefully) unlikely to put up with rank 9/11 b******t, once the issue had been called to their attention.

Herbert Feinstein: Recovering Mob Lawyer, Black Humorist

One of the smartest and most cantankerous academics I ever met was the late Herbert Feinstein, a scholar-fan of Mark Twain and Buster Keaton who taught comedy-related classes at San Francisco State University while I was collecting MAs and teaching there circa 1986-1993. Herb was fond of Racine’s line about how life is a comedy to those who think and a tragedy to those who feel. I shared his appreciation of humour noir, gallows humor, absurdist humor, and combinations thereof, and he gets some of the credit (or blame) for my penchant for satire.

Herb Feinstein was famously crotchety, not known for suffering fools gladly, and far from the most popular member of the SFSU faculty. He exuded inner torment and barely-veiled self-loathing, which seemed somehow inseparable from his charmingly dark sense of humor. I enjoyed his wit and gradually got to know him over the course of a couple of comedy classes.

Feinstein told me that he had worked in Hollywood and had firsthand knowledge of the sexual blackmail that goes on there. He said many A-list actors got their start in the porn industry, assured me that a great many such films were in private hands, and mentioned Sylvester Stallone. He made several allusions to his own bad experiences in that milieu. So I wasn’t surprised that his obituary included these lines:

He began practicing law at MCA in Los Angeles in the early ’50s, working for film studio boss Lew Wasserman, which is where Feinstein fostered interests and relationships which would span the course of his five decades of professional life. Perhaps it was the proximity of the mafia to the film business, perhaps his inner scholar calling, but Feinstein left Hollywood for the Bay Area in the mid-’50…

Feinstein’s inner pain and self-loathing, and the dark humor he treated it with, presumably stemmed in part from his experiences with the Hollywood (Jewish) mafia and the adjacent intelligence agency milieu. Having earned his BA from Columbia while still in his teens, Feinstein quickly picked up a Harvard law degree, served in Naval Intelligence, became a mob lawyer for LA kingpin Lew Wasserman…and then had some sort of non-lethal falling out with that world, moved to Berkeley, did a Ph.D. on Mark Twain’s legal affairs, and wound up teaching comedy at San Francisco State.

I never got a chance to talk to Feinstein about 9/11. Given his background and outlook, I assumed he probably wouldn’t be first in line to join Scholars for 9/11 Truth, so I didn’t reconnect with him. But looking back, I wish I had. He probably knew or suspected that Israel did it, though I doubt he would have wanted to say that in public.

Their Own Worst Enemies

Herb Feinstein’s outlook on life turned on his frequent observation that people are their own worst enemies. Irrationally self-destructive behavior, he believed, is so common as to be almost ubiquitous.

Feinstein’s “own worst enemies” worldview struck me, even then, as quintessentially Jewish. At the time (the 1980s) I had largely bought into the Jewish victim narrative, so I saw the Jewish penchant for dark humor about people digging their own graves as a response to the ubiquitous persecution that Jews had experienced for thousands of years. I figured Jews used gallows humor to laugh off their pain, and to wonder whether they were somehow bringing it on themselves.

Today, after further research, I’ve concluded that Jews have very definitely been bringing it on themselves. They really are their own worst enemies. Goy persecution stems from Jewish behavior, not some mysterious irrational Jew-hatred that would have persisted, for no reason, across every culture for millennia.

For a spectacular exhibition of Jews being their own worst enemies, look no further than the Jewish state of Israel. Its genocide of Gaza has long since exhausted any sympathy the uninformed may have felt in the wake of October 7, 2023, and is driving the irreversible delegitimization of the Zionist project.

Even more starkly, Israel’s June 13 attack on Iran—the culmination of Netanyahu’s decades-long campaign—has backfired spectacularly. The war had two goals: removing Iran’s “nuclear threat” and triggering regime change. Israel didn’t just fail to achieve those goals. It brought Iranian nuclear weapons much closer, and made regime change even less likely, than would have been the case in the absence of war. Iranians of all stripes have united behind the Supreme Leader and the Islamic Republican form of government. And a consensus is forming, not only in Iran but in nuclear nations including Russia, Pakistan, and North Koriea, that the Islamic Republic of Iran needs a nuclear weapon ASAP to deter further attacks.

Perhaps even worse for Israel’s prospects, the aborted war on Iran punctured the Zionist myth of invincibility. Iranian rockets rained down on strategic targets in such numbers that Netanyahu had to run to Trump for an exit. Had Iran wanted to destroy Israel’s life-supporting infrastructure it could have done so. Salim Mansur writes:

Iran possessed the capability to destroy the water desalination plants in Israel as much as the main power grids and reduce Israel into what Israelis have done to the people in Gaza. But Iran did not target the source of drinking water in Israel, nor the power grids. Would Iran have done so if the ceasefire was not agreed upon? I don’t think so. The red lines for Iran in a war imposed on Iranians are self-imposed based on their religious tradition…

The small Zionist settler colony squatting on stolen land has underlined its own vulnerability. It no longer has escalation dominance. Its nuclear deterrent is of dubious relevance given the mutual assured destruction that Iran can threaten with non-nuclear means (and which will likely be supplemented by nukes, whether homemade or purchased, in the not-so-distant future).

Israel’s current predicament is just a more acute version of its longstanding one: Who could ever have believed that the best way to protect Jews from the universal persecution they have always supposedly experienced would be to pack them all together in a small genocidal settler colony, surrounded by people who hate them? The Zionists who dreamed up that “solution” to their version of the Jewish Problem were quintessential examples of “their own worst enemies.”

Today, thanks to its ill-conceived genocide and war, Israel has undermined whatever chance it may have had of becoming a peaceful and prosperous regional country with an assured future. It is its own worst enemy on steroids. And its vision of “Hamas savages” is a self-projection. Israelis, who have made killer-rapists their national heroes, are the savages. Deep down inside, they know it. They hate themselves, and project that hate on the other. The Zionist Jew is his own worst enemy, in the sense that the unbearably evil enemy he fears is a disguised image of himself…a terrible truth that just makes the whole thing that much more unbearable.

Herb Feinstein sought to understand humans’ propensity for self-destruction by way of Sigmund Freud’s death wish. Herb wasn’t an ideologue, much less a card-carrying Freudian, but he did think the death wish hypothesis was one of the few serious attempts to explain the “own worst enemy” syndrome.

The Source of Self-Hating Jew Syndrome?

Today, a revisionist anti-Freud school holds that psychoanalytic woo-woo about kids wanting to have sex with their parents is itself a classic defense mechanism against the terrible truth that many children suffer all-too-real abuse. Jumping on that bandwagon, I propose that “self-hating Jew syndrome” is largely the product of circumcision. When the rabbi inflicts unspeakable torture on the week-old baby by taking a knife to the most sensitive part of the child’s anatomy, he isn’t just instilling lifelong PTSD in his victim: He is breaking the child’s “secure attachment” bond with its Jewish mother, who will spend the rest of her life overcompensating for having turned her baby over to a torturer.

Subjected to an unspeakable atrocity, his bond with his mother deeply wounded, the Jewish male baby grows up damaged, and first blames himself for his suffering. But gradually he is inculcated into the tribal belief that the evil aggressor, the boogieman-torturer whose awful image lingers in his unconscious memory, is the archetypal goy, the non-Jew, who has pursued and persecuted the poor innocent Jews across thousands of years and countless locations out of sheer unadulterated villainy.

A bizarre blend of that self-hate and other-hate persists, cements the Jewish tribe together, and manifests itself in the ghettos Jews build for themselves, including the genocidal horrorshow ghetto known as “Israel.” (Those who begin to recover from self-hatred by recognizing that the hate stems from the Jewish side, not the goyish one, are insulted as “self-hating Jews” by the ones who are still mired in hatred.)

My frequent radio guest Alan Hart, who passed away in 2018, titled his trilogy Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews. And while Alan Hart understood that the state of Israel was indeed the enemy of the Jews, I’m not sure he fully grasped how the Jewish State exemplifies the larger Jewish genius for being one’s own worst enemy.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Tomorrow is the Fourth of July, and a real American patriot is doing his part to jump-start American Revolution 2.0.

Jonathan Lake, whose ancestors fought in the Revolution, used to work for DARPA: “I was more on the fundamental physics side of things, because I didn’t want to build bombs. But I did fundamental research supporting microgyroscopes for positioning systems.” He got involved in pro-Palestine activism in 2014. The Mossad messed with him (details below). Today, July 3, 2025, is his fourth day hunger striking outside FBI headquarters in Dallas. He’s demanding that the FBI prosecute all Epstein co-conspirators…very possibly including the Israeli-controlled president of the United States.

Jonathan Lake:

I have initiated a hunger strike. I have a bunch of signs. I can read you what some of them say. My hunger strike is pointed directly at the Epstein co-conspirators, which is what I think is primarily the reason the U.S. government is so tied to Israel is their intelligence operations with blackmail and pedophilia. And so my demand for my hunger strike is that they prosecute all Epstein co-conspirators. And I am on a road, not on FBI property, but where they have to pass me to get to their headquarters. And I just have signs that say, “FBI, do your job.” “FBI, prosecute Epstein co-conspirators.” And then I have a sign that says, “Mossad terrorizes American women and children.” I have other signs that say “Mossad rapes American children.” I'm slowly building up to more aggressive signs. My most aggressive sign is “Mossad would rape your daughter too.”

Transcript:

Welcome to Truth Jihad Audio Visual. I'm Kevin Barrett back in beautiful Saidia, Morocco (after traveling through Spain on a project for the Al-Andalus Tribune). I’m not in my office, I’m in my living room, as you can see from the background. The background's better looking than I am at this point, I'm sure. And the reason I'm here is that I might have a chance to break some news.

Chatting about what everybody already knows about and just spouting off our opinions is all well and good. Bringing on the kind of cool guests that I bring on is well and good. But today we might actually be breaking some news, telling you something you don't already know.

Jonathan Lake just contacted me. He tells me he's a DARPA whistleblower who had a run-in with Israel and specifically the Mossad while he was working for DARPA. He’s now doing a hunger strike…I believe it’s in front of the FBI offices in Austin, Texas. Did I get that right, Jonathan?

Almost. Dallas, Texas is the FBI headquarters for the whole state of Texas. Also, it's where Kennedy was killed. So there's some symbolic significance here, too.

Yeah, it's a good place to do it. So I guess we could just basically we could begin here by telling us about how you got to this place and specifically how you were working for DARPA and then how that ended.

Sure. So I was just your kind of normal Ph.D. electrical engineering grad student. And I honestly I first became aware of politics through the issue of climate change. I'm a scientist, so I read a lot of scientific papers. And I heard about like Dr. James Hansen starting to get arrested. I started to realize, wow, the climate change is a really big issue. And then I formed Fossil Free UCLA and was a pretty effective activist for them. I was making a lot of progress. We actually ended up getting one of the largest fossil fuel divestment campaign victories for the whole UC system back in the 2014 to 2017 time frame.

But unfortunately, we were the first climate org, my little local one at UCLA, to show solidarity with the Students for Justice in Palestine, because we started making connections between the climate crisis and justice in Palestine, because militarism is a huge source of fossil fuel emissions and blows out our budget so we can't do other things for the climate.

Yeah militarism is really the biggest threat one way or another. Training AI how to kill people: Hey, that's a great idea what could possibly go wrong?

Yeah. And so I was actually working on positioning systems. I was just a kid. I didn't actually work on anything real. I was more on the fundamental physics side of things because I didn't want to build bombs. But I did fundamental research supporting microgyroscopes for positioning systems. I left that field because I knew I didn't want to be in the military-industrial complex. So I ended up working for Apple, doing some other things.

But going back to my story. Back in 2014 is when I first became aware of the situation in Gaza, because there was the Gaza War, if you remember, back in 2014.

Yeah, there was the mowing the lawn in 2008 into January 2009. And again in 2014. I’m probably missing a couple of these regular massacres of Palestinian civilians that the Zionists carry out.

Yeah. And so that's when there was a lot of activism around that at UCLA on USA's campus. But I was like kind of shocked because no climate org would support them. And then we had a successful fossil free campaign and we all got together and we got in a group and we voted. Do we want to support them? And we said yes. And basically resulting from that is when the Mossad decided to target me because I was a co-leader of that movement.

Okay, and how do you know they targeted you, and what did they do?

So there was a woman who was actually introduced to me through my mom, which is so nefarious. It turned out that she had been ritually abused, probably originally by her family, her parents. But then basically the Mossad connection comes in. There are always gray areas. It's always hard to know exactly what's going on because it's like people working for people working for people. But it became clear to me over time because I realized when she came into my life, what she did to my life…eventually I was bankrupted. I was terrorized. I actually ended up with PTSD. Because if someone is exposed to satanic ritual abuse…she had horrible symptoms where she'd just be screaming in the middle of the night with night terrors. And once I realized that she was screaming in the middle of the night because she's been abused all her life, I started to internalize that. So I got pretty traumatized. And only like 10 years down the line now, I actually was even willing to face what had all happened and kind of put it all together. But back to the connection of the massage…

Quick question. So she she told you about her satanic ritual abuse background?

Well, what she told me specifically, which I guess I should just try to stick to that as much as I can, is that her first memory in life was getting abused in a bathtub. That's the wording that she used. And then she alluded to the fact that she had been basically passed around from a bunch of different people and no one protected her, including the police.

Were her parents part of a cult or something?

I think so. I don't know. That's my suspicion, yes. And then the interesting thing is she then, we ended up breaking up. She left me because I started getting suspicious of her, because she started talking about how she had…first she was disrupting my life by jumping out of the car, doing these crazy things. She also had physical symptoms where she'd lose her vision. And it was just clear that she was suffering from something really really serious and that was disrupting my life,

Then by the end of that…I was actually watching a documentary on the truth of 9/11, believe it or not, the Ken O'Keefe documentary. I still remember that night vividly. And she basically…we had a discussion and somehow it came up that she had dated a pro-Palestinian protester before me. And then I started questioning her about that. And the second I started questioning her about that, because that sounded really suspicious to me, I started making connections like, why are you in my life? Then she got up and just left me. That's when the relationship ended.

Interesting.

Yeah.

And for any people in the audience who think this sounds improbable, actually, I've had experiences in my life that would suggest that it's maybe not so improbable. For one thing, I was hired once (in the mid-1980s in San Francisco) to transcribe interviews of women who danced in a strip joint, and two of them both recounted explicitly their histories of kind of satanic cult ritual abuse. Interestingly, they were both from Jewish backgrounds. And aside from that, I also remember that when I was shopping around an article about the JFK assassination to various magazines, as a college journalist in 1978, I published this piece on the intelligence community killing JFK in the Daily Cardinal in Madison, Wisconsin. But I shopped it around to various large magazines, got some interested responses, including from the Progressive magazine.

Anyway, right after I was doing that, this crazy woman showed up at the co-op where I was living. She announced that she had a chip in her brain and that her job was that she was controlled by the CIA and her purpose in life was to target people for the CIA to kill. She just kind of randomly showed up at this dinner where our hippie co-op would allow people to come to dinner and see if they wanted to live there. Anyway so she kind of honed in on me. And I certainly did not start any relationship with her. But I got to know her out of curiosity. And it turned out that she was from a big time political family in Oklahoma and had come to law school in Madison and gotten involved with a major dissident, a guy who was the head of a local underground newspaper. And she started hearing voices in her head telling her to kill this guy. Well, fortunately, she didn't. My journalism professor mentor told me, quote, “Kevin, they're just f*****g with you.”

So the idea that intelligence communities would screw with people in this kind of way doesn't strike me as implausible. And then my ex-CIA friend Gordon Duff has described similar things as something that intelligence communities actually do. So, yeah, your story is far from implausible.

Just kind of connecting it back to the Mossad…because I didn't originally think of the Mossad. I didn't really know that much about them. I studied them very deeply after this experience. But what ended up happening…it was like this random event where this woman… I'll just call her E, the person who came into my life, she left and then she stole my car. She came back in the apartment just to steal my car.

She stole my car. And then I basically lost contact with her. She never talked to me again. So I was left without a car trying to figure s**t out. Sorry if I shouldn't curse. But then I... Basically was trying to get in contact with her. So I started the only way I knew. I knew where she worked. I knew where she lived. So I was able to put just notes on her car. And first I was like…I had just found out about the ritual abuse. This was all new information to me. So I was concerned for her, as any normal person would be when someone tells you something that crazy and dramatic. And so I like wrote notes to her, like asking her if she's okay. If she needed help. And also like, hey, we need to figure out this lease on our apartment because I'm not going to keep renting the same place. I don't need it if we're not living together.

But then a local cop shows up at my mom's house and gives me a restraining order. And so the restraining order was saying I was stalking her because I was trying to get in contact with her because I needed her signature. And they were taking me to court. And they got somehow fast-tracked to the court, which this whole thing is a little suspicious how easily it was for them to get in front of a judge. But fortunately, the judge took one look at the case and read all the documents that they had submitted for the stalking charges and basically spent the whole hour lecturing her on how this was a complete waste of the court's time because I hadn't done anything to her. I hadn't threatened her. I had done nothing wrong in that case.

But what ended up happening was I actually got recommended a lawyer by one of my mom's friends. And that lawyer is the one who was actually working for a Mossad agent previously in a divorce case. And that is where the connection came in. And the reason I knew he was Mossad is his ex-wife came to my mom's house crying because she was my mom's friend. That's how they knew each other. That's probably how the connection started originally. One of my mom's friends recommended the lawyer.

So I got pulled into this, restraining order case where they had E on one side, and then it had my lawyer and me on the other, but the lawyer was actually previously associated with the Mossad. And so once I heard that story…And then he also charged me $10,000, which was ridiculous for what he did, because he didn't do much.

This does kind of cut against the grain of the conventional wisdom that if you're in trouble, you should look for a Jewish lawyer.

Right. Not the one that works for Mossad, I don't think.

So basically, they kind of threw chaos into your life and messed with you. And that's plausible. You're working for DARPA. You're the kind of person that might be worth it to them to screw with, I suppose. So how does this lead you to your current hunger strike at FBI headquarters in Dallas?

Well, you can imagine, you know, this is a pretty dramatic action. But so the climate crisis has only gotten worse. My hometown has burned down. The town I was supposed to move to with my ex-wife got hit by Hurricane Helene, Asheville, North Carolina. And so I was left looking around being like, man, this world is really falling apart. And militarism and the climate crisis… We actually need to solve the problems in front of us instead of running from them.

When it first happened, I went straight to the FBI because I was like, you know, this is messed up. I come from a very privileged background. So I felt back then like law enforcement would have my back. They did not. They just completely ignored me, which is not surprising given the circumstances. But then I basically bottled this up for 10 years until…like I said, all that dramatic climate change stuff has affected my life. And I realized that we have to face these problems head on.

So...Now, I have initiated a hunger strike. I have a bunch of signs. I can read you what some of them say. My hunger strike is pointed directly at the Epstein co-conspirators, which is what I think is primarily the reason the U.S. government is so tied to Israel is their intelligence operations with blackmail and pedophilia. And so my demand for my hunger strike is that they prosecute all Epstein co-conspirators. And I am on a road, not on FBI property, but where they have to pass me to get to their headquarters. And I just have signs that say, “FBI, do your job.” “FBI, prosecute Epstein co-conspirators.” And then I have a sign that says, “Mossad terrorizes American women and children.” I have other signs that say “Mossad rapes American children.” I'm slowly building up to more aggressive signs. My most aggressive sign is “Mossad would rape your daughter too.”

Wow.

I haven't done that one yet.

So, Jonathan, I think that most Americans would strongly support you in your demand for the prosecution of the Epstein co-conspirators and clients, possibly up to and including the current president of the United States,as well as past ones. Your demand is far from fringe. That's actually pretty mainstream.

There's a rumor, that this whole promise to release the Epstein clients list that we heard from the Trump campaign ended up not happening because Trump is on that list. And that would certainly explain his behavior with Israel. What do you think of that theory?

You’ve got to follow what makes sense logically. We can't lose our sense of just logical thinking. And I think you're absolutely spot on. That's exactly, I would agree with that a hundred percent.

Any poll is going to show that probably 75 percent of Americans would basically agree with you, on both sides of the aisle, or the split between the blues and the reds. I would think that the mainstream media probably doesn't really want to cover you.

No one has picked me up, unfortunately, except you, which I thank you so much, Kevin. You are a blessing from God for me right now.

Well, thanks, Jonathan. I actually would have thought that the alternative media community might be interested. Mainstream, of course, won't.

It's only been a few days. This is day four. So there might be some more people. But so far, it's been pretty much radio silence.

Read the rest of the transcript by clicking “transcript” above the video image at my Substack.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link FFWN link

My friend Gordon Duff—a Marine Corps/CIA black ops vet and master gunsmith with an amazing firearms collection—once told me: “I don’t mind killing people, I just got tired of killing the wrong people.” The always-quotable Gordon, with his darkly humorous hyperbole, was making a serious point: If you work for the American national security state, your job mostly entails threatening and killing relatively good people on behalf of seriously bad ones.

Donald Trump, the pathetic slave of genocidal Israeli gangsters, has taken that irony to the next level with his hilariously insane threats against Sayyid Ali Khamenei, the Supreme Leader of Iran. Even the ultra-Zionist Daily Beast, inured (as we all are) to Trump’s ever-escalating lunacy, found Trump’s rabid slobbering a wee bit over the top.

Here is a screenshot of Trump’s rabid rant demanding that Ayatollah Khamenei thank him for “SAVING HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH.”

Trump’s crazed, thuggish, childishly illiterate screed is so bizarrely wrong on so many levels it’s hard to envision it as an actual statement by a head of state. First and most obviously, that’s not the way to address a revered religious scholar who is seven years your senior and far ahead of you in IQ points, educational attainments, manners and morals, and general gravitas. If Trump’s intention were to make himself a laughing stock, while permanently alienating not just the government of Iran but all Iranians, not to mention most of the world’s population, he could hardly have crafted a more perfect diatribe.

Trump is especially incensed that Iran’s Supreme Leader is claiming victory over Israel and the US. But the Rahbar’s claim is accurate. The war was supposedly aimed at denying Iran nuclear weapons. Yet it vastly increased the likelihood of Iran’s developing and deploying such weapons. As I wrote for a forthcoming American Free Press article:

The indisputable reality is that the Israeli-American war on Iran—or on its nuclear program, as JD Vance insists—has backfired. If there had been no war, and instead Trump had revived the JCPOA nuclear agreement, Iran would have continued developing its civilian nuclear program while deliberately choosing not to build nuclear weapons. Iran hates nuclear weapons for religious reasons, and does not want to build them.

But now that Iran has been viciously bushwhacked by Israel, and stabbed in the back by the White House and the International Atomic Energy Agency—both of which conspired to assist Israel’s sneak attack—it is almost certain to build and/or purchase a nuclear weapon in short order to deter such attacks. Putin’s advisor Dmitry Medvedev has stated: “A number of countries are ready to directly supply Iran with their own nuclear warheads.” And now Iran will conceal its nuclear program from the IAEA, which by conspiring with Israel to attack NPT-compliant Iran has made itself irrelevant.

The Israeli and American aggressors also hoped to force an Iranian surrender entailing the end of Iran’s rocket program and relations with regional allies. That, too, is off the table. Iran’s rockets proved a formidable deterrent to Israel’s aggression, forcing the Israelis to run to the Americans for help.

And regime change, the Zio-Americans’ unstated objective, is further away then ever:

Iranians’ accurate perception that Iran won the war (or its first round) by decimating Israel’s strategic sites and preventing Israel from achieving any of its objectives has generated unprecedented levels of Iranian patriotic unity.

Trump’s crazed threat, coupled with an insistence that the Rahbar thank him for saving him from “A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH,” hilariously misreads his interlocutor. The Rahbar of Iran is 86 years old and has spent much of his life in courageous and honorable resistance to Zionist genocide and thuggish US imperialism. As a thoughtful and pious Muslim, he would be overjoyed at the prospect of martyrdom at the hands of Great Satan Trump or Little Satan Netanyahu, which would guarantee him a place in the highest levels of Paradise. (Shia Islam, the Rahbar’s school of thought, particularly valorizes martyrdom.)

Obviously Trump is messing with the wrong guy.

The West Asian leader Trump should threaten, or better yet execute, is the wanted-for-genocide war criminal Benjamin Mileikowsky, who operates under the alias “Bibi Netanyahu.” Mileikowsky is a gangster like Trump who knows or suspects he’s going to hell. Such people, who have made worldly pleasures their false god, fear death with all the fear in their cravenly rusted-out hearts.

Trump and Netanayhu—the dumb big gangster/satan and the shrewder little one—speak the same language: ThugSpeak. If Trump issued a crude threat against Netanyahu, Bibi would be alarmed, because he greatly fears death, and operates on Trump’s bullying wavelength. What’s more, everything Trump falsely says about Iran and the Rahbar would be true if he were saying it about Israel and Bibi. Here is the corrected version of Trump’s rant:

Why would the so-called “Prime Minister,” Benjamin “Bibi Netanyahu” Mileikowsky, of the war torn Country of “Israel,” say so blatantly and foolishly that he won the War with Iran, when he knows his statement is a lie, it is not so. As a man of Talmudic faith, I guess he is supposed to lie. His Country was decimated, his evil Strategic Sites were OBLITERATED, and I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life. I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH, and he does not have to say, “THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP!” In fact, in the final act of the War, I demanded that Iran refrain from firing a very large group of rockets, which were heading directly to Tel Aviv, looking for a big day, perhaps the final knockout! Tremendous damage would have ensued, and many Israelis would have been killed. It was going to be the biggest attack of the War, by far. But instead of thanks and a promise to quit starting wars and committing genocide, I get hit with the opposite and immediately dropped all US aid to “Israel.” “Israel” has to get back into the World Order flow, give up its nuclear weapons, apologize for killing JFK and doing 9/11 and committing genocide, or things will only get worse for them. They are always so angry, hostile, genocidal, and unhappy, and look at what it has gotten them - A burned out, blown up Country, with no future, a decimated Military, a horrible Economy, and DEATH all around them. They have no hope, and it will only get worse! I wish the leadership of Israel would realize that you often get more with HONEY than you do with VINEGAR. PEACE!!!

If Bibi won’t fold, Trump—who thanks to 9/11 has the authority to sign any extrajudicial death warrant he so desires—could issue an order to “terminate Bibi’s command…with extreme prejudice.” Though a post-Netanyahu Israel would still be genocidal (“Israel” is just a euphemism for the genocide of Palestine) and doomed (the world and especially the region have seen enough of the Genocidal Zionist Entity and will put it to bed one way or another) the unraveling of Jewish supremacism in Occupied Palestine could conceivably happen more quickly and peacefully if the US president had the courage to take out Bibi with great fanfare, charge Israel with a long list of crimes against America including the Lavon Affair, the Kennedy assassinations, the USS Liberty massacre, and 9/11, declare an emergency, round up Israel-first traitors, and put an end to 61 years of Zionist-occupied governance.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

We are traveling the length of historic al-Andalus, from Barcelona to Zaragoza to today’s Andalusia (southern Spain) asking ordinary people about convivencia. What is convivencia? It’s a friendlier term for “coexistence” that was originally used to describe the strikingly positive relationship between Muslim, Christian, and Jewish communities in Islamic Spain a.k.a. Al-Andalus.

Read the rest of the introduction, and the transcript of the interview, at the Al-Andalus Tribune Substack

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com