Truth Jihad Radio

Convivencia interview #1: Zaragoza, Spain.

We are traveling the length of historic al-Andalus, from Barcelona to Zaragoza to today’s Andalusia (southern Spain) asking ordinary people about convivencia. What is convivencia? It’s a friendlier term for “coexistence” that was originally used to describe the strikingly positive relationship between Muslim, Christian, and Jewish communities in Islamic Spain a.k.a. Al-Andalus. Today's interviewee is Hamid from Ghana.

Read the full transcript at the Al-Andalus Tribune or Al-Andalus Tribune Substack.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Dissociated Press Rumble video link

David “Dadi” Barnea, chief of the Israeli Mossad, has issued a chilling threat to Sen. Ted Cruz in the wake of Cruz’s humiliation on the Tucker Carlson show.

During the Carlson interview, Cruz admitted that he knows nothing whatsoever about Iran, and probably couldn’t even find it on a map, but wants to send Americans there to die on behalf of his controllers in Israel.

Barnea, in his capacity as acting head of the Mossad’s Division of Pedophile Blackmail (DPB), messaged Cruz on his special Israeli-made beeper: “Hey schmuck, you are making us look bad. Learn 3rd grade social studies Iran material NOW or we release the child sex tapes.” Cruz responded by holding the beeper close to his ear to listen closely in case it was ticking. Satisfied that it was not, the Texas Senator drove to a nearby elementary school to sit in on a social studies class before raping his 8-year-old classmates.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

As I write this on Sunday, June 16, Iran has been pounding Israel all night and into the morning. Videos abound of Iranian missiles destroying Israeli anti-missile sites among other targets.

Iran and Israel have been escalating, trading attacks on each other’s energy facilities and scientific sites. As usual, the genocidal Zionists are the aggressors. Israel reacted to Iran’s initial (Friday night) retaliatory rocket barrage against military targets by upping the ante and bombing Iranian energy installations including South Pars, the world’s largest natural gas field. Iran retaliated by striking Israel’s main energy source, the Bazan Oil Refinery Complex in Haifa. Apparently Iran has begun using a few of its thousands of new-generation hypersonic missiles, after previously limiting itself to firing 30-year-old models.

Another notable Iranian strike targeted the Weizmann Institute, a key developer of the genocide technologies used against Gaza, as well as high-tech weapons used against Iran. The strike came as retaliation for Israel’s attack on the Sepand building in Tehran.

Though Trump-n-Yahoo claim the purpose of the war is to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, the outcome will likely be the exact opposite. Iran would have preferred not to build nukes. It would have adhered to the JCPOA had Trump not shredded it. And even without the JCPOA Iran would have abided by its NPT obligations and its internal anti-WMD fatwa. But now, in the wake of Trump’s treacherous complicity in Israel’s criminal attack, and the complete destruction of international law in the wake of the Gaza genocide, it’s clear that Iran has no choice but to acquire a nuclear arsenal. The only question now is the timeline and details, which nobody outside of the select few involved will know about until the demonstration explosion happens somewhere in southeastern Iran. (Billions of us would prefer to see it happen in downtown Tel Aviv.)

Selection from the opening of this week’s False Flag Weekly News

Oliver Boyd-Barrett: But the absolute hypocrisy with which the Iran situation is generally talked about, the utter absurdity of the idea that it is Iran that represents a nuclear threat in the Middle East, whereas in fact right almost almost next door Israel has possibly as many as 250 nuclear warheads and hasn't ever signed the the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which Iran has signed. So Israel does not get regular visits from the IAEA, the United Nations regulatory, nuclear regulatory agency. No one knows what's going on with respect to Israel's vast nuclear weapons stockpile. It's totally absurd to talk about Iran, which so far as we know—I certainly believe that Iran has no nuclear weapon at this point in time.

They're starting to say, or some of the people in particular in Iran are saying, that maybe we need one now. Look at what happens when you don't have one. Well, that is true. That is a very important argument. It's the argument that applies to North Korea, which discovered that by having its own nuclear defense, it has become far less vulnerable to US and Western harassment.

So it could very well be that the final outcome of what's going on today may very well be that the Iranian administration will no longer be able to prevent the enrichment of uranium to the 90% level that's required for the development of a nuclear system.

Kevin Barrett: It seems like the Iranians have no motivation to cooperate anymore. Why shouldn't they just withdraw from the treaty?

Yes, that is certainly true. The problem is that if Iran was to develop a nuclear weapon at this point in time… I still think that it is still the position of the Supreme Leader that at least the use of nuclear weapons is sinful. A very worthy position, by the way, which I fully applaud and commend. It's possible, however, that one could get around the fatwa simply by developing nuclear weapons on the, not on the pretext, but on the very good argument that the idea that they could be used would provide some kind of defense for the Iranian people against Israeli and United States aggression.

And of course, there are tactical nuclear weapons now too that don't have the same moral repercussions as the strategic weapons, the really big ones.

Yes, maybe. But going back to the original point, the potential nuclear threat (from Iran) is an absurdity. And I have argued in a recent post that Iran made a mistake in entering into the JCPOA negotiations and the agreement that was originally come to, I believe, in 2015, and which Trump, in his first administration, sabotaged—that Iran allowed itself to get into this conversation in the first place, I think was a mistake, because it lent legitimacy to this propaganda, this disinformation, that was being spread by the West, that Iran was actually a nuclear threat that actually intended to acquire a nuclear weapon and would therefore be a threat to Israel.

Arguably, Oliver, if the US had held up its end of the deal, which it was sort of expected to, if Trump hadn't been elected, then quite likely the deal would have held, wouldn't it have?

Yes, I think there's some merit in that argument. But if we were to accept that argument, I think then we have to take the position that there is something truly exceptional about Trump.

And yeah, let's look at the argument for that. We have Trump's role here was to lull the Iranians into completely fake negotiations and then to be supposedly telling them to hold off when, in fact, he was conferring on the plans for a strike. And he has actually come right out and admitted it and boasted that the negotiating partners he was dealing with are all dead. and joking about them not dying of COVID. I mean, that's a pretty bad look for the president of the United States. He looks like a psychopath and a liar, and nobody will ever deal with him seriously again. Iran probably should have learned that lesson a long time ago.

Yes, it should have learned that lesson, but it should have learned that lesson not only about Trump, I'm afraid. There may be some unusual characteristics about the way in which Trump executes U.S. policy. And although in the first few months of the second Trump administration, we have been left wondering about whether he was actually different, that he was a peacemaker as he claimed to be, and that we could expect something really different. But although he may be different in his tactics of maintaining U.S. hegemony, I think the reality is that Trump is absolutely the same as everybody else over the past two or three or four decades. Trump represents US empire, represents US hegemony.

And we've wasted a few months trying to establish whether he is different, whether he might be looking to a different kind of world order that might be based on some reinvention of great power competition. I think not. I think now we see the reality in Europe, we see the reality with respect to Iran. And the reality is that Trump is an imperialist. He leads an imperial nation and part of the agenda of this imperial nation, as is several times being made U.S. policy, the Bush policy of full spectrum dominance. That policy has never been rescinded. That is U.S. policy, that it will not tolerate significant competition to its power or influence, either globally or regionally. People have got to take that seriously. And instead of still being bamboozled by these rather simplistic tactics of pretending that “we're really interested in peace negotiations” and “we're really looking forward to Sunday because on Sunday we're going to resolve all these difficulties between us.” And then in the meantime, allowing Israel to attack when Iran should have, frankly, engaged in a preemptive attack in the light of the many reports that Israel was about to launch its attack. And it should also have received credible intelligence from Russia or from many of its other allies, that it needed to wake up and stop pretending that it's playing a game of being a civilized partner in a bid for peaceful global harmony. We've got to get out of that mindset.

And unfortunately, too many of the nations that are seeking greater independence and seeking to assert their sovereignty through the BRICS and through other international alliances, too often they are failing to understand the basic principle to geopolitics in this moment of time.

Okay, well, so we saw the initial reports turn out to have been exaggerated. The Iranian nuclear sites are somewhat scratched, but not much more than that, it appears. And then, of course, Iran reacted with True Promise 3. And I think some Iranian legislators are saying they should have done this a long time ago. This apparently was a much heavier barrage against Tel Aviv than True Promise 1 or 2. And so we can look at some of those images here. These are images of destruction in Tel Aviv…

(Read the full transcript by clicking “transcript” above the video image at my Substack.)

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

This interview was conducted Thursday, just hours before Israel launched its criminal attack on Iran. Stay tuned for updates. -KB

Mr. Kevin Barrett…we might be going into war. Do you think the U.S. citizens right now, the U.S. population, is ready to sacrifice many of their sons and daughters once again to go to war and die for the Israeli regime?

No, and I think this is a huge miscalculation on the part of the Zionist element in the American administration, and indeed the Congress. They seem to imagine that somehow they can gain enough popular support for a war that they can credibly threaten Iran. And I think that's not the case. Neither of the two sides of the American red-versus-blue schism is the slightest bit interested in another big war for Israel. Obviously, the blue side, that is the Democrats who are opposed to Trump, are not going to be following the baboon in the White House like he's some kind of great leader. We see a huge movement now rising up against “King Trump,” the “we don't want a king” movement. And we see California getting close to wanting to secede from the union rather than allow Trump to send federal troops in to occupy California and have his way with the immigrants.

So the U.S. is on the brink of falling apart. There might be some in the Zionist circles of the Trump administration who imagine that somehow Trump could play the role of a macho, fearless leader and try to unite the country in a big war. But I think they're probably even a minority within the administration. The majority of Trump support comes from people who see through these wars for Israel, who are sick of them, who don't want more losing wars, like the catastrophes in Iraq and Afghanistan under the neocons.

So neither side is interested in any such war, and there's no way that any interest or commitment to such a war could ever be sustained. It'll never even really get off the ground. But even if they were able to whip up some kind of hysteria, if some Americans, a lot of Americans, suddenly died on Mideast military bases, I think that that rally around the flag effect would last about five seconds.

So the U.S. is not prepared for any major war. The Israelis, unfortunately, are. And they're the ones who are trying to drag the U.S. into yet another disastrous war for Israel, which would certainly be lost and would probably be the final nail in the coffin of the U.S. empire.

Israelis have already cost the Americans $8 trillion in their 9-11 wars after Israel blew up the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and falsely blamed Muslims to drag the United States into a series of wars whose only beneficiary was the state of Israel. And a great many Americans have now seen through this, including a lot of Trump supporters. So the idea that Israel is going to get away with finishing off the American empire by dragging it into another huge war is really a non-starter.

So I don't think it's actually the Americans who hold the cards or the Israelis who hold the cards here. It's really Iran that holds the cards. And behind Iran, Russia and China, who are really the number one or number two and number one militaries in the world, respectively.

So if it turns to all-out war, this will be the last war that fully brings down the American empire. But I don't think it will. I don't think the Americans are that stupid.

Okay, let's hope you're right. Let's just hold on. I'm going to give our viewers a roundup of what we're discussing. If you're just joining us, you're watching Press TV's rolling coverage of the recent IAEA anti-Iran resolution that was just passed. by the Board of Governors of the IAEA. Let's just give you some updates on that recent story. Let's just give you some updates on that recent story. The foreign ministry and the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran in a joint statement have condemned the resolution and they said that Iran has always stood by its commitment. The statement said the IAEA report has time and again confirmed this. The statement further said that Western countries undermine the IAEA's credibility for their own political ends. It also stated that the resolution is one-sided and has no technical or legal basis. On Thursday, the U.N. nuclear watchdog approved the resolution accusing Iran of noncompliance with the agency. It claimed that Tehran has failed to fully cooperate with the agency. The resolution was submitted on Tuesday by the U.S. and the E3, which is France, U.K. and Germany, and we are covering that for you. with some of our analysts who are joining us.

Let me go back to Dhaka, where we have Greg Seaman joining us. Greg, I want to look at the aspects of this, which is that the IAEA, for the most part, serves the purpose of being a nuclear watchdog. And if you're a nuclear watchdog, it means you have to be neutral, at least that is what we are told. However, there is no neutrality in the statement that we've had. I want to look at the back and forth that has been going on because the IAEA does know from experience that if you give an anti-Iran resolution, Iran usually responds by limiting IAEA's ability to inspect or increasing its centrifuges. So what purpose does this new resolution serve? What are they trying to achieve by it?

Israel needs to get US to support it in any war with Iran because Israel has insufficient military force capability and capacity. It can commit a genocide against unarmed civilians, but a military force the size of Iran's is well out of the question. So this comes to the point that war is politics by another means. And so if we look at it, this is, I think, the beginning of the... basis to try and justify and legitimise a war. Just like they did with Iraq, and just like they did with the lies about Libya, about Syria, and if we look even earlier about Yugoslavia, lies and these false condemnations always proceed.

So this is the politics which is meant to facilitate the war. And the only way the war will be facilitated is if it's seen as justified and legitimate. And like your speaker said before, the American gentleman, the American public are not going to be happy with this, because they've just come out of 20-odd years of what they called endless wars, which cost a lot of blood, a lot of treasure, and for nothing.

And so they would see this as an extension of those endless wars. And it's very hard to justify. That does not mean that the US and Zionist forces will go with the public will and desire. They can always go against it like they have in the past. And so, yeah, I mean, this is how I see it. It's the beginning of the road to try and justify something which cannot be justified under normal conditions. Because as has been said by yourself and a number of speakers, you still have ongoing negotiations where Oman is the mediator.

And I mean...The US doesn't do diplomacy anymore. they do economic warfare, they do bullying, they do regime changes, but they do not do diplomacy.

Kevin, the same question that I posed to the previous guests, I want to see if you can also handle a little bit of that for us, because we've seen the repeatedly every time this anti-Iran resolutions are taken or whenever an anti-Iran decision is taken, Iran also responds by increasing its nuclear capability, by increasing the centrifuges, by gaining a greater knowledge base that is pushing it closer to the very thing they are trying to prevent it from. What is the whole point of this back and forth? Why isn't it possible to have reasonable middle ground negotiations where you give and you take and peace reigns? What is the point of this repeated anti-Iran rhetoric coming from the IAEA or some of the other UN agencies that are in charge as nuclear watchdogs?

The real source of all of this is the genocidal extremist administration in Israel. Netanyahu has devoted his entire political career to dragging the United States into a campaign to try to basically destroy the region on behalf of Israel, paving the way for what the extremists in israel believe would be their expansion to and perhaps even beyond the borders of their so-called biblical Greater Israel, which goes from the Nile to the Euphrates rivers. Ultimately, they are targeting for genocide Egyptians, Syrians, Lebanese, Saudis, Jordanians, and even perhaps some Turks.

So this extremist administration in Israel has a certain amount of support planted throughout the West, by virtue of the Jewish Zionist oligarchs who dominate the commanding heights of Western finance and media. And certainly they're not all on precisely the same page. Some of those people are not Greater Israel fanatics. But Netanyahu has staked his claim and made his career by working with the Greater Israel fanatics, like these crazy people in his cabinet. And his political career now depends on fleeing forward into ever wider war in the region.

And the brakes on that process have been applied by realists in the American foreign policy establishment. They stopped a prospective war on Iran back in 2007, when Ambassador Gwyneth Todd has revealed that she was part of an internal effort by Americans, sane Americans, to stop a plan that was supported by the neoconservative Dick Cheney to sink an American ship and blame it on Iran.

So this has been going on for quite a while. Netanyahu and his people are totally behind it. And the question of why the more realistic voices, both in the United States and in Europe, apparently cannot muster the courage and the wisdom and the strength to stand against it, is probably going to be a mystery for quite some time.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

USG whistleblower Richard Cook begins his new essay: “I agree with those who say that the riots which have begun in Los Angeles are the start of a ‘color revolution’ against the US government.” But what’s the endgame? Destruction of the American Republic to pave the way for a British-globalist bankster dictatorship? Or will it be a specifically Jewish-Zionist dictatorship? Tune in, listen, and draw your own conclusions.

Read the transcript of this interview by clicking “transcript” above the video image at my Substack.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link FFWN link

What was a Holocaust survivor doing at a pro-genocide demonstration? That was one of the questions raised by media reports out of Boulder, Colorado last week. According to those reports, a Jewish-Zionist “return the hostages” demonstration—meaning a thinly-disguised celebration of Israel’s genocidal slaughter of tens or hundreds of thousands of Gazaoui women and children—was attacked by a man wielding a flame-thrower and molotov cocktails. And then the Jews hit PR gold. As it turned out, an alleged “Holocaust survivor” whose initials fortuitously happen to be B.S., was, as the headlines put it, “Burned in Boulder.”

Burned, as in completely incinerated? She doesn’t look injured in interviews. Does this woman carry a genetic trait allowing complete recuperation from severe burns, even out-and-out cremation, to the point that she survived total immolation twice, the first time after being “burned in Auschwitz” and the second after being “burned in Boulder”? I quickly cranked out a four-paragraph satire:

Genocide-Supporting Holocaust Survivor Re-Incinerated in Boulder Attack

Dissociated Press

An unidentified pro-genocide Holocaust (TM) survivor was re-incinerated Sunday in Boulder, Colorado by an anti-genocide activist. According to a report from ABC News that is nearly impossible to satirize, the Holocaust (TM) survivor underwent a horrific experience during World War II: He was gassed to death, buried in swamp alongside millions of other bodies, then dug up, cremated, and re-buried alongside the millions of other waterlogged cremated bodies in a mass grave that has never been located.

After surviving such a horrific experience, Jewish groups claim, it seems deeply unfair that this poor schmuck should once again be incinerated, this time while participating in a pro-genocide demonstration.

“People who attack pro-genocide demonstrations are evil terrorists,” wrote Leo Terrel of the Justice Department’s Antisemitism Task Force. “Imagine a German attacking a ‘gas the Jews’ demonstration in Berlin in 1943! Would Hitler have put up with that? I don’t think so! And neither will we! Sig heil!”

The Anti-Defamation League says it plans to bury the Holocaust (TM) survivor in a swamp, let the corpse soak for a year or two, and then dig it up and cremate it—a process that should enable the poor twice-incinerated schmuck to survive and collect lavish reparations for another 80 years.

A few days later, the “burned Holocaust survivor” was identified as a certain Barbara Steinmetz, whose presumably well-off family traveled extensively in the late 1930s and early 1940s, ostensibly to avoid political persecution based on ethnicity. Though a “Holocaust survivor” entitled to endless reparations from the goyim, she had never seen the inside of a concentration camp, much less a “gas chamber.”

The Jewish-owned-and-operated mainstream media’s mighty Wurlitzer began cranking out countless BS-pegged propaganda articles designed to legitimize Israel’s slaughter of tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands of Palestinian women and children in an ongoing series of atrocities designed to lead to the complete destruction of Palestine and the Palestinian people. Forget about those US-taxpayer-funded genocidal murders, the media screamed, lookie over here at this poor oppressed Holocaust survivor! Why, she’s terrified to be Jewish! Even though Jews, unlike their Palestinian victims, are not being systematically slaughtered in unimaginable numbers—nobody was even killed in the attack on the pro-genocide demonstration—the only thing that matters is Jewish suffering in general, and the suffering of poor oppressed Holocaust survivor Barbara Steinmetz in particular:

And it's why she continues to tell their story, to warn about antisemitism − even as hate against Jews soars to historic levels.

Just last year, Steinmetz showed up to a Boulder City Council meeting in support of her local Jewish community.

A woman sat next to Steinmetz, she recounted in a video interview in June 2024. The woman had a Palestinian flag and a sign that read "From the river to the sea," a phrase that can be used to promote antisemitism.

Steimetz turned to her and said: "Do you realize that that means you want to kill me? You want me destroyed?'"

The woman just turned away.

"Jews in Boulder and maybe Denver, and probably in cities all around the world, are afraid of wearing their Jewish stars," Steinmetz said.

People are taking down their mezuzahs so no one will know it's a Jewish house, she said.

-USA Today

Neither Steinmetz herself, the journalists behind this story, nor most readers seem likely to notice the fact that Steinmetz’s words mark her as clinically insane. Someone who thinks a Palestinian flag with the legend “from the river to the sea” means “you want to kill me! You want me destroyed!” is suffering from paranoid psychosis. Imagine: It’s the late 1980s, and an Afrikaaner immigrant to the US at a city council meeting turns to the person sitting next to them and claims that their ANC flag and “end apartheid” sign means “you want to kill me! You want me destroyed!” That crazy Afrikaaner would never have gotten sympathetic treatment from the media, even though he would have been somewhat less crazy than Steinmetz. (The ANC did threaten Afrikaaners as a people more than the pro-Palestine movement threatens Jews, though current claims of an anti-white genocide in South Africa are obviously exaggerated.)

People are increasingly noticing how routinely Jews manufacture false or exaggerated tales of their own victimization in order to legitimize their victimization of others:

If people are starting to hate Jews, maybe it’s because so many Jews, like Barbara Steinmetz and the media propagandists making use of her, exhibit such a grotesquely exaggerated concern for their own relatively minor suffering, and such a complete lack of compassion—if not outright sadistic glee—at the almost incomparably greater suffering of others…suffering inflicted by the Jewish tribe itself, as it tries to steal the land and property of non-Jews whose only crime is to inhabit a land that the Jews are trying to steal, based on self-evidently ludicrous claims that their genocidal bronze-age deity gave it to them three thousand years ago.

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Eid mubarak, and happy “we’re still alive five days after an attack on Russia’s nuclear bombers” day.

The Al-Andalus Tribune just published the text (and reposted the video) of my khutbah “Eid, the Hajj, and the Prophet’s Last Sermon.”

Listen to my Wednesday interview on the Richie Allen Show. We discussed Gaza (of course) and Richie seems to be coming around to my point of view…or at least isn’t pushing back as hard as he used to.

If you’re an American Free Press subscriber you may have already read my new piece “Is the World Finally Getting Fed Up With the Genocide of Gaza?” And if you aren’t, you can subscribe now and read it…or wait a couple of days to read it here.

False Flag Weekly News plans to return tomorrow after a week off due to slow Fundrazrs. Check out the list of stories. And make sure tomorrow’s show happens by contributing to its Fundrazr. Muse the Cat thanks you!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

A lot of noticing has been going on lately. People are noticing the Gaza genocide. They’re noticing that Western leaders, especially American ones, are enabling it. And they’re noticing the relationship between genocide complicity and the abysmal quality of leadership that prevails in today’s West.

The latest episode of False Flag Weekly News, featuring Prof. Oliver Boyd-Barrett, tackled the bad leadership issue head-on. We opened by discussing two notable essays, both published this week: A.J. Smuskiewicz’s “Dementia Joe and President Sybil: Pathologies of American Presidents” and Prof. Boyd-Barrett’s own “Aggressive Virus Feeds on Brains of Western Leaders” (a follow-up to his “Devious US Intention and Incompetence Always Good for Genocide.”)

Smuskiewicz notes that POTUS-46 a.k.a. “Dementia Joe, better known as Genocide Joe” was even more brain-dead than we realized, as explained in Jake Tapper’s new book. Coincidentally, just as Tapper’s book was raising questions of extreme malfeasance and possible treason on the part of Zombie Biden’s handlers, we learned that Biden has been “suddenly” diagnosed with a 9/10 Gleason score prostate cancer that must have been spreading for many years. Did Biden’s handlers cover that up too? Oliver Boyd-Barrett comments:

Let's just accept that he was suffering from dementia and that for a long period of time, we had a president who wasn't really functional. But you might say that, well, a president who has made good choices of advisor and the secretaries of state and so on, that nonetheless, a good government can be maintained. But what in fact happened, we had people like Sullivan and Blinken take over the shop on behalf of the neocon cabal that has essentially ruled until Trump's inauguration, at least, and I think actually still rule the United States.

So having a brain-dead zombie president controlled by neocon cabal handlers was actually quite convenient for that neocon cabal. It enabled the world’s first live-streamed genocide, for one thing. Does the cabal still rule? Are they using another deranged septuagenarian?

Trump’s derangement manifests in the erratic behavior satirized by Smuskiewicz:

NATO and the U.S. provoked Russia to invade Ukraine. Putin invaded Ukraine unprovoked because he wants to take over the whole country—and maybe Poland too. Russia is winning the war and holds all the cards. Russia is not winning the war and doesn’t hold any cards. Maybe Ukraine can join NATO. Ukraine can never join NATO. Putin wants peace. Putin does not want peace, so we will hit Russia with crushing sanctions. There will be no more sanctions on Russia. Zelensky wants peace. Zelensky does not want peace. We will stop all weapons to Ukraine. We will send more and better weapons to Ukraine. Ukraine needs to hold elections. Ukraine does not need to hold elections. We have a minerals deal. We do not have a minerals deal. No European troops should be in Ukraine. European troops should be in Ukraine. The U.S. should stop all involvement in Ukraine. The U.S. should take over Ukraine’s power plants. I’m talking to Putin. I’m not talking to Putin. I just talked to Putin. Who is Putin?

Israel should finish the job in Gaza and do whatever it takes to eliminate Hamas and win the war there. Israel needs to stop the fighting and killing in Gaza. People in Gaza are suffering and want to live in peace. We will help them. People in Gaza don’t want peace. They are terrorists and must be destroyed. Israel can kick out all the Palestinians and take over Gaza. I’m going to buy Gaza and build resorts and casinos there. It will be beautiful for everyone! Netanyahu is an SOB and I hate him. I just s—ed Bibi’s c–k in the Oval Office while Miriam watched, and I told them both that I will do whatever they want me to do.

We totally crushed the evil weakling Houthis in Yemen. The Houthis are brave and strong fighters. Ahmed al-Sharaa is an evil terrorist with a $10 million bounty on his head. Ahmed al-Sharaa is a very attractive man with a strong past. He serves delicious tea, and I really love his beard! Iran has a right to enrich uranium for its nuclear program. Iran must stop all uranium enrichment and end its nuclear program.

I love tariffs! Tariffs will be 10 percent. No, 20 percent. 25 percent. No wait, make it 50 percent. Okay, how about 125 percent? Would you believe 145 percent? Just wait, I’ll make them a hundred thousand million billion trillion zillion percent! The biggest tariffs anyone ever saw, it’ll be a record! Everyone will be amazed! Oh, just forget about it, we’ll go back to 10 percent. Tariffs? I don’t want any tariffs. I don’t like ‘em.

You don’t have to exaggerate much to write satire these days, as I have learned the hard way (or should I say the easy way). And if you’re looking for a plausibly unflattering psychiatric diagnosis of Genocide Don, Bandy Lee and her colleagues have been working on it for almost a decade.

Dementia Joe and Dementia Don (a.k.a. Genocide Joe and Genocide Don) may be extreme cases, but they exemplify the clownish level of leadership extant throughout today’s Western Empire. The evilest clown, of course, is Netanyahu, whose lust for torture-murdering young people makes John Wayne Gacy look like a piker.

But Bibi isn’t the only evil clown who bears responsibility for the world’s first live-streamed genocide. Take Macron and Starmer—please.

Macron just “took center stage” in overthrowing democracy in Romania. The winner and rightful Romanian president, Călin Georgescu, had his victory annulled by an oligarch-controlled court on the grounds that Russia had “interfered.” A new rigged vote was held, and the oligarchs inserted someone named Nicursor Dan (no relation to Steely). Prof. Boyd-Barrett offered some background:

I suppose the bottom line to my mind, Kevin, is that there is a longstanding warmth relationship between France and Romania. French is quite widely understood and used in Romania, by the way. So this is something that Macron is able to build on. But to get to the bottom line, the main thing here, I think, is in the light of previous statements from Macron and previous actions by Macron, the main thing is whether Macron, supposedly on behalf of the European Union, can send French troops into Romania and position them in such a way that they would have ready access from a Romanian position into Ukraine supposedly to defend Odessa against further Russian penetration of Ukraine.

I think that that's the bottom line here. In order for Macron to be able to do that, he and the European Union need to sustain good relations with Romania. And this is almost certainly, in my view, what’s behind these recent shenanigans that have been going on with the saga of the Romanian elections. As you pointed out, we had a regular election in November or December last year, 2024. The leading candidate and who won the first round, Georgescu, was not at all in favor of the continuing Romanian participation in Europe's war against Russia over the Ukraine as a proxy. And all of a sudden, after the first round results showed Georgescu in the lead, quite mysteriously, Romanian intelligence fabricated a stupid story about how the election had been corrupted by some kind of Russian advertisements and suchlike on TikTok. It was almost as stupid as the allegations made about Trump back in the 2016 elections in the United States.

But this time they actually did overturn the election, unlike with Trump. So the Romanian Constitutional Court just closed the election down. And there are many reports that they did this with the total encouragement, if not under the command, of sources in Brussels from the European countries. So they then went into a totally new election round, in which a gentleman called Simeon did very well in the first round and was totally expected to carry the second round, but mysteriously failed to do so. Instead, this gentleman, Dan, comes from more or less from nowhere. He's a total centrist. He's totally supportive of the European Union.

In any case, Macron is now feeling empowered. He's got a friend in Romania. If he wants to, on behalf of the Coalition of the Braindead, to send in a contingent of 10-part French troops with a view to attacking a Russian advance into Odessa….Well, good luck to him. And let's hope that it won't trigger World War III, which it might very well do, by the way.

Macron has been plausibly accused of promiscuous homosexuality. His wife, formerly his teacher, molested him when he was fifteen. Candace Owens has trumpeted theories that Macron’s wife is a man, while Ron Unz suspects those and other bizarre and baseless allegations may have been fostered by Macron’s own cover-up team to distract from the real scandals—just as the “Michelle Obama is a man” theory has diverted attention from the more plausible allegations of Larry Sinclair that Obama is a promiscuous cocaine-abusing homosexual and that people have been murdered to cover up that fact.

Are Western leaders a bunch of rapists (Bill Clinton and Trump have been plausibly accused) and perverts (the Bush family, Obama, Biden)? A recent outbreak of fires at UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s house, blamed as always on the Russians, has heightened that impression:

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer did not pay for escort services with three young Ukrainians, so they decided to take revenge on him and set fire to the house. This is reported by the Ukrainian TV channel "Politics of the country" with reference to the British media. (source)

Coincidentally or not, the scandal broke at the same moment that Netanyahu was furiously denouncing Starmer as an alleged Hamas asset:

By torching Starmer’s house and blaming unpaid call-boys, somebody might be sending a message. The same kind of message was delivered to Bill Clinton in the mid-1990s by a Zionist-oligarch-asset named Monica Lewinsky. The ensuing scandal undermined Clinton’s political capital and distracted him, preventing him from forcing Israel to comply with the Oslo peace process, and torpedoing Clinton’s hopes of going down in history as “the president who brought peace to the Middle East.”

So if Western leaders are basically a bunch of clownish perverts, that’s probably by design. The Jewish-Zionist oligarchs who rule the West specialize in political blackmail, as the Jeffrey Epstein affair illustrated. Since the days when J. Edgar Hoover had blackmail material on just about everyone of significance, and Zionist Jewish mob boss Meyer Lansky had blackmail material on Hoover, [[[the oligarchs]]] have used their money and organized-crime-i.e.-covert-ops capacities to make sure that they control Western leaders. Talentless nobodies like child-molester Dennis Hastert get promoted to high positions precisely because Zionist Jews have filmed them diddling kiddies. That’s how the selection process works.

No wonder they’re all such evil clowns.

But people are starting to notice. They’re noticing evil clownery in high places. They’re noticing Jeffrey Epstein. They’re noticing Israel’s genocide of Gaza, and the complicity of the evil clowns the Jewish oligarchs have selected to lead the West.

They’re even noticing that noticing is now a sign of antisemitism.

All of this noticing reminds me of Mme. Defarge’s knitting needles in A Tale of Two Cities. It remains to be seen how much more noticing will have to happen before people finally get fed up with evil clownery and start storming fortresses and setting up guillotines.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Paul Craig Roberts, the illustrious economist and architect of Reaganomics, became a notable voice of 9/11 truth two decades ago—a courageous move, given that he’s important enough to raise the ire of the perps and coverup team. Since then he has been calling it like he sees it and hasn’t backed down an inch. (Check out our past interviews on 9/11 and terminal corruption, Trump-Russia, and the ongoing collapse of US empire.

In today’s discussion we agree that most recent technological “progress” isn’t worth it—a point Roberts brilliantly makes in “The Digital Revolution Is Too Costly to Continue.” But when the conversation turns to immigrant-driven crime, I find his alarmism way overblown. (Americans worrying about crime in Europe is like Mexicans worrying about heat waves in Alaska.)

We also discuss West Asia aka the Middle East, where Roberts predicts Gaza will be annexed by the US per Trump’s bloviations, which I find highly unlikely.

Excerpt:

Welcome to Truth Jihad Podcast. Kevin Barrett here doing this since 2006 in a long list of media and networks. I've been on Alex Jones' network, been on John Statmiller's RBN network, and lots of other people's as well. I got invited to Jeff Rense’s but turned him down. He wanted me to pay. Anyway, here I am all by myself with a good economics advisor, actually. This is actually one of the world's top economic advisors that you could ever possibly have. That's Paul Craig Roberts. And he's now moved up in the world from when he was crafting Reaganomics to advising people like me. So welcome, Paul Craig Roberts. Great to have you back.

Well, thank you, Kevin.

Actually, I think I might be a notch or two above Reagan in terms of critical acumen, although that's probably not saying very much. So...you've certainly followed an interesting career trajectory when you became one of the highest level people to come out for 9/11 Truth, thereby exposing yourself to a certain amount of pushback and perhaps even physical danger. So how's that all been, looking back over 20 years?

Well, people have lost confidence in the official narrative, but it still stands. The government will never abandon it. So it'll be another one of those things that we know, but the government won't admit.

That's right. We all get to be smarter than the government now because they're such bad liars.

Yeah, there's a whole accumulation of them, you know. They go way back in time. But if you start with our youth, we have the Kennedy assassination, both of them. Martin Luther King, and then we have all the made-up wars in the Middle East, and 9/11, and the COVID pandemic, and the vax, and it's endless. And now we have Iranian weapons of mass destruction, Iranian nukes. It's endless.

So the question is, where do you even start with something like this? Maybe we could start with hopes for change. Obama was hope and change back in 2008. That didn't work out so well. And now Trump has brought the hope of change. And the red pill is now in the White House. RFK Jr. is in the cabinet, and a lot of folks thought that Trump was going to keep promises to open up the JFK files and this sort of thing. And at some point, I think you actually had a little bit of hope that there might be marginal improvement under a new Trump regime. What do you think about the way it's all going?

Well, I think we're learning once again that the ruling establishment is much stronger than a presidential administration. The ruling establishment is institutionalized throughout the society. And so it makes it very difficult for merely a president to change the focus and put the country in the direction that the ruling establishment doesn't want. It just really can't be done…

(Read the full transcript by clicking “transcript” above the video image at my Substack.)

Stripe is Substack’s only processor and they debanked me, so you can no longer pay me through Substack. Now I am posting everything on Substack free and asking people to sign up for recurring donations at my Paypal donation page…or better yet, the free speech platform SPdonate.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link False Flag Weekly News link

My False Flag Weekly News co-host E. Michael Jones is an expert on Antichrist. But that doesn’t mean he’s an eschatologist. He doesn’t have to be.

Catholic eschatologists view the Antichrist as an individual who will come at the end of the age, deceiving people and persecuting the faithful before ultimately succumbing to Christ. That’s very similar to the Muslim view of Dajjal (“Antichrist” in Arabic).

But E. Michael Jones understands that to know who is anti-Christ in today’s world, you don’t even need to look at the signs unfolding all around us, like the genocide in the Holy Land. All you need to do is figure out who is against Jesus. That’s what anti-Christ means, after all. And there is only one organized, powerful group or nation that fits the bill.

By definition, the Jews are the party of anti-Christ. When Jesus appeared to his people with a message from God, one group from among his people accepted him, while another rejected him. The former group became known as “Christians.” The latter became known as “Jews.” (“Muslims,” who mostly line up with Christians in these matters, came along later.)

Dr. Jones has long pointed out that the basis of Jewish identity is the rejection of Jesus. Jews reject Christ’s moral universalism, which threatens their status as self-styled “chosen people.” They reject Christ’s elevation of the spiritual over the material. They reject Christ’s command to “turn the other cheek,” instead cultivating hatred of the Other and extreme vindictiveness—as we are witnessing in Gaza. (Obligatory disclaimer: These generalizations about the core myths and rituals of the Jewish tribe are roughly accurate, but individuals born Jewish react differently—in many cases admirably—to those and other defects in their tribal heritage.)

What are we to make of the fact that the Party of Antichrist has occupied the Holy Land and is committing genocide there, wantonly slaughtering the descendants of Jesus’s family? And more to the point what are we going to do about it? Who is going to lead the forces that will put an end to such obscene blasphemy?

#Pope2Gaza

The new Pope Leo XIV is one candidate. As Sam Husseini wrote: “The New Pope Should Go to Gaza. Now.” Husseini cites Kathy Boylan’s "Pope Francis, go to Gaza for God’s sake!" Noting that the Church has asked forgiveness for its failure to stop the 9/11 wars and the millions of murders they entailed, Husseini asks:

Can the Catholic Church stop asking for forgiveness after allowing or enabling mass criminality — and instead strive to stop the slaughter in real time? Not to wash their hands of the crucifixion, but to halt it?

Kathy Boylan:

"The Pope has got to go to the concentration camp called Gaza. I’m sure Israel would find it very difficult to say 'no' to the Holy Father’s presence in Gaza -- and he might stop the bombing and he might stop the killing. And he should stay there, not just go and visit for a while. The Pope should stay -- we beg the Pope to do that.

"And I have a message for all the other people, if you’re not the Pope, I’m asking everyone who is paying taxes to refuse to pay even a portion of their federal taxes, to end their complicity."

During our conversation on False Flag Weekly News, E. Michael Jones agreed with Husseini and Boylan: Pope Leo should go to Gaza. But can moral force alone really stop the Zionist Antichrist? As Stalin supposedly put it: How many divisions does the Pope have?

Will Trump Stop the Genocide?

The Pope doesn’t command military divisions. But Donald Trump does. And though Trump, unlike the Pope, is unlikely to put moral considerations first, the US president does have rock-solid political reasons to take the Zionist Antichrist down several notches.

The overriding objective of Trump’s Middle East policy is simple: Avoid letting the US to get suckered into yet another disastrous neocon war for Israel, one that would make previous episodes look like the proverbial walk in the park.

Netanyahu is trying to force a breakdown of US-Iran nuclear negotiations. That would give him the opportunity to attack Iran, confident the US would be drawn in. Netanyahu doesn’t care that Iran could climb the escalation ladder by killing thousands of US soldiers, sinking US ships, and most importantly, destroying enough of the region’s oil production to completely collapse the global economy. That would be the US’s problem, not Israel’s.

Trump has every reason to revive the JCPOA nuclear agreement he unilaterally shredded in 2018. But Netanyahu needs perpetual war to stay out of prison. And Netanyahu has powerful allies, including dozens of “American” oligarchs and even “US” senators like Tom Cotton and Lindsey Graham.

Politically, Trump’s best move would be, as I wrote last month, to “terminate Bibi’s command…with extreme prejudice if necessary.”

Does the Pope have the courage to go to Gaza? Do Trump and his circle have the wisdom and worldly power to simultaneously halt the genocide and engineer regime-change in Tel Aviv? (Those two projects go together.)

If neither church nor state can stand against the Zionist Antichrist, it will continue to metastasize at terrifying speed, accelerating its genocide and fleeing forward into an ever-more-destructive war.

And whether church and/or state do the right thing depends, at least partly, on us. By turning up the volume, and exposing the legions of Antichrist for what they truly are, we can help enable the leaders to do the right thing.

Read the transcript of my False Flag Weekly News conversation with E. Michael Jones by clicking “transcript” above the video image at my Substack.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com