Truth Jihad Radio

Now that the Evil Empire is about to ban TikTok—or force its sale to Zionists—I guess I should try to post some videos there as an act of solidarity.

Unfortunately, the last time I tried to post a video on Tik-Tok, it was quickly taken down by censors. That puzzled me, until I heard Glen Greenwald explain why TikTok also censors his attempts to criticize the American Empire. Greenwald says TikTok outsources censorship to the same CIA (Mossad) cabal that silences and shadowbans us on US-Zionist social media. Why? Because Tik-Tok needs access to the lucrative US market. So the current “ban-TikTok” frenzy is probably a shakedown attempt to gain even more censorship power. Maybe they need it to deal with the surge of pro-Palestine content.

So...What can I post on TikTok that won’t get banned? Maybe a cat video?

Before I give up and start making cat videos full-time, I think I’ll try resistance-through-hyperconformity and indulge in some brutal self-censorship. Just as an author of a subversive book might publish an empty book cover to avoid offending the censors—just the front cover and back covers without any content—I decided to publish “The Beginning and the End of This Week’s False Flag Weekly News” for the benefit of TikTok and YouTube.

That way people who don’t want to know what’s happening in the world can watch the silly beginning and the silly ending, without actually having to encounter any dangerous perspectives on the week’s 30 biggest news stories. And hopefully the censors will appreciate the fact that I’ve deliberately disemboweled my own broadcast in a pathetically obsequious attempt to appease them. (Good thing they’re too dumb to understand irony.)

Meanwhile, if you want to watch the full, uncensored False Flag Weekly News, last week’s is here, and next week’s is shaping up like this:

FFWN Special! Cat McGuire Asks Jeff Brown about “Zio-American Empire vs. China”

Watch Saturday after 1 pm Eastern HERE

This week, instead of the regular weekly news roundup, False Flag Weekly News presents a special edition on “The Zio-American Empire vs. China” featuring China skeptic Cat McGuire questioning bullish-on-China Jeff Brown. I’ve already posted Cat’s questions for Jeff.

And finally, don’t miss today’s live radio show:

Listen live Fridays noon to 2pm Eastern on Revolution.Radio later archived at KevinBarrett.Substack.com

First hour: Retired Air Force officer and commercial airline pilot Glen Stanish reflects on the history of the 9/11 truth movement. Was a consensus ever reached about how the illusion of hijacked-then-crashed planes was manufactured? Were the crashed planes ever identified based on their dozens of virtually-indestructible parts with serial numbers and replacement date codes? If not, why not? Whatever happened to Glen’s friend Christopher Bollyn, author of Solving 9/11, which implicates Israel as the author of 9/11? Could the Gaza genocide have been avoided if the truth about Israel’s responsibility for 9/11 had been successfully forced into the mainstream?

Second hour: Journalist Rick Sterling discusses his new article “Olympic Doping Case, Global Politics and the Sacrificing of Kamila Valieva: Here is how the West robbed and abused the best figure skater in the world, Kamila Valieva, while provoking the war in Ukraine.” His conclusion: “it is likely that US secret services intentionally created this situation to prevent Russian achievements at the Beijing Olympics and ‘unbalance’ the adversary.” We’ll also discuss his previous article “From Dallas to Gaza: How JFK’s Assassination Was Good for Zionist Israel.“

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

I recently raised the question: “Do 90% of Israeli Jews support genocide?” I said “yes.” Richie Allen said “no.” The comments section is full of other opinions.

Coincidentally, right before last week’s interview with Richie, RT published a piece on Israel’s anti-Zionist Jews: “‘I don’t want to be a pawn in this sick game’: Israel’s anti-Zionist fringe is taking a stand.” I brought it up in this week’s False Flag Weekly News:

Yes, there are actually some anti-genocide and even anti-Zionist Jews in occupied Palestine, aka Israel. But there aren't very many. It's less than 2%, probably even less than that, especially the vocal ones. But at least there are some, and RT's correspondent managed to track a couple down.

One of them, 25-year-old Tomer Avrahami, is quoted as saying: “Thanks to media research and tours in historic Palestine, I came to the conclusion that I had no willingness to take part in the ongoing Nakba of the Palestinian people,” meaning the Palestinian Holocaust. And they mentioned another one named Tal Mitnick, who keeps getting sentenced to prison because he refuses to serve.

The majority of the people who refuse to serve in the armed forces in Israel are doing it for other reasons. But a minority of maybe 10%-ish (of the refuseniks) are doing it because they are against genocide.

So there are some, and God bless them.

According to the Torah, if there were even ten righteous men in Sodom, the city would be saved. Are there ten righteous Jews in Israel? Very likely. Naturei Karta, the anti-Zionist Orthodox (Haredi) group, is based in Jerusalem. And since RT reports that 30% of Israeli Jewish young people are draft evaders, 10% of whom are anti-Zionist, we may surmise that Tomer Avrahami and Tal Mitnick represent hundreds or even thousands.

But the righteous anti-Zionist Jews of Israel are such a small minority, amidst a general population of genocidal lunatics, that God and man both have good reason to be getting fed up with the place. Even America’s pro-Zionist Jews are worried—not only about the future of Israel, but also about its implications for Jews in general.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a hardcore Zionist and the USG’s highest-ranking Jew, sees the writing on the wall and is demanding Netanyahu’s head on a platter. The BBC reported Wednesday that “US Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer has called for Israel to hold elections to replace Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.” Bibi fired back: “We’re not a banana republic.”

Actually, Bibi, Israel is even more dependent on the US than your average banana republic. Most banana republics would continue to exist if the US wasn’t propping up their governments, economies, and militaries. Israel wouldn’t. It’s surrounded by over a billion people who don’t want it there. The US cutting off support to Israel would have the same consequences as France cutting off support to French Algeria in 1962.

Another well-placed and rabidly Zionist ultra-ethnocentric Jew, Thomas Friedman, says “Netanyahu is making Israel radioactive.” Presumably he means that figuratively. He knows that Israel and world Jewry have benefited for 75 years from the presumption that they are quintessential genocide victims, and that their sudden transformation into universally-reviled genocide perpetrators bodes poorly for their worldly prospects.

But Friedman may have chosen the radioactive metaphor because he knows that Bibi is leading Israel down a path that could end in smoking radioactive rubble. It’s quite likely that there has been far more nuclear proliferation than meets the eye, and Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza, with its unlimited potential for regional and global escalation, could easily lead to a tragic, horrendous nuclear solution to the Zionism problem.

Even absent the use of nukes, a regional escalation that unleashed the full might of Hezbollah’s arsenal, much less Iran’s, Turkey’s or Russia’s, could largely destroy Israel, according to an Israeli military study. That’s one reason why Netanyahu’s incessant attempts to provoke all-out war with Hezbollah have been shot down by the US as well as elements of the IDF.

Schumer and Friedman are trumpeting an Anglo-American consensus that’s engineering a long-overdue Israeli regime change, according to Thierry Meyssan of VoltaireNet:

(After repeated provocations by Bibi’s “Jewish fascists”) Washington decided to radically change its policy. Until then, it had considered that it could not afford to let Israel lose. It had therefore supported its crime. Now, it could no longer afford to let the Jewish fascists win. It’s important to understand that Washington didn’t change its mind when it saw the suffering of the Gazans, nor because of a sudden outburst of anti-fascism, but because of the threats of the "revisionist Zionists." Its positions are dictated exclusively by its desire to maintain its domination of the world. It could not contemplate another defeat for its Israeli allies, this time after those in Syria and Ukraine. But it could even less envisage losing to the "revisionist Zionists".

The Biden Administration therefore invited General Benny Gantz, the former alternative Prime Minister and since October 12 Minister without Portfolio, to consult in the United States, despite the opposition of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It’s a kind of backlash to the way the latter was invited to deliver a speech before Congress against the advice of President Barack Obama, in 2015.

Can the US force new elections on Israel and enthrone Gantz? Will Netanyahu respond by attempting to “flee forward” into a wider war? And most importantly, even if the US manages to regime-change Israel, will it solve the underlying problem? (The expression “underlying problem” is an understatement, since what it describes is seven million Jewish colonists, 98% of whom are pro-genocide and millions of whom are raving fanatics, squatting on stolen land in the midst of a billion people who are determined to get it back.)

When Netanyahu steps down, Israel will be symbolically admitting defeat. The writing is already on the wall. Last week Israeli Major General (ret.) Yizkhak Barik announced: “We have already lost the war with Hamas, and we are also losing our allies in the world…If a regional war breaks out that destroys the country, there is no doubt that in the history of the people of Israel, they (Netanyahu and his cabinet) will be remembered forever.”

Any new Biden-installed Israeli government would have to concede defeat by, at the very least, massively scaling down its assault on Gaza. The Americans will try to push through a peace plan that would sideline Hamas while resuscitating the long-moribund two-state solution along the lines endorsed by Saudi Arabia, creating a “state of Palestine based on the borders of June 4, 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital.” Rousing success could ensure Biden’s re-election.

But success of any kind is far from assured. Every US president since Carter has tried to become the “brought-lasting-peace-to-the-Middle East” president and all have failed. The reason: Zionism’s stranglehold on American politics, finance, and media.

Can Biden force Israel to evacuate 700,000 settlers? To do so, he would have to prevail over the will of the Israeli majority (backed by the hardline American Zionists who haven’t figured out, as Chuck Schumer and Thomas Friedman have, that Israel’s current course is suicidal).

With or without Netanyahu, Israel is highly unlikely to withdraw from the territories it stole in 1967. To make that happen, Biden would have to threaten to block US aid. Such an unprecedented move would unleash a torrent of Zionist hysteria—and funding for Biden’s 2024 opponent, Donald Trump, who is on record supporting everything Israel does including genocide.

So Biden needs to engineer a PR spectacle in which Israel pretends to re-commit to the Oslo peace process, but without doing much of anything tangible. And the Palestinians would have to accept more vague, empty promises.

Good luck with that. Remember, this will be playing out against a backdrop of a perceived Palestinian Resistance victory—and amidst residual fury, which may not dissipate for decades or even centuries, over the Gaza genocide. The notion that Palestinians will settle for the same old two-state-solution schtick that has been defrauding them since the mid-1990s, after Hamas, Hezbollah, and AnsarUllah just collectively whipped Israel’s butt—and in the wake of a genocide whose punishment really ought to be the elimination of Israel and imprisonment of 98% of its Jewish population—is a non-starter.

Following Israeli regime change and “official defeat,” the Resistance will be emboldened by its victory, strengthened by the soft power bonanza handed it by the genocidal Zionists, and in no mood to accept half-measures. An immediate and complete Israeli pullout from the post-1967 occupied territories, and the quick establishment of a universally-recognized Palestine, might suffice. Anything less would convince the Resistance to stick with its prevailing assumption that Zionism can only be defeated militarily.

And Zionism will be defeated militarily, if it comes to that. Gen. Barik’s forecast of a “regional war…that destroys the country” is apt.

Why are Netanyahu and his cabinet risking destruction, while American Zionists like Schumer and Friedman demur? One would think it would be the other way around: The Israelis, after all, are the ones in the line of fire.

One reason is that the Israelis are steeped in millenarian messianic myth, while the Americans think in terms of global geopolitics. Netanyahu’s cabinet is full of crazies who think they can force the Messiah to come save them if they just kill enough Palestinians, blow up the al-Aqsa mosque, and find a heifer whose hide is the perfect shade of pink.

Not all Israelis are that crazy, but they’re getting there. Likud and the Revisionist Zionists used to be marginal. Now those genocidal maniacs represent the middle ground of Israeli politics, with even loonier genocidal maniacs occupying the right flank.

Ultimately, the roadblock in the path to peace in Palestine is Israeli public opinion. The vast majority of Israeli Jews just can’t conceive of treating the Palestinians as equals. Israel’s hardcore Jewish supremacism, horrifyingly exposed by the Gaza genocide, threatens to undermine the milder Jewish supremacism in America that has made life so comfortable for the likes of Chuck Schumer and Thomas Friedman.

So to “save the Jews,” Israeli Jews need to not only repudiate genocide, but also Zionism itself. Only the transformation of genocidal, supremacist “Israel” into a normal country for all of its rightful inhabitants, including the descendants of those ethnically cleansed by the genocidal supremacists, will bring peace and prevent the world from turning against the Jews.

Somehow the anti-Zionist Israeli Jews need to stop being a fringe and start being a majority. Since Israel is the world’s leading manufacturer of the “love and compassion drug” ecstasy (which was presumably widely used at the Re’im Music Festival) maybe Tomer Avrahami and Tal Mitnick will find a way to sneak it into their country’s water supply.

Failing that, or something equally improbable, Israel is going down the hard way, and the Jews with it.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

I recently raised the question: “Do 90% of Israeli Jews support genocide?” I said “yes.” Richie Allen said “no.” The comments section is full of other opinions.

Coincidentally, right before last week’s interview with Richie, RT published a piece on Israel’s anti-Zionist Jews: “‘I don’t want to be a pawn in this sick game’: Israel’s anti-Zionist fringe is taking a stand.” I brought it up in this week’s False Flag Weekly News:

Yes, there are actually some anti-genocide and even anti-Zionist Jews in occupied Palestine, aka Israel. But there aren't very many. It's less than 2%, probably even less than that, especially the vocal ones. But at least there are some, and RT's correspondent managed to track a couple down.

One of them, 25-year-old Tomer Avrahami, is quoted as saying: “Thanks to media research and tours in historic Palestine, I came to the conclusion that I had no willingness to take part in the ongoing Nakba of the Palestinian people,” meaning the Palestinian Holocaust. And they mentioned another one named Tal Mitnick, who keeps getting sentenced to prison because he refuses to serve.

The majority of the people who refuse to serve in the armed forces in Israel are doing it for other reasons. But a minority of maybe 10%-ish (of the refuseniks) are doing it because they are against genocide.

So there are some, and God bless them.

According to the Torah, if there were even ten righteous men in Sodom, the city would be saved. Are there ten righteous Jews in Israel? Very likely. Naturei Karta, the anti-Zionist Orthodox (Haredi) group, is based in Jerusalem. And since RT reports that 30% of Israeli Jewish young people are draft evaders, 10% of whom are anti-Zionist, we may surmise that Tomer Avrahami and Tal Mitnick represent hundreds or even thousands.

But the righteous anti-Zionist Jews of Israel are such a small minority, amidst a general population of genocidal lunatics, that God and man both have good reason to be getting fed up with the place. Even America’s pro-Zionist Jews are worried—not only about the future of Israel, but also about its implications for Jews in general.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a hardcore Zionist and the USG’s highest-ranking Jew, sees the writing on the wall and is demanding Netanyahu’s head on a platter. The BBC reported Wednesday that “US Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer has called for Israel to hold elections to replace Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.” Bibi fired back: “We’re not a banana republic.”

Actually, Bibi, Israel is even more dependent on the US than your average banana republic. Most banana republics would continue to exist if the US wasn’t propping up their governments, economies, and militaries. Israel wouldn’t. It’s surrounded by over a billion people who don’t want it there. The US cutting off support to Israel would have the same consequences as France cutting off support to French Algeria in 1962.

Another well-placed and rabidly Zionist ultra-ethnocentric Jew, Thomas Friedman, says “Netanyahu is making Israel radioactive.” Presumably he means that figuratively. He knows that Israel and world Jewry have benefited for 75 years from the presumption that they are quintessential genocide victims, and that their sudden transformation into universally-reviled genocide perpetrators bodes poorly for their worldly prospects.

But Friedman may have chosen the radioactive metaphor because he knows that Bibi is leading Israel down a path that could end in smoking radioactive rubble. It’s quite likely that there has been far more nuclear proliferation than meets the eye, and Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza, with its unlimited potential for regional and global escalation, could easily lead to a tragic, horrendous nuclear solution to the Zionism problem.

Even absent the use of nukes, a regional escalation that unleashed the full might of Hezbollah’s arsenal, much less Iran’s, Turkey’s or Russia’s, could largely destroy Israel, according to an Israeli military study. That’s one reason why Netanyahu’s incessant attempts to provoke all-out war with Hezbollah have been shot down by the US as well as elements of the IDF.

Schumer and Friedman are trumpeting an Anglo-American consensus that’s engineering a long-overdue Israeli regime change, according to Thierry Meyssan of VoltaireNet:

(After repeated provocations by Bibi’s “Jewish fascists”) Washington decided to radically change its policy. Until then, it had considered that it could not afford to let Israel lose. It had therefore supported its crime. Now, it could no longer afford to let the Jewish fascists win. It’s important to understand that Washington didn’t change its mind when it saw the suffering of the Gazans, nor because of a sudden outburst of anti-fascism, but because of the threats of the "revisionist Zionists." Its positions are dictated exclusively by its desire to maintain its domination of the world. It could not contemplate another defeat for its Israeli allies, this time after those in Syria and Ukraine. But it could even less envisage losing to the "revisionist Zionists".

The Biden Administration therefore invited General Benny Gantz, the former alternative Prime Minister and since October 12 Minister without Portfolio, to consult in the United States, despite the opposition of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. It’s a kind of backlash to the way the latter was invited to deliver a speech before Congress against the advice of President Barack Obama, in 2015.

Can the US force new elections on Israel and enthrone Gantz? Will Netanyahu respond by attempting to “flee forward” into a wider war? And most importantly, even if the US manages to regime-change Israel, will it solve the underlying problem? (The expression “underlying problem” is an understatement, since what it describes is seven million Jewish colonists, 98% of whom are pro-genocide and millions of whom are raving fanatics, squatting on stolen land in the midst of a billion people who are determined to get it back.)

When Netanyahu steps down, Israel will be symbolically admitting defeat. The writing is already on the wall. Last week Israeli Major General (ret.) Yizkhak Barik announced: “We have already lost the war with Hamas, and we are also losing our allies in the world…If a regional war breaks out that destroys the country, there is no doubt that in the history of the people of Israel, they (Netanyahu and his cabinet) will be remembered forever.”

Any new Biden-installed Israeli government would have to concede defeat by, at the very least, massively scaling down its assault on Gaza. The Americans will try to push through a peace plan that would sideline Hamas while resuscitating the long-moribund two-state solution along the lines endorsed by Saudi Arabia, creating a “state of Palestine based on the borders of June 4, 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital.” Rousing success could ensure Biden’s re-election.

But success of any kind is far from assured. Every US president since Carter has tried to become the “brought-lasting-peace-to-the-Middle East” president and all have failed. The reason: Zionism’s stranglehold on American politics, finance, and media.

Can Biden force Israel to evacuate 700,000 settlers? To do so, he would have to prevail over the will of the Israeli majority (backed by the hardline American Zionists who haven’t figured out, as Chuck Schumer and Thomas Friedman have, that Israel’s current course is suicidal).

With or without Netanyahu, Israel is highly unlikely to withdraw from the territories it stole in 1967. To make that happen, Biden would have to threaten to block US aid. Such an unprecedented move would unleash a torrent of Zionist hysteria—and funding for Biden’s 2024 opponent, Donald Trump, who is on record supporting everything Israel does including genocide.

So Biden needs to engineer a PR spectacle in which Israel pretends to re-commit to the Oslo peace process, but without doing much of anything tangible. And the Palestinians would have to accept more vague, empty promises.

Good luck with that. Remember, this will be playing out against a backdrop of a perceived Palestinian Resistance victory—and amidst residual fury, which may not dissipate for decades or even centuries, over the Gaza genocide. The notion that Palestinians will settle for the same old two-state-solution schtick that has been defrauding them since the mid-1990s, after Hamas, Hezbollah, and AnsarUllah just collectively whipped Israel’s butt—and in the wake of a genocide whose punishment really ought to be the elimination of Israel and imprisonment of 98% of its Jewish population—is a non-starter.

Following Israeli regime change and “official defeat,” the Resistance will be emboldened by its victory, strengthened by the soft power bonanza handed it by the genocidal Zionists, and in no mood to accept half-measures. An immediate and complete Israeli pullout from the post-1967 occupied territories, and the quick establishment of a universally-recognized Palestine, might suffice. Anything less would convince the Resistance to stick with its prevailing assumption that Zionism can only be defeated militarily.

And Zionism will be defeated militarily, if it comes to that. Gen. Barik’s forecast of a “regional war…that destroys the country” is apt.

Why are Netanyahu and his cabinet risking destruction, while American Zionists like Schumer and Friedman demur? One would think it would be the other way around: The Israelis, after all, are the ones in the line of fire.

One reason is that the Israelis are steeped in millenarian messianic myth, while the Americans think in terms of global geopolitics. Netanyahu’s cabinet is full of crazies who think they can force the Messiah to come save them if they just kill enough Palestinians, blow up the al-Aqsa mosque, and find a heifer whose hide is the perfect shade of pink.

Not all Israelis are that crazy, but they’re getting there. Likud and the Revisionist Zionists used to be marginal. Now those genocidal maniacs represent the middle ground of Israeli politics, with even loonier genocidal maniacs occupying the right flank.

Ultimately, the roadblock in the path to peace in Palestine is Israeli public opinion. The vast majority of Israeli Jews just can’t conceive of treating the Palestinians as equals. Israel’s hardcore Jewish supremacism, horrifyingly exposed by the Gaza genocide, threatens to undermine the milder Jewish supremacism in America that has made life so comfortable for the likes of Chuck Schumer and Thomas Friedman.

So to “save the Jews,” Israeli Jews need to not only repudiate genocide, but also Zionism itself. Only the transformation of genocidal, supremacist “Israel” into a normal country for all of its rightful inhabitants, including the descendants of those ethnically cleansed by the genocidal supremacists, will bring peace and prevent the world from turning against the Jews.

Somehow the anti-Zionist Israeli Jews need to stop being a fringe and start being a majority. Since Israel is the world’s leading manufacturer of the “love and compassion drug” ecstasy (which was presumably widely used at the Re’im Music Festival) maybe Tomer Avrahami and Tal Mitnick will find a way to sneak it into their country’s water supply.

Failing that, or something equally improbable, Israel is going down the hard way, and the Jews with it.

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Mahmood OD returns to Truth Jihad Radio to discuss the ongoing genocide of Gaza and how to stop it.

Mahmood OD, a native Palestinian born in Haifa, is the author of 2048: A Manifesto for the One State Solution in Israel Palestine. In it, he considers the underlying causes of the violence and instability in the region, and proposes a simple and sensible solution, starting with: “The whole conflict can be solved with one thing: Equality. But to reach the stage of equality, one must establish basic understanding about the other side…”

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Mahmood OD returns to Truth Jihad Radio to discuss the ongoing genocide of Gaza and how to stop it.

Mahmood OD, a native Palestinian born in Haifa, is the author of 2048: A Manifesto for the One State Solution in Israel Palestine. In it, he considers the underlying causes of the violence and instability in the region, and proposes a simple and sensible solution, starting with: “The whole conflict can be solved with one thing: Equality. But to reach the stage of equality, one must establish basic understanding about the other side…”

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Marwan Boustany is the author of Guidance According to the Qur’an. The Qur’an states (an-Nahl 89): “And We have sent down to you the Book as clarification for all things and as guidance and mercy and good tidings for those who self-surrender to God.” People have sought guidance from the Qur’an in many ways. What is the best approach, and why?

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Marwan Boustany is the author of Guidance According to the Qur’an. The Qur’an states (an-Nahl 89): “And We have sent down to you the Book as clarification for all things and as guidance and mercy and good tidings for those who self-surrender to God.” People have sought guidance from the Qur’an in many ways. What is the best approach, and why?

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Do more than 90% of Israeli Jews support the genocide of Gaza, i.e. the current “military operation”? Richie Allen doesn’t think so. During my appearance on his show yesterday he challenged me to cite polling data.

Unfortunately, no pollster in Israel will ever ask flat-out: “Do you support the genocide of Gaza?” Nor have any asked a more polite version of the same question: “Do you support or oppose Israel’s current military campaign in Gaza?” (I argue that well over 90% would say they support it, while less than 10% would say they oppose it.)

So we are going to have to extrapolate. Fortunately (though unfortunately for the Palestinians) this is an easy extrapolation. Time’s “What Do Israelis Think of the War with Hamas?” includes the following paragraph:

Poll results were also hawkish when it came to the use of force in Gaza: 57.5% of Israeli Jews said that they believed the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) were using too little firepower in Gaza, 36.6% said the IDF was using an appropriate amount of firepower, while just 1.8% said they believed the IDF was using too much fire power, while 4.2% said they weren’t sure

Let me repeat that. Fewer than 2% of Israeli Jews think the IDF is “using too much fire power” in Gaza.

Richie Allen might argue that those numbers may have changed since the poll was taken in November. But he would be grasping at straws. There is no evidence whatsoever of any significant change. Essentially nobody, I repeat nobody, in Israel is protesting against the IDF’s wholesale massacre of Palestinians. The “left-wing” Israelis are protesting Netanyahu’s failure to get the Israeli hostages returned. But they are completely indifferent to the genocide of Gazans. In fact, “indifferent” is probably the wrong word. To the extent that any Israeli Jews are saying anything about Palestinian suffering and death, they are wildly celebrating it.

This poll wasn’t an outlier. During a previous massacre of thousands of Gazan civilians, 2008’s Operation Cast Lead, “a poll taken the day after the start of the operation showed 81 percent of the Israeli public supporting the operation, with only 12 percent opposed.” Since 20 percent of Israel’s population are non-Jewish Arabs who disproportionately opposed the massacre, that means that virtually the entire Israeli Jewish population supported it. Polls during subsequent “mowing the lawn” operations gave similar results.

So if fewer than 2% of Israeli Jews think the IDF is “using too much fire power” in Gaza, does that mean that Israeli Jews, as a group, are raving genocidal lunatics that need to be dealt with in the same way that mad dogs are dealt with?

That comparison is unfair—to mad dogs. It is also unfair to some of the 140,000 or fewer Jewish Israelis (out of a total population of around 7 million) who, by way of thinking that Israel is “using too much fire power,” may actually oppose the genocide that is being perpetrated in their name. God bless that minuscule minority of non-genocidal Israelis. As for the other 98%…maybe the Jewish Autonomous Oblast would make a good re-education facility.

Extract from my conversation with Richie Allen

Going back to the days I was on radio in Spain, it is morally and it is wrong on every level to take hostages, regardless of who you are. We know what the IDF and the Israeli police have done to the people of Gaza for decades and decades: Reprehensible things, disgusting things, crimes against humanity. But two wrongs don't make a right. And keeping people for months, you know, in terror, because they must be terrified, the hostages. And never knowing when they're going to go home. That's wrong, Kevin. And I can't support that. I support the people of Palestine and their rights to their land, the right of return, all of that, pre-67. I know my history. I know Israel should not exist. Not legally. It has no legal basis, of course. It has no legitimacy in law internationally.

But don't keep hostages. Don't do that. It's terribly wrong. I hear what you're saying, you know, that it's leverage, but you're describing human beings with loves, with families, with cares, with ambitions. You're describing them as leverage. They're not. They're human beings, Kevin.

Well, yeah, that's a good point, Richie. But remember that Israel is holding 10,000 Palestinians hostages and it systematically practices torture on them and sexual abuse. Before October 7th, Israel was holding, at that point, 6,000 or however many thousands of Palestinian hostages. Now it’s 10,000. So, if the Palestinians try to grab a few hundred hostages in order to get their own 10,000 plus hostages released..

It's true that inn war, people have to do terrible things. And so the onus is on whoever starts the war. In this case, it was these genocidal lunatics who crossed the seas because they believe that their god gave them this land thousands of years ago. They have a many-thousand-year-old real estate deed, and it has apparently no statute of limitations on it. So they have the right to come over and massacre and expel the people who live there.

So it's obvious who started this. And when a war is started, when they attack you, when somebody commits that gross of an evil, you have the right to fight back. You know, Richie, if some gangsters came and massacred members of your family, God forbid, and expelled you from your house, set up shop in your house, would you have the right to use force to get your house back? Family members are dead and others they're holding and torturing. Do you have the right to pick up a gun and go after them to get your house back?

I say you do. I say if you don't pick up a gun and get your house back, you're committing a grave moral wrong. And anybody who isn't fighting Zionism with a gun right now is committing a grave moral wrong. And obviously that's the case for the direct victims of this, the Palestinians.

Well, I don't have any fight with Zionism, and I don't feel that I should be compelled to pick up a gun against an ideology. I'll use my my voice and my my journalism to...

They're Antichrist, they're not just an ideology.

Well, we could be here all night discussing that. I don't agree with that characterisation of people. You know, like I said, I used to interview Zionists about these things. And while they were very extreme, ideologically extreme, there were still human beings raising children, you know, who believed.

I interviewed Norman Finkelstein many times over the years, Kevin. For some reason, he doesn't return my emails these days, but that's fair enough. He might have a good reason as far as he's concerned. But Norman said to me once, he said, Richie, you see a lot of the children of Israel, not all of them, but see a lot of them as victims because from the moment they can talk and the moment they can understand what they're being told, they are told, you know, that the Arabs are evil and that God has given you, as you said, the right to be here. And that terrifies these kids effectively.

So you're calling people, you know, the Antichrist. These are people, many of them, who've been brought up within a cult, really, you could argue, a sect. And they're victims in some way, aren't they? That's a legitimate area of research, I think. What say you?

Yes, I agree completely. I translated and published Laurent Guyénot's book From Yahweh to Zion, which is probably the best critical book ever written on Jewish identity politics and its connection to religious tradition. And the conclusion of that book is that the leaders of Judaism, even long before Zionism, some of those leaders abused their people and told them that the other groups of people around them were evil. “So go and smash their gods and steal their stuff and give it to Yahweh,” meaning give it to the high priests of Yahweh, which are the people who organized the whole racket.

The Jews are traumatized from a very early age. And we could get into what Sigmund Freud would say about the circumcision of newborns, but that certainly does leave a—

Hang on there now. I was circumcised.

So was I. And in any case, you know, the various kinds of psychological abuse and torture that are meted out in that tradition to make them a people (who shall dwell) apart, brainwashing children into believing that the goyim, all the other tribes, all the non-Jews, are out to get them.—that creates a kind of mentality that ultimately leads perfectly nice individual people to become part of a group that is a tribal psychopath. That is, it's a tribe that treats other tribes or nations the way that a psychopathic individual treats other human beings.

And so that's the problem we have. Yes, the vast majority of Zionists are basically decent people, but their group mentality is psychopathic.

I remember talking about this over the years, me being a history graduate. There are no moral grounds for Israel to exist. We could talk about Sykes-Picot, the Ottoman Empire, what the British and French did. Obviously the Balfour Declaration. But it's only this biblical thing that is their case, really. Golda Meir once said, this country exists as the accomplishment of a promise made by God himself. It would be absurd to call its legitimacy into account. And he's channeling God's alleged, what did God say? “Unto thy seed have I given this land from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the Euphrates.”

But let me read you this from Fred: “Kevin is exaggerating about the number of Israelis wanting to rid the world of the Palestinians. I lived there in 1981 as a kibbutz volunteer. And yes, there are a lot who want to get rid of the Palestinians, but I wouldn't say even 50%. You know, he's wrong. He's exaggerating,” says Fred. And then Fred says “Kevin is right that the massacres will only get worse once the hostages are freed because the IDF won't have to worry about killing them.”

Fred spent time in a kibbutz He said, no way is every Israeli or is most of them or are most of them wanting to kill the Palestinians. That's his opinion.

Well, I think he's right about the 1980s. But there's been a real change in Israel since then. Israel's been taken over by these ultra extremist lunatics. Now, I think the governments in the 80s and before were really nearly as evil as the current government. But they were much better at hiding it. And they talked a different talk. And so public opinion in Israel was very, very different then than it is today.

And part of the issue has been demographics. The liberal elites in Israel are having very few children, very small families, while the more radical elements are having the larger families. And that's one of the factors that's driven the rise of Likud. They're the heirs of Jabotinsky, the ultra-terrorist lunatic. Basically the whole world considered this guy one of the worst terrorists of all time.

But now the party that's been ruling Israel for decades is the party of Jabotinsky. And now even crazier people are in the coalition with that party. And that has conditioned public opinion in Israel.

And I think the other thing that he misses is that — since October 7th, you know, it rhymes with September 11th, and, as you know, shortly after September 11th, if you took a poll in America: “Should we go, kill all the Arabs or kill all the Muslims?” you would have gotten a surprising number of people saying yes. Because there is this kind of shock effect when the country is attacked that could lead people to kind of get into that kind of mentality.

Do you remember the Howard Stern show on the morning of September the 11th? I remember it well. I was working in radio in Waterford in Ireland and some of the lads who worked there were fond of Stern. So they would get in the mail, they would receive tapes of Stern's shows, because the internet wasn't such a big thing. You couldn't download radio. So about a week or so after we got the tapes from Stern's show, Stern was basically advocating going in and wiping everybody out on the day.

So you're right. It does tend to stimulate that sort of talk. “Yeah, let's kill them all.” You're right, Kevin. I'll give you that. Yeah. Okay.

And the current government has encouraged that and stoked it and kept it at that kind of level. So I do think that Fred really should take a look at the polls. I'll find some and send them to you, Richie. And I will eat my proverbial hat if fewer than 90% of Israeli Jews don't support this genocide and if the majority don't want to make it worse.

I'm not being stubborn when I say I don't believe it. I'm not calling you a liar. I know you're not a liar. I've known you for years. When you claim that you've seen or read something, you've never left me down. So I'm not calling you a liar. I do not believe in their hearts that they want to get rid of the Palestinians. Not so many of them. I'd be a fool to think that none of them do. I think they obviously do. But look, I won't…I'll give you the final word on that.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Do more than 90% of Israeli Jews support the genocide of Gaza, i.e. the current “military operation”? Richie Allen doesn’t think so. During my appearance on his show yesterday he challenged me to cite polling data.

Unfortunately, no pollster in Israel will ever ask flat-out: “Do you support the genocide of Gaza?” Nor have any asked a more polite version of the same question: “Do you support or oppose Israel’s current military campaign in Gaza?” (I argue that well over 90% would say they support it, while less than 10% would say they oppose it.)

So we are going to have to extrapolate. Fortunately (though unfortunately for the Palestinians) this is an easy extrapolation. Time’s “What Do Israelis Think of the War with Hamas?” includes the following paragraph:

Poll results were also hawkish when it came to the use of force in Gaza: 57.5% of Israeli Jews said that they believed the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) were using too little firepower in Gaza, 36.6% said the IDF was using an appropriate amount of firepower, while just 1.8% said they believed the IDF was using too much fire power, while 4.2% said they weren’t sure

Let me repeat that. Fewer than 2% of Israeli Jews think the IDF is “using too much fire power” in Gaza.

Richie Allen might argue that those numbers may have changed since the poll was taken in November. But he would be grasping at straws. There is no evidence whatsoever of any significant change. Essentially nobody, I repeat nobody, in Israel is protesting against the IDF’s wholesale massacre of Palestinians. The “left-wing” Israelis are protesting Netanyahu’s failure to get the Israeli hostages returned. But they are completely indifferent to the genocide of Gazans. In fact, “indifferent” is probably the wrong word. To the extent that any Israeli Jews are saying anything about Palestinian suffering and death, they are wildly celebrating it.

This poll wasn’t an outlier. During a previous massacre of thousands of Gazan civilians, 2008’s Operation Cast Lead, “a poll taken the day after the start of the operation showed 81 percent of the Israeli public supporting the operation, with only 12 percent opposed.” Since 20 percent of Israel’s population are non-Jewish Arabs who disproportionately opposed the massacre, that means that virtually the entire Israeli Jewish population supported it. Polls during subsequent “mowing the lawn” operations gave similar results.

So if fewer than 2% of Israeli Jews think the IDF is “using too much fire power” in Gaza, does that mean that Israeli Jews, as a group, are raving genocidal lunatics that need to be dealt with in the same way that mad dogs are dealt with?

That comparison is unfair—to mad dogs. It is also unfair to some of the 140,000 or fewer Jewish Israelis (out of a total population of around 7 million) who, by way of thinking that Israel is “using too much fire power,” may actually oppose the genocide that is being perpetrated in their name. God bless that minuscule minority of non-genocidal Israelis. As for the other 98%…maybe the Jewish Autonomous Oblast would make a good re-education facility.

Extract from my conversation with Richie Allen

Going back to the days I was on radio in Spain, it is morally and it is wrong on every level to take hostages, regardless of who you are. We know what the IDF and the Israeli police have done to the people of Gaza for decades and decades: Reprehensible things, disgusting things, crimes against humanity. But two wrongs don't make a right. And keeping people for months, you know, in terror, because they must be terrified, the hostages. And never knowing when they're going to go home. That's wrong, Kevin. And I can't support that. I support the people of Palestine and their rights to their land, the right of return, all of that, pre-67. I know my history. I know Israel should not exist. Not legally. It has no legal basis, of course. It has no legitimacy in law internationally.

But don't keep hostages. Don't do that. It's terribly wrong. I hear what you're saying, you know, that it's leverage, but you're describing human beings with loves, with families, with cares, with ambitions. You're describing them as leverage. They're not. They're human beings, Kevin.

Well, yeah, that's a good point, Richie. But remember that Israel is holding 10,000 Palestinians hostages and it systematically practices torture on them and sexual abuse. Before October 7th, Israel was holding, at that point, 6,000 or however many thousands of Palestinian hostages. Now it’s 10,000. So, if the Palestinians try to grab a few hundred hostages in order to get their own 10,000 plus hostages released..

It's true that inn war, people have to do terrible things. And so the onus is on whoever starts the war. In this case, it was these genocidal lunatics who crossed the seas because they believe that their god gave them this land thousands of years ago. They have a many-thousand-year-old real estate deed, and it has apparently no statute of limitations on it. So they have the right to come over and massacre and expel the people who live there.

So it's obvious who started this. And when a war is started, when they attack you, when somebody commits that gross of an evil, you have the right to fight back. You know, Richie, if some gangsters came and massacred members of your family, God forbid, and expelled you from your house, set up shop in your house, would you have the right to use force to get your house back? Family members are dead and others they're holding and torturing. Do you have the right to pick up a gun and go after them to get your house back?

I say you do. I say if you don't pick up a gun and get your house back, you're committing a grave moral wrong. And anybody who isn't fighting Zionism with a gun right now is committing a grave moral wrong. And obviously that's the case for the direct victims of this, the Palestinians.

Well, I don't have any fight with Zionism, and I don't feel that I should be compelled to pick up a gun against an ideology. I'll use my my voice and my my journalism to...

They're Antichrist, they're not just an ideology.

Well, we could be here all night discussing that. I don't agree with that characterisation of people. You know, like I said, I used to interview Zionists about these things. And while they were very extreme, ideologically extreme, there were still human beings raising children, you know, who believed.

I interviewed Norman Finkelstein many times over the years, Kevin. For some reason, he doesn't return my emails these days, but that's fair enough. He might have a good reason as far as he's concerned. But Norman said to me once, he said, Richie, you see a lot of the children of Israel, not all of them, but see a lot of them as victims because from the moment they can talk and the moment they can understand what they're being told, they are told, you know, that the Arabs are evil and that God has given you, as you said, the right to be here. And that terrifies these kids effectively.

So you're calling people, you know, the Antichrist. These are people, many of them, who've been brought up within a cult, really, you could argue, a sect. And they're victims in some way, aren't they? That's a legitimate area of research, I think. What say you?

Yes, I agree completely. I translated and published Laurent Guyénot's book From Yahweh to Zion, which is probably the best critical book ever written on Jewish identity politics and its connection to religious tradition. And the conclusion of that book is that the leaders of Judaism, even long before Zionism, some of those leaders abused their people and told them that the other groups of people around them were evil. “So go and smash their gods and steal their stuff and give it to Yahweh,” meaning give it to the high priests of Yahweh, which are the people who organized the whole racket.

The Jews are traumatized from a very early age. And we could get into what Sigmund Freud would say about the circumcision of newborns, but that certainly does leave a—

Hang on there now. I was circumcised.

So was I. And in any case, you know, the various kinds of psychological abuse and torture that are meted out in that tradition to make them a people (who shall dwell) apart, brainwashing children into believing that the goyim, all the other tribes, all the non-Jews, are out to get them.—that creates a kind of mentality that ultimately leads perfectly nice individual people to become part of a group that is a tribal psychopath. That is, it's a tribe that treats other tribes or nations the way that a psychopathic individual treats other human beings.

And so that's the problem we have. Yes, the vast majority of Zionists are basically decent people, but their group mentality is psychopathic.

I remember talking about this over the years, me being a history graduate. There are no moral grounds for Israel to exist. We could talk about Sykes-Picot, the Ottoman Empire, what the British and French did. Obviously the Balfour Declaration. But it's only this biblical thing that is their case, really. Golda Meir once said, this country exists as the accomplishment of a promise made by God himself. It would be absurd to call its legitimacy into account. And he's channeling God's alleged, what did God say? “Unto thy seed have I given this land from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the Euphrates.”

But let me read you this from Fred: “Kevin is exaggerating about the number of Israelis wanting to rid the world of the Palestinians. I lived there in 1981 as a kibbutz volunteer. And yes, there are a lot who want to get rid of the Palestinians, but I wouldn't say even 50%. You know, he's wrong. He's exaggerating,” says Fred. And then Fred says “Kevin is right that the massacres will only get worse once the hostages are freed because the IDF won't have to worry about killing them.”

Fred spent time in a kibbutz He said, no way is every Israeli or is most of them or are most of them wanting to kill the Palestinians. That's his opinion.

Well, I think he's right about the 1980s. But there's been a real change in Israel since then. Israel's been taken over by these ultra extremist lunatics. Now, I think the governments in the 80s and before were really nearly as evil as the current government. But they were much better at hiding it. And they talked a different talk. And so public opinion in Israel was very, very different then than it is today.

And part of the issue has been demographics. The liberal elites in Israel are having very few children, very small families, while the more radical elements are having the larger families. And that's one of the factors that's driven the rise of Likud. They're the heirs of Jabotinsky, the ultra-terrorist lunatic. Basically the whole world considered this guy one of the worst terrorists of all time.

But now the party that's been ruling Israel for decades is the party of Jabotinsky. And now even crazier people are in the coalition with that party. And that has conditioned public opinion in Israel.

And I think the other thing that he misses is that — since October 7th, you know, it rhymes with September 11th, and, as you know, shortly after September 11th, if you took a poll in America: “Should we go, kill all the Arabs or kill all the Muslims?” you would have gotten a surprising number of people saying yes. Because there is this kind of shock effect when the country is attacked that could lead people to kind of get into that kind of mentality.

Do you remember the Howard Stern show on the morning of September the 11th? I remember it well. I was working in radio in Waterford in Ireland and some of the lads who worked there were fond of Stern. So they would get in the mail, they would receive tapes of Stern's shows, because the internet wasn't such a big thing. You couldn't download radio. So about a week or so after we got the tapes from Stern's show, Stern was basically advocating going in and wiping everybody out on the day.

So you're right. It does tend to stimulate that sort of talk. “Yeah, let's kill them all.” You're right, Kevin. I'll give you that. Yeah. Okay.

And the current government has encouraged that and stoked it and kept it at that kind of level. So I do think that Fred really should take a look at the polls. I'll find some and send them to you, Richie. And I will eat my proverbial hat if fewer than 90% of Israeli Jews don't support this genocide and if the majority don't want to make it worse.

I'm not being stubborn when I say I don't believe it. I'm not calling you a liar. I know you're not a liar. I've known you for years. When you claim that you've seen or read something, you've never left me down. So I'm not calling you a liar. I do not believe in their hearts that they want to get rid of the Palestinians. Not so many of them. I'd be a fool to think that none of them do. I think they obviously do. But look, I won't…I'll give you the final word on that.

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Dr. Ridgely Abdul Mu’min Muhammad of the Nation of Islam Research Group (NOIRG) discusses his forthcoming article “Does Israel Want the Gaza Strip?” We’ll also discuss The Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan’s “The Genocide of Palestinians: A Test for The Whole Human Family” as well as issues raised in NOIRG’s March 4 article “How the Synagogue of Satan Became Israel: From Sugar to Cotton to Oil.”

Excerpt:

I basically emailed you and a couple other contacts at the Nation of Islam, questioning, “where's the Honorable Minister? We need his eloquence now more than ever. And then, lo and behold, at Savior's Day, he came through.

Well, the thing is, if you heard his speech...

I haven't heard it. I read the article.

Oh, man, you’ve got to hear it, because he was told...He said he got a message through someone from the Savior telling him to be quiet. So he was already being quiet, and so he decided to be even quieter and not say anything about anything on an international basis until he gave his speech. And what he said was so profound and earth-shattering because he just went into Netanyahu straight up and no backing off.

And that article that I wrote that you read, you'll see that Israel has been planning to do this for a long time because they want Gaza. They have a canal, the Ben Gurion Canal, that they'v been planning on since the late 60s, right after NASA nationalized the Suez Canal in 1956, where they've been planning another canal from the late 60s to get around the Suez Canal.

As you know, they got this trade route established from China over Israel into Palestine. And so now we know what they were up to because of that canal and the trillions of gallons of gas, cubic feet of natural gas and gallons of gas that right off the Gaza Strip, supposedly owned by the Gazans, but Netanyahu has prevented them from utilizing it, even though it's been known since 1999. Netanyahu has been instrumental in keeping the Palestinians from utilizing their natural resources.

And you remember, my brother, because you was on the panel when we dealt with 9-1-1 for Savior's Day. What year was that?

Oh, man, that was, I'm just thinking back, maybe 2017, 18, something like that.

Right. And then wasn’t it brought out that Netanyahu was on a regular basis talking to Giuliani when he was the mayor right around 9-1-1?

Well, I think what I remember talking about was that Netanyahu was getting on the phone with Larry Silverstein, the notorious landlord of two months who bought out the World Trade Center two months before 9-11, doubled the terror insurance, and then skipped breakfast on 9/11. He was always at the Windows of the World restaurant on top of the North Tower every day except that day. And then he unconvincingly said his wife reminded him, tapped him on the shoulder as he was walking out to breakfast and said, you have a dermatologist appointment.

Larry Silverstein then went to court and claimed double indemnity on the basis of two completely separate and unrelated terror attacks, namely the two planes. And he got his double indemnity insurance settlement, walking off with nearly $6 billion. And he'd only put down maybe 15 million max of his own money, and another 100 million of his friends’.

So that was the best investment ever made. It would have been the worst investment ever made if 9/11 hadn't happened, because the Twin Towers were outmoded, they didn't have communications infrastructure, and they were riddled with asbestos, and a court had ordered that asbestos taken out would have cost double-digit billions, quite likely.

So, yeah, Silverstein, the guy who confessed to demolishing Building 7 on a PBS documentary, America Rebuilds. He was on the phone every weekend with Netanyahu, according to Haaretz, the best newspaper in Israel. So, yeah, I think I remember talking about that. And Christopher Bollyn, who also spoke at that wonderful event, might have mentioned it, too.

Right. So, look, it all goes full circle now. Now we have Netanyahu in the middle of a turn. You know, you heard turn your other cheek. How about just look away and go in the wrong direction? You remember when they scrambled the jets on 9-1-1, they went in the wrong direction. They went over the ocean.

It's the same thing that happened with Hamas. Israel actually sells surveillance equipment to the rest of the world, based upon how well they're able to monitor and track and keep up with every Palestinian in Gaza and the West Bank. They sell this to the rest of the world, and you're going to tell me on October 7th they just didn't see it?

But, you know, The New York Times is bringing out articles about the fact that Netanyahu and the rest of them were warned that this was going to happen at least a year in advance. But yet they chose not to be in place to protect their people at that time because they wanted the excuse to destroy Gaza. So they made the excuse.

They made Hamas. They got Qatar to fund Hamas. Hamas was not funded by Iran. It was funded by Qatar and Israel. And the weaponry, according to the New York Times article, the bombs that were shot into Israel came from Israel. They say that in previous Israeli wars with Palestinians, some of the missiles did not explode. So the Palestinians picked up the bombs and shot them over the wall. But they had tags on them “made in America.” It’s part of that 3.8 billion dollars a year, supposedly for protection, but actually used for aggression, feeding a straw man that they can take down.

And they used that as the excuse why they're murdering all the Gazans so they can take their land and take the oil and the natural gas and then run a canal right through it so that they will not have to go through the Suez Canal that's owned and controlled by Egypt.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com