Truth Jihad Radio

Press TV

Joining us on this edition of the News Review, we have Professor of International Relations at Lebanese University, Mr. Jamal Waqim, who's joining us from the Lebanese capital Beirut. Also from Saidia, Morocco, we have political commentator Kevin Barrett. Gentlemen, welcome to the program.

Let's start off with Mr. Waqeem. We're listening to the comments by U.S. President Joe Biden, who claims that the Israelis have put forth a rational offer. I want to get your thoughts on that. How do you read into those comments by the U.S. president? And the main question here is, can the Israelis even be trusted in such a situation?

Jamal Waqim: Well, of course, Biden is supporting Israel ever since it launched its aggression against Gaza. And he's supporting all its political stances and initiatives. He wants Israel to be victorious in this aggression against the resistance in the Gaza Strip. And that's why he's endorsing all conditions and prerequisites for such an objective to be achieved. This is how we can understand Biden's comments.

In this regard, of course, Israel cannot be trusted. Throughout the Arab-Israeli struggle, it was only checked by power and by force, not by any negotiations or any agreement. So that's why I believe that these conditions that have been put on the table by Israel are not acceptable to the resistance in Gaza, and this will drag on the conflict in the Gaza Strip, leading to more and more civilians being killed by the Israeli army.

Mr. Kevin Barrett, I want to get your thoughts as well. Do you agree with our guest in Beirut that these conditions that are being put forth by the Israelis in Washington are not acceptable? Why is that? And do you also see that Washington and the Tel Aviv regime just keep kicking the ball down further down the field?

Kevin Barrett: Yeah, I think he's right. The Israelis are looking for a so-called “temporary ceasefire” which would allow for all of their hostages to be released. And then after that ceasefire is over, they would be free to continue committing genocide and pulverizing Gaza without any restraint.

Obviously that's a non-starter. The only way the Palestinian resistance can reasonably be expected to release all the Israelis in its custody is if there's going to be a permanent ceasefire, not a temporary one. And that's the main sticking point here, it seems.

The Americans, unfortunately, are seeking an Israeli victory. They are on the side of the Zionists. Biden's administration is surrounded by Zionists. And they don't want to see their side lose. They also have political problems, though, because Biden will very likely lose the next presidential election if there hasn't been some kind of durable peace.

Now, what he would like to see, I suppose, would be some sort of imaginary Israeli victory. But there's no such thing. That can't happen. There's no prospective path to the Israelis defeating Hamas and getting their people back alive. That's not going to happen in any Israeli “victory scenario.”

But they have these delusions, Netanyahu does, because all the other alternatives involve Netanyahu leaving power and very likely entering prison. And the Americans are really just hostages of the Zionists, and so they entertain these lunatic fantasies.

Ultimately, the Americans are going to have to put pressure on the Zionists to accept some kind of permanent cessation to this genocide. That's the only reasonable way this can end, and that's the only way that Biden can preserve his chances of being reelected.

Professor Waqim, let's talk about the hypocritical stance that we're seeing from the United States. On one hand, they're showing that they're pushing for a ceasefire, but on the other hand, they veto three United Nations Security Council resolutions for a humanitarian ceasefire. There's also been this notion circulating that the bloodshed could stop with just one phone call from the US president. How do you view this inconsistency and hypocritical stance by Washington?

Jamal Waqim: I believe that Biden administration fully supports the Israeli aggression. But at the same time they don't want to lose the Arab votes and the Muslim votes in the United States, especially since they are running in elections. So that's why on one hand they give Israel a free hand to continue its aggression against the Palestinians in Gaza, and at the same time they play this card, or let's say they try to appear as if they are trying to call for a ceasefire or an agreement in order to win over the Arab and the Muslim voters in the United States, especially since Biden is in a very dire situation right now. He's not being able to withstand the pressure by the Arab and the Muslim lobby in the United States. And at the same time, he's not faring well against his opponent, Donald Trump. All expectations say that he will lose the upcoming elections due to be held in November. And this is how we can understand the hypocritical stance of the Biden administration in this regard.

Kevin Barrett, your thoughts on that issue as well. The U.S. hypocrisy. Our guest, Professor Waqim, believes that this facade that the Biden administration is putting on with attempts and struggling to get a ceasefire is to keep the Arab and Muslim votes in an election year. But if that's the case, that ship has set sail and it's departing fast, isn't it?

That's right. They just had the Super Tuesday vote yesterday, which is the biggest primary election voting day in the United States. And approximately 20 percent of the Democratic voters in the state of Minnesota voted uncommitted. So that was even more than in Michigan, the key swing state, last week. So the voters are sending a very strong message to Biden that continued tolerance or even all-out support, as it appears, for this genocide is going to lead to those people not voting for him.

It's kind of mind-boggling that the Zionists have so much power that they can force a sitting U.S. president to essentially guarantee his own failure to be reelected. He would rather face that loss of office than bite the Zionist hand that feeds him. It makes you wonder, what kind of power is that? How do they exert that power?

Some of it is money. It's been estimated that the 50-plus major Jewish groups led by AIPAC and their supporters donate up to half, between a third and half, of the campaign money that flows into American elections. And these are bribes that are basically considered under the euphemism of campaign contributions.

So the money is one big factor. The media is another. The Western media is totally controlled by Zionist Jews. Now, let's be honest and admit that some of them, more and more of them, especially younger Western and especially American Jews, are turning against Israel and its genocide of Palestine. But the fact is that the bulk of the power in that community is very much pro-genocide, pro-Zionism.

And finally, there's organized crime. We've seen American presidents and would-have- been presidents like John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy murdered by the state of Israel along with their people in the American military and intelligence apparatus. Those people are essentially the same people that blew up the buildings on September 11, 2001. So the Zionist presence in organized crime is incredibly important, and we shouldn't forget that anybody who goes up against them is inviting retaliation.

All right, that's all the time we have for this segment of the program. Thanks to my guests, Professor Jamal Waqim joining us from the Lebanese capital Beirut, and also political commentator Kevin Barrett joining us from Saidia, Morocco.

PS: Regarding yesterday’s post “Why Are Arab Regimes So Impotent in the Face of Zionist Barbarism?” here is an excellent contribution from my once and (insha’allah) future radio guest Daniel Haqiqatjou.

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

First 20 minutes: Peter Koenig recently posted an analysis and video of Dr. Ralph Wilde’s presentation to the ICJ which “completely destroys the legality of Israel, of Israel’s existence. Going back by over 100 years to the Balfour Declaration of 1917, all the way to the illegal UK ‘handing over’ of Palestine in 1947 to the United Nations.” We may also discuss his other recent articles “Who Owns the World?“, “The Brain Is the Battlefield of the Future,” “Navalny’s Death – A Western-Instigated False Flag”? and more. Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he worked for over 30 years around the world.

Final 35 minutes: Eric Walberg discusses his recent articles “Islam and Jesus as Jewish Messiah,” “Godless in America,” and “Pauline Christianity vs. Jesus as Jewish Messiah.”

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

First 20 minutes: Peter Koenig recently posted an analysis and video of Dr. Ralph Wilde’s presentation to the ICJ which “completely destroys the legality of Israel, of Israel’s existence. Going back by over 100 years to the Balfour Declaration of 1917, all the way to the illegal UK ‘handing over’ of Palestine in 1947 to the United Nations.” We may also discuss his other recent articles “Who Owns the World?“, “The Brain Is the Battlefield of the Future,” “Navalny’s Death – A Western-Instigated False Flag”? and more. Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he worked for over 30 years around the world.

Final 35 minutes: Eric Walberg discusses his recent articles “Islam and Jesus as Jewish Messiah,” “Godless in America,” and “Pauline Christianity vs. Jesus as Jewish Messiah.”

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Aaron Bushnell identified himself in the livestream video as he walked toward the Israeli embassy as “an active duty member of the U.S. Air Force” adding that “I will no longer be complicit in genocide.” He then lit himself ablaze and yelled “FREE PALESTINE!” over and over. -Sam Husseini (where you can watch the uncensored video)

On December 17, 2010, Tunisian street vendor Mohamed Bouazizi set himself on fire in Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia, catalyzing what would become known as the Arab Spring. Bouazizi, oppressed by local authorities, sensed himself in a hopeless position—a feeling shared by many of his compatriots, who pushed back against hopelessness by way of mass uprisings. Across the Arab world the cry was taken up: الشعب يريد إسقاط النظام, “the people want to bring down the regime.” By time it was over, governments in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and Yemen had fallen.

Last Sunday, February 25, US Air Force serviceman Aaron Bushnell burned himself to death in front of the Israeli embassy, saying “I will no longer be complicit in genocide.” Like Mohamed Bouazizi, Aaron Bushnell expressed “extreme” feelings shared by millions. And like Bouazizi, Bushnell carried out his last act in the shadow of the government building that symbolized tyranny. For Bouazizi, it was the governor’s office in Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia. For Bushnell, it was the Israeli embassy in Washington, DC.

In neither case was the authorities’ control of social media sufficient to dampen the fires of outrage. In 2010 Arab potentates were scrambling to get a handle on the hard-to-censor nature of the internet, while American “democracy” proponents following Gene Sharp were way ahead of them in weaponizing the newly omnipresent cell phone.

Today, the pro-Palestine side of social media is outrunning the American Zionist oligarchs who dominate the legacy internet, as platforms founded by Chinese (TikTok) and Russians (Telegram) gain ground on the Zuckerbergs of the world. Suddenly, the majority of American young adults openly side with Hamas. Global outrage at Israel’s genocide of Gaza, like Arab outrage at circa-2010 dictatorships, isn’t easy to censor out of existence.

Bouazizi and Bushnell were both known as good guys who went out of their way to feed hungry people—Bouazizi by giving them his produce, Bushnell by volunteering with aid groups. Both suffered under fake leftist regimes—Ben Ali’s rotten remnants of Bourgiba’s Tunisian revolutionaries, and Biden’s equally rotten corpse of what was once the party of FDR and Kennedy. Both quickly became icons of the fight against injustice.

Finally, and most importantly, Bouazizi and Bushnell both lived in lands dismembered and degraded by Zionists. Bouzizi’s MENA region has been trying to excise the carcinogenic implant of the Zionist entity since it metastasized in 1948, but Zionist hands on the levers of global power won’t allow it. The gargantuan gap between the people of the region, who are in overwhelming majority anti-Zionist, and the rulers, whose pragmatism forces them to accommodate the Zionist-led West, makes normal governance in the region impossible.

Bushnell’s America, too, has seen normal governance destroyed by Zionists. The Kennedy assassinations (protecting Israel’s nuclear program) and 9/11 (hijacking America’s military to destroy Israel’s enemies) were the one-two punch that KO’d American democracy.

Unlike Mohamed Bouazizi, Aaron Bushnell picked exactly the right place to burn himself alive: The Israeli embassy in Washington, DC, the real center of power in post-JFK post-9/11 America. While Bouzizi’s grievance was personal, his thoughts and feelings inchoate, Bushnell knew what he was up against, and planned his last words perfectly: “I will no longer be complicit in genocide. Free Palestine!”

Will Bushnell spark an “American spring”? It would be nice if the same haters-of-injustice who overran US cities during the 2020 George Floyd protests would notice a vastly greater injustice—the Zionist hijacking of America and ensuing US complicity in the genocide of Palestine—and up their game. But instead of randomly looting and burning down small businesses and retail outlets, why not protest the genocidaires themselves? There are plenty of institutions and individuals directly complicit in the Gaza genocide, starting with Israeli embassies and consulates, and including locations affiliated with AIPAC, the ADL, and the other “major Zionist organizations.” They all richly deserve to be the focus of “mostly peaceful protests.”

Might Aaron Bushnell’s sacrifice spark a movement of patriotic, high-IQ service members willing to lay down their lives to end Zionist dominance of the United States? That, according to Alan Sabrosky, former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College, is the only conceivable way that the Zionist golem’s death-grip on America could end. Sabrosky notes that the anti-Zionist anti-Deep-State “Constitutional counter-coup” would probably have to be led by colonels (Douglas MacGregor anyone?) not generals, since the generals are blackmailed, bought-and-paid-for, or otherwise controlled.

So here’s the left-right combination that could knock out the Zionists: First, angry young leftists start doing a George-Floyd-protests-redux against Zionist targets. But this time the Zionist-dominated mainstream media is split, with the younger journalists supporting the protests, while the older ones and management react with horror. As the chaos spreads, and the Democratic party continues to polarize, a Trump victory in November seems all but assured. Panicking neocons belatedly take Robert Kagan’s advice and try assassinating Trump.

Successful or not, the assassinate-Trump plot offers the anti-Zionist colonels the opportunity they need to declare a state of emergency and stage a Constitutional counter-coup. Uniting pro-Trump forces with the anti-Zionists of the center and right, the colonels reveal Israel’s responsibility for the Kennedy assassinations and 9/11, purge the media and financial sector, nationalize the big banks, bring the troops home from overseas bases to keep order during the return to Constitutional governance, and declare an end to the misbegotten American empire and the rebirth of the American Republic, which they intend to make great again.

The Arab spring turned out to be a mixed bag. It made Tunisia incrementally more democratic, brought heroic Houthis to power in Yemen, swapped one dictator for another in Egypt, imposed chaos on Libya, nearly destroyed Syria, but ultimately didn’t fundamentally change the region.

Would an American spring fare better? I hope and pray for the unlikely prospect that we get a chance to find out.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

Aaron Bushnell identified himself in the livestream video as he walked toward the Israeli embassy as “an active duty member of the U.S. Air Force” adding that “I will no longer be complicit in genocide.” He then lit himself ablaze and yelled “FREE PALESTINE!” over and over. -Sam Husseini (where you can watch the uncensored video)

On December 17, 2010, Tunisian street vendor Mohamed Bouazizi set himself on fire in Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia, catalyzing what would become known as the Arab Spring. Bouazizi, oppressed by local authorities, sensed himself in a hopeless position—a feeling shared by many of his compatriots, who pushed back against hopelessness by way of mass uprisings. Across the Arab world the cry was taken up: الشعب يريد إسقاط النظام, “the people want to bring down the regime.” By time it was over, governments in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, and Yemen had fallen.

Last Sunday, February 25, US Air Force serviceman Aaron Bushnell burned himself to death in front of the Israeli embassy, saying “I will no longer be complicit in genocide.” Like Mohamed Bouazizi, Aaron Bushnell expressed “extreme” feelings shared by millions. And like Bouazizi, Bushnell carried out his last act in the shadow of the government building that symbolized tyranny. For Bouazizi, it was the governor’s office in Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia. For Bushnell, it was the Israeli embassy in Washington, DC.

In neither case was the authorities’ control of social media sufficient to dampen the fires of outrage. In 2010 Arab potentates were scrambling to get a handle on the hard-to-censor nature of the internet, while American “democracy” proponents following Gene Sharp were way ahead of them in weaponizing the newly omnipresent cell phone.

Today, the pro-Palestine side of social media is outrunning the American Zionist oligarchs who dominate the legacy internet, as platforms founded by Chinese (TikTok) and Russians (Telegram) gain ground on the Zuckerbergs of the world. Suddenly, the majority of American young adults openly side with Hamas. Global outrage at Israel’s genocide of Gaza, like Arab outrage at circa-2010 dictatorships, isn’t easy to censor out of existence.

Bouazizi and Bushnell were both known as good guys who went out of their way to feed hungry people—Bouazizi by giving them his produce, Bushnell by volunteering with aid groups. Both suffered under fake leftist regimes—Ben Ali’s rotten remnants of Bourgiba’s Tunisian revolutionaries, and Biden’s equally rotten corpse of what was once the party of FDR and Kennedy. Both quickly became icons of the fight against injustice.

Finally, and most importantly, Bouazizi and Bushnell both lived in lands dismembered and degraded by Zionists. Bouzizi’s MENA region has been trying to excise the carcinogenic implant of the Zionist entity since it metastasized in 1948, but Zionist hands on the levers of global power won’t allow it. The gargantuan gap between the people of the region, who are in overwhelming majority anti-Zionist, and the rulers, whose pragmatism forces them to accommodate the Zionist-led West, makes normal governance in the region impossible.

Bushnell’s America, too, has seen normal governance destroyed by Zionists. The Kennedy assassinations (protecting Israel’s nuclear program) and 9/11 (hijacking America’s military to destroy Israel’s enemies) were the one-two punch that KO’d American democracy.

Unlike Mohamed Bouazizi, Aaron Bushnell picked exactly the right place to burn himself alive: The Israeli embassy in Washington, DC, the real center of power in post-JFK post-9/11 America. While Bouzizi’s grievance was personal, his thoughts and feelings inchoate, Bushnell knew what he was up against, and planned his last words perfectly: “I will no longer be complicit in genocide. Free Palestine!”

Will Bushnell spark an “American spring”? It would be nice if the same haters-of-injustice who overran US cities during the 2020 George Floyd protests would notice a vastly greater injustice—the Zionist hijacking of America and ensuing US complicity in the genocide of Palestine—and up their game. But instead of randomly looting and burning down small businesses and retail outlets, why not protest the genocidaires themselves? There are plenty of institutions and individuals directly complicit in the Gaza genocide, starting with Israeli embassies and consulates, and including locations affiliated with AIPAC, the ADL, and the other “major Zionist organizations.” They all richly deserve to be the focus of “mostly peaceful protests.”

Might Aaron Bushnell’s sacrifice spark a movement of patriotic, high-IQ service members willing to lay down their lives to end Zionist dominance of the United States? That, according to Alan Sabrosky, former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College, is the only conceivable way that the Zionist golem’s death-grip on America could end. Sabrosky notes that the anti-Zionist anti-Deep-State “Constitutional counter-coup” would probably have to be led by colonels (Douglas MacGregor anyone?) not generals, since the generals are blackmailed, bought-and-paid-for, or otherwise controlled.

So here’s the left-right combination that could knock out the Zionists: First, angry young leftists start doing a George-Floyd-protests-redux against Zionist targets. But this time the Zionist-dominated mainstream media is split, with the younger journalists supporting the protests, while the older ones and management react with horror. As the chaos spreads, and the Democratic party continues to polarize, a Trump victory in November seems all but assured. Panicking neocons belatedly take Robert Kagan’s advice and try assassinating Trump.

Successful or not, the assassinate-Trump plot offers the anti-Zionist colonels the opportunity they need to declare a state of emergency and stage a Constitutional counter-coup. Uniting pro-Trump forces with the anti-Zionists of the center and right, the colonels reveal Israel’s responsibility for the Kennedy assassinations and 9/11, purge the media and financial sector, nationalize the big banks, bring the troops home from overseas bases to keep order during the return to Constitutional governance, and declare an end to the misbegotten American empire and the rebirth of the American Republic, which they intend to make great again.

The Arab spring turned out to be a mixed bag. It made Tunisia incrementally more democratic, brought heroic Houthis to power in Yemen, swapped one dictator for another in Egypt, imposed chaos on Libya, nearly destroyed Syria, but ultimately didn’t fundamentally change the region.

Would an American spring fare better? I hope and pray for the unlikely prospect that we get a chance to find out.

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Alan Sabrosky returns to his “first Friday of the month” slot to discuss ever-escalating genocidal Zionist lies including the Intercept’s exposé of Zionist Oct. 7 rape lies and the NY Times’ response; Israel’s shameless lies to the World Court; its mowing down starving Palestinians lined up for food aid and then blaming the victims; and more. Dr. Sabrosky recommends the Linux-based system Qubes (which appears to be keeping the vandals at bay) and discusses Holocaust historiography, the border crisis and the death of the West, the larger wars on Palestine and Russia, and “the pride of Carthage.”

Dr. Alan Sabrosky is the former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College. He expresses his Jewish heritage via cuisine, not foreign policy.

Excerpt:

Alan Sabrosky: When I was growing up in the United States and in high school in the late 1950s and at college in the early 1960s in Michigan and Ohio respectively, there wasn't a word about anything that added up to, that was called later a Holocaust. Nothing about gas chambers, nothing about extermination camps, nothing about any huge numbers of people murdered. World War II was strictly World War I on a vaster scale and bloodier scale, and that was it. And also, by the way, no one at that time ever talked about the real Holocaust, and there were real Holocausts in World War II. I'm not talking about the Holodomor under Stalin in Ukraine before World War II.

There were real Holocausts, and those were German and Japanese cities. The American Air Force burned to death over 100,000 Japanese in one night in Tokyo. The American and British Air Forces burned to death God knows how many people in German cities. The official death toll has more German civilians being killed in World War II than German soldiers. And in Japan it was much the same way. Far more Japanese civilians died under American attack than Japanese soldiers, sailors, airmen and so forth in the war.

And our war against civilians is one of the reasons I think that Americans, however much you and I and those who think like us, might wring their hands about what's happening in Gaza, there is a profound indifference. And it goes beyond governmental indifference. Americans—sorry Alison Weir, I respect your work (at IfAmericansKnew.org)—but Americans do know, a lot of them do know, and if all of them knew what was happening, most wouldn't care. And that's the really sad part of it. But that's true. We wouldn't care.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Alan Sabrosky returns to his “first Friday of the month” slot to discuss ever-escalating genocidal Zionist lies including the Intercept’s exposé of Zionist Oct. 7 rape lies and the NY Times’ response; Israel’s shameless lies to the World Court; its mowing down starving Palestinians lined up for food aid and then blaming the victims; and more. Dr. Sabrosky recommends the Linux-based system Qubes (which appears to be keeping the vandals at bay) and discusses Holocaust historiography, the border crisis and the death of the West, the larger wars on Palestine and Russia, and “the pride of Carthage.”

Dr. Alan Sabrosky is the former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College. He expresses his Jewish heritage via cuisine, not foreign policy.

Excerpt:

Alan Sabrosky: When I was growing up in the United States and in high school in the late 1950s and at college in the early 1960s in Michigan and Ohio respectively, there wasn't a word about anything that added up to, that was called later a Holocaust. Nothing about gas chambers, nothing about extermination camps, nothing about any huge numbers of people murdered. World War II was strictly World War I on a vaster scale and bloodier scale, and that was it. And also, by the way, no one at that time ever talked about the real Holocaust, and there were real Holocausts in World War II. I'm not talking about the Holodomor under Stalin in Ukraine before World War II.

There were real Holocausts, and those were German and Japanese cities. The American Air Force burned to death over 100,000 Japanese in one night in Tokyo. The American and British Air Forces burned to death God knows how many people in German cities. The official death toll has more German civilians being killed in World War II than German soldiers. And in Japan it was much the same way. Far more Japanese civilians died under American attack than Japanese soldiers, sailors, airmen and so forth in the war.

And our war against civilians is one of the reasons I think that Americans, however much you and I and those who think like us, might wring their hands about what's happening in Gaza, there is a profound indifference. And it goes beyond governmental indifference. Americans—sorry Alison Weir, I respect your work (at IfAmericansKnew.org)—but Americans do know, a lot of them do know, and if all of them knew what was happening, most wouldn't care. And that's the really sad part of it. But that's true. We wouldn't care.

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Watch the Press TV interview above or on YouTube, Rumble, or Bitchute. Below is a rush transcript

Press TV: Rick Sterling is an investigative journalist joining us from Walnut Creek in California. We also have Kevin Barrett, editor at Veterans Today joining us from Saidiya over in Morocco. Welcome to you both. Rick Sterling, I'll start with you. There's a couple of real shocking, not that before we didn't hear shocking news coming out of the Gaza Strip. One of them is the fact that you have people in one particular incident that's now been broadcast that are eating cactus for food. The other is the massacre that took place where the military aid convoy comes, not the military, but aid convoy comes, Palestinians line up for food and then they get shot at by the regime forces and they killed over a hundred. What do you make of the fact that this is still continuing by the Israeli regime?

Rick Sterling: Well, I think Israel is spitting in the face of the International Court of Justice which ruled at the end of January that Israel should stop this and they're just continuing as before. The Israeli tanks and soldiers have fired on the civilians lining up to try to get food. It's just another continuation of the genocide.

Taking a look at the way that this genocide has continued, Kevin Barrett, it would not happen were it not for the U.S. support militarily for the Israeli regime. We had at one point where a Pentagon spokesperson has said that Israel has unfettered access to military equipment of all kinds, bombs, you name it. That's happening almost on a daily basis, if not on a daily basis. So doesn't that make the U.S. complicit in this and as guilty?

Kevin Barrett: Yes, the U.S. is 100% complicit, and American leaders ought to be right up there on the defendant's stand in the world court, along with the Israeli leaders, and they all need to be tried, convicted, and sentenced, and in many cases executed. These are among the worst war criminals in history. There's no reason that this has to happen. There are wars that are driven by actual necessity. This is not. This is basically an act of pure aggression by these Zionist genocidal maniacs who have a crazy fundamentalist religious view. It's actually not even an authentic traditional religious view. But it's a satanic spin-off of millenarian messianic lunacy that's been percolating in that community for hundreds of years now, and it's turned into sheer genocide driven by utter madness.

There's no military purpose to luring people, to starving them until they show up in the thousands to try to get a sack of flour, and then firing into the crowd with tanks, which is what just happened. Killing over a hundred people and wounding many, many hundreds more. And this is just one example of so many of these extreme, sadistic, genocidal actions by the Zionists that have nothing to do with any kind of military necessity.

The Israelis keep posting videos of themselves performing atrocities and acts of extreme cruelty. For instance, just recently, I just happened to look at a few of these. An Israeli soldier filmed himself proudly destroying a children's toy store, attacking the toys. They seem to really hate children and mothers. There's some kind of psychological complex at work here.

The Americans are indeed totally guilty. Joe Biden was recently filmed licking an ice cream cone and blabbering about a possible ceasefire, which he claimed, while he licked the ice cream cone, would be coming this weekend. But as the people of Gaza starve, and then are mowed down by the hundreds as they line up for the food that would keep them alive, Biden’s promises while he’s licking ice cream don’t look very sincere.

They don't. Another act that has not received yet an official reaction from the U.S. President or many other U.S. officials is that self-immolation that has taken place that has led to now somewhat of a movement. Why are we not seeing a reaction to that? U.S. President Joe Biden talks about the deaths that have happened in Ukraine, for example, and showing sympathy there, but not towards someone who is employed by the U.S. government? Your reaction to that, Rick Sterling, as to what has driven someone to do that, and whether that is what Americans are now feeling, that they've reached that level of understanding to understand that a genocide is taking place.

Rick Sterling: I think among the public, there's a very strong feeling that that is the case. Even months ago, 70% of the population in the U.S. supported a ceasefire. Meanwhile, the US administration has vetoed the resolutions for a ceasefire at the UN Security Council three times, most recently just a week ago. Among the public here, there's a growing realization that the mythology of Israel is not what the reality is. And it’s bringing about a sea change. The Administration has got a lot of people who are very political. They were very quick to charge China with genocide over the situation with the Uighurs. And people who’ve looked into it say there’s no basis for that, that it’s truly baseless. And in contrast, whether it’s Pelosi or Biden, they refuse to recognize that genocide is happening in Gaza. So you’ve got a lot of hypocrisy. The animosity in the US administration extends now to South Africa. And in the US Congress there is now a resolution that attempts to threaten South Africa. It’s calling for a review of relations. And it’s pretty clear that they’re doing this due to South Africa’s courage and wisdom in bringing the charge of genocide against Israel to the ICJ. So there’s a sea change happening around the world where people are starting to see the United States differently. And there’s also a sea change happening within the US where people are looking at the elites who are running the country and sensing the big divide between what they’re doing and what most Americans would prefer.

All right. And quickly, if you can, Kevin Barrett, since you mentioned Joe Biden licking on that ice cream, it was when asked about whether there's going to be a truce. HJe mentioned Monday, as soon as Monday. That's just a few days away. Putting aside that scene of him licking the ice cream, however, why would he say that when you have Hamas already to have reacted, saying that large gaps remain and pretty much there are those divisive factors that do exist even in the prior truces that were on the table.

Kevin Barrett: You know, I have no idea why Biden would say something like that while he's licking that ice cream cone unless he was trying to show total contempt for the suffering that's going on. And it's really mind-boggling. A lot of people here in the United States think that Biden is senile, that he's not really in control of his faculties and that it's the people around him who run things and the people around him are mostly Zionist Jews. And those people have decided they’re going to protect their Zionist co-religionists and co-ethnics over in Occupied Palestine no matter what. Biden is a hostage and a captive of his own administration. He doesn’t have the intellectual firepower or the spark of willpower to stand up even if he wanted to, which he very likely doesn’t, not being a particularly moral individual himself. So we’ll see how it transpires, and we’ll all be praying that it somehow stops. But I don’t think it will be the Americans who stop it. I think it will be the people in Yemen and Lebanon and people all around the world, including people like Aaron Bushnell.

LIVE RADIO! Alan Sabrosky on Zionist Lies, Peter Koenig on “Israel Is an Illegal State”

Listen live Fridays noon to 2pm Eastern on Revolution.Radio later archived at KevinBarrett.Substack.com

First hour: Alan Sabrosky returns to his “first Friday of the month” slot to discuss ever-escalating genocidal Zionist liesincluding the Intercept’s exposé of Zionist Oct. 7 rape lies and the NY Times’ response; Israel’s shameless lies to the World Court; its mowing down starving Palestinians lined up for food aid and then blaming the victims; and more. We’ll also discuss other topics which may include the larger wars on Palestine and Russia, social media selectivity and bias, the border, the primacy of understanding domestic false flags, and “the pride of Carthage.”

Retired Marine Corps officer Dr. Alan Sabrosky is the former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College. He expresses his Jewish heritage via cuisine, not foreign policy.

Second hour: Peter Koenig recently posted an analysis and video of Dr. Ralph Wilde’s presentation to the ICC which “completely destroys the legality of Israel, of Israel’s existence. Going back by over 100 years to the Balfour Declaration of 1917, all the way to the illegal UK ‘handing over’ of Palestine in 1947 to the United Nations.” We may also discuss his other recent articles “Who Owns the World?“, “The Brain Is the Battlefield of the Future,” “Navalny’s Death – A Western-Instigated False Flag”? and more.

Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he worked for over 30 years around the world.

FFWN: Could Aaron Bushnell’s Sacrifice Spark a Regime Change?

Watch Saturdays after 1 pm Eastern, and check out the list of 30 stories now, HERE

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Watch the Press TV interview above or on YouTube, Rumble, or Bitchute. Below is a rush transcript

Press TV: Rick Sterling is an investigative journalist joining us from Walnut Creek in California. We also have Kevin Barrett, editor at Veterans Today joining us from Saidiya over in Morocco. Welcome to you both. Rick Sterling, I'll start with you. There's a couple of real shocking, not that before we didn't hear shocking news coming out of the Gaza Strip. One of them is the fact that you have people in one particular incident that's now been broadcast that are eating cactus for food. The other is the massacre that took place where the military aid convoy comes, not the military, but aid convoy comes, Palestinians line up for food and then they get shot at by the regime forces and they killed over a hundred. What do you make of the fact that this is still continuing by the Israeli regime?

Rick Sterling: Well, I think Israel is spitting in the face of the International Court of Justice which ruled at the end of January that Israel should stop this and they're just continuing as before. The Israeli tanks and soldiers have fired on the civilians lining up to try to get food. It's just another continuation of the genocide.

Taking a look at the way that this genocide has continued, Kevin Barrett, it would not happen were it not for the U.S. support militarily for the Israeli regime. We had at one point where a Pentagon spokesperson has said that Israel has unfettered access to military equipment of all kinds, bombs, you name it. That's happening almost on a daily basis, if not on a daily basis. So doesn't that make the U.S. complicit in this and as guilty?

Kevin Barrett: Yes, the U.S. is 100% complicit, and American leaders ought to be right up there on the defendant's stand in the world court, along with the Israeli leaders, and they all need to be tried, convicted, and sentenced, and in many cases executed. These are among the worst war criminals in history. There's no reason that this has to happen. There are wars that are driven by actual necessity. This is not. This is basically an act of pure aggression by these Zionist genocidal maniacs who have a crazy fundamentalist religious view. It's actually not even an authentic traditional religious view. But it's a satanic spin-off of millenarian messianic lunacy that's been percolating in that community for hundreds of years now, and it's turned into sheer genocide driven by utter madness.

There's no military purpose to luring people, to starving them until they show up in the thousands to try to get a sack of flour, and then firing into the crowd with tanks, which is what just happened. Killing over a hundred people and wounding many, many hundreds more. And this is just one example of so many of these extreme, sadistic, genocidal actions by the Zionists that have nothing to do with any kind of military necessity.

The Israelis keep posting videos of themselves performing atrocities and acts of extreme cruelty. For instance, just recently, I just happened to look at a few of these. An Israeli soldier filmed himself proudly destroying a children's toy store, attacking the toys. They seem to really hate children and mothers. There's some kind of psychological complex at work here.

The Americans are indeed totally guilty. Joe Biden was recently filmed licking an ice cream cone and blabbering about a possible ceasefire, which he claimed, while he licked the ice cream cone, would be coming this weekend. But as the people of Gaza starve, and then are mowed down by the hundreds as they line up for the food that would keep them alive, Biden’s promises while he’s licking ice cream don’t look very sincere.

They don't. Another act that has not received yet an official reaction from the U.S. President or many other U.S. officials is that self-immolation that has taken place that has led to now somewhat of a movement. Why are we not seeing a reaction to that? U.S. President Joe Biden talks about the deaths that have happened in Ukraine, for example, and showing sympathy there, but not towards someone who is employed by the U.S. government? Your reaction to that, Rick Sterling, as to what has driven someone to do that, and whether that is what Americans are now feeling, that they've reached that level of understanding to understand that a genocide is taking place.

Rick Sterling: I think among the public, there's a very strong feeling that that is the case. Even months ago, 70% of the population in the U.S. supported a ceasefire. Meanwhile, the US administration has vetoed the resolutions for a ceasefire at the UN Security Council three times, most recently just a week ago. Among the public here, there's a growing realization that the mythology of Israel is not what the reality is. And it’s bringing about a sea change. The Administration has got a lot of people who are very political. They were very quick to charge China with genocide over the situation with the Uighurs. And people who’ve looked into it say there’s no basis for that, that it’s truly baseless. And in contrast, whether it’s Pelosi or Biden, they refuse to recognize that genocide is happening in Gaza. So you’ve got a lot of hypocrisy. The animosity in the US administration extends now to South Africa. And in the US Congress there is now a resolution that attempts to threaten South Africa. It’s calling for a review of relations. And it’s pretty clear that they’re doing this due to South Africa’s courage and wisdom in bringing the charge of genocide against Israel to the ICJ. So there’s a sea change happening around the world where people are starting to see the United States differently. And there’s also a sea change happening within the US where people are looking at the elites who are running the country and sensing the big divide between what they’re doing and what most Americans would prefer.

All right. And quickly, if you can, Kevin Barrett, since you mentioned Joe Biden licking on that ice cream, it was when asked about whether there's going to be a truce. HJe mentioned Monday, as soon as Monday. That's just a few days away. Putting aside that scene of him licking the ice cream, however, why would he say that when you have Hamas already to have reacted, saying that large gaps remain and pretty much there are those divisive factors that do exist even in the prior truces that were on the table.

Kevin Barrett: You know, I have no idea why Biden would say something like that while he's licking that ice cream cone unless he was trying to show total contempt for the suffering that's going on. And it's really mind-boggling. A lot of people here in the United States think that Biden is senile, that he's not really in control of his faculties and that it's the people around him who run things and the people around him are mostly Zionist Jews. And those people have decided they’re going to protect their Zionist co-religionists and co-ethnics over in Occupied Palestine no matter what. Biden is a hostage and a captive of his own administration. He doesn’t have the intellectual firepower or the spark of willpower to stand up even if he wanted to, which he very likely doesn’t, not being a particularly moral individual himself. So we’ll see how it transpires, and we’ll all be praying that it somehow stops. But I don’t think it will be the Americans who stop it. I think it will be the people in Yemen and Lebanon and people all around the world, including people like Aaron Bushnell.

LIVE RADIO! Alan Sabrosky on Zionist Lies, Peter Koenig on “Israel Is an Illegal State”

Listen live Fridays noon to 2pm Eastern on Revolution.Radio later archived at KevinBarrett.Substack.com

First hour: Alan Sabrosky returns to his “first Friday of the month” slot to discuss ever-escalating genocidal Zionist liesincluding the Intercept’s exposé of Zionist Oct. 7 rape lies and the NY Times’ response; Israel’s shameless lies to the World Court; its mowing down starving Palestinians lined up for food aid and then blaming the victims; and more. We’ll also discuss other topics which may include the larger wars on Palestine and Russia, social media selectivity and bias, the border, the primacy of understanding domestic false flags, and “the pride of Carthage.”

Retired Marine Corps officer Dr. Alan Sabrosky is the former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College. He expresses his Jewish heritage via cuisine, not foreign policy.

Second hour: Peter Koenig recently posted an analysis and video of Dr. Ralph Wilde’s presentation to the ICC which “completely destroys the legality of Israel, of Israel’s existence. Going back by over 100 years to the Balfour Declaration of 1917, all the way to the illegal UK ‘handing over’ of Palestine in 1947 to the United Nations.” We may also discuss his other recent articles “Who Owns the World?“, “The Brain Is the Battlefield of the Future,” “Navalny’s Death – A Western-Instigated False Flag”? and more.

Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and a former Senior Economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organization (WHO), where he worked for over 30 years around the world.

FFWN: Could Aaron Bushnell’s Sacrifice Spark a Regime Change?

Watch Saturdays after 1 pm Eastern, and check out the list of 30 stories now, HERE

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

The ongoing #GazaHolocaust is making more and more people wonder: Since the Zionists have been caught pathologically lying about pretty much everything, why should we uncritically accept their founding myth? Doesn’t the fact that the guardians of the official Holocaust narrative have to terrorize and imprison historians they disagree with suggest that they can’t win the argument using logic and evidence?

Germar Rudolf's new Holocaust Encyclopedia (free online at www.NukeBook.org) offers "an uncensored and unconstrained look at the pertinent evidence that upholds the orthodox Holocaust narrative." Unlike all mainstream defenses of orthodoxy that I'm aware of, The Holocaust Encyclopedia is a very easy-to-use reference guide to the relevant evidence and sources

Has the Holocaust Encyclopedia surpassed Thomas Dalton's Debating the Holocaust and Nick Kollerstrom's Breaking the Spell as the best up-to-date introduction to nuts-and-bolts of the revisionist side of the Holocaust argument? Check it out and see.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com