Truth Jihad Radio

Truth Jihad Radio

Download on the App Store

Truth Jihad Radio episodes

  • Dershowitz and Israel: Cornered Rats

    Rumble link Bitchute link

    I finally figured out why Alan Dershowitz is such a good defense lawyer. He thinks like a cornered rat.

    A cornered rat, like a psychopath who has been caught, shifts into frenzied overdrive in search of an escape route. That’s what Dersh’s mind does, but in the world of legal strategems rather than the physical world. Even if the state has his client dead to rights, Dersh will put up a maniacally vicious fight, biting and clawing in search of an exit.

    It would be unfair to say that there is something vaguely ratlike about Dershowitz’s physiognomy. Yet if you search Google Images for “Alan Dershowitz rat” you can’t help but notice a certain resemblance.

    Comparing humans to vermin isn’t very nice. In this case, it’s an insult to vermin.

    Dershowitz has been defending Israel’s slow-motion genocide of Palestine for decades. Now that the genocide is accelerating, so is Dersh’s genocide advocacy. He is currently under consideration to lead Israel’s defense against charges of genocide brought by South Africa.

    Coincidentally, the day after Dersh was named as potential lead defender of genocide, his name showed up 137 times in a newly-released batch of Jeffrey Epstein papers. Compare that to Bill Clinton’s 73 mentions and Donald Trump’s four.

    Previously, Dershowitz’s defense against charges of abusing sex-trafficked underage girls was “I kept my underwear on.” Now he says the only people objecting to his apparent involvement in rape, statutory rape, blackmail, and treason are “radical feminists”:

    “Where are all those radical feminists when it comes to the Hamas rapes of young Jewish girls, sexual abuse, beheadings?”

    That’s a classic example of the “cornered rat defense.” When the prosecution has you nailed seven ways from Sunday, start screaming outrageous lies about the imaginary crimes of your enemy, which (you claim) are much worse than your own. That’s undoubtedly the defense the ratlike lawyer will employ to defend his ten-thousand-ton rabid rat client, the genocidal pseudo-state of Israel.

    Israel as Cornered Rat

    Cornered rats, of course, can be dangerous. Especially ten-thousand-ton rabid ones.

    That is the lesson we learned last week, as Israel was forced into a corner by several adverse developments:

    *The US sent home its lead aircraft carrier, the Gerald R. Ford., sending a message to Israel: “Sorry, we’re not going to all-out war with Iran for you.”

    *The Israeli Supreme Court dealt wannabe-dictator Bibi a body blow, striking down his “no judicial review” law.

    *The Economist, flagship for the Rothschild-and-friends banking empire that also controls the Israeli Supreme Court, called for Bibi’s head on a platter, saying he had “botched” the war.

    *Facing the obvious fact that it can’t “defeat Hamas and free the hostages” Israel announced a major pullout from Gaza.

    But the cornered rat immediately lashed out:

    *Using its fake-Islamic militia ISIS, Israel murdered almost 100 innocent Iranians in a terrorist attack on the annual mourning ceremony for the martyred General Soleimani.

    *The Zionist rats bombed a building in Beirut, murdering Hamas’s hostage negotiator, Saleh al-Arouri. (The clear message: “We don’t want our stinkin’ hostages back!”)

    *A whole chorus of Israeli leaders called for a “voluntary migration” of Palestinians — whose homes, water and electricity and sewage systems, markets, hospitals, and pretty much everything else Israel has destroyed — to…get this…the Congo!

    Congo, of course, is the poster-nation for genocide. Belgian genocidaires killed more than 10 million people there under Leopold II. Conrad’s Heart of Darkness tagline, “exterminate all the brutes,” became the title of the greatest book on genocide ever written which later become an HBO series.

    So when the cornered Israeli rat squeals “send them to the Congo” the translation is “send them to the gas chambers.”

    Israel has become openly, nakedly, unashamedly genocidal. By murdering 30,000 innocent Palestinians and destroying their means of life in an effort to cause so much pain and suffering that the survivors, assuming there are any, will be compelled to leave their homeland, Israel has unmasked itself as a rabid rat that the whole world can see needs to be exterminated.

    Unfortunately this cornered rabid rat has nuclear weapons. The world needs to find a way to disarm it quickly and cleanly, before its final frenzy leads to millions of deaths.



    This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com
    1 hr 7 min
  • Jeff Brown on Gaza Genocide and Western War on the World

    On February 9, 2020, Jeff Brown of the Seek Truth from Facts Foundation and ChinaRising broke the story—on my radio show—that “Coronavirus Is Biowar on China.” Jeff’s early assessment was basically correct, as was later shown by Run Unz’s book Our COVID-19 Catastrophe  (video intro HERE).

    Is Michael Hoffman right about the Talmud inspiring the Zionist genocide of Palestine? Jeff Brown seems to agree. Check out his post: “The Jewish holy book, the Talmud clearly states that all non-Jews are lower than dogs and should be killed: Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, you, me and the rest of humanity’s eight billion.”

    So what’s the connection between the US war on China, Russia, and Iran, and the Zionist genocide attempt against Palestine? Is the New World Order world takeover conspiracy—or the four conspiracies—disproportionately Jewish, as Peter Myers argues? Let’s find out what Jeff Brown thinks.

    Except:

    I recently saw you cited by Ramin Mazahiri, the longtime press TV Paris correspondent. He wrote about the I Ching, and Mao Zedong's swimming the Yangtze river, as mirroring a key hexagram in the I Ching, this ancient Chinese book of wisdom that's sometimes used as a divining tool.

    The quote is something to the effect, “cross great rivers to achieve great things.” And this was to inspire the people.

    Of course, the Chinese got it.

    They got the symbolism: he was telling them that everybody should gather together and rally together and create great things, great change.

    The Cultural Revolution — and we don't have time to go into it here — was incredibly successful. The propaganda against it is so counterfactual and so awful in the West but there are plenty of plenty of places on my website for people to access not just Ramin but Godfrey Roberts and myself and others. The writers group just published a free PDF e-book called The Little Red Book on Mao Zedong…

    (Ramin got a response) confirming that it is exactly true, that what Mao was doing was also digging deep into the I Ching.

    And so Ramin was really on to something. Ramin asked for confirmation, and he got one of the best sources in the business, and that's Dr. Kwon Lee. So it is true.

    See:

    Ramn Mazaheri, Mao’s famous Cultural Revolution swim across the Yangzi River finally explained

    Dr. Kwan Lee: “Ramin Mazaheri rightly explained Chinese culture”



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com
    56 min
  • Jeff Brown on Gaza Genocide and Western War on the World

    On February 9, 2020, Jeff Brown of the Seek Truth from Facts Foundation and ChinaRising broke the story—on my radio show—that “Coronavirus Is Biowar on China.” Jeff’s early assessment was basically correct, as was later shown by Run Unz’s book Our COVID-19 Catastrophe  (video intro HERE).

    Is Michael Hoffman right about the Talmud inspiring the Zionist genocide of Palestine? Jeff Brown seems to agree. Check out his post: “The Jewish holy book, the Talmud clearly states that all non-Jews are lower than dogs and should be killed: Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims, you, me and the rest of humanity’s eight billion.”

    So what’s the connection between the US war on China, Russia, and Iran, and the Zionist genocide attempt against Palestine? Is the New World Order world takeover conspiracy—or the four conspiracies—disproportionately Jewish, as Peter Myers argues? Let’s find out what Jeff Brown thinks.

    Except:

    I recently saw you cited by Ramin Mazahiri, the longtime press TV Paris correspondent. He wrote about the I Ching, and Mao Zedong's swimming the Yangtze river, as mirroring a key hexagram in the I Ching, this ancient Chinese book of wisdom that's sometimes used as a divining tool.

    The quote is something to the effect, “cross great rivers to achieve great things.” And this was to inspire the people.

    Of course, the Chinese got it.

    They got the symbolism: he was telling them that everybody should gather together and rally together and create great things, great change.

    The Cultural Revolution — and we don't have time to go into it here — was incredibly successful. The propaganda against it is so counterfactual and so awful in the West but there are plenty of plenty of places on my website for people to access not just Ramin but Godfrey Roberts and myself and others. The writers group just published a free PDF e-book called The Little Red Book on Mao Zedong…

    (Ramin got a response) confirming that it is exactly true, that what Mao was doing was also digging deep into the I Ching.

    And so Ramin was really on to something. Ramin asked for confirmation, and he got one of the best sources in the business, and that's Dr. Kwon Lee. So it is true.

    See:

    Ramn Mazaheri, Mao’s famous Cultural Revolution swim across the Yangzi River finally explained

    Dr. Kwan Lee: “Ramin Mazaheri rightly explained Chinese culture”



    This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com
    56 min
  • Alan Sabrosky’s First First Friday

    Arguably the two biggest stories of the 21st century—Israel’s 9/11/2001 false flag attack on America, and the neocon COVID bioattack on China and Iran—were first/most credibly aired right here on Truth Jihad Radio. Two of the key people responsible for breaking those stories return to Truth Jihad Radio tonight to kick off 2024! Here is the archive of the first hour with Dr. Alan Sabrosky. The second hour with Jeff Brown will follow.

    First hour: Good news for 2024: Retired Marine Corps officer Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College, is back in good health and planning regular appearances every first Friday of the month here on Truth Jihad Radio!

    “Doc” Sabrosky made alt-media headlines in 2010 when he appeared on my radio show and said: “They did it. I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the US Army War College, at the Marine Corps headquarters, and I’ve made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation.” Since then Dr. Sabrosky has become a notable but much-censored critic of the Zionist genocide of Palestine and occupation of America. (He says he expresses his Jewish identity through cuisine, not foreign policy.)

    So what’s his take on the biggest stories of the week and of 2023? Tune in and find out!

    Extract:

    I started a couple of years ago, actually about a year and a half ago, to do what I thought was going to be a series of three articles on America's Endgame. And the first one went out. And then I got distracted into secondary articles. And also I realized that the other articles were going to be about 20,000 words apiece and absolutely no one would read them.

    They were going to be big enough anyway.

    And there was a delay because of my vision, and some shoulder injuries that came home to roost So I couldn't even use a mouse or keyboard for about three months. But now I've got three articles that are coming out, starting in about two weeks, at one week intervals.

    The first one is called “The Culling Fields.” And it's a take on the killing fields in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge. It's an attempt to look at why so many, not necessarily warlike, but strong countries, as different as Germany and Ireland and the United States, have effectively caved with barely a whimper to the woke dementia enfolding them.

    Because they didn't all have the same experience. Ireland wasn't in either World War. It had strong and different movements in the Roman Catholic Church and the IRA, and it now has a homosexual Hindu as its Prime Minister.

    That's serious intersectionality, isn't it?

    It's very much that.

    Ireland has one of the largest migration rates in Europe. And when there's the same amount of migrant violence that there is in so many countries, a lot of it from Sub-Saharan Africa, not North Africa or the Middle East, and both the Catholic Church and the IRA say nothing.

    Germany, you can understand. It lost 10% of its population in World War II, half civilians, had between 6 and 8 million women raped by Soviet, American, or French colonial troops at the end of the war, was partitioned, occupied, lost most of its territory. The process of denazification was actually a process of de-Germanification, and they were effectively stripped of anything that resembled the type of German heritage that they had.

    And you could sort of understand them. But not Ireland.

    But then there's the United States, which was on the winning side of both world wars, and had, I'm going to say minuscule casualties…

    …So I've been looking at that and I think I found an explanation. I'm going to explore that completely in the first article.

    The second one looks at Germany and it's basically calling for a repartition of Germany. That the eastern part of Germany, the eastern states, the ones that were communist states, like the former communist regimes, most of them in Eastern Europe and Russia, are absolutely not going along with the woke agenda.

    Whereas the West, Western Germany is in overdrive on this. And if there's going to be anything saved of Germany, maybe the two pieces of it need to be separate.

    There was a, there was a nasty incident, uh, I think within the past week where at the trial, A female judge presided over the trial of eight migrants, and I don't know where they were from, who gang-raped a 15-year-old German girl, and she turned them loose without any punishment.

    And there was a really interesting meme which showed the two Germans, and there was a wall called East Germany, and they were rebuilding the wall with bricks, putting a wall between them. I'm actually going to explore that: what would it take, and is it a good idea?

    The third one is the final one on America's Endgame. It basically looks at where we could have gone in 2020 and where I believe it is now too late for us to go in 2024, which is going to be a replay of 2020 from the left side.

    And it's basically called Ruthless or Ruined. You know, what did America's endgame mean? We should have been ruthless and instead we've been ruined. There may be a chance to save something of it.

    I think we can salvage something of the United States, something of what was the United States that I served and loved and still love for at least for its ideals, if not for its reality. And it's not going to be all of the United States.

    One of the classic axioms in military tactics and strategy is that if you try and defend everything, you end up defending nothing. Basically, you spread yourself too thin and you lose the whole thing...



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com
    57 min
  • Alan Sabrosky’s First First Friday

    Arguably the two biggest stories of the 21st century—Israel’s 9/11/2001 false flag attack on America, and the neocon COVID bioattack on China and Iran—were first/most credibly aired right here on Truth Jihad Radio. Two of the key people responsible for breaking those stories return to Truth Jihad Radio tonight to kick off 2024! Here is the archive of the first hour with Dr. Alan Sabrosky. The second hour with Jeff Brown will follow.

    First hour: Good news for 2024: Retired Marine Corps officer Dr. Alan Sabrosky, former Head of Strategic Studies at the US Army War College, is back in good health and planning regular appearances every first Friday of the month here on Truth Jihad Radio!

    “Doc” Sabrosky made alt-media headlines in 2010 when he appeared on my radio show and said: “They did it. I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the US Army War College, at the Marine Corps headquarters, and I’ve made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation.” Since then Dr. Sabrosky has become a notable but much-censored critic of the Zionist genocide of Palestine and occupation of America. (He says he expresses his Jewish identity through cuisine, not foreign policy.)

    So what’s his take on the biggest stories of the week and of 2023? Tune in and find out!

    Extract:

    I started a couple of years ago, actually about a year and a half ago, to do what I thought was going to be a series of three articles on America's Endgame. And the first one went out. And then I got distracted into secondary articles. And also I realized that the other articles were going to be about 20,000 words apiece and absolutely no one would read them.

    They were going to be big enough anyway.

    And there was a delay because of my vision, and some shoulder injuries that came home to roost So I couldn't even use a mouse or keyboard for about three months. But now I've got three articles that are coming out, starting in about two weeks, at one week intervals.

    The first one is called “The Culling Fields.” And it's a take on the killing fields in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge. It's an attempt to look at why so many, not necessarily warlike, but strong countries, as different as Germany and Ireland and the United States, have effectively caved with barely a whimper to the woke dementia enfolding them.

    Because they didn't all have the same experience. Ireland wasn't in either World War. It had strong and different movements in the Roman Catholic Church and the IRA, and it now has a homosexual Hindu as its Prime Minister.

    That's serious intersectionality, isn't it?

    It's very much that.

    Ireland has one of the largest migration rates in Europe. And when there's the same amount of migrant violence that there is in so many countries, a lot of it from Sub-Saharan Africa, not North Africa or the Middle East, and both the Catholic Church and the IRA say nothing.

    Germany, you can understand. It lost 10% of its population in World War II, half civilians, had between 6 and 8 million women raped by Soviet, American, or French colonial troops at the end of the war, was partitioned, occupied, lost most of its territory. The process of denazification was actually a process of de-Germanification, and they were effectively stripped of anything that resembled the type of German heritage that they had.

    And you could sort of understand them. But not Ireland.

    But then there's the United States, which was on the winning side of both world wars, and had, I'm going to say minuscule casualties…

    …So I've been looking at that and I think I found an explanation. I'm going to explore that completely in the first article.

    The second one looks at Germany and it's basically calling for a repartition of Germany. That the eastern part of Germany, the eastern states, the ones that were communist states, like the former communist regimes, most of them in Eastern Europe and Russia, are absolutely not going along with the woke agenda.

    Whereas the West, Western Germany is in overdrive on this. And if there's going to be anything saved of Germany, maybe the two pieces of it need to be separate.

    There was a, there was a nasty incident, uh, I think within the past week where at the trial, A female judge presided over the trial of eight migrants, and I don't know where they were from, who gang-raped a 15-year-old German girl, and she turned them loose without any punishment.

    And there was a really interesting meme which showed the two Germans, and there was a wall called East Germany, and they were rebuilding the wall with bricks, putting a wall between them. I'm actually going to explore that: what would it take, and is it a good idea?

    The third one is the final one on America's Endgame. It basically looks at where we could have gone in 2020 and where I believe it is now too late for us to go in 2024, which is going to be a replay of 2020 from the left side.

    And it's basically called Ruthless or Ruined. You know, what did America's endgame mean? We should have been ruthless and instead we've been ruined. There may be a chance to save something of it.

    I think we can salvage something of the United States, something of what was the United States that I served and loved and still love for at least for its ideals, if not for its reality. And it's not going to be all of the United States.

    One of the classic axioms in military tactics and strategy is that if you try and defend everything, you end up defending nothing. Basically, you spread yourself too thin and you lose the whole thing...



    This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com
    57 min
  • Mahmood OD on “One-State Solution by 2048”

    Mahmood OD, a native Palestinian born in Haifa, is the author of 2048: A Manifesto for the One State Solution in Israel Palestine. In it, he considers the underlying causes of the violence and instability in the region, and proposes a simple and sensible solution, starting with: “The whole conflict can be solved with one thing: Equality. But to reach the stage of equality, one must establish basic understanding about the other side…”

    How can we get from the current catastrophe—an accelerating genocide by Jewish Supremacists—to the world Mahmood envisions, in which both sides understand and acknowledge the humanity and equality of the other?

    Excerpt:

    So how did you come to write 2048: A Manifesto for the One State Solution in Israel Palestine?

    Well, basically it took the 2021 escalation. Because for your listeners, if they're unfamiliar with me, I'm a Palestinian who was born in Haifa, which is in Israel. In 2021, I was like, okay, here we go again, another war, another escalation, then we go back to square one, no real solutions proposed. I was like, let me just write a book because from my perspective, it's very straightforward. It's a human cause. It's a matter of equality, human rights that should be by the 21st century now.

    The Arab states back then and the Palestinians, even the Jewish people who used to live in historical Palestine before Zionism, in collaboration with the Nazis by the way in many cases, started bringing Jews to Europe. Many people are also not familiar with the fact that Zionism was the solution, the final solution for the Jewish problem as Hitler prescribed it at the time.

    So, the Arab nations back then, and the Palestinians, they didn't want an ethno-state. They wanted a whole state for everyone, because Jews, Arabs, and Muslims, Christians lived peacefully for hundreds of years. Whether it's in Palestine, whether it's in Morocco, whether it's in the Hejaz, everywhere. They had problems in Europe. They didn't have problems with us. And obviously, we were welcoming anyone who wants to come back then.

    Let me give you an example my native city of Haifa. In 1947 we had approximately 75,000 Palestinian Christians and Muslims who were then expelled by these new Zionist immigrants to take the population back to 5,000. Now my great great parents obviously were some of the few that remained there because they had to keep people to basically be slaves and build up the country, albeit they lived under martial law for a very long time.

    So the notion of a one state that is for everyone isn't new. I didn't bring something new here and many people wrote about the subject too. But my intention after the 2021 escalation was to highlight how very basic and straightforward it is.

    So from my perspective, I decided to put in points that are very straightforward to find a solution, including many key areas that should be highlighted. Things to do with anti-semitism, things to do with Zionism, and obviously points to reach a solution which mainly revolve around the refugees and the dismantling of the apartheid state.

    Because at the end of the day, we're all human beings, and we all want the same things. We want rights, we want equality, we want basic human life. Yet Zionism was established on racial supremacy. It was established as a better race controlling a lower grade race.

    You know, many people say it's utopic, it's unrealistic, but from my perspective, I don't care how utopic it seems, it shouldn't be sounding utopic because you're talking about equal human rights. And many things that human beings perceived to be utopic previously, like the end of slavery. America had civil wars because of the abolishment of slavery. Eight-hour working days were considered to be utopic. Women voting was considered to be utopic.

    So, from my perspective, it's an implementable solution that is very much realistic, but we need to have our foot down constantly. This shouldn't be a case of there was an escalation, it ended, now we move on.

    What happened on the 7th of October woke the whole world up. And not just the act itself, it's primarily Israel's reaction. Because if Israel stopped on the 7th of October and took a step back and recalculated what it's been doing for the past 75 years and proposed a solution, because they mainly called for a prisoner swap, we wouldn't have been here.

    But Israel did Palestine a favor. And I know it might sound insane because they're committing a genocide, but in many ways they woke the whole world up to the Palestinian cause.

    So from our perspective, from any decent human being's perspective, this should be a case where you're at it the whole time. There's a saying in Arabic, ما ضاع حق وراءه مطالب. You never lose a right as long as there's someone behind it asking for it. And I believe this should be the core issue that decent people like yourself constantly do and anyone who's concerned with basic human rights continue to do, because Israel is doing everyone a favor by making it untenable for it to exist as it is.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com
    57 min
  • Mahmood OD on “One-State Solution by 2048”

    Mahmood OD, a native Palestinian born in Haifa, is the author of 2048: A Manifesto for the One State Solution in Israel Palestine. In it, he considers the underlying causes of the violence and instability in the region, and proposes a simple and sensible solution, starting with: “The whole conflict can be solved with one thing: Equality. But to reach the stage of equality, one must establish basic understanding about the other side…”

    How can we get from the current catastrophe—an accelerating genocide by Jewish Supremacists—to the world Mahmood envisions, in which both sides understand and acknowledge the humanity and equality of the other?

    Excerpt:

    So how did you come to write 2048: A Manifesto for the One State Solution in Israel Palestine?

    Well, basically it took the 2021 escalation. Because for your listeners, if they're unfamiliar with me, I'm a Palestinian who was born in Haifa, which is in Israel. In 2021, I was like, okay, here we go again, another war, another escalation, then we go back to square one, no real solutions proposed. I was like, let me just write a book because from my perspective, it's very straightforward. It's a human cause. It's a matter of equality, human rights that should be by the 21st century now.

    The Arab states back then and the Palestinians, even the Jewish people who used to live in historical Palestine before Zionism, in collaboration with the Nazis by the way in many cases, started bringing Jews to Europe. Many people are also not familiar with the fact that Zionism was the solution, the final solution for the Jewish problem as Hitler prescribed it at the time.

    So, the Arab nations back then, and the Palestinians, they didn't want an ethno-state. They wanted a whole state for everyone, because Jews, Arabs, and Muslims, Christians lived peacefully for hundreds of years. Whether it's in Palestine, whether it's in Morocco, whether it's in the Hejaz, everywhere. They had problems in Europe. They didn't have problems with us. And obviously, we were welcoming anyone who wants to come back then.

    Let me give you an example my native city of Haifa. In 1947 we had approximately 75,000 Palestinian Christians and Muslims who were then expelled by these new Zionist immigrants to take the population back to 5,000. Now my great great parents obviously were some of the few that remained there because they had to keep people to basically be slaves and build up the country, albeit they lived under martial law for a very long time.

    So the notion of a one state that is for everyone isn't new. I didn't bring something new here and many people wrote about the subject too. But my intention after the 2021 escalation was to highlight how very basic and straightforward it is.

    So from my perspective, I decided to put in points that are very straightforward to find a solution, including many key areas that should be highlighted. Things to do with anti-semitism, things to do with Zionism, and obviously points to reach a solution which mainly revolve around the refugees and the dismantling of the apartheid state.

    Because at the end of the day, we're all human beings, and we all want the same things. We want rights, we want equality, we want basic human life. Yet Zionism was established on racial supremacy. It was established as a better race controlling a lower grade race.

    You know, many people say it's utopic, it's unrealistic, but from my perspective, I don't care how utopic it seems, it shouldn't be sounding utopic because you're talking about equal human rights. And many things that human beings perceived to be utopic previously, like the end of slavery. America had civil wars because of the abolishment of slavery. Eight-hour working days were considered to be utopic. Women voting was considered to be utopic.

    So, from my perspective, it's an implementable solution that is very much realistic, but we need to have our foot down constantly. This shouldn't be a case of there was an escalation, it ended, now we move on.

    What happened on the 7th of October woke the whole world up. And not just the act itself, it's primarily Israel's reaction. Because if Israel stopped on the 7th of October and took a step back and recalculated what it's been doing for the past 75 years and proposed a solution, because they mainly called for a prisoner swap, we wouldn't have been here.

    But Israel did Palestine a favor. And I know it might sound insane because they're committing a genocide, but in many ways they woke the whole world up to the Palestinian cause.

    So from our perspective, from any decent human being's perspective, this should be a case where you're at it the whole time. There's a saying in Arabic, ما ضاع حق وراءه مطالب. You never lose a right as long as there's someone behind it asking for it. And I believe this should be the core issue that decent people like yourself constantly do and anyone who's concerned with basic human rights continue to do, because Israel is doing everyone a favor by making it untenable for it to exist as it is.



    This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com
    57 min
  • “Next Year in Palestine” (2023-2024 roundup with E. Michael Jones)

    Rumble link Bitchute link

    Happy New Year! E Michael Jones and I just posted a special two-hour New Year’s edition of False Flag Weekly News. It begins with the 12 biggest stories of the week, and moves on to the 38 biggest stories of 2023, along with predictions for 2024. We even offered our own “illegal” nomination for Person of the Year. Hint: It sure isn’t Taylor Swift!

    Below are a couple of transcript extracts to whet your appetite.

    Block the Boat in Oakland has been shutting down shipping to Israel. I guess they're working with the Houthis over there in Oakland. Hey Mike, are we allowed to recommend that people donate to Block the Boat, or will we be listed as terrorists if we do that?

    You're already a terrorist, so forget about it. It's too late to worry about it. I saw the ADL attack on you on your Substack. So the only consolation we have is that there are more and more people in the same situation and at a certain point the whole narrative is going to break down because this whole attack on “conspiracy theorists and anti-Semites” is not going to hold water anymore.

    Here's another illegal public service announcement from False Flag Weekly News: Boycott Israel! Even though all the states now have laws telling you that you can't, or you will be thrown into a maximum security dungeon or something. Over in the UK, you get locked up in the Tower of London, which I understand has better accommodations.

    But in any case, here are the things you can boycott if you want to become an arch criminal by boycotting Israel. Just go to this website, theislamicinformation.com .

    Okay, so that's our public service announcements.

    Let's get into the breaking news, which this week and this year happens to be good news. Electronic Intifada broke the news this morning that South Africa has invoked the genocide convention. They're taking the Zionist genocidal entity to the world court. People like Sam Husseini have been arguing for this, quite vociferously, for a month and a half or two months already, and it's great to see that it finally happened.

    So, Mike, is there any chance that this will put significant pressure on Israel and get them to stop the genocide? Francis Boyle thinks that it will. What do you think?

    I defer to Francis Boyle. He's an expert on this type of thing. And if he's optimistic, then I have to be optimistic. But I'm not a lawyer. But if he thinks it's possible, then I'm encouraged.

    Yeah, the deal is the world court apparently, unlike your national criminal court or ICC, is not 100% rigged by the western powers led by the United States. So some meaningful pressure at least can be generated. Boyle says that this is a body blow from which the Zionist entity will never recover. So let's hope that he's right.

    Israel can certainly keep killing civilians until somebody tells them to stop and we'll see who that is. Maybe it's the Houthis—that is, the Yemeni government. Because the so-called Houthis are in fact the legitimate government of Yemen.

    John Helmer wrote this great piece about how the Houthis are correctly identifying ships that are operating on behalf of or owned by Israel or going to Israel. Those are the only ones that they're stopping. They're letting Russia and China and everybody else go through and that has changed everything according to Pepe Escobar in his brand new piece which also makes a lot of good points. Is Pepe's optimism warranted, Michael?

    First of all, I'd like to say this is the proper conduct of warfare, because it's targeting the people who are actually responsible, rather than some type of indiscriminate attack. But their reach now, according to this article, goes all the way to the coast of India, which is a totally new situation. So it's not just the choke points like the Bab al-Mandeb and the Straits of Hormuz. They have the ability to project power way beyond that.

    And secondly, it's hard to tell how the United States could react to this type of asymmetrical warfare. Because what are you going to do? The Saudis already failed to conquer Yemen, which is the base for the Houthis. So what's the United States going to do?

    And apparently they just had to call off their operation to protect shipping in the Red Sea, Operation Prosperity Guardian. This is crucial because the American Empire is based on the British Empire and the British Empire was based on the British Navy and their ability to control the sea lanes. They're losing here. They were already losing because of the railroad from Shanghai into Rotterdam. That's another blow. It’s the consolidation of the Eurasian landmass. If they lose control of the sea lanes, that's it. That's the basis of world power for the American empire.

    And part of this is a technological change that shipping, ships, navies are now vulnerable. The Russian Navy has not done well. They own the Black Sea, but they can't really operate there because navies just are too vulnerable today. So that means that this Mackinder thesis, the sea power of the Western empires, whether it was Britain in the 19th century or the U.S. now, that sea power is heavily eroding. And so I think that's kind of the backdrop here to what Pepe was talking about.

    So Israel is now up against the whole world. They're being called into the world court for genocide prosecution by South Africa and they are actually having to revoke visas for UN people because the whole UN is against it. “Everybody's against us. Everybody's anti-Semitic.” Well, if the entire world is anti-Semitic, maybe it's because you guys are doing something wrong—and committing genocide is doing something wrong.

    Yeah, the whole army's out of step except that one guy.

    The main cause of anti-Semitism is Jewish behavior. But they will never, never admit that. Well, now it's becoming so obvious that they can't deny it anymore.

    This is calling into question the entire idea of international law, because the Israelis and the United States are simply flouting the principle. This is the exception to every rule, which then destroys the idea of the rule to begin with. And then we're back at, you know, dog-eat-dog barbarism here for the entire world.

    Israel has been ignoring and flouting UN resolutions on return of the refugees. Every Palestinian refugee forced out in 1948 and ever since then has the right, the inalienable right, as an individual, nobody can give it away for them, to return to their homes. And the UN has repeatedly reaffirmed that. Israel has ignored that. And likewise, the UN has insisted Israel withdraw from the land it stole in its 1967 war of aggression. And of course, Israel has flouted all of that, too.

    But sometimes the defenders of Israel point to the 1948 resolution supposedly creating Israel, although that had no actual force because it was simply a General Assembly resolution. In any case, Israel is totally on the outs with the entire world community now, and the axis of resistance is going from strength to strength.

    Yeah, as we said, if the American empire cannot control the sea lanes, it's the end of the American empire. And a specific example would be Germany. Germany doesn't have enough energy to run its industry. They had a pipeline. The Americans blew up the pipeline. And they said, you don't need the pipeline. We will have liquefied natural gas sent to you in big ships. It will cost six times what you've been paying, but that's no small price to pay for independence, energy independence from Russia. Well, that whole narrative goes down the drain if you can't protect those ships. All the Yemenis have to do is expand it to include these type of liquefied gas shipments, and that's the end. And Germany will be forced in the opposite direction. It will be forced out of collaboration with the American empire. It has already happened on a minor scale because Germany, the CDU, has announced it's going to open up its mothballed nuclear reactors. That's a step in the direction of returning energy sovereignty in Germany based on the fact that these shipping lanes are not reliable anymore.

    Well, so far the Houthis are only going after the Israeli-linked ships, but once they show that they can do that with impunity, then you're right. Then the American policing of the sea lanes becomes something of the past…



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com
    1 hr 51 min
  • “Next Year in Palestine” (2023-2024 roundup with E. Michael Jones)

    Rumble link Bitchute link

    Happy New Year! E Michael Jones and I just posted a special two-hour New Year’s edition of False Flag Weekly News. It begins with the 12 biggest stories of the week, and moves on to the 38 biggest stories of 2023, along with predictions for 2024. We even offered our own “illegal” nomination for Person of the Year. Hint: It sure isn’t Taylor Swift!

    Below are a couple of transcript extracts to whet your appetite.

    Block the Boat in Oakland has been shutting down shipping to Israel. I guess they're working with the Houthis over there in Oakland. Hey Mike, are we allowed to recommend that people donate to Block the Boat, or will we be listed as terrorists if we do that?

    You're already a terrorist, so forget about it. It's too late to worry about it. I saw the ADL attack on you on your Substack. So the only consolation we have is that there are more and more people in the same situation and at a certain point the whole narrative is going to break down because this whole attack on “conspiracy theorists and anti-Semites” is not going to hold water anymore.

    Here's another illegal public service announcement from False Flag Weekly News: Boycott Israel! Even though all the states now have laws telling you that you can't, or you will be thrown into a maximum security dungeon or something. Over in the UK, you get locked up in the Tower of London, which I understand has better accommodations.

    But in any case, here are the things you can boycott if you want to become an arch criminal by boycotting Israel. Just go to this website, theislamicinformation.com .

    Okay, so that's our public service announcements.

    Let's get into the breaking news, which this week and this year happens to be good news. Electronic Intifada broke the news this morning that South Africa has invoked the genocide convention. They're taking the Zionist genocidal entity to the world court. People like Sam Husseini have been arguing for this, quite vociferously, for a month and a half or two months already, and it's great to see that it finally happened.

    So, Mike, is there any chance that this will put significant pressure on Israel and get them to stop the genocide? Francis Boyle thinks that it will. What do you think?

    I defer to Francis Boyle. He's an expert on this type of thing. And if he's optimistic, then I have to be optimistic. But I'm not a lawyer. But if he thinks it's possible, then I'm encouraged.

    Yeah, the deal is the world court apparently, unlike your national criminal court or ICC, is not 100% rigged by the western powers led by the United States. So some meaningful pressure at least can be generated. Boyle says that this is a body blow from which the Zionist entity will never recover. So let's hope that he's right.

    Israel can certainly keep killing civilians until somebody tells them to stop and we'll see who that is. Maybe it's the Houthis—that is, the Yemeni government. Because the so-called Houthis are in fact the legitimate government of Yemen.

    John Helmer wrote this great piece about how the Houthis are correctly identifying ships that are operating on behalf of or owned by Israel or going to Israel. Those are the only ones that they're stopping. They're letting Russia and China and everybody else go through and that has changed everything according to Pepe Escobar in his brand new piece which also makes a lot of good points. Is Pepe's optimism warranted, Michael?

    First of all, I'd like to say this is the proper conduct of warfare, because it's targeting the people who are actually responsible, rather than some type of indiscriminate attack. But their reach now, according to this article, goes all the way to the coast of India, which is a totally new situation. So it's not just the choke points like the Bab al-Mandeb and the Straits of Hormuz. They have the ability to project power way beyond that.

    And secondly, it's hard to tell how the United States could react to this type of asymmetrical warfare. Because what are you going to do? The Saudis already failed to conquer Yemen, which is the base for the Houthis. So what's the United States going to do?

    And apparently they just had to call off their operation to protect shipping in the Red Sea, Operation Prosperity Guardian. This is crucial because the American Empire is based on the British Empire and the British Empire was based on the British Navy and their ability to control the sea lanes. They're losing here. They were already losing because of the railroad from Shanghai into Rotterdam. That's another blow. It’s the consolidation of the Eurasian landmass. If they lose control of the sea lanes, that's it. That's the basis of world power for the American empire.

    And part of this is a technological change that shipping, ships, navies are now vulnerable. The Russian Navy has not done well. They own the Black Sea, but they can't really operate there because navies just are too vulnerable today. So that means that this Mackinder thesis, the sea power of the Western empires, whether it was Britain in the 19th century or the U.S. now, that sea power is heavily eroding. And so I think that's kind of the backdrop here to what Pepe was talking about.

    So Israel is now up against the whole world. They're being called into the world court for genocide prosecution by South Africa and they are actually having to revoke visas for UN people because the whole UN is against it. “Everybody's against us. Everybody's anti-Semitic.” Well, if the entire world is anti-Semitic, maybe it's because you guys are doing something wrong—and committing genocide is doing something wrong.

    Yeah, the whole army's out of step except that one guy.

    The main cause of anti-Semitism is Jewish behavior. But they will never, never admit that. Well, now it's becoming so obvious that they can't deny it anymore.

    This is calling into question the entire idea of international law, because the Israelis and the United States are simply flouting the principle. This is the exception to every rule, which then destroys the idea of the rule to begin with. And then we're back at, you know, dog-eat-dog barbarism here for the entire world.

    Israel has been ignoring and flouting UN resolutions on return of the refugees. Every Palestinian refugee forced out in 1948 and ever since then has the right, the inalienable right, as an individual, nobody can give it away for them, to return to their homes. And the UN has repeatedly reaffirmed that. Israel has ignored that. And likewise, the UN has insisted Israel withdraw from the land it stole in its 1967 war of aggression. And of course, Israel has flouted all of that, too.

    But sometimes the defenders of Israel point to the 1948 resolution supposedly creating Israel, although that had no actual force because it was simply a General Assembly resolution. In any case, Israel is totally on the outs with the entire world community now, and the axis of resistance is going from strength to strength.

    Yeah, as we said, if the American empire cannot control the sea lanes, it's the end of the American empire. And a specific example would be Germany. Germany doesn't have enough energy to run its industry. They had a pipeline. The Americans blew up the pipeline. And they said, you don't need the pipeline. We will have liquefied natural gas sent to you in big ships. It will cost six times what you've been paying, but that's no small price to pay for independence, energy independence from Russia. Well, that whole narrative goes down the drain if you can't protect those ships. All the Yemenis have to do is expand it to include these type of liquefied gas shipments, and that's the end. And Germany will be forced in the opposite direction. It will be forced out of collaboration with the American empire. It has already happened on a minor scale because Germany, the CDU, has announced it's going to open up its mothballed nuclear reactors. That's a step in the direction of returning energy sovereignty in Germany based on the fact that these shipping lanes are not reliable anymore.

    Well, so far the Houthis are only going after the Israeli-linked ships, but once they show that they can do that with impunity, then you're right. Then the American policing of the sea lanes becomes something of the past…



    This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com
    1 hr 51 min
  • Piers Robinson on Engineered Catastrophes, Propaganda, Academic Unfreedom, and More

    Piers Robinson of the Organisation for Propaganda Studies has noticed that propagandists don’t like it when scholars study and analyze their propaganda. His latest ruminations on “The Perils of Studying Propaganda” begins with the observation:

    “Acknowledging that powerful actors pour huge resources into managing the ‘information environment’, in order to manipulate perceptions, attitudes and behaviours, tends to play havoc with assumptions underpinning much of liberal political science.” The propaganda-saturated COVID era, he argues, made it even more obvious that such is indeed the case. But even absent COVID, people who annoy the biggest propagandists, from Julian Assange (thorn in the side of the US empire) to Prof. David Miller (who had the temerity to notice the Zionist role in promoting Islamophobia) have been known to experience severe pushback. So…does academic freedom protect the rights of scholars to study and critique Establishment propaganda? Piers Robinson is the right man to try to answer that question.

    Excerpt from the interview:

    Kevin Barrett: Okay, well, you know, regarding the biosecurity regime that is coming into place, there's sort of, you know, two different ways of looking at that and of looking at the COVID crisis. And I guess it depends sort of, you know, whether you analyze it as a globalist conspiracy in which people who are pushing for a one world order are using this medical pretext to establish international institutions that will override the sovereignty of nation states as a step towards world government that many fear will be totalitarian. That seems to be the majority view among the COVID dissidents.

    The other view, and I actually lean towards it more regarding COVID, is that the whole COVID crisis was the product not so much of globalists who are trying to give power to the WHO to erode national sovereignties, but rather, I believe it was a neoconservative American military biological attack on China and Iran. It was designed to slow China's economic growth or reduce the growth differential between the U.S. and the West versus China. And, of course, also to hit Iran.

    And it did mysteriously jump from Wuhan, where it hit at exactly the worst possible place and time for China. It was just spreading big time in advance of the Chinese New Year, when virtually the entire nation of China is crossing through Wuhan, the national transportation hub. And if it hadn't been for their very quick reaction, it probably would have hit initially much harder in China.

    And then, where did it jump to? Of all places, Qom, Iran, where there are no Chinese people. And it knocked out a whole bunch of high-level Iranian mullahs. So, given that and lots of other things, including proven foreknowledge by the Defense Intelligence Agency…

    …So I think it's the neocons and the militarists who are the problem. I know that's a minority take among the COVID skeptics. What do you think?

    Piers Robinson: No, I'm completely with you on keeping an open mind as to exactly where the power axes lie with COVID-19. And I'm actually, interestingly enough, writing a piece at the moment with Vanessa Beely on this issue.

    Essentially the Western military industrial complex and its penetration into global organizations, is part of a projection of power As you know I'm pretty open-minded—I think where I sit on this is I try to take a kind of strictly sociological empirical view that until we've got the power network analyses done we need to be relatively open-minded and not sign up to one particular theory or thesis about exactly what's going on.

    But I am inclined at the moment with everything I'm looking at with COVID-19 to think that this seems to be quite strongly rooted in the West. And I think when you locate that in terms of what we know about the Western Empire, distributions of power, both economic and military, changing across the international system, it starts to make, I think, a little bit more sense to think of COVID in those terms.

    I'm not ruling out any of the possibilities at the moment.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com
    57 min

About Truth Jihad Radio

From the publisher's feed

Red-pill truths and interpretations "they" don't want you to know about.

kevinbarrett.substack.com