Truth Jihad Radio

Piers Robinson of the Organisation for Propaganda Studies has noticed that propagandists don’t like it when scholars study and analyze their propaganda. His latest ruminations on “The Perils of Studying Propaganda” begins with the observation:

“Acknowledging that powerful actors pour huge resources into managing the ‘information environment’, in order to manipulate perceptions, attitudes and behaviours, tends to play havoc with assumptions underpinning much of liberal political science.” The propaganda-saturated COVID era, he argues, made it even more obvious that such is indeed the case. But even absent COVID, people who annoy the biggest propagandists, from Julian Assange (thorn in the side of the US empire) to Prof. David Miller (who had the temerity to notice the Zionist role in promoting Islamophobia) have been known to experience severe pushback. So…does academic freedom protect the rights of scholars to study and critique Establishment propaganda? Piers Robinson is the right man to try to answer that question.

Excerpt from the interview:

Kevin Barrett: Okay, well, you know, regarding the biosecurity regime that is coming into place, there's sort of, you know, two different ways of looking at that and of looking at the COVID crisis. And I guess it depends sort of, you know, whether you analyze it as a globalist conspiracy in which people who are pushing for a one world order are using this medical pretext to establish international institutions that will override the sovereignty of nation states as a step towards world government that many fear will be totalitarian. That seems to be the majority view among the COVID dissidents.

The other view, and I actually lean towards it more regarding COVID, is that the whole COVID crisis was the product not so much of globalists who are trying to give power to the WHO to erode national sovereignties, but rather, I believe it was a neoconservative American military biological attack on China and Iran. It was designed to slow China's economic growth or reduce the growth differential between the U.S. and the West versus China. And, of course, also to hit Iran.

And it did mysteriously jump from Wuhan, where it hit at exactly the worst possible place and time for China. It was just spreading big time in advance of the Chinese New Year, when virtually the entire nation of China is crossing through Wuhan, the national transportation hub. And if it hadn't been for their very quick reaction, it probably would have hit initially much harder in China.

And then, where did it jump to? Of all places, Qom, Iran, where there are no Chinese people. And it knocked out a whole bunch of high-level Iranian mullahs. So, given that and lots of other things, including proven foreknowledge by the Defense Intelligence Agency…

…So I think it's the neocons and the militarists who are the problem. I know that's a minority take among the COVID skeptics. What do you think?

Piers Robinson: No, I'm completely with you on keeping an open mind as to exactly where the power axes lie with COVID-19. And I'm actually, interestingly enough, writing a piece at the moment with Vanessa Beely on this issue.

Essentially the Western military industrial complex and its penetration into global organizations, is part of a projection of power As you know I'm pretty open-minded—I think where I sit on this is I try to take a kind of strictly sociological empirical view that until we've got the power network analyses done we need to be relatively open-minded and not sign up to one particular theory or thesis about exactly what's going on.

But I am inclined at the moment with everything I'm looking at with COVID-19 to think that this seems to be quite strongly rooted in the West. And I think when you locate that in terms of what we know about the Western Empire, distributions of power, both economic and military, changing across the international system, it starts to make, I think, a little bit more sense to think of COVID in those terms.

I'm not ruling out any of the possibilities at the moment.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Piers Robinson of the Organisation for Propaganda Studies has noticed that propagandists don’t like it when scholars study and analyze their propaganda. His latest ruminations on “The Perils of Studying Propaganda” begins with the observation:

“Acknowledging that powerful actors pour huge resources into managing the ‘information environment’, in order to manipulate perceptions, attitudes and behaviours, tends to play havoc with assumptions underpinning much of liberal political science.” The propaganda-saturated COVID era, he argues, made it even more obvious that such is indeed the case. But even absent COVID, people who annoy the biggest propagandists, from Julian Assange (thorn in the side of the US empire) to Prof. David Miller (who had the temerity to notice the Zionist role in promoting Islamophobia) have been known to experience severe pushback. So…does academic freedom protect the rights of scholars to study and critique Establishment propaganda? Piers Robinson is the right man to try to answer that question.

Excerpt from the interview:

Kevin Barrett: Okay, well, you know, regarding the biosecurity regime that is coming into place, there's sort of, you know, two different ways of looking at that and of looking at the COVID crisis. And I guess it depends sort of, you know, whether you analyze it as a globalist conspiracy in which people who are pushing for a one world order are using this medical pretext to establish international institutions that will override the sovereignty of nation states as a step towards world government that many fear will be totalitarian. That seems to be the majority view among the COVID dissidents.

The other view, and I actually lean towards it more regarding COVID, is that the whole COVID crisis was the product not so much of globalists who are trying to give power to the WHO to erode national sovereignties, but rather, I believe it was a neoconservative American military biological attack on China and Iran. It was designed to slow China's economic growth or reduce the growth differential between the U.S. and the West versus China. And, of course, also to hit Iran.

And it did mysteriously jump from Wuhan, where it hit at exactly the worst possible place and time for China. It was just spreading big time in advance of the Chinese New Year, when virtually the entire nation of China is crossing through Wuhan, the national transportation hub. And if it hadn't been for their very quick reaction, it probably would have hit initially much harder in China.

And then, where did it jump to? Of all places, Qom, Iran, where there are no Chinese people. And it knocked out a whole bunch of high-level Iranian mullahs. So, given that and lots of other things, including proven foreknowledge by the Defense Intelligence Agency…

…So I think it's the neocons and the militarists who are the problem. I know that's a minority take among the COVID skeptics. What do you think?

Piers Robinson: No, I'm completely with you on keeping an open mind as to exactly where the power axes lie with COVID-19. And I'm actually, interestingly enough, writing a piece at the moment with Vanessa Beely on this issue.

Essentially the Western military industrial complex and its penetration into global organizations, is part of a projection of power As you know I'm pretty open-minded—I think where I sit on this is I try to take a kind of strictly sociological empirical view that until we've got the power network analyses done we need to be relatively open-minded and not sign up to one particular theory or thesis about exactly what's going on.

But I am inclined at the moment with everything I'm looking at with COVID-19 to think that this seems to be quite strongly rooted in the West. And I think when you locate that in terms of what we know about the Western Empire, distributions of power, both economic and military, changing across the international system, it starts to make, I think, a little bit more sense to think of COVID in those terms.

I'm not ruling out any of the possibilities at the moment.

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Kevin Barrett is editor at Veterans Today who joins us. Welcome to the program, Kevin Barrett. I'm not too sure whether I should talk about the reference that the Osama Hamdan, the senior Hamas leader there, made to the Israeli regime force who wanted to kill children or to the other aspect of this war. But let's start with that one in particular, which is pretty gruesome and pretty shocking. Why do you think the Israeli soldiers are acting in that way unless they're being maybe instructed to kill babies? But then again, isn't that part of their psyche in terms of the training that they received in the past in their military?

Yes, the Israeli military is notorious for deliberately targeting and murdering children. Chris Hedges wrote about that in his famous article “A Gaza Diary” from 15 years ago, maybe 20, I think, actually. And he described how he had been in war zones and witnessed atrocities before, but until he went to Gaza, he had never seen soldiers barking out obscene insults over their bullhorns in order to lure Palestinian children within range of their gun sights so that they could be shot for sport. And he witnessed that happen to several Palestinian children. It's a common occurrence. The sport shooting of children is a regular part of what the Israeli Defense Forces do. And they never face any kind of justice. Because it’s open season on Palestinian childfen.

The Israeli Defense Forces hand out t-shirts that say, “one shot, two kills,” and they show a pregnant Palestinian woman with a target on her belly.

They are proud of killing children. Ayelet Shaked, the former Justice Minister, is notorious for calling for the mass murder of Palestinian children. She called them “little snakes.” And she said Israel should also kill their mothers. So there is something deep in the Israeli psyche that is twisted, mentally ill. They hate Palestinian children and want to kill them.

In this current war in Gaza there are mainstream Western reports attesting to the fact that Israel soldiers have been lured into ambushes by the resistance fighters broadcasting recorded sounds of children. The Israelis are always going to want to kill the children. That lures them into the ambush. And the Israeli military even admitted to this. So these are psychotic, genocidal child killers. And they are terrorists.

The Palestinian side is rationally calculating a military operation and trying to diplomatically negotiate a solution. The Israeli side is just psychotic and genocidal and they want to exterminate Amalek, as Netanyahu said, referring to the Hebrew Bible ordering the complete extermination of every man, woman, child and baby and even animal.

So there's something deeply wrong with the Israeli psyche.

So when you take a look at the future here, what are we looking at? At this point we are hearing about the losses that the Israeli regime forces are suffering on the ground, but it's not to the point where I don't think they're going to throw the white flag in. So are we looking at a war of attrition here? Are we looking at a long ways to go when it comes to this genocidal war?

It's really just a matter of how long the world puts up with genocide. And the longer it waits, the worse it will look in the eyes of history.

I have no idea at what point the proverbial straw will break the camel's back and the relevant forces in the world will shift enough to the point that the Zionists feel that they have no choice but to stop the genocide.

It could be a combination of things: Pressure from the Ansarullah forces of Yemen, who have been heroically targeting Israeli shipping and imposing their own blockade on the Israelis, who are of course themselves imposing a genocidal blockade on food, water, and medicine and fuel in Gaza. So that’s the biggest factor that’s got the Americans concerned about the possibility of a wider war. Naturally Netanyahu wants a wider war, because his whole political career, and maybe his staying out of jail, depends on his keeping the war going, and seeing how much mass murder of civilians he can get away with.

The resistance forces have been good at managing things to avoid the escalation that could lead to something utterly disastrous for the region. At this point Yemen is the only country meaningfully pressuring the US to put an end to this genocide.

LIVE RADIO! Piers Robinson on Academic Unfreedom; Mahmood OD on “One-State Solution by 2048”

Listen live Fridays noon to 2pm Eastern on Revolution.Radio later archived at KevinBarrett.Substack.com

First hour: Piers Robinson of the Organisation for Propaganda Studies has noticed that propagandists don’t like it when scholars study and analyze their propaganda. His latest ruminations on “The Perils of Studying Propaganda” begins with the observation:

“Acknowledging that powerful actors pour huge resources into managing the ‘information environment’, in order to manipulate perceptions, attitudes and behaviours, tends to play havoc with assumptions underpinning much of liberal political science.” The propaganda-saturated COVID era, he argues, made it even more obvious that such is indeed the case. But even absent COVID, people who annoy the biggest propagandists, from Julian Assange (thorn in the side of the US empire) to Prof. David Miller (who had the temerity to notice the Zionist role in promoting Islamophobia) have been known to experience severe pushback. So…does academic freedom protect the rights of scholars to study and critique Establishment propaganda? Piers Robinson is the right man to try to answer that question.

Second hour: Mahmood OD, a native Palestinian born in Haifa, is the author of 2048: A Manifesto for the One State Solution in Israel Palestine. In it, he considers the underlying causes of the violence and instability in the region, and proposes a simple and sensible solution, starting with: “The whole conflict can be solved with one thing: Equality. But to reach the stage of equality, one must establish basic understanding about the other side…”

How can we get from the current catastrophe—an accelerating genocide by Jewish Supremacists—to the world Mahmood envisions, in which both sides understand and acknowledge the humanity and equality of the other?

FFWN: “Next Year in Palestine” (2023-2024 roundup with E. Michael Jones)

Check out the year’s biggest stories now, and watch after 1 pm Eastern Saturday, HERE

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Kevin Barrett is editor at Veterans Today who joins us. Welcome to the program, Kevin Barrett. I'm not too sure whether I should talk about the reference that the Osama Hamdan, the senior Hamas leader there, made to the Israeli regime force who wanted to kill children or to the other aspect of this war. But let's start with that one in particular, which is pretty gruesome and pretty shocking. Why do you think the Israeli soldiers are acting in that way unless they're being maybe instructed to kill babies? But then again, isn't that part of their psyche in terms of the training that they received in the past in their military?

Yes, the Israeli military is notorious for deliberately targeting and murdering children. Chris Hedges wrote about that in his famous article “A Gaza Diary” from 15 years ago, maybe 20, I think, actually. And he described how he had been in war zones and witnessed atrocities before, but until he went to Gaza, he had never seen soldiers barking out obscene insults over their bullhorns in order to lure Palestinian children within range of their gun sights so that they could be shot for sport. And he witnessed that happen to several Palestinian children. It's a common occurrence. The sport shooting of children is a regular part of what the Israeli Defense Forces do. And they never face any kind of justice. Because it’s open season on Palestinian childfen.

The Israeli Defense Forces hand out t-shirts that say, “one shot, two kills,” and they show a pregnant Palestinian woman with a target on her belly.

They are proud of killing children. Ayelet Shaked, the former Justice Minister, is notorious for calling for the mass murder of Palestinian children. She called them “little snakes.” And she said Israel should also kill their mothers. So there is something deep in the Israeli psyche that is twisted, mentally ill. They hate Palestinian children and want to kill them.

In this current war in Gaza there are mainstream Western reports attesting to the fact that Israel soldiers have been lured into ambushes by the resistance fighters broadcasting recorded sounds of children. The Israelis are always going to want to kill the children. That lures them into the ambush. And the Israeli military even admitted to this. So these are psychotic, genocidal child killers. And they are terrorists.

The Palestinian side is rationally calculating a military operation and trying to diplomatically negotiate a solution. The Israeli side is just psychotic and genocidal and they want to exterminate Amalek, as Netanyahu said, referring to the Hebrew Bible ordering the complete extermination of every man, woman, child and baby and even animal.

So there's something deeply wrong with the Israeli psyche.

So when you take a look at the future here, what are we looking at? At this point we are hearing about the losses that the Israeli regime forces are suffering on the ground, but it's not to the point where I don't think they're going to throw the white flag in. So are we looking at a war of attrition here? Are we looking at a long ways to go when it comes to this genocidal war?

It's really just a matter of how long the world puts up with genocide. And the longer it waits, the worse it will look in the eyes of history.

I have no idea at what point the proverbial straw will break the camel's back and the relevant forces in the world will shift enough to the point that the Zionists feel that they have no choice but to stop the genocide.

It could be a combination of things: Pressure from the Ansarullah forces of Yemen, who have been heroically targeting Israeli shipping and imposing their own blockade on the Israelis, who are of course themselves imposing a genocidal blockade on food, water, and medicine and fuel in Gaza. So that’s the biggest factor that’s got the Americans concerned about the possibility of a wider war. Naturally Netanyahu wants a wider war, because his whole political career, and maybe his staying out of jail, depends on his keeping the war going, and seeing how much mass murder of civilians he can get away with.

The resistance forces have been good at managing things to avoid the escalation that could lead to something utterly disastrous for the region. At this point Yemen is the only country meaningfully pressuring the US to put an end to this genocide.

LIVE RADIO! Piers Robinson on Academic Unfreedom; Mahmood OD on “One-State Solution by 2048”

Listen live Fridays noon to 2pm Eastern on Revolution.Radio later archived at KevinBarrett.Substack.com

First hour: Piers Robinson of the Organisation for Propaganda Studies has noticed that propagandists don’t like it when scholars study and analyze their propaganda. His latest ruminations on “The Perils of Studying Propaganda” begins with the observation:

“Acknowledging that powerful actors pour huge resources into managing the ‘information environment’, in order to manipulate perceptions, attitudes and behaviours, tends to play havoc with assumptions underpinning much of liberal political science.” The propaganda-saturated COVID era, he argues, made it even more obvious that such is indeed the case. But even absent COVID, people who annoy the biggest propagandists, from Julian Assange (thorn in the side of the US empire) to Prof. David Miller (who had the temerity to notice the Zionist role in promoting Islamophobia) have been known to experience severe pushback. So…does academic freedom protect the rights of scholars to study and critique Establishment propaganda? Piers Robinson is the right man to try to answer that question.

Second hour: Mahmood OD, a native Palestinian born in Haifa, is the author of 2048: A Manifesto for the One State Solution in Israel Palestine. In it, he considers the underlying causes of the violence and instability in the region, and proposes a simple and sensible solution, starting with: “The whole conflict can be solved with one thing: Equality. But to reach the stage of equality, one must establish basic understanding about the other side…”

How can we get from the current catastrophe—an accelerating genocide by Jewish Supremacists—to the world Mahmood envisions, in which both sides understand and acknowledge the humanity and equality of the other?

FFWN: “Next Year in Palestine” (2023-2024 roundup with E. Michael Jones)

Check out the year’s biggest stories now, and watch after 1 pm Eastern Saturday, HERE

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

This week’s False Flag Weekly News co-host Peter Myers argues in his new book The Cosmopolitan Empire that there isn’t just one New World Order conspiracy. In reality, he says, there are four: The Rothschild Globalists (or Illuminati), the Zionists, the British, and the Green Left. The first two, he notes, are heavily Jewish, while the latter two, at least at first glance, seem less so.

Why are so many elite individuals and groups, of diverse orientations, pushing to roll back the sovereignty of nation-states and establish a one-world government? There are two categories of reasons: the selfish and the ostensibly altruistic. The obvious selfish reason why anyone would push for one-world government is that they imagine themselves, or their group, as prospective rulers of the world.

The supposedly unselfish reasons begin with the observation that history seems to be heading in that direction. Global trade and communications have knit the world more tightly together than ever before. All that remains is to establish some kind of central authority.

And if we don’t, we’re doomed. Or so say the one-worlders. The first and most obvious reason is war. Military technology has reached the point that the competition for power and resources between sovereign nation-states can only end in one of two ways: peacefully (or relatively so) with the emergence of a one-world superstate; or tragically, with a huge war triggering a regression to barbarism and rapid die-off of most of the world’s population.

H.G. Wells, the most prominent propagandist for the one-world superstate, saw war as the biggest threat. But today, many worry as much or more about ecological catastrophe and (bizarrely) naturally-occurring pandemics. And then there are asteroid hits, solar mega-storms, alien invasions, and other supposedly non-human-instigated threats that Earth’s human population supposedly needs to band together to defeat.

Philosophically, there are two main problems with the push for one-world government. The one that jumps out at almost everyone is that it might be a bad government. Clearly a world with many different sovereign nations whose governments are all run by wise and saintly rulers would be better than a one-world state ruled by Satan himself. Likewise, a one-world state run by the virtuous would be better that a many-nation world whose nations are under the sway of the vicious.

So what we want is justice, a.k.a. good governance; how we get there is secondary. It’s the same issue that animates debates between the advocates of democracy, autocracy, religious republicanism, and what-have-you. Only an idiot would prefer a vicious democracy to a virtuous autocracy. (Unfortunately, we have all been brainwashed towards idiocy in this regard, and tend to regard democracy as the end rather than the means.)

That observation leads us to a less obvious problem with one-world movements: The ends-versus-means dilemma. Assuming we agree that a one-world government is a good goal to strive for, we will quickly discover that those with a stake in the current system of relatively sovereign nations—the powers that be in today’s world—will oppose us. If defeating them using only virtuous means seems hopeless, as is likely, we may be tempted to use vicious means. And a one-world government that came to power through vicious means would almost certainly be a vicious one.

That ends-versus-means problem contributed to the failure of Communism. Those who sparked Communist takeovers seemed to think that their wonderful new system, with its promise of paradise on Earth, was so important that it was worth killing and torturing people for. The states that emerged, led by such people, were not paradises.

It is only natural to fear that globalists would use, and indeed are using, vicious means in their attempts to establish a one-world state. Would they lie to us, perhaps exaggerating various threats in order to stampede us into the corral of their New World Order? Would they be willing to kill large numbers of people to achieve their designs? The questions answer themselves.

Jewish Conspiracies

Let’s take a closer look at the four one-world conspiracy groups identified by Peter Myers.

Those who have been trained to sniff out anti-Semitism in all its pernicious forms—meaning all of us—will quickly notice that two of the four conspiracies, namely Globalism and Zionism, are quintessentially Jewish. Globalism is dominated by a cabal of mostly-Jewish bankers, while Zionism seeks ever-expanding power, and ever-expanding borders, for a self-styled Jewish State.

It seems that the quintessentially Jewish half of the New World Order conspiracy has two wings: A right wing (Zionism, embodied by Netanyahu) and a left wing (Globalism, embodied by Soros and his Rothschild associates). Likewise, the less-Jewish half of the conspiracy—the British and the Green Left—also fall on a left-right axis, with the Brits on the right and the Greens on the left. The resulting quadrant resembles the famous Nolan Chart.

But wait! Are the British and Green Left factions really all that non-Jewish? The right-wing British faction, so beloved among followers of Lyndon LaRouche, may have been dominated by white racist Anglo-Saxons back in the day, but according to Myers it has been subjected to a hostile takeover by the Globalist (Rothschild-Soros) faction. So as of the 21st century, it’s actually Jewish too.

But what about the Green Left? Surely those radically non-ethnocentric types, like Greta Thunberg and AOC, can’t be part of a Jewish world takeover conspiracy…can they?

Maybe not entirely. But Myers points out that the biggest influence on this group, whether its individual members know it or not, is the thought of Leon Trotsky. And Trotsky, as we all know, was Jewish. So have been the majority of his hardcore followers. Indeed, as Myers shows in The Cosmopolitan Empire, the Stalin-Trotsky cleavage was essentially a split between the less-Jewish and more-Jewish factions of the Bolsheviks.

Why Are the Leading World Takeover Conspiracies So Jewish?

So what explains the disproportionate Jewish presence in the leading world-takeover conspiracies? We all know that the ADL has a one-word answer: anti-Semitism. But if we bother to actually read Myers’ book, look into his sources, and admit that the picture he paints is not entirely inaccurate, we need to think more deeply than the ADL wants us to.

There are two overriding reasons why Jews feature so prominently in world takeover conspiracies. The first, and most obvious, is Jewish power. Only a tiny minority of the world’s population has the wealth and power to have more than a vanishingly small chance of becoming a serious player in a world takeover conspiracy. Among those who are wealthy, powerful, and in the right place to participate, a disproportionate number happen to be Jewish.

But even more important, I suspect, are the peculiar traditions of thought and culture associated with Jewish identity. Jews have always been arch-tribalists. Like Gypsies, they have a powerful in-group versus out-group orientation vis-a-vis the nations they wander among. Like Gypsies, they sometimes rob or exploit those other nations (goyim). And like Gypsies, they experience persecution, which is then memorialized in the tribal mythology to intensify tribal bonds and inculcate deep hatred of outsiders (goys, Amalek, etc.)

In short, the Jews have always been at cultural and economic war with their host populations. Perhaps for that reason, Jewish eschatology posits a final Jewish victory over the goyim, the non-Jewish nations. The Jewish messiah, according to the rabbis, will lead this victory and establish a single, Jewish world government on the ruins of the goyish nations.

The Jewish “culture war” on the goyim, then, is part of a millennial effort to weaken and ultimately destroy the bonds that hold the goyish nations together: family, nation, and religion. Freemasonry, especially its radical Illuminist version, has historically targeted all three. The sexual depravity and gender-bending antics of today’s Green Left, like the sexual revolution and feminism of an earlier generation, is part of a concerted effort to weaken the family, the most basic building block of the religions and nations of the goyim. No wonder Trotsky and his followers, those anti-family fanatics, were disproportionately Jewish, while the Stalinist pro-nation pro-family opposition was driven by goyish reaction.

These sometimes-competing, sometimes-cooperating New World Order factions all seek to leverage Western power to impose a World State inspired by Jewish eschatology. For hardline Zionists, the ever-expanding Jewish State will eventually be the only state left standing, and its ruler will become the de facto world ruler, enthroned in a blood sacrifice temple on the ruins of Masjid al-Aqsa. For Globalists, building a world government on usury-power is the primary issue, while putting it in Palestine and calling it “Jewish” is secondary. For the Trotskyoids of the Green Left, scaring us into ceasing to reproduce and accepting world governance is the name of the game. (That explains why the Green Left serves as the shock troops of the Rothschild-Soros Globalists.) And for the Brits…well, are there really any Anglo-Saxon racists left who have any hope of building a world government ruled by the one true master race, the Anglo-Saxons? The Larouche people may think so, but I rather doubt it. The entity that the Saker calls the Anglo-Zionist Empire may be somewhat Zionist, but it isn’t very Anglo—and it’s probably more Jewish-Illuminist Globalist than either.

So that is my summary of the picture that emerges from Peter Myers’ The Cosmopolitan Empire. Now let’s turn to Peter himself. Below is an edited excerpt from this week’s False Flag Weekly News special broadcast.

Peter Myers: On the front cover of my book is the Supreme Court of Israel, and on top of it is a Masonic pyramid with all-seeing eye, as on the $1 bill. Underneath the pyramid is a library. And this building, by the way, is the most beautiful building in Israel, and the most expensive building.

The (Israeli) Supreme Court is where the judges had the big debate over over whether or not it would be able to disallow resolutions of the Knesset. And the factions were almost at war in the streets of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.

Well, this is the Supreme Court where those judges are based. And at the top of the building, under the pyramid, is a library of three levels. And beneath the library are three flights of ten stairs making thirty stairs plus three levels of the library: a pretty clear connection to the 33 degrees of Freemasonry.

So this is a Masonic pyramid and you can also be called an Illuminati pyramid. Illumination from the pyramid “enlightens” the judges. You can't see the pyramid from the street, it can be seen from surrounding buildings or from planes.

Okay, so the Globalist faction is the Illuminist faction, tracing itself back to Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati.

This pyramid has never been shown in the mainstream media. Now you can imagine there would be a lot of people who would be interested in it. It would sell newspapers. People would say “that's like the dollar bill.”

It's like the Denver airport.

It’s not like the Catholic Church’s sex scandals that the media keeps flashing over the newspapers. They don't do that to the Rothschilds. Basically, the fact that the media haven't touched this, they haven't run magazine articles about this, means that they are subservient. The media know that they could make a lot of money out of selling newspapers about it, or magazines, but they don't touch it. Because some things are taboo.

It’s like how for many years they weren’t covering the annual Bilderberger meetings, but finally that taboo got worn away.

There is a plaque in the Supreme Court which says that the Rothschild family designed and paid for it. And there's a painting at the entrance which shows members of the Rosh Yilf family with Shimon Peres, Yitzhak Rabin and a model of the building.

OK, well that's definitely the Illuminist faction, the liberal globalist Illuminist faction. Well, here's the Temple Mount. This is a different faction here, isn't it?

That's right. So this is the Zionists, not the globalist faction, because the globalists are not pitching for the Third Temple. The Economist magazine (the mouthpiece of the Rothschild globalist faction) accepts that there is a debate about the location of the original temple.

But the Zionists don't accept that, the rabbis don't accept it. And here's the U.S. ambassador, a Jewish man from America, David Friedman, posing with this photo. And the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque are missing. The “Third Temple” is there. And this is, of course, what the fundamentalists, Netanyahu's faction, want to do. They believe that the Messiah will rule from Jerusalem.

But the site of the Temple Mount is not actually where the original temple was. Instead it was down the hill where there's a spring, natural spring water, the Gihon Spring, because they had to have spring water for their purification ceremonies. So be aware that there is a debate about the location of the original temple, because if the original temple is not at the Temple Mount, then there's no reason why the Jews can't build their third temple down the hill where the original temple was.

And as it is, the Temple Mount is actually a part of the Antonia Fortress, a Roman fortress which housed 6,000 Roman soldiers. They had to have that many there because the Jews were such a troublesome group.

Yeah, I talked about this with Nick Kollerstrom last night on my radio show, and he agrees with you that there was no temple on the current site of the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Well, here's the calendar that you mentioned earlier in the show. Jewish holidays outnumber Christian ones.

Yeah, so this is the calendar of the U.S. House of Representatives. And it lists holidays.

If you look at Monday the 10th, you'll see it says Passover begins at Sunday. Well, there are eight of those Jewish entries in the calendar for that year. Eight Jewish entries, only two Christian ones.

So why are they showing so many Jewish holidays?

Well, to me it means that the idea of United States as a Christian country is a myth. It used to be a Christian country. They're trying to make it into a Jewish country now.

A lot of people will say that the Christian Zionists are the ones who are ruling the roost over the Jewish Zionists. And I think this calendar shows it's not true. It's the Jewish Zionists who are running the show, not the Christian Zionists.

Here again in December, Hanukkah has two entries on the 12th and the 20th, and Christmas has one.

And of course, Easter and Christmas are pretty much secularized now, partly through Jewish assistance.

And this is what that Polish legislator was pushing back against when he took a fire extinguisher to the menorah full of Hanukkah candles.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Rumble link Bitchute link

This week’s False Flag Weekly News co-host Peter Myers argues in his new book The Cosmopolitan Empire that there isn’t just one New World Order conspiracy. In reality, he says, there are four: The Rothschild Globalists (or Illuminati), the Zionists, the British, and the Green Left. The first two, he notes, are heavily Jewish, while the latter two, at least at first glance, seem less so.

Why are so many elite individuals and groups, of diverse orientations, pushing to roll back the sovereignty of nation-states and establish a one-world government? There are two categories of reasons: the selfish and the ostensibly altruistic. The obvious selfish reason why anyone would push for one-world government is that they imagine themselves, or their group, as prospective rulers of the world.

The supposedly unselfish reasons begin with the observation that history seems to be heading in that direction. Global trade and communications have knit the world more tightly together than ever before. All that remains is to establish some kind of central authority.

And if we don’t, we’re doomed. Or so say the one-worlders. The first and most obvious reason is war. Military technology has reached the point that the competition for power and resources between sovereign nation-states can only end in one of two ways: peacefully (or relatively so) with the emergence of a one-world superstate; or tragically, with a huge war triggering a regression to barbarism and rapid die-off of most of the world’s population.

H.G. Wells, the most prominent propagandist for the one-world superstate, saw war as the biggest threat. But today, many worry as much or more about ecological catastrophe and (bizarrely) naturally-occurring pandemics. And then there are asteroid hits, solar mega-storms, alien invasions, and other supposedly non-human-instigated threats that Earth’s human population supposedly needs to band together to defeat.

Philosophically, there are two main problems with the push for one-world government. The one that jumps out at almost everyone is that it might be a bad government. Clearly a world with many different sovereign nations whose governments are all run by wise and saintly rulers would be better than a one-world state ruled by Satan himself. Likewise, a one-world state run by the virtuous would be better that a many-nation world whose nations are under the sway of the vicious.

So what we want is justice, a.k.a. good governance; how we get there is secondary. It’s the same issue that animates debates between the advocates of democracy, autocracy, religious republicanism, and what-have-you. Only an idiot would prefer a vicious democracy to a virtuous autocracy. (Unfortunately, we have all been brainwashed towards idiocy in this regard, and tend to regard democracy as the end rather than the means.)

That observation leads us to a less obvious problem with one-world movements: The ends-versus-means dilemma. Assuming we agree that a one-world government is a good goal to strive for, we will quickly discover that those with a stake in the current system of relatively sovereign nations—the powers that be in today’s world—will oppose us. If defeating them using only virtuous means seems hopeless, as is likely, we may be tempted to use vicious means. And a one-world government that came to power through vicious means would almost certainly be a vicious one.

That ends-versus-means problem contributed to the failure of Communism. Those who sparked Communist takeovers seemed to think that their wonderful new system, with its promise of paradise on Earth, was so important that it was worth killing and torturing people for. The states that emerged, led by such people, were not paradises.

It is only natural to fear that globalists would use, and indeed are using, vicious means in their attempts to establish a one-world state. Would they lie to us, perhaps exaggerating various threats in order to stampede us into the corral of their New World Order? Would they be willing to kill large numbers of people to achieve their designs? The questions answer themselves.

Jewish Conspiracies

Let’s take a closer look at the four one-world conspiracy groups identified by Peter Myers.

Those who have been trained to sniff out anti-Semitism in all its pernicious forms—meaning all of us—will quickly notice that two of the four conspiracies, namely Globalism and Zionism, are quintessentially Jewish. Globalism is dominated by a cabal of mostly-Jewish bankers, while Zionism seeks ever-expanding power, and ever-expanding borders, for a self-styled Jewish State.

It seems that the quintessentially Jewish half of the New World Order conspiracy has two wings: A right wing (Zionism, embodied by Netanyahu) and a left wing (Globalism, embodied by Soros and his Rothschild associates). Likewise, the less-Jewish half of the conspiracy—the British and the Green Left—also fall on a left-right axis, with the Brits on the right and the Greens on the left. The resulting quadrant resembles the famous Nolan Chart.

But wait! Are the British and Green Left factions really all that non-Jewish? The right-wing British faction, so beloved among followers of Lyndon LaRouche, may have been dominated by white racist Anglo-Saxons back in the day, but according to Myers it has been subjected to a hostile takeover by the Globalist (Rothschild-Soros) faction. So as of the 21st century, it’s actually Jewish too.

But what about the Green Left? Surely those radically non-ethnocentric types, like Greta Thunberg and AOC, can’t be part of a Jewish world takeover conspiracy…can they?

Maybe not entirely. But Myers points out that the biggest influence on this group, whether its individual members know it or not, is the thought of Leon Trotsky. And Trotsky, as we all know, was Jewish. So have been the majority of his hardcore followers. Indeed, as Myers shows in The Cosmopolitan Empire, the Stalin-Trotsky cleavage was essentially a split between the less-Jewish and more-Jewish factions of the Bolsheviks.

Why Are the Leading World Takeover Conspiracies So Jewish?

So what explains the disproportionate Jewish presence in the leading world-takeover conspiracies? We all know that the ADL has a one-word answer: anti-Semitism. But if we bother to actually read Myers’ book, look into his sources, and admit that the picture he paints is not entirely inaccurate, we need to think more deeply than the ADL wants us to.

There are two overriding reasons why Jews feature so prominently in world takeover conspiracies. The first, and most obvious, is Jewish power. Only a tiny minority of the world’s population has the wealth and power to have more than a vanishingly small chance of becoming a serious player in a world takeover conspiracy. Among those who are wealthy, powerful, and in the right place to participate, a disproportionate number happen to be Jewish.

But even more important, I suspect, are the peculiar traditions of thought and culture associated with Jewish identity. Jews have always been arch-tribalists. Like Gypsies, they have a powerful in-group versus out-group orientation vis-a-vis the nations they wander among. Like Gypsies, they sometimes rob or exploit those other nations (goyim). And like Gypsies, they experience persecution, which is then memorialized in the tribal mythology to intensify tribal bonds and inculcate deep hatred of outsiders (goys, Amalek, etc.)

In short, the Jews have always been at cultural and economic war with their host populations. Perhaps for that reason, Jewish eschatology posits a final Jewish victory over the goyim, the non-Jewish nations. The Jewish messiah, according to the rabbis, will lead this victory and establish a single, Jewish world government on the ruins of the goyish nations.

The Jewish “culture war” on the goyim, then, is part of a millennial effort to weaken and ultimately destroy the bonds that hold the goyish nations together: family, nation, and religion. Freemasonry, especially its radical Illuminist version, has historically targeted all three. The sexual depravity and gender-bending antics of today’s Green Left, like the sexual revolution and feminism of an earlier generation, is part of a concerted effort to weaken the family, the most basic building block of the religions and nations of the goyim. No wonder Trotsky and his followers, those anti-family fanatics, were disproportionately Jewish, while the Stalinist pro-nation pro-family opposition was driven by goyish reaction.

These sometimes-competing, sometimes-cooperating New World Order factions all seek to leverage Western power to impose a World State inspired by Jewish eschatology. For hardline Zionists, the ever-expanding Jewish State will eventually be the only state left standing, and its ruler will become the de facto world ruler, enthroned in a blood sacrifice temple on the ruins of Masjid al-Aqsa. For Globalists, building a world government on usury-power is the primary issue, while putting it in Palestine and calling it “Jewish” is secondary. For the Trotskyoids of the Green Left, scaring us into ceasing to reproduce and accepting world governance is the name of the game. (That explains why the Green Left serves as the shock troops of the Rothschild-Soros Globalists.) And for the Brits…well, are there really any Anglo-Saxon racists left who have any hope of building a world government ruled by the one true master race, the Anglo-Saxons? The Larouche people may think so, but I rather doubt it. The entity that the Saker calls the Anglo-Zionist Empire may be somewhat Zionist, but it isn’t very Anglo—and it’s probably more Jewish-Illuminist Globalist than either.

So that is my summary of the picture that emerges from Peter Myers’ The Cosmopolitan Empire. Now let’s turn to Peter himself. Below is an edited excerpt from this week’s False Flag Weekly News special broadcast.

Peter Myers: On the front cover of my book is the Supreme Court of Israel, and on top of it is a Masonic pyramid with all-seeing eye, as on the $1 bill. Underneath the pyramid is a library. And this building, by the way, is the most beautiful building in Israel, and the most expensive building.

The (Israeli) Supreme Court is where the judges had the big debate over over whether or not it would be able to disallow resolutions of the Knesset. And the factions were almost at war in the streets of Jerusalem and Tel Aviv.

Well, this is the Supreme Court where those judges are based. And at the top of the building, under the pyramid, is a library of three levels. And beneath the library are three flights of ten stairs making thirty stairs plus three levels of the library: a pretty clear connection to the 33 degrees of Freemasonry.

So this is a Masonic pyramid and you can also be called an Illuminati pyramid. Illumination from the pyramid “enlightens” the judges. You can't see the pyramid from the street, it can be seen from surrounding buildings or from planes.

Okay, so the Globalist faction is the Illuminist faction, tracing itself back to Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati.

This pyramid has never been shown in the mainstream media. Now you can imagine there would be a lot of people who would be interested in it. It would sell newspapers. People would say “that's like the dollar bill.”

It's like the Denver airport.

It’s not like the Catholic Church’s sex scandals that the media keeps flashing over the newspapers. They don't do that to the Rothschilds. Basically, the fact that the media haven't touched this, they haven't run magazine articles about this, means that they are subservient. The media know that they could make a lot of money out of selling newspapers about it, or magazines, but they don't touch it. Because some things are taboo.

It’s like how for many years they weren’t covering the annual Bilderberger meetings, but finally that taboo got worn away.

There is a plaque in the Supreme Court which says that the Rothschild family designed and paid for it. And there's a painting at the entrance which shows members of the Rosh Yilf family with Shimon Peres, Yitzhak Rabin and a model of the building.

OK, well that's definitely the Illuminist faction, the liberal globalist Illuminist faction. Well, here's the Temple Mount. This is a different faction here, isn't it?

That's right. So this is the Zionists, not the globalist faction, because the globalists are not pitching for the Third Temple. The Economist magazine (the mouthpiece of the Rothschild globalist faction) accepts that there is a debate about the location of the original temple.

But the Zionists don't accept that, the rabbis don't accept it. And here's the U.S. ambassador, a Jewish man from America, David Friedman, posing with this photo. And the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque are missing. The “Third Temple” is there. And this is, of course, what the fundamentalists, Netanyahu's faction, want to do. They believe that the Messiah will rule from Jerusalem.

But the site of the Temple Mount is not actually where the original temple was. Instead it was down the hill where there's a spring, natural spring water, the Gihon Spring, because they had to have spring water for their purification ceremonies. So be aware that there is a debate about the location of the original temple, because if the original temple is not at the Temple Mount, then there's no reason why the Jews can't build their third temple down the hill where the original temple was.

And as it is, the Temple Mount is actually a part of the Antonia Fortress, a Roman fortress which housed 6,000 Roman soldiers. They had to have that many there because the Jews were such a troublesome group.

Yeah, I talked about this with Nick Kollerstrom last night on my radio show, and he agrees with you that there was no temple on the current site of the Al-Aqsa Mosque. Well, here's the calendar that you mentioned earlier in the show. Jewish holidays outnumber Christian ones.

Yeah, so this is the calendar of the U.S. House of Representatives. And it lists holidays.

If you look at Monday the 10th, you'll see it says Passover begins at Sunday. Well, there are eight of those Jewish entries in the calendar for that year. Eight Jewish entries, only two Christian ones.

So why are they showing so many Jewish holidays?

Well, to me it means that the idea of United States as a Christian country is a myth. It used to be a Christian country. They're trying to make it into a Jewish country now.

A lot of people will say that the Christian Zionists are the ones who are ruling the roost over the Jewish Zionists. And I think this calendar shows it's not true. It's the Jewish Zionists who are running the show, not the Christian Zionists.

Here again in December, Hanukkah has two entries on the 12th and the 20th, and Christmas has one.

And of course, Easter and Christmas are pretty much secularized now, partly through Jewish assistance.

And this is what that Polish legislator was pushing back against when he took a fire extinguisher to the menorah full of Hanukkah candles.

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Press TV

So Netanyahu is now saying that (Israel is paying) is a heavy price. How heavy is the price?

Netanyahu is not admitting how heavy the price really is. The actual number of Israeli casualties is much higher than the official count. We know that because we've actually seen that the resistance fighters have filmed themselves taking out tanks and trucks and other military vehicles by the hundreds. They've filmed many of their other operations as well. So we can see that just based on what's out there in the resistance film footage, the casualty count has to be a lot higher than Netanyahu is admitting.

He also is ignoring the fact, at least publicly, that Israel has lost something like 7% of its population. They haven't been killed, they've fled the country. This has happened occasionally before, but this time it's not certain that they'll be coming back, because the Israeli economy is in shambles. The northern edge of the country is now uninhabited, as they've all been evacuated due to the northern front of Hezbollah.

And the Israeli economy may not come back. It's heavily dependent on tourism, and that's completely shut down now. The usual tourist hotels are full of Israelis who fled the war zones in the north. And so that of course is bad enough. But (the main reason) the future of the Zionist entity looks incredibly bleak is because of the way that they've managed to commit the most horrendous genocide ever seen on live television, and they've sickened and appalled pretty much the entire world. Their only supporters now are in Washington DC. And even in the United States of America polls show that the majority of young adults want the resistance to win and put an end to Israel.

So they have lost the military battle. They can’t get their hostages back. They can’t succeed in their ground operations. They can’t stop Hamas as they say they are going to. They’ve lost their economic battle. They’ve lost in their propaganda war, where they’re making up ludicrous stories about beheaded babies that nobody believes. Nobody believes anything they say any more. They’ve blown all their credibility, blown up their economy, and shown that they’re a military paper tiger. The end of the Zionist entity is near. And Netanyahu knows that his own political end is even nearer.

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Press TV

So Netanyahu is now saying that (Israel is paying) is a heavy price. How heavy is the price?

Netanyahu is not admitting how heavy the price really is. The actual number of Israeli casualties is much higher than the official count. We know that because we've actually seen that the resistance fighters have filmed themselves taking out tanks and trucks and other military vehicles by the hundreds. They've filmed many of their other operations as well. So we can see that just based on what's out there in the resistance film footage, the casualty count has to be a lot higher than Netanyahu is admitting.

He also is ignoring the fact, at least publicly, that Israel has lost something like 7% of its population. They haven't been killed, they've fled the country. This has happened occasionally before, but this time it's not certain that they'll be coming back, because the Israeli economy is in shambles. The northern edge of the country is now uninhabited, as they've all been evacuated due to the northern front of Hezbollah.

And the Israeli economy may not come back. It's heavily dependent on tourism, and that's completely shut down now. The usual tourist hotels are full of Israelis who fled the war zones in the north. And so that of course is bad enough. But (the main reason) the future of the Zionist entity looks incredibly bleak is because of the way that they've managed to commit the most horrendous genocide ever seen on live television, and they've sickened and appalled pretty much the entire world. Their only supporters now are in Washington DC. And even in the United States of America polls show that the majority of young adults want the resistance to win and put an end to Israel.

So they have lost the military battle. They can’t get their hostages back. They can’t succeed in their ground operations. They can’t stop Hamas as they say they are going to. They’ve lost their economic battle. They’ve lost in their propaganda war, where they’re making up ludicrous stories about beheaded babies that nobody believes. Nobody believes anything they say any more. They’ve blown all their credibility, blown up their economy, and shown that they’re a military paper tiger. The end of the Zionist entity is near. And Netanyahu knows that his own political end is even nearer.

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Swami Beyondanonda of WakeUpLaughing.com has spent the better part of four decades, maybe the way-better part (since the rest was so awful), trying to provoke an “upwising” by inciting people (to laughter) over seriously unfunny issues including 9/11, COVID, and electile dysfunction. So…What can the Swami possibly say about the mass slaughters in 404 and Occupied Palestine, among other symptoms of a seriously distressed planet? Tune in and find out.

Public Service Announcement: Swami Beyondanonda urges you to observe One-One-Oneness Day on 1-11-2024.

Then in the final half-hour, the Swami’s Jewish manager, Steve Bhaerman, joins us to reprimand the Swami for his politically incorrect and possibly even anti-Semitic remarks, and to threaten to institutionalize him and medicate him into Zombieland forever if he doesn’t “wise up.”

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com

Swami Beyondanonda of WakeUpLaughing.com has spent the better part of four decades, maybe the way-better part (since the rest was so awful), trying to provoke an “upwising” by inciting people (to laughter) over seriously unfunny issues including 9/11, COVID, and electile dysfunction. So…What can the Swami possibly say about the mass slaughters in 404 and Occupied Palestine, among other symptoms of a seriously distressed planet? Tune in and find out.

Public Service Announcement: Swami Beyondanonda urges you to observe One-One-Oneness Day on 1-11-2024.

Then in the final half-hour, the Swami’s Jewish manager, Steve Bhaerman, joins us to reprimand the Swami for his politically incorrect and possibly even anti-Semitic remarks, and to threaten to institutionalize him and medicate him into Zombieland forever if he doesn’t “wise up.”

This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com/subscribe

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit kevinbarrett.substack.com