
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


My False Flag Weekly News colleague Cat McGuire was at the United Nations headquarters in New York this week protesting against the Pandemic Treaty, Agenda 2030, and Smart Cities. Below is the protesters’ statement.
CORRECTION: Cat McGuire erred when she said BlackRock owns State Street. BlackRock purchased State Street Research and Management, a mutual…
My False Flag Weekly News colleague Cat McGuire was at the United Nations headquarters in New York this week protesting against the Pandemic Treaty, Agenda 2030, and Smart Cities. Below is the protesters’ statement.
CORRECTION: Cat McGuire erred when she said BlackRock owns State Street. BlackRock purchased State Street Research and Management, a mutual…
Video link
The bad news is that there’s no False Flag Weekly News this week. Why not?
1) Last week’s Fundrazr came up short – please fix! https://fundrazr.com/62Grv2 and make next week’s show happen: https://fundrazr.com/72HJc3
2) My computer froze.
The good news is that Helen Buyniski has returned to do an interview on her scintillating new article “Never Forget to Never Forget (or Else).”
Enjoy!
Excerpts from Helen’s article:
“One might question the sanity of a group that devotes millions of dollars and countless lifetimes to analyzing every negative sentiment ever expressed about it in a way that categorically denies the validity of those sentiments and their origins, despite being significantly overrepresented in corporate boardrooms, magazines’ ‘richest’ lists, and influential industries like media and medicine.”
“Indeed, so insecure are they about filling most of the major positions despite Jews constituting less than 2% of the greater US population that to even mention this characteristic of the Biden administration has been deemed antisemitic hate speech.”
“We should all be so lucky to be as oppressed as Doug Emhoff…Emhoff has been on a mission to fight a wholly imaginary ‘epidemic of hate- by forcing the IHRA definition of antisemitism down the world’s throat ever since he was tasked with establishing a task force to root out ‘antisemitic’ thoughtcrime last year, and his pet project is all about centering Jewish persecution in the pantheon of oppression made so fashionable during 2020’s intersectionality craze. The campaign’s ‘four pillars’ include ‘raising awareness’ of antisemitism, improving security for the Jewish community (which already receives 94% of Homeland Security grants), reversing the ‘normalization’ of antisemitism (as defined by the Anti-Defamation League, which clutches its well-worn pearls every year at the thought that someone, somewhere believes in hateful tropes like ‘Jews stick together more than other Americans’), and – last and most definitely least – ‘cross-community solidarity,’ an afterthought for 98% of the US population. The deployment of this 60-page slab of pathos while the majority of Americans can’t scrape together $400 for an emergency and private equity vultures are tearing the last shreds off the carcass of homeownership sends an unmistakeable message: Black Lives may Matter, but Jewish Lives Matter Most, and don’t you forget it.”
“The Strategy is framed at once as both ‘essential to our broader fight against all forms of hate’ and the only thing standing between Debra Lipstadt’s Passover seder and Kristallnacht 2.0.”
“The inspiration for this legislative trainwreck (DeSantis’s bill punishing anti-Semitic leafleting with five years in prison) was the Goyim Defense League, a deliberately unappealing crew of stereotypically-‘antisemitic’ activists who had been staging flyer drops across the country for months in the hope of provoking legislation just like this. While the group claimed its aim was informing the public of the corrosive influence of Jewish power, with flyers purporting to show the Jewish role in Covid-19, the financial crisis, and other catastrophes, their decision to target upscale Jewish neighborhoods for the flyer drops while shouting ethnic slurs from their cars ensured this ‘education’ spree would attract massive amounts of negative publicity and police attention while torpedoing the credibility of anyone expressing remotely similar ideas.”
Video link
The bad news is that there’s no False Flag Weekly News this week. Why not?
1) Last week’s Fundrazr came up short – please fix! https://fundrazr.com/62Grv2 and make next week’s show happen: https://fundrazr.com/72HJc3
2) My computer froze.
The good news is that Helen Buyniski has returned to do an interview on her scintillating new article “Never Forget to Never Forget (or Else).”
Enjoy!
Excerpts from Helen’s article:
“One might question the sanity of a group that devotes millions of dollars and countless lifetimes to analyzing every negative sentiment ever expressed about it in a way that categorically denies the validity of those sentiments and their origins, despite being significantly overrepresented in corporate boardrooms, magazines’ ‘richest’ lists, and influential industries like media and medicine.”
“Indeed, so insecure are they about filling most of the major positions despite Jews constituting less than 2% of the greater US population that to even mention this characteristic of the Biden administration has been deemed antisemitic hate speech.”
“We should all be so lucky to be as oppressed as Doug Emhoff…Emhoff has been on a mission to fight a wholly imaginary ‘epidemic of hate- by forcing the IHRA definition of antisemitism down the world’s throat ever since he was tasked with establishing a task force to root out ‘antisemitic’ thoughtcrime last year, and his pet project is all about centering Jewish persecution in the pantheon of oppression made so fashionable during 2020’s intersectionality craze. The campaign’s ‘four pillars’ include ‘raising awareness’ of antisemitism, improving security for the Jewish community (which already receives 94% of Homeland Security grants), reversing the ‘normalization’ of antisemitism (as defined by the Anti-Defamation League, which clutches its well-worn pearls every year at the thought that someone, somewhere believes in hateful tropes like ‘Jews stick together more than other Americans’), and – last and most definitely least – ‘cross-community solidarity,’ an afterthought for 98% of the US population. The deployment of this 60-page slab of pathos while the majority of Americans can’t scrape together $400 for an emergency and private equity vultures are tearing the last shreds off the carcass of homeownership sends an unmistakeable message: Black Lives may Matter, but Jewish Lives Matter Most, and don’t you forget it.”
“The Strategy is framed at once as both ‘essential to our broader fight against all forms of hate’ and the only thing standing between Debra Lipstadt’s Passover seder and Kristallnacht 2.0.”
“The inspiration for this legislative trainwreck (DeSantis’s bill punishing anti-Semitic leafleting with five years in prison) was the Goyim Defense League, a deliberately unappealing crew of stereotypically-‘antisemitic’ activists who had been staging flyer drops across the country for months in the hope of provoking legislation just like this. While the group claimed its aim was informing the public of the corrosive influence of Jewish power, with flyers purporting to show the Jewish role in Covid-19, the financial crisis, and other catastrophes, their decision to target upscale Jewish neighborhoods for the flyer drops while shouting ethnic slurs from their cars ensured this ‘education’ spree would attract massive amounts of negative publicity and police attention while torpedoing the credibility of anyone expressing remotely similar ideas.”
The brilliant Linh Dinh‘s latest, an interview with João Guimaraes, includes reflections on the hyperreal vs. authentic (i.e. mediated vs. reality). Synchronistically, my latest essay begins: “There are disasters, and there are media representations of disasters. But what if representations are the worst disasters of all?”
Even more synchronistically: La…
The brilliant Linh Dinh‘s latest, an interview with João Guimaraes, includes reflections on the hyperreal vs. authentic (i.e. mediated vs. reality). Synchronistically, my latest essay begins: “There are disasters, and there are media representations of disasters. But what if representations are the worst disasters of all?”
Even more synchronistically: La…
Dr. E. Michael Jones, one of the world’s leading critics of the Anti-Defamation League, shares his thoughts on the viral hashtag #BanTheADL—which garnered support from Elon Musk, whipping up MSM hysteria and raising hopes that one of the world’s nastiest organizations may get taken down within our lifetimes. So did the ADL finally pick on someone its ow…
Dr. E. Michael Jones, one of the world’s leading critics of the Anti-Defamation League, shares his thoughts on the viral hashtag #BanTheADL—which garnered support from Elon Musk, whipping up MSM hysteria and raising hopes that one of the world’s nastiest organizations may get taken down within our lifetimes. So did the ADL finally pick on someone its ow…
Dr. Meryl Nass takes time out of her busy schedule to return to Truth Jihad Radio! (She was a regular guest on this show, where she exposed the COVID origins coverup, before she was famous.)
Next Tuesday, Sept. 19, Maine’s medical licensing board will conclude its hearing on revoking Dr. Nass’s license to practice medicine. Then the following day, Wednesday, Sept. 20, the UN will roll out its own PPPR (pandemic prevention, preparedness and response) program, coordinated to accompany the controversial World Health Organization’s proposed Pandemic Treaty. A protest against the PPPR and WHO Treaty will be held on Saturday, Sept. 23 at the UN headquarters in New York. Dr. Meryl Nass may be speaking.
Dr. Nass, a published expert on biological warfare, has been subjected to a barrage of specious and often incoherent attacks since she began questioning various aspects of the COVID pandemic/response. The original campaign to pull her medical license charged her with spreading misinformation. But since misinformation is often in the eye of the beholder, and more importantly since there is no provision for pulling medical licenses on such grounds, her persecutors dropped that absurd charge and instead went after her for prescribing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to COVID patients, just like tens of thousands of other doctors around the world have. (Ivermectin has been used by almost a third of the world’s population, meaning more than two billion people.)
More recently, Dr. Nass was subjected to a discombobulated “debunking” by the Associated Press. “Fact checker” Melissa Goldin spends most of the article belaboring the obvious fact that Dr. Nass is not a representative of the WHO, when in fact neither Dr. Nass nor anyone else has ever claimed that she is! Compounding the irony, Goldin gets the most important fact wrong. I fact-checked her fact-check in a September 2 email:
Hello Melissa,
In your article on the Meryl Nass video, you cite the AP as saying “The (WHO) treaty, though legally binding, has no enforcement mechanisms and does not overrule any nations’ individual health or domestic policies.” But doesn’t the treaty itself say that signatory nations MUST enforce its provisions? Since treaties are legally binding, that means that the treaty DOES include an enforcement mechanism: Namely, the legal requirement that signatory nations enforce it. Therefore it DOES overrule whatever policies those nations would have otherwise pursued by making independent policies illegal, and forcing the signatory nation to enforce the WHO’s rules whether they like it or not.
Please let me know if I’m wrong, in which case I’ll have my international law professor friends arbitrate.
Best
Kevin Barrett
[NO RESPONSE]
Dr. Meryl Nass takes time out of her busy schedule to return to Truth Jihad Radio! (She was a regular guest on this show, where she exposed the COVID origins coverup, before she was famous.)
Next Tuesday, Sept. 19, Maine’s medical licensing board will conclude its hearing on revoking Dr. Nass’s license to practice medicine. Then the following day, Wednesday, Sept. 20, the UN will roll out its own PPPR (pandemic prevention, preparedness and response) program, coordinated to accompany the controversial World Health Organization’s proposed Pandemic Treaty. A protest against the PPPR and WHO Treaty will be held on Saturday, Sept. 23 at the UN headquarters in New York. Dr. Meryl Nass may be speaking.
Dr. Nass, a published expert on biological warfare, has been subjected to a barrage of specious and often incoherent attacks since she began questioning various aspects of the COVID pandemic/response. The original campaign to pull her medical license charged her with spreading misinformation. But since misinformation is often in the eye of the beholder, and more importantly since there is no provision for pulling medical licenses on such grounds, her persecutors dropped that absurd charge and instead went after her for prescribing ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to COVID patients, just like tens of thousands of other doctors around the world have. (Ivermectin has been used by almost a third of the world’s population, meaning more than two billion people.)
More recently, Dr. Nass was subjected to a discombobulated “debunking” by the Associated Press. “Fact checker” Melissa Goldin spends most of the article belaboring the obvious fact that Dr. Nass is not a representative of the WHO, when in fact neither Dr. Nass nor anyone else has ever claimed that she is! Compounding the irony, Goldin gets the most important fact wrong. I fact-checked her fact-check in a September 2 email:
Hello Melissa,
In your article on the Meryl Nass video, you cite the AP as saying “The (WHO) treaty, though legally binding, has no enforcement mechanisms and does not overrule any nations’ individual health or domestic policies.” But doesn’t the treaty itself say that signatory nations MUST enforce its provisions? Since treaties are legally binding, that means that the treaty DOES include an enforcement mechanism: Namely, the legal requirement that signatory nations enforce it. Therefore it DOES overrule whatever policies those nations would have otherwise pursued by making independent policies illegal, and forcing the signatory nation to enforce the WHO’s rules whether they like it or not.
Please let me know if I’m wrong, in which case I’ll have my international law professor friends arbitrate.
Best
Kevin Barrett
[NO RESPONSE]
From the publisher's feed