
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Video link
Ray McGinnis has a Religious Studies background, has spent much of his life working with the United Church of Canada, and held mainstream liberal views on most issues. Then, not so many years ago, he looked into David Ray Griffin’s work on 9/11. Shocked at what he found, McGinnis researched and wrote Unanswered Questions: What the September Eleventh Families Asked and the 9/11 Commission Ignored.
Among the questions raised by 9/11 is: If the mainstream is lying this outrageously about September 11th, what else might they be lying about? Ray McGinnis started looking more critically at other important issues. Below are excerpts from our interview.
*“(The 9/11 family members) kind of soldier on… they're disheartened by this, you know, stonewalling and obstruction. And I think about…Pearl Harbor back in December 7th, 1941. There was an investigation very quickly…they did a cover up. And then families of the senior Pacific Command officers who were kind of hung out to take the blame for the surprise attack of the Japanese (started campaigning for their vindication)… it turns out in the 1990s when all these documents were released that…people in the Department of Defense and the White House in 1941 December and before that (had) intercepts of Japanese communications. It was well known in Washington D.C. that the Japanese were coming. When the fleet commanders before December 7th thought to send their Pacific fleet north toward Japan just to make sure that there wouldn't be a fleet coming south, they were ordered to send them back to Pearl Harbor and to go south of Hawaii and not north. In 1998 the Senate finally voted 52 to 47 in favor of exonerating the two commanders because clearly they were in the dark, and the people in Washington, D.C. did know that the Japanese were going to attack.”
*“We're going to have the 60-year anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy coming up on the 22nd of November, 2023. And I wonder…well I don't wonder so much as I can just imagine how the media, if it pays attention, how they're going to play that 50th anniversary. They're going to cherry pick all kind of things and blame Oswald all over again. It's like once there's a narrative connected to the myth of what America is, they have to tell it over and over again and can never admit that there's anything wrong with it. So it's a huge problem. If a country is built on lies, then the children grow up learning things in the history books in high school and in university that are full of holes. It's a huge problem for the whole society.”
*“It's sad about how how highly suspicious these circumstances are with all these plane crashes (like JFK Jr.’s) and Paul Wellstone’s and Beverly Eckert’s, who was one of the 12 members of the Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission. She was still intending personally to go to court. She had not taken a payout from the government.”
*“I've just received a book called Canary in a COVID World. Breanne Dressen was a preschool teacher who stepped up in the middle of all of the COVID vaccine excitement in the news and decided that she would be one of the people in the trials to ‘take these vaccines in quotes in their infancy so we can have the trials and then they can roll it to the general public.’ And she got AstraZeneca and was instantly injured. She talks about how there would be people who would be trying to be part of a support group on Facebook and they'd be taken down. She talked about how a young woman was describing her own experience of the reactions, and Facebook's fact checkers would say ‘this is misinformation, so someone's been been injured, they have no neurological and all kinds of physical internal organ problems.’ And they're simply describing it, and the Facebook fact checkers take it upon themselves to say ‘this is misinformation.’ Well, we have that new category of malinformation, which is ‘information that may be true, but it doesn't serve our objectives, so we're going to suppress it.’ …I mean, you can talk about free speech, but if you say something that doesn't adhere to the narrative of the moment or the narratives of the past that need to be upheld, then you'll find yourself deplatformed or shadowbanned.”
For another take on the zombie movie we’re living through, check out the ending of this week’s False Flag Weekly News with E. Michael Jones.
Video link
Ray McGinnis has a Religious Studies background, has spent much of his life working with the United Church of Canada, and held mainstream liberal views on most issues. Then, not so many years ago, he looked into David Ray Griffin’s work on 9/11. Shocked at what he found, McGinnis researched and wrote Unanswered Questions: What the September Eleventh Families Asked and the 9/11 Commission Ignored.
Among the questions raised by 9/11 is: If the mainstream is lying this outrageously about September 11th, what else might they be lying about? Ray McGinnis started looking more critically at other important issues. Below are excerpts from our interview.
*“(The 9/11 family members) kind of soldier on… they're disheartened by this, you know, stonewalling and obstruction. And I think about…Pearl Harbor back in December 7th, 1941. There was an investigation very quickly…they did a cover up. And then families of the senior Pacific Command officers who were kind of hung out to take the blame for the surprise attack of the Japanese (started campaigning for their vindication)… it turns out in the 1990s when all these documents were released that…people in the Department of Defense and the White House in 1941 December and before that (had) intercepts of Japanese communications. It was well known in Washington D.C. that the Japanese were coming. When the fleet commanders before December 7th thought to send their Pacific fleet north toward Japan just to make sure that there wouldn't be a fleet coming south, they were ordered to send them back to Pearl Harbor and to go south of Hawaii and not north. In 1998 the Senate finally voted 52 to 47 in favor of exonerating the two commanders because clearly they were in the dark, and the people in Washington, D.C. did know that the Japanese were going to attack.”
*“We're going to have the 60-year anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy coming up on the 22nd of November, 2023. And I wonder…well I don't wonder so much as I can just imagine how the media, if it pays attention, how they're going to play that 50th anniversary. They're going to cherry pick all kind of things and blame Oswald all over again. It's like once there's a narrative connected to the myth of what America is, they have to tell it over and over again and can never admit that there's anything wrong with it. So it's a huge problem. If a country is built on lies, then the children grow up learning things in the history books in high school and in university that are full of holes. It's a huge problem for the whole society.”
*“It's sad about how how highly suspicious these circumstances are with all these plane crashes (like JFK Jr.’s) and Paul Wellstone’s and Beverly Eckert’s, who was one of the 12 members of the Family Steering Committee for the 9/11 Independent Commission. She was still intending personally to go to court. She had not taken a payout from the government.”
*“I've just received a book called Canary in a COVID World. Breanne Dressen was a preschool teacher who stepped up in the middle of all of the COVID vaccine excitement in the news and decided that she would be one of the people in the trials to ‘take these vaccines in quotes in their infancy so we can have the trials and then they can roll it to the general public.’ And she got AstraZeneca and was instantly injured. She talks about how there would be people who would be trying to be part of a support group on Facebook and they'd be taken down. She talked about how a young woman was describing her own experience of the reactions, and Facebook's fact checkers would say ‘this is misinformation, so someone's been been injured, they have no neurological and all kinds of physical internal organ problems.’ And they're simply describing it, and the Facebook fact checkers take it upon themselves to say ‘this is misinformation.’ Well, we have that new category of malinformation, which is ‘information that may be true, but it doesn't serve our objectives, so we're going to suppress it.’ …I mean, you can talk about free speech, but if you say something that doesn't adhere to the narrative of the moment or the narratives of the past that need to be upheld, then you'll find yourself deplatformed or shadowbanned.”
For another take on the zombie movie we’re living through, check out the ending of this week’s False Flag Weekly News with E. Michael Jones.
Dave Gahary of Money Tree Publishing is considered a dangerous extremist by the likes of the ADL. But who are the real extremists? Dave agrees with folks like Alan Sabrosky that the nihilists of what passes for the left are far more extreme and dangerous than Trump’s deplorables and J6ers. He also agrees with “Doc” Sabrosky that the US is inching toward civil war.
Approaching the 22nd anniversary of 9/11, one of the notable new articles is Mark Gaffney’s “The Demolition of the World Trade Center (The Devil’s Trick).” It summarizes the case for controlled demolition at the World Trade Center, and (controversially) considers Heinz Pommer’s arguments for a nuclear component to the final takedowns of the Towers.
Mark H. Gaffney is the author of Dimona the Third Temple (1989), The 9/11 Mystery Plane and the Vanishing of America(2008), Black 9/11. Money, Motive and Technology (2016), and Deep History and the Ages of Man (2022).
Gordon Duff, retired C*A fixer and publisher of The Intel Drop, has personally advised Imran Khan (the legitimately elected but illegitimately jailed leader of Pakistan) and the highest levels of the Nigerian government. And yes, I know some of you don’t believe Gordon, but I’ve personally watched him call up and talk to some of the big names he drops, and even participated in a couple of the conversations, so I know he isn’t making everything up.
Now that Imran Khan has been taken down by corrupt scumbags, and the Nigerian regime is at odds with the new anti-French military government in Niger, I’m curious about Gordon’s take on these and other symptoms of the world hurtling towards hell in its proverbial handbasket.
Gordon Duff, retired C*A fixer and publisher of The Intel Drop, has personally advised Imran Khan (the legitimately elected but illegitimately jailed leader of Pakistan) and the highest levels of the Nigerian government. And yes, I know some of you don’t believe Gordon, but I’ve personally watched him call up and talk to some of the big names he drops, and even participated in a couple of the conversations, so I know he isn’t making everything up.
Now that Imran Khan has been taken down by corrupt scumbags, and the Nigerian regime is at odds with the new anti-French military government in Niger, I’m curious about Gordon’s take on these and other symptoms of the world hurtling towards hell in its proverbial handbasket.
Brett Redmayne-Titley‘s new book THERE! On-Scene Reporting from a World Gone Mad incriminates the author in “real journalism in the first degree”—a crime for which he is lucky not to have been executed. Brett repeatedly shows up at confrontations between US imperial authority and its victims, sometimes getting uncomfortably close to the lethal violence…and occasionally finding a chance to verbally push back at its perpetrators. Too craftily elusive to have suffered Gonzolo Lira’s fate, and luckier than Serena Shim and Shireen Abu Akleh, Brett Redmayne-Titley offers an alternately righteous-anger-inducing and heartbreaking succession of scenes from the moral, spiritual, and material decline of empire. Tied together by the narrative of Brett’s close-up-and-personal view of the police execution of Evan Quik for the crime of briefly borrowing then returning his mother’s car, the book takes us from the birth of Occupy to Zionist-afflicted Lebanon, NATO-besieged Transnitria, methane-poisoned Los Angeles, Erdogan-addled Turkey, a Wells Fargo branch that won’t let you withdraw your money, and perhaps most horrifically, the pedo-gang scene around Child Protective Services (CPS) that appears to have murdered Fox reporter Martin Burns, Georgia State Sen. Nancy Schaefer and her husband, and God knows how many others.
Closer to home, Brett introduces us to various San Diego debacles including a toxic Trumpfest, a rapper jailed for gangbanger lyrics (if bad lyrics were a crime most of the pop music world would have to be executed) and a nuclear disaster waiting to happen.
There is a great read, if you can handle emotions like righteous anger and utter and complete disgust. Devouring it in one sitting, I emerged happier than ever that I left the USA.
Brett Redmayne-Titley‘s new book THERE! On-Scene Reporting from a World Gone Mad incriminates the author in “real journalism in the first degree”—a crime for which he is lucky not to have been executed. Brett repeatedly shows up at confrontations between US imperial authority and its victims, sometimes getting uncomfortably close to the lethal violence…and occasionally finding a chance to verbally push back at its perpetrators. Too craftily elusive to have suffered Gonzolo Lira’s fate, and luckier than Serena Shim and Shireen Abu Akleh, Brett Redmayne-Titley offers an alternately righteous-anger-inducing and heartbreaking succession of scenes from the moral, spiritual, and material decline of empire. Tied together by the narrative of Brett’s close-up-and-personal view of the police execution of Evan Quik for the crime of briefly borrowing then returning his mother’s car, the book takes us from the birth of Occupy to Zionist-afflicted Lebanon, NATO-besieged Transnitria, methane-poisoned Los Angeles, Erdogan-addled Turkey, a Wells Fargo branch that won’t let you withdraw your money, and perhaps most horrifically, the pedo-gang scene around Child Protective Services (CPS) that appears to have murdered Fox reporter Martin Burns, Georgia State Sen. Nancy Schaefer and her husband, and God knows how many others.
Closer to home, Brett introduces us to various San Diego debacles including a toxic Trumpfest, a rapper jailed for gangbanger lyrics (if bad lyrics were a crime most of the pop music world would have to be executed) and a nuclear disaster waiting to happen.
There is a great read, if you can handle emotions like righteous anger and utter and complete disgust. Devouring it in one sitting, I emerged happier than ever that I left the USA.
Irish journalist John Waters discusses his new article “‘Trust the Experts’ Is the Virus.” In it he cites comedian Jimmy Dore’s bit on COVID-era mass formation psychosis, which in retrospect was hilarious as well as terrifying. But what’s so funny about mass hysteria?
Waters: “We come back to the hypothesis of the French philosopher Henri Bergson. In his book, Laughter — An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic, in which he proposes that humour derives fundamentally from rigidity in human behaviours and affairs. We find funny, he says, anything that breaks away from the natural patterns of human life, by becoming mechanistic and predictable. Hence, what makes people laugh is the absence of alertness and elasticity in the object of ridicule, i.e. forms of sclerosis arising from the culture of the group, things that deviate from the law of life, which abjures rigidity and mechanisation. But, here, the rigidities are not simply those of sclerotic authority, or bureaucracy, or power, but of our friends and neighbours, our brothers and sisters, our parents and children, the man behind the cash desk in the supermarket who used to be so friendly and, well, funny — all these and many more, who for a full two years at least, became the attack dogs from the Valley of the Squinting Windows where the Stasi live.”
But seriously, read the whole thing, it’s spot on.
Irish journalist John Waters discusses his new article “‘Trust the Experts’ Is the Virus.” In it he cites comedian Jimmy Dore’s bit on COVID-era mass formation psychosis, which in retrospect was hilarious as well as terrifying. But what’s so funny about mass hysteria?
Waters: “We come back to the hypothesis of the French philosopher Henri Bergson. In his book, Laughter — An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic, in which he proposes that humour derives fundamentally from rigidity in human behaviours and affairs. We find funny, he says, anything that breaks away from the natural patterns of human life, by becoming mechanistic and predictable. Hence, what makes people laugh is the absence of alertness and elasticity in the object of ridicule, i.e. forms of sclerosis arising from the culture of the group, things that deviate from the law of life, which abjures rigidity and mechanisation. But, here, the rigidities are not simply those of sclerotic authority, or bureaucracy, or power, but of our friends and neighbours, our brothers and sisters, our parents and children, the man behind the cash desk in the supermarket who used to be so friendly and, well, funny — all these and many more, who for a full two years at least, became the attack dogs from the Valley of the Squinting Windows where the Stasi live.”
But seriously, read the whole thing, it’s spot on.
From the publisher's feed