
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Yesterday, we learned that it’s not science vs. religion. It’s one view of the past, based on man’s word, vs. another view of the past, based on God’s Word. And that’s because there are two different kinds of science.
Observational science deals with the present. It’s directly testable, observable, and repeatable. It builds technology and cures diseases.
Historical science deals with the past. It’s not directly testable, observable, or repeatable. So what you believe about the past determines how you interpret the evidence in the present.
We all study the same world. The battle is between two different interpretations of the same evidence.
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
370370 ratings
Yesterday, we learned that it’s not science vs. religion. It’s one view of the past, based on man’s word, vs. another view of the past, based on God’s Word. And that’s because there are two different kinds of science.
Observational science deals with the present. It’s directly testable, observable, and repeatable. It builds technology and cures diseases.
Historical science deals with the past. It’s not directly testable, observable, or repeatable. So what you believe about the past determines how you interpret the evidence in the present.
We all study the same world. The battle is between two different interpretations of the same evidence.

8,619 Listeners

3,939 Listeners

1,701 Listeners

2,186 Listeners

1,515 Listeners

1,940 Listeners

3,079 Listeners

3,138 Listeners

2,864 Listeners

21,124 Listeners

5,381 Listeners

1,528 Listeners

1,593 Listeners

2,892 Listeners

13,037 Listeners