
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Yesterday, we learned that it’s not science vs. religion. It’s one view of the past, based on man’s word, vs. another view of the past, based on God’s Word. And that’s because there are two different kinds of science.
Observational science deals with the present. It’s directly testable, observable, and repeatable. It builds technology and cures diseases.
Historical science deals with the past. It’s not directly testable, observable, or repeatable. So what you believe about the past determines how you interpret the evidence in the present.
We all study the same world. The battle is between two different interpretations of the same evidence.
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
Yesterday, we learned that it’s not science vs. religion. It’s one view of the past, based on man’s word, vs. another view of the past, based on God’s Word. And that’s because there are two different kinds of science.
Observational science deals with the present. It’s directly testable, observable, and repeatable. It builds technology and cures diseases.
Historical science deals with the past. It’s not directly testable, observable, or repeatable. So what you believe about the past determines how you interpret the evidence in the present.
We all study the same world. The battle is between two different interpretations of the same evidence.

5,211 Listeners

2,713 Listeners

1,514 Listeners

159 Listeners

1,012 Listeners

3,129 Listeners

2,856 Listeners

5,370 Listeners

5,330 Listeners

1,533 Listeners

2,466 Listeners

948 Listeners

387 Listeners

2,903 Listeners

13,089 Listeners