
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Yesterday, we learned that it’s not science vs. religion. It’s one view of the past, based on man’s word, vs. another view of the past, based on God’s Word. And that’s because there are two different kinds of science.
Observational science deals with the present. It’s directly testable, observable, and repeatable. It builds technology and cures diseases.
Historical science deals with the past. It’s not directly testable, observable, or repeatable. So what you believe about the past determines how you interpret the evidence in the present.
We all study the same world. The battle is between two different interpretations of the same evidence.
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
Yesterday, we learned that it’s not science vs. religion. It’s one view of the past, based on man’s word, vs. another view of the past, based on God’s Word. And that’s because there are two different kinds of science.
Observational science deals with the present. It’s directly testable, observable, and repeatable. It builds technology and cures diseases.
Historical science deals with the past. It’s not directly testable, observable, or repeatable. So what you believe about the past determines how you interpret the evidence in the present.
We all study the same world. The battle is between two different interpretations of the same evidence.

5,211 Listeners

2,598 Listeners

1,518 Listeners

175 Listeners

1,038 Listeners

3,156 Listeners

2,887 Listeners

5,464 Listeners

5,373 Listeners

1,547 Listeners

2,488 Listeners

953 Listeners

386 Listeners

2,928 Listeners

13,245 Listeners