
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In this episode of Stanford Legal, host Professor Pamela Karlan interviews her Stanford Law School colleague Professor Lisa Larrimore Ouellette about actions by the Trump administration that Ouellette says are undermining scientific research and jeopardizing America’s longstanding global leadership in medicine and innovation. Drawing on an essay she penned for Just Security, Ouellette explains how decades of bipartisan support for federally funded science—an engine of American innovation since World War II—is now at risk. From canceling grants already approved through peer review, to capping essential “indirect cost” reimbursements, she details how these moves threaten not just labs and universities but also patients, whose clinical trials are being abruptly halted.
Ouellette also highlights a second front in her current scholarship: how drug development policy can be better aligned with public health needs. As a member of a National Academies committee, she recently co-authored a report showing that both private investment and federal funding often fail to prioritize diseases causing the greatest suffering.
Links:
Connect:
(00:00) Research Funding
(05:01) The Competitive Grant Process
(15:01) Addressing Disease Burden
(20:00) Impacts of Stopped Clinical Trials
(25:01) The Role of Federal Investment in Innovation
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
4.3
3939 ratings
In this episode of Stanford Legal, host Professor Pamela Karlan interviews her Stanford Law School colleague Professor Lisa Larrimore Ouellette about actions by the Trump administration that Ouellette says are undermining scientific research and jeopardizing America’s longstanding global leadership in medicine and innovation. Drawing on an essay she penned for Just Security, Ouellette explains how decades of bipartisan support for federally funded science—an engine of American innovation since World War II—is now at risk. From canceling grants already approved through peer review, to capping essential “indirect cost” reimbursements, she details how these moves threaten not just labs and universities but also patients, whose clinical trials are being abruptly halted.
Ouellette also highlights a second front in her current scholarship: how drug development policy can be better aligned with public health needs. As a member of a National Academies committee, she recently co-authored a report showing that both private investment and federal funding often fail to prioritize diseases causing the greatest suffering.
Links:
Connect:
(00:00) Research Funding
(05:01) The Competitive Grant Process
(15:01) Addressing Disease Burden
(20:00) Impacts of Stopped Clinical Trials
(25:01) The Role of Federal Investment in Innovation
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
3,986 Listeners
377 Listeners
6,271 Listeners
3,485 Listeners
460 Listeners
6,700 Listeners
112,458 Listeners
130 Listeners
32,361 Listeners
4,601 Listeners
5,764 Listeners
16,210 Listeners
384 Listeners
10,850 Listeners
521 Listeners