
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode of Stanford Legal, host Professor Pamela Karlan interviews her Stanford Law School colleague Professor Lisa Larrimore Ouellette about actions by the Trump administration that Ouellette says are undermining scientific research and jeopardizing America’s longstanding global leadership in medicine and innovation. Drawing on an essay she penned for Just Security, Ouellette explains how decades of bipartisan support for federally funded science—an engine of American innovation since World War II—is now at risk. From canceling grants already approved through peer review, to capping essential “indirect cost” reimbursements, she details how these moves threaten not just labs and universities but also patients, whose clinical trials are being abruptly halted.
Ouellette also highlights a second front in her current scholarship: how drug development policy can be better aligned with public health needs. As a member of a National Academies committee, she recently co-authored a report showing that both private investment and federal funding often fail to prioritize diseases causing the greatest suffering.
Links:
Connect:
(00:00) Research Funding
(05:01) The Competitive Grant Process
(15:01) Addressing Disease Burden
(20:00) Impacts of Stopped Clinical Trials
(25:01) The Role of Federal Investment in Innovation
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
By Stanford Law School4.3
4040 ratings
In this episode of Stanford Legal, host Professor Pamela Karlan interviews her Stanford Law School colleague Professor Lisa Larrimore Ouellette about actions by the Trump administration that Ouellette says are undermining scientific research and jeopardizing America’s longstanding global leadership in medicine and innovation. Drawing on an essay she penned for Just Security, Ouellette explains how decades of bipartisan support for federally funded science—an engine of American innovation since World War II—is now at risk. From canceling grants already approved through peer review, to capping essential “indirect cost” reimbursements, she details how these moves threaten not just labs and universities but also patients, whose clinical trials are being abruptly halted.
Ouellette also highlights a second front in her current scholarship: how drug development policy can be better aligned with public health needs. As a member of a National Academies committee, she recently co-authored a report showing that both private investment and federal funding often fail to prioritize diseases causing the greatest suffering.
Links:
Connect:
(00:00) Research Funding
(05:01) The Competitive Grant Process
(15:01) Addressing Disease Burden
(20:00) Impacts of Stopped Clinical Trials
(25:01) The Role of Federal Investment in Innovation
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

6,828 Listeners

4,056 Listeners

3,534 Listeners

377 Listeners

676 Listeners

1,113 Listeners

6,302 Listeners

112,484 Listeners

496 Listeners

32,334 Listeners

5,822 Listeners

15,955 Listeners

855 Listeners

744 Listeners

210 Listeners

138 Listeners