Criminal Procedure: The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment permits the prosecution in a criminal trial to present testimony by a substitute expert conveying the testimonial statements of a nontestifying forensic analyst? - Argued: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:0:9 EDT

U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Arizona, Case No. 22-899

Audio Arguendo provides unedited recordings of oral arguments from the Supreme Court and interesting cases from around the globe. If you have a case that you think we should broadcast, just send us a tweet at @AudioArguendo with the name of the case, a short description of the issue, and a link to where the audio can be found. We assert no claim of copyright over any of the recordings and have posted them in podcast form to make them more widely and conveniently available.

Share U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Arizona, Case No. 22-899

Sign up to save your podcasts

U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Arizona, Case No. 22-899

U.S. Supreme Court Smith v. Arizona, Case No. 22-899

More shows like Audio Arguendo

Political Gabfest

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

Bloomberg Law

U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments

Meet the Press

We the People

The Lawfare Podcast

The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg

Strict Scrutiny

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch Podcast

Amarica's Constitution

Divided Argument

Central Air

Supreme Court Oral Arguments