In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the controversy surrounding Insomniac Games' policies and the Ramey Suit. He discusses the legal implications of premature information sharing, game DLC value, and licensing terms for various types of games. The episode also explores the Sony-Marvel relationship, community management challenges, and the legal complexities of Spider Man's Ramey Suit rights. It concludes with speculation on future DLCs.

(0:00) Introduction and Recap of Previous Episode

(1:43) Audience Feedback and Comments

(2:16) Insomniac Games' Policies and the Ramey Suit Controversy

(4:30) Legal Implications of Premature Information Sharing

(5:45) Audience Feedback and Game DLC Value

(7:13) Licensing Terms for Movie Tie-in Games vs Independent Games

(10:05) Sony-Marvel Relationship and Company Position Changes

(13:20) Community Management Challenges and Audience Feedback

(15:33) Game Developers, Financial Teams, and Rights of Spider Man Ramey Suit

(20:11) Lawyer's Interpretation Impact on Contract and IP Rights

(24:10) Speculation and Response on Suit Inclusion in Future DLCs

(26:19) Closing Remarks and Viewer Engagement

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the legal complexities surrounding the "Ramey suit" in Marvel's Spider Man game. He discusses Insomniac Games' response to fan criticisms, the Marvel-Sony alliance, and the business aspects of adding the suit. The episode concludes with listener feedback and appreciation.

(0:00) Introduction and Marvel's Spider Man game overview

(2:33) Insomniac Games' stance and response to fan criticisms

(3:56) The complexity of licensing and contract for the "Ramey suit"

(7:16) The Marvel-Sony alliance and its impact on the game

(9:44) Business considerations of adding the "Ramey suit" to the game

(12:41) The importance of negotiation leverage in the gaming industry

(14:28) Intellectual property and contracts in the gaming industry

(15:27) Closing thoughts and the reasoning behind Insomniac's actions

(16:07) Listener feedback and appreciation: Closing the episode

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the topic of regulation in the video game industry. He analyzes congressional hearings, Google's impact, and political grandstanding. He critiques lawmakers' tech understanding and discusses the risks of government intervention. The episode concludes with a discussion on the balance between regulation and freedom, and the importance of self-regulation.

(0:00) Introduction and Discussion on Regulation in the Video Game Industry

(2:04) Analysis of Congressional Hearings and Google's Impact

(4:10) Political Grandstanding and Regulatory Infrastructure

(7:18) Effectiveness and Critique of Congressional Hearings

(9:18) Implications of Lawmakers' Lack of Tech Understanding

(11:08) Government Regulation in the Video Game Industry: Risks and Advice

(14:05) Worst-Case Scenario of Government Intervention in Tech Industries

(14:38) Balance Between Regulation and Freedom in the Gaming Industry

(15:52) Role and Importance of Self-Regulation in the Gaming Industry

(16:43) Closing Remarks and Call to Action

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the launch of the Epic Game Store and its impact on the gaming industry. He explores how Fortnite profits are fueling Epic's rivalry with Steam, discusses Epic's aggressive strategy, and analyses its potential long-term success. He also examines the effect of Epic's revenue split on game developers, and the removal of Infinity Blade games from the iOS Store.

(0:00) Introduction and episode overview

(1:38) Epic Game Store's launch and its impact

(2:49) How Fortnite profits are fueling Epic's competition with Steam

(7:22) Benefits and challenges of Epic's market disruption

(9:53) Analysis of Epic's aggressive strategy and its potential long-term success

(13:00) Epic's revenue split and its impact on game developers

(15:30) The impact of the Epic Game Store on the gaming industry

(18:40) The role of Epic in competitive pricing and recommendations

(20:43) Removal of Infinity Blade games from iOS Store and Epic's shift in focus

(22:35) Conclusion and closing remarks

In this episode, Richard Hoeg discusses the legal controversies surrounding Epic Games' use of dances in 'Fortnite', including the lawsuit from rapper 2 Milly. He delves into the Ferguson v Epic Games case and explains the intricacies of the US Copyright Act, particularly focusing on choreography and pantomime registration.

(0:00) Opening

(0:36) Rapper 2 Milly sues Epic Games for using his dance in 'Fortnite'

(2:50) Ferguson v Epic Games

(14:48) The United States Copyright Act

(17:02) Copyright Registration of Choreography and Pantomime

(25:02) Fortnite takes heat from rappers, actors on monetized dance moves

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the business models of Steam and Epic Games, analyzing their revenue share tiers and impact on indie developers. He examines the disruption caused by big games like Fortnite and the Epic Game Store's developer-friendly approach. Richard speculates on the future of digital game marketplaces and the potential threat Steam faces from Epic's new model.

(0:00) Introduction and discussion on Steam's business model and shortcomings

(7:23) Analysis of Steam's revenue share tiers and their impact on indie developers

(10:16) Discussion on the impact of big games like Fortnite and Epic's disruption of the digital video game ecosystem

(15:23) Examination of the Epic Game Store's operating principles, revenue split, and developer-friendly approach

(20:10) Epic's cost analysis compared with Steam's and the sustainability of the 88.12 revenue split

(25:10) Speculation on the future of digital game marketplaces, Steam's potential response, and the advantages of Epic's model

(31:06) Discussion on Steam's potential threat from Epic's new model and Richard's optimism about Epic's impact on the industry

(32:01) Richard's closing remarks and invitation to follow him on Twitter

In this episode, Richard Hoeg discusses loot boxes in video games, examining the IGDA's call for child protection and FTC's investigation. He delves into the history and regulation of the industry, ESRB's approach, and potential solutions like credit card payments and system-level requirements.

(0:00) Introduction and discussion on loot boxes

(1:32) Call for child protection and examination of IGDA's statement

(3:12) FTC's investigation and analysis of loot box laws

(5:11) History and regulation in the video game industry

(7:34) ESRB's approach and potential FTC regulation

(9:31) IGDA's call to action and launching an education campaign

(11:23) Disclosure of loot box odds and marketing ethics

(14:32) Realism of marketing to children and industry defense

(15:24) Potential solutions: Credit card payments and system-level requirements

(17:22) Industry discussions on the issue and closing thoughts

(18:19) Request for feedback and appreciation for listeners

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, providing a comprehensive summary and discussing the legal definition of a bet or wager.

(0:00) Opening

(8:20) Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act

(8:31) Summary of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act

(9:39) What Constitutes a Bet or Wager

In this episode, Richard Hoeg delves into an article concerning ZeniMax's terms, discusses defined terms in legal agreements, explores the concept of limited license, and examines the implications of limited liability in the digital realm.

(0:00) Intro

(0:45) Article

(11:20) ZeniMax Terms

(13:18) Defined Terms

(15:10) Limited License

(22:35) Limited Liability