
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode of Explaining History, we explore the fraught world of war reporting in Vietnam during the decade before full-scale U.S. involvement. Drawing on Philip Knightley’s classic study The First Casualty, we examine how embedded American correspondents were constrained by censorship, official manipulation, and the Pentagon’s control over information. We also highlight the surprising advantage held by some British reporters, who—operating outside the U.S. military’s embedded framework—were often able to uncover truths their American colleagues could not. Finally, we consider the striking indifference of the U.S. media to Vietnam before 1964, and what this meant for public awareness of America’s growing commitment to the conflict.
If you enjoy the Explaining History podcast and its many years of content and would like to help the show continue, please consider supporting it in the following ways:
If you want to go ad-free, you can take out a membership here
Or
You can support the podcast via Patreon here
Or you can just say some nice things about it here
Explaining History helps you understand the 20th Century through critical conversations and expert interviews. We connect the past to the present. If you enjoy the show, please subscribe and share.
▸ Support the Show & Get Exclusive Content
Become a Patron: patreon.com/explaininghistory
▸ Join the Community & Continue the Conversation
Facebook Group: facebook.com/groups/ExplainingHistoryPodcast
Substack: theexplaininghistorypodcast.substack.com
▸ Read Articles & Go Deeper
Website: explaininghistory.org
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Nick Shepley4.6
7272 ratings
In this episode of Explaining History, we explore the fraught world of war reporting in Vietnam during the decade before full-scale U.S. involvement. Drawing on Philip Knightley’s classic study The First Casualty, we examine how embedded American correspondents were constrained by censorship, official manipulation, and the Pentagon’s control over information. We also highlight the surprising advantage held by some British reporters, who—operating outside the U.S. military’s embedded framework—were often able to uncover truths their American colleagues could not. Finally, we consider the striking indifference of the U.S. media to Vietnam before 1964, and what this meant for public awareness of America’s growing commitment to the conflict.
If you enjoy the Explaining History podcast and its many years of content and would like to help the show continue, please consider supporting it in the following ways:
If you want to go ad-free, you can take out a membership here
Or
You can support the podcast via Patreon here
Or you can just say some nice things about it here
Explaining History helps you understand the 20th Century through critical conversations and expert interviews. We connect the past to the present. If you enjoy the show, please subscribe and share.
▸ Support the Show & Get Exclusive Content
Become a Patron: patreon.com/explaininghistory
▸ Join the Community & Continue the Conversation
Facebook Group: facebook.com/groups/ExplainingHistoryPodcast
Substack: theexplaininghistorypodcast.substack.com
▸ Read Articles & Go Deeper
Website: explaininghistory.org
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

5,431 Listeners

3,193 Listeners

1,871 Listeners

955 Listeners

659 Listeners

1,229 Listeners

4,811 Listeners

452 Listeners

1,377 Listeners

571 Listeners

3,212 Listeners

533 Listeners

14,464 Listeners

1,823 Listeners

2,417 Listeners