
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Many Christians today are questioning the existence of a historical Adam because of evolutionary ideas. Is this okay? Definitely not!
A historical Adam is foundational to the gospel. In the New Testament, Paul says, “The first man Adam” and “as death comes through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man.” It’s because of the physical actions of the first man that there’s death in creation.
Without a physical Adam who sinned, why did Jesus need to come and die physically to save us from sin? And why did he need to rise physically to conquer death? Rejecting a historical Adam actually destroys the gospel!
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
Many Christians today are questioning the existence of a historical Adam because of evolutionary ideas. Is this okay? Definitely not!
A historical Adam is foundational to the gospel. In the New Testament, Paul says, “The first man Adam” and “as death comes through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man.” It’s because of the physical actions of the first man that there’s death in creation.
Without a physical Adam who sinned, why did Jesus need to come and die physically to save us from sin? And why did he need to rise physically to conquer death? Rejecting a historical Adam actually destroys the gospel!

5,211 Listeners

2,598 Listeners

1,518 Listeners

175 Listeners

1,038 Listeners

3,156 Listeners

2,887 Listeners

5,464 Listeners

5,373 Listeners

1,547 Listeners

2,488 Listeners

953 Listeners

386 Listeners

2,928 Listeners

13,245 Listeners