
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Many Christians today are questioning the existence of a historical Adam because of evolutionary ideas. Is this okay? Definitely not!
A historical Adam is foundational to the gospel. In the New Testament, Paul says, “The first man Adam” and “as death comes through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man.” It’s because of the physical actions of the first man that there’s death in creation.
Without a physical Adam who sinned, why did Jesus need to come and die physically to save us from sin? And why did he need to rise physically to conquer death? Rejecting a historical Adam actually destroys the gospel!
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
370370 ratings
Many Christians today are questioning the existence of a historical Adam because of evolutionary ideas. Is this okay? Definitely not!
A historical Adam is foundational to the gospel. In the New Testament, Paul says, “The first man Adam” and “as death comes through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man.” It’s because of the physical actions of the first man that there’s death in creation.
Without a physical Adam who sinned, why did Jesus need to come and die physically to save us from sin? And why did he need to rise physically to conquer death? Rejecting a historical Adam actually destroys the gospel!

8,619 Listeners

3,939 Listeners

1,701 Listeners

2,186 Listeners

1,515 Listeners

1,940 Listeners

3,079 Listeners

3,138 Listeners

2,864 Listeners

21,124 Listeners

5,381 Listeners

1,528 Listeners

1,593 Listeners

2,892 Listeners

13,037 Listeners