
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Many Christians today are questioning the existence of a historical Adam because of evolutionary ideas. Is this okay? Definitely not!
A historical Adam is foundational to the gospel. In the New Testament, Paul says, “The first man Adam” and “as death comes through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man.” It’s because of the physical actions of the first man that there’s death in creation.
Without a physical Adam who sinned, why did Jesus need to come and die physically to save us from sin? And why did he need to rise physically to conquer death? Rejecting a historical Adam actually destroys the gospel!
By Ken Ham and Mark Looy4.6
374374 ratings
Many Christians today are questioning the existence of a historical Adam because of evolutionary ideas. Is this okay? Definitely not!
A historical Adam is foundational to the gospel. In the New Testament, Paul says, “The first man Adam” and “as death comes through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man.” It’s because of the physical actions of the first man that there’s death in creation.
Without a physical Adam who sinned, why did Jesus need to come and die physically to save us from sin? And why did he need to rise physically to conquer death? Rejecting a historical Adam actually destroys the gospel!

5,207 Listeners

2,714 Listeners

1,515 Listeners

157 Listeners

1,011 Listeners

3,130 Listeners

2,856 Listeners

5,370 Listeners

5,330 Listeners

1,532 Listeners

2,468 Listeners

947 Listeners

387 Listeners

2,903 Listeners

13,084 Listeners