
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The argument against counting mail-in ballots that arrive after election day is going to involve Supreme Court-pleasing “originalist” language, but is the case really just another way to say that Trump should have beaten Joe Biden in 2020?
Guest: Jay Willis, editor-in-chief of Balls & Strikes.
Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme, and Rob Gunther.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By Slate Podcasts3.9
10531,053 ratings
The argument against counting mail-in ballots that arrive after election day is going to involve Supreme Court-pleasing “originalist” language, but is the case really just another way to say that Trump should have beaten Joe Biden in 2020?
Guest: Jay Willis, editor-in-chief of Balls & Strikes.
Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme, and Rob Gunther.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

38,222 Listeners

6,753 Listeners

9,196 Listeners

8,488 Listeners

4,034 Listeners

3,521 Listeners

1,023 Listeners

5,624 Listeners

1,863 Listeners

112,194 Listeners

2,359 Listeners

2,073 Listeners

23,934 Listeners

2,135 Listeners

7,229 Listeners

2,407 Listeners

5,799 Listeners

446 Listeners

16,198 Listeners

739 Listeners

1,672 Listeners