What's on my mind?

Zuri dutifully provided breakfast for her husband, while Minkah was nourished by his mother’s milk. Unbeknownst to her, Zuri’s mother, an early morning visitor, would inadvertently complete the formula.

Support the show

Even during the journey home, Zuri harbored skepticism towards Mosi’s narrative. She ventured to broach the subject with Big J, as she felt it was essential to understand his perspective on the matter.

Support the show

Having imparted a significant revelation to his family, Mosi was now prepared to field any questions that might arise. He stood ready, open to discussion and further inquiry

Support the show

One week has passed since the tragic loss of the esteemed civil rights leader, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. In the wake of this profound event, he has decided to bring to light the truth about Minkah. This disclosure, he believes, is of significant importance and he is prepared to share it with everyone. The details surrounding Minkah have been shrouded in mystery, and he feels that now is the appropriate time to reveal them. He hopes that this revelation will provide clarity and foster understanding among all.

Support the show

Mosi is inclined to disclose the information; however, the appropriate time for such revelation has not yet arrived.

Support the show

Mosi reflects..

Support the show

Minkah is here.

Support the show

The argument that Trump's lawyer made for why the former president has immunity reminded me of a child caught in a lie by an adult, but the child is trying to explain his way out of it. I am glad I missed most of it because the part I heard was unconvincing and dangerous. How can he claim that impeachment was the only appropriate remedy when he opposed his impeachment by saying he could only be held accountable for criminal acts after leaving office?
This is a clear example of contradictory rhetoric. I am deeply concerned that many of my fellow citizens are being deceived by this. I hope that they will soon realize the truth and act accordingly. One might assume that only uneducated people are susceptible to the former president's deception. But that is not the case. Many well-educated people have abandoned their rationality and prioritized a false narrative over what they know is right.
It is undeniable that the founders, despite their shortcomings, were opposed to the concept of a monarchy. The notion of complete immunity would have been considered absurd to them.

Support the show

We must all understand that we rule...nothing. Have you ever experienced an epiphany? A moment when you're engrossed in profound contemplation, and suddenly, a metaphorical light bulb illuminates. Each day, I pose the question, What's on my mind today?' This practice serves as a method of self-reflection, a means of directing my focus toward examining an issue and understanding the factors that influence its trajectory.
Through this introspection, I've come to realize that the most significant events transpire within the confines of our minds. However, the challenge lies in the common misconception that the majority of us exercise complete control over our thoughts. While there is a degree of truth that a small amount of us may be able to do this, the reality is that a majority of us willingly surrender a portion of our cognitive control to external influences. We often find ourselves swayed by factors such as wealth, religion, carnal desires, substances, and other sources of pleasure.
It is anticipated that a significant number of individuals might respond with a denial, asserting, "No, not me." However, I would like to assure you that this is a misconception. Irrespective of one's position or status, a universal willingness exists to relinquish a degree of control to attain perceived desires. Despite the notion that being subservient may be unappealing to many, the reality is that we have all experienced it to some extent and continue to do so. This is an undeniable truth of our existence.

Support the show

The task of people trying to revise historical events, such as the Jan 6th event, is increasingly challenging and verging on the impossible. As demonstrated by Katt Williams, when evidence exists, it will inevitably be discovered. Therefore, any attempts by the former president or his minions to reinterpret the events of January 6th, are destined to fail. There's a well-known adage about online content: "The internet is forever."

Attempts to portray violent incidents as peaceful or to label the perpetrators as victims are futile. Encouraging individuals to disregard their own perceptions in favor of a prescribed narrative is not only ineffective but also dismissive of their cognitive abilities. It's tantamount to asking people to distrust their own senses, which is an unrealistic expectation. The truth has a way of revealing itself, regardless of attempts to obscure it.

Support the show