What's on my mind?

The U.S. Constitution, in its original form, imposed certain restrictions on individual actions. For example, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution stipulates the prerequisites for presidential candidacy:

Natural Born Citizen: The candidate must be a U.S. citizen by birth, not through naturalization at a later stage. This requirement is fulfilled by any individual born within the United States or to U.S. citizen parents abroad.
Age: The candidate must be at least 35 years old on Inauguration Day (January 20th) following the election.
Residency The candidate must have resided in the United States for at least 14 years prior to taking office.

The framers of the U.S. Constitution also provided a mechanism for the government and the people to amend the Constitution as needed. This adaptability has led many to refer to the Constitution as a "living document". The efficacy of this mechanism was demonstrated with the ratification of the 11th amendment in 1795 and the 12th amendment in 1804, underscoring the Constitution's capacity for modernization.

Following the Civil War, the U.S. government recognized the need to address certain issues within the Constitution, leading to the addition of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, collectively known as the Reconstruction Amendments. These amendments introduced changes to broaden the scope of the Constitution, but also established additional eligibility criteria for holding office, akin to earlier stipulations. Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, also known as the Disqualification Clause, outlines the conditions under which an individual is deemed ineligible to hold public office in the United States. The clause states:

"No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Support the show

As citizens of the United States, we may feel as though we are encountering an individual like Trump for the first time, but this is not the case. Trump embodies the archetype of the indulged child who believes he should always be prioritized. He struggles to comprehend how someone outside his social stratum could perform equally well or surpass him. However, we deceive ourselves by considering this as a novel phenomenon. It isn't. Trump is a direct product of privilege. He exemplifies the outcome when a child is never denied. His belief that wealth can procure anything isn't entirely unfounded; this approach has seemingly served him well throughout his life. A majority of his followers are individuals of a similar disposition. His admiration for autocratic governance suggests a lack of understanding of the essence of American values. It implies that many of his zealous supporters may not fully comprehend the sentiment expressed in Lee Greenwood's song, "God Bless the U.S.A." Trump and his adherents are mistaken in their understanding. Merely uttering words does not constitute patriotism. True patriotism is embodied by advocating for the less privileged, marginalized, and minorities. However, to fulfill these requirements, one must prioritize the needs of others above one's interests, and prioritizing the needs of others above one's interests is a significant challenge for Trump and his supporters.

Trump perceived individuals such as Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Joe Biden as inferior to him for reasons that are ostensibly clear to him but not to the rest of us. He fails to understand why he isn't universally adored. The distinction between someone who has genuinely exerted effort and someone for whom the work has been done is evident. He stands as the foremost and most compelling argument against participation awards.

Support the show

They are after your money. That's the only thing I'm certain of. They will use any means and any words to get it. They are hypocritical and dishonest. They don't care about your well-being, your expenses, your savings, your lifestyle, your family, or even yourself. They will exploit you while you live, and they will pursue you after you die. They are greedy, and they will scare you into thinking that you need them to survive or to avoid suffering. They will make you hate or fear one group of people, while inviting those same people to this country to work for low wages.
The truth is, there are only two sides in this conflict: you and them. You outnumber them by far. But they have what you want and they know that many of you will do anything to get it. They also know that by giving some of you what they have, they achieve two things: one, they make you dependent on them, and if you disobey them, you are finished. I am astonished by how many of you are willing to accept that offer. They have power over you. Two, they take from you, and you will always end up giving whatever they gave to you, back to them.
The most important takeaway is that you always have more power than they do. Sure, they can buy off a few of you guys, but not all of you. Not enough of you.

Support the show

You have more potential to make an impact than you might think. If you want to capture people’s attention, follow the meaning of the saying, “the squeaky wheel gets the most grease.” This means that the more you complain or protest, the more likely you will get what you want. There are different ways of being loud. One of my favorites is the boycotting that is happening of businesses that support the Israeli government and, by proxy, the Israeli government killing innocent Palestinians.
If you want the American government to listen to you and to change its position on calling for a ceasefire, you have to challenge capitalism. In the world of geopolitics, it seems like it should be easy to say, stop killing innocent people. It seems like it should not require any courage to say that or for a government to refrain from doing that. But when you are dealing with weak men, what else can you expect?
The world is in a state of rage, and men are primarily responsible. Men often feel the need to prove themselves to others, even if it means resorting to violence or oppression. This is a toxic form of masculinity that harms everyone, including men themselves.
When I think about my childhood, I remember many times when my mother would calm my father down or say something that would make him reconsider his actions. I heard this statement today that women are less prone to aggression than men because they are more confident and secure in themselves. They are also more willing to defend themselves and their loved ones, more than any man would be willing to do. This is why a female animal is most fierce when her offspring, whether cubs, calves, or something else, are threatened. Sometimes, a female animal will protect her young from the father or another male of the same species.

Every person who has died or been captured in the conflict between Palestine and Israel shares one thing in common: they were born by a woman. I think women understand the value of life better than men, and they would not take a life carelessly. When I look at the current state of the world today, I often wish women were in charge.

Support the show

Support the show

Support the show

Support the show

Support the show

Donald Trump is a monstrous product of the white men who have failed to hold him accountable. The trouble he faces is a result of his actions and those of his associates. Joe Scarborough, the host of Morning Joe, has repeatedly stated on his show that people in New York were aware of his tendency to overstate.

Donald Trump is responsible for his own downfall and would have been wiser if he had followed Public Enemy's advice and not believed the hype he created and others created around him. He should have known himself better. White men have enabled him to lie about his wealth, they have allowed him to use the courts to force contractors to accept whatever he pays them. Donald Trump does not see how his fraud has hurt others because he does not consider himself as part of the other.

He fails to realize that he is no longer in a familiar environment. He can no longer rely on the sycophants who would ignore his misdeeds and let him do as he wishes. Donald Trump posed a question yesterday while addressing the cameras during one of the recesses at his civil trial, and it was similar to why New York is suing him now. It shows how unaware he was of the many people who have turned a blind eye and let him have his way. 

It also shows he did not anticipate that the people who would hold him accountable would not resemble him. They would be black, for the most part, but even more egregious to Trump, they are women. Black women who are DAs and a judge, for the most part, are holding Donald Trump accountable. His disparaging remarks about the black judge and DAs show that he does not think that they have the authority to challenge him. And because he is dealing with the state or federal government, he cannot outspend them and use the justice system against them.

Support the show

The media portrayed Donald Trump as a successful and influential figure. They highlighted his wealth and lavish lifestyle, featuring his New York apartment on magazine covers and giving him cameo movie roles. They also helped him gain popularity and credibility as a political candidate, eventually leading him to the White House.

White people controlled the media outlets that gave him a platform, elevated him, and gave him a positive image. Republicans and, yes, even some Democrats overlooked his actions and enabled him to pursue his agenda. 

White people concealed the truth and attempted to use other black people to challenge President Obama. People like Larry Elder, Candace Owens, and Herman Cain tried, but that did not work.

White-controlled media enabled Trump to question the validity of Obama's presidency. These white men who controlled the press or media implied, "Black people, you did not vote according to our wishes, so we will undermine your chosen leader." But then they accepted a white voice that volunteered, thinking that black people would trust a white voice telling them that Obama should not be president because he was not born here. But this strategy soon backfired. Trump's lies started to reveal themselves.

It began with President Barack Obama and the night of the News-Press correspondent dinner. I am sure Obama was fed up with Donald Trump and the media's obsession with the birther nonsense. So he jabbed back with jokes, but there is always a hint of truth in a good joke. People laughed because they knew that those jokes held some validity of truth.

Initially, Obama wasn't enough. Throughout Trump's first presidential campaign, he garnered free media. By the time his first campaign was over, he had amassed nearly $2 billion in free media coverage, approximately twice the total expenditure of the most expensive presidential campaigns in history. The New York Times, in 1989, provided a platform for Donald Trump to advocate for the death penalty for five individuals who were later found innocent. The United States Justice Department in 1973 filed a lawsuit against Donald Trump, his father, Fred, and Trump Management, seeking a settlement that would ensure a commitment from Trump and his father to refrain from discriminatory practices. After two years, the case was resolved when Trump attempted to countersue the Justice Department for $100 million, alleging false statements. However, the court dismissed these allegations. These incidents, on their own, would have significantly impacted any other candidate's electoral prospects. However, the predominantly white-owned media landscape conveyed to the white public that societal norms had shifted, giving Donald Trump a blank check to normalize expressions of racism and embracing dictators and authoritarian governments.

Then, a panel of representatives, led by Bennie Thompson, on the January 6th committee, transferred all their information to independent prosecutor Jack Smith. Black District Attorneys in Georgia, New York State, and New York City also undertook the task of holding Donald Trump accountable for his actions. They would challenge Donald Trump, while many white men and the white media would let him go unnoticed.

Suppose you are an individual of African descent, particularly from the southern United States. In that case, you have observed that racism has consistently permeated American society, often subtly and nuancedly.

Their plan would fail here, though. The strategy failed because it was based on a misunderstanding of the African-American community, especially African-American women. The proponents of the strategy, primarily white men, did not comprehend the historical and cultural context that shaped the views and values of their target audience. They did not realize that they were essen

Support the show