Want to keep the conversation going?

Join our Slack community at dailyaishowcommunity.com

Intro

With OpenAI dropping 4.1, 4.1 Mini, 4.1 Nano, O3, and O4-Mini, it’s been a week of nonstop releases. The Daily AI Show team unpacks what each of these new models can do, how they compare, where they fit into your workflow, and why pricing, context windows, and access methods matter. This episode offers a full breakdown to help you test the right model for the right job.

Key Points Discussed

The new OpenAI models include 4.1, 4.1 Mini, 4.1 Nano, O3, and O4-Mini. All have different capabilities, pricing, and access methods.

4.1 is currently only available via API, not inside ChatGPT. It offers the highest context window (1 million tokens) and better instruction following.

O3 is OpenAI’s new flagship reasoning model, priced higher than 4.1 but offers deep, agentic planning and sophisticated outputs.

The model naming remains confusing. OpenAI admits their naming system is messy, especially with overlapping versions like 4.0, 4.1, and 4.5.

4.1 models are broken into tiers: 4.1 (flagship), Mini (mid-tier), and Nano (lightweight and cheapest).

Mini and Nano are optimized for specific cost-performance tradeoffs and are ideal for automation or retrieval tasks where speed matters.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro were referenced as benchmarks for comparison, especially for long-context tasks and coding accuracy.

Beth emphasized prompt hygiene and using the model-specific guides that OpenAI publishes to get better results.

Jyunmi walked through how each model is designed to replace or improve upon prior versions like 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5.

Karl highlighted client projects using O3 and 4.1 via API for proposal generation, data extraction, and advanced analysis.

The team debated whether Pro access at $200 per month is necessary now that O3 is available in the $20 plan. Many prefer API pay-as-you-go access for cost control.

Brian showcased a personal agent built with O3 that created a complete go-to-market course, complete with a dynamic dashboard and interactive progress tracking.

The group agreed that in the future, personal agents built on reasoning models like O3 will dynamically generate learning experiences tailored to individual needs.

Timestamps & Topics

00:01:00 🧠 Intro to the wave of OpenAI model releases

00:02:16 📊 OpenAI’s model comparison page and context windows

00:04:07 💰 Price comparison between 4.1, O3, and O4-Mini

00:05:32 🤖 Testing models through Playground and API

00:07:24 🧩 Jyunmi breaks down model replacements and tiers

00:11:15 💸 O3 costs 5x more than 4.1, but delivers deeper planning

00:12:41 🔧 4.1 Mini and Nano as cost-efficient workflow tools

00:16:56 🧠 Testing strategies for model evaluation

00:19:50 🧪 TypingMind and other tools for testing models side-by-side

00:22:14 🧾 OpenAI prompt guide makes big difference in results

00:26:03 🧠 Carl applies O3 and 4.1 in live client projects

00:29:13 🛠️ API use often more efficient than Pro plan

00:33:17 🧑‍🏫 Brian demos custom go-to-market course built with O3

00:39:48 📊 Progress dashboard and course personalization

00:42:08 🔁 Persistent memory, JSON state tracking, and session testing

00:46:12 💡 Using GPTs for dashboards, code, and workflow planning

00:50:13 📈 Custom GPT idea: using LinkedIn posts to reverse-engineer insights

00:52:38 🏗️ Real-world use cases: construction site inspections via multimodal models

00:56:03 🧠 Tip: use models to first learn about other models before choosing

00:57:59 🎯 Final thoughts: ask harder questions, break your own habits

01:00:04 🔧 Call for more demo-focused “Be About It” shows coming soon

01:01:29 📅 Wrap-up: Biweekly recap tomorrow, conundrum on Saturday, newsletter Sunday

The Daily AI Show Co-Hosts: Jyunmi Hatcher, Andy Halliday, Beth Lyons, Brian Maucere, and Karl Yeh