
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Behind the familiar Buddhist doctrine that "there is no self" lies a centuries-long tradition of dispute and disagreement. Reductionists believe that the self is no more than a bundle of sense impressions and mental states that add up to nothing of substance or permanence, while emergentists believe that the self is something more - something related to these impressions and mental states, but not reducible to them. We're not going to settle the argument this week, but we will be exploring the ethical ramifications and asking what's at stake.
By ABC, ABC Australia4.5
191191 ratings
Behind the familiar Buddhist doctrine that "there is no self" lies a centuries-long tradition of dispute and disagreement. Reductionists believe that the self is no more than a bundle of sense impressions and mental states that add up to nothing of substance or permanence, while emergentists believe that the self is something more - something related to these impressions and mental states, but not reducible to them. We're not going to settle the argument this week, but we will be exploring the ethical ramifications and asking what's at stake.

97 Listeners

65 Listeners

124 Listeners

89 Listeners

19 Listeners

45 Listeners

1,734 Listeners

897 Listeners

1,532 Listeners

759 Listeners

316 Listeners

131 Listeners

67 Listeners

66 Listeners

47 Listeners

462 Listeners

158 Listeners

769 Listeners

10 Listeners

195 Listeners

114 Listeners

235 Listeners

1,003 Listeners

61 Listeners