
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Behind the familiar Buddhist doctrine that "there is no self" lies a centuries-long tradition of dispute and disagreement. Reductionists believe that the self is no more than a bundle of sense impressions and mental states that add up to nothing of substance or permanence, while emergentists believe that the self is something more - something related to these impressions and mental states, but not reducible to them. We're not going to settle the argument this week, but we will be exploring the ethical ramifications and asking what's at stake.
By ABC, ABC Australia4.5
191191 ratings
Behind the familiar Buddhist doctrine that "there is no self" lies a centuries-long tradition of dispute and disagreement. Reductionists believe that the self is no more than a bundle of sense impressions and mental states that add up to nothing of substance or permanence, while emergentists believe that the self is something more - something related to these impressions and mental states, but not reducible to them. We're not going to settle the argument this week, but we will be exploring the ethical ramifications and asking what's at stake.

99 Listeners

63 Listeners

128 Listeners

87 Listeners

18 Listeners

43 Listeners

1,736 Listeners

788 Listeners

1,539 Listeners

752 Listeners

315 Listeners

140 Listeners

59 Listeners

61 Listeners

46 Listeners

471 Listeners

161 Listeners

1,036 Listeners

8 Listeners

195 Listeners

114 Listeners

236 Listeners

1,008 Listeners

56 Listeners