
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Behind the familiar Buddhist doctrine that "there is no self" lies a centuries-long tradition of dispute and disagreement. Reductionists believe that the self is no more than a bundle of sense impressions and mental states that add up to nothing of substance or permanence, while emergentists believe that the self is something more - something related to these impressions and mental states, but not reducible to them. We're not going to settle the argument this week, but we will be exploring the ethical ramifications and asking what's at stake.
By ABC, ABC Australia4.5
191191 ratings
Behind the familiar Buddhist doctrine that "there is no self" lies a centuries-long tradition of dispute and disagreement. Reductionists believe that the self is no more than a bundle of sense impressions and mental states that add up to nothing of substance or permanence, while emergentists believe that the self is something more - something related to these impressions and mental states, but not reducible to them. We're not going to settle the argument this week, but we will be exploring the ethical ramifications and asking what's at stake.

99 Listeners

64 Listeners

125 Listeners

89 Listeners

16 Listeners

43 Listeners

1,737 Listeners

785 Listeners

1,535 Listeners

752 Listeners

313 Listeners

133 Listeners

63 Listeners

64 Listeners

44 Listeners

467 Listeners

165 Listeners

1,080 Listeners

8 Listeners

194 Listeners

116 Listeners

234 Listeners

1,014 Listeners

55 Listeners