
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


A mistrial.
Sean Diddy Comb’s legal team has just filed for another mistrial, alleging that the prosecutors knew that Cassie was lying on the stand and still allowed her to testify.
This entire fight centers around a 2016 balcony incident, in which Cassie and her friend Bona allege that Combs dangled Bona off the balcony. The defense argues that this incident never even happened.
This makes it sound like the defense is grasping at straws to get a mistrial.
However, the energy in the courtroom has been interesting lately. The defense has been taking some large “wins” in cross examinations. Some netizens believe that their biggest win yet was “taking down” the second victim to testify, Mia.
Netizens believe that the defense has completely dismantled her story and that she came off “unlikeable” on the stand. But the prosecutors argue that all the defense did was harass, argue, and further traumatize a victim on the stand. Prosecutors argue that the cross examination was so brutal and humiliating that it might deter future victims from testifying in criminal cases. So which one is true?
This is the testimony of Mia.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
By Stephanie Soo4.8
2554925,549 ratings
A mistrial.
Sean Diddy Comb’s legal team has just filed for another mistrial, alleging that the prosecutors knew that Cassie was lying on the stand and still allowed her to testify.
This entire fight centers around a 2016 balcony incident, in which Cassie and her friend Bona allege that Combs dangled Bona off the balcony. The defense argues that this incident never even happened.
This makes it sound like the defense is grasping at straws to get a mistrial.
However, the energy in the courtroom has been interesting lately. The defense has been taking some large “wins” in cross examinations. Some netizens believe that their biggest win yet was “taking down” the second victim to testify, Mia.
Netizens believe that the defense has completely dismantled her story and that she came off “unlikeable” on the stand. But the prosecutors argue that all the defense did was harass, argue, and further traumatize a victim on the stand. Prosecutors argue that the cross examination was so brutal and humiliating that it might deter future victims from testifying in criminal cases. So which one is true?
This is the testimony of Mia.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

13,254 Listeners

3,928 Listeners

24,585 Listeners

20,596 Listeners

99,698 Listeners

2,233 Listeners

8,619 Listeners

18,548 Listeners

185 Listeners

10,270 Listeners

32 Listeners

58,365 Listeners

112 Listeners

22 Listeners

3,024 Listeners

95 Listeners

18 Listeners

431 Listeners

9,008 Listeners

6,136 Listeners

1,951 Listeners

1,982 Listeners

20,222 Listeners

414 Listeners

464 Listeners

164 Listeners

100 Listeners

27 Listeners

1,924 Listeners

18 Listeners

804 Listeners

96 Listeners

2 Listeners

1,065 Listeners

26,094 Listeners