
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


A mistrial.
Sean Diddy Comb’s legal team has just filed for another mistrial, alleging that the prosecutors knew that Cassie was lying on the stand and still allowed her to testify.
This entire fight centers around a 2016 balcony incident, in which Cassie and her friend Bona allege that Combs dangled Bona off the balcony. The defense argues that this incident never even happened.
This makes it sound like the defense is grasping at straws to get a mistrial.
However, the energy in the courtroom has been interesting lately. The defense has been taking some large “wins” in cross examinations. Some netizens believe that their biggest win yet was “taking down” the second victim to testify, Mia.
Netizens believe that the defense has completely dismantled her story and that she came off “unlikeable” on the stand. But the prosecutors argue that all the defense did was harass, argue, and further traumatize a victim on the stand. Prosecutors argue that the cross examination was so brutal and humiliating that it might deter future victims from testifying in criminal cases. So which one is true?
This is the testimony of Mia.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
By Stephanie Soo4.8
2554925,549 ratings
A mistrial.
Sean Diddy Comb’s legal team has just filed for another mistrial, alleging that the prosecutors knew that Cassie was lying on the stand and still allowed her to testify.
This entire fight centers around a 2016 balcony incident, in which Cassie and her friend Bona allege that Combs dangled Bona off the balcony. The defense argues that this incident never even happened.
This makes it sound like the defense is grasping at straws to get a mistrial.
However, the energy in the courtroom has been interesting lately. The defense has been taking some large “wins” in cross examinations. Some netizens believe that their biggest win yet was “taking down” the second victim to testify, Mia.
Netizens believe that the defense has completely dismantled her story and that she came off “unlikeable” on the stand. But the prosecutors argue that all the defense did was harass, argue, and further traumatize a victim on the stand. Prosecutors argue that the cross examination was so brutal and humiliating that it might deter future victims from testifying in criminal cases. So which one is true?
This is the testimony of Mia.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

13,271 Listeners

3,951 Listeners

24,547 Listeners

20,598 Listeners

99,736 Listeners

2,233 Listeners

8,624 Listeners

18,518 Listeners

185 Listeners

10,273 Listeners

32 Listeners

58,521 Listeners

113 Listeners

22 Listeners

3,024 Listeners

94 Listeners

18 Listeners

432 Listeners

9,077 Listeners

6,153 Listeners

1,949 Listeners

1,978 Listeners

20,702 Listeners

413 Listeners

468 Listeners

163 Listeners

97 Listeners

27 Listeners

1,929 Listeners

18 Listeners

809 Listeners

95 Listeners

2 Listeners

1,056 Listeners

26,115 Listeners