
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


A mistrial.
Sean Diddy Comb’s legal team has just filed for another mistrial, alleging that the prosecutors knew that Cassie was lying on the stand and still allowed her to testify.
This entire fight centers around a 2016 balcony incident, in which Cassie and her friend Bona allege that Combs dangled Bona off the balcony. The defense argues that this incident never even happened.
This makes it sound like the defense is grasping at straws to get a mistrial.
However, the energy in the courtroom has been interesting lately. The defense has been taking some large “wins” in cross examinations. Some netizens believe that their biggest win yet was “taking down” the second victim to testify, Mia.
Netizens believe that the defense has completely dismantled her story and that she came off “unlikeable” on the stand. But the prosecutors argue that all the defense did was harass, argue, and further traumatize a victim on the stand. Prosecutors argue that the cross examination was so brutal and humiliating that it might deter future victims from testifying in criminal cases. So which one is true?
This is the testimony of Mia.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
By Stephanie Soo4.8
2537825,378 ratings
A mistrial.
Sean Diddy Comb’s legal team has just filed for another mistrial, alleging that the prosecutors knew that Cassie was lying on the stand and still allowed her to testify.
This entire fight centers around a 2016 balcony incident, in which Cassie and her friend Bona allege that Combs dangled Bona off the balcony. The defense argues that this incident never even happened.
This makes it sound like the defense is grasping at straws to get a mistrial.
However, the energy in the courtroom has been interesting lately. The defense has been taking some large “wins” in cross examinations. Some netizens believe that their biggest win yet was “taking down” the second victim to testify, Mia.
Netizens believe that the defense has completely dismantled her story and that she came off “unlikeable” on the stand. But the prosecutors argue that all the defense did was harass, argue, and further traumatize a victim on the stand. Prosecutors argue that the cross examination was so brutal and humiliating that it might deter future victims from testifying in criminal cases. So which one is true?
This is the testimony of Mia.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

13,222 Listeners

3,958 Listeners

24,389 Listeners

369,028 Listeners

99,278 Listeners

2,231 Listeners

8,594 Listeners

18,317 Listeners

185 Listeners

17,761 Listeners

10,053 Listeners

32 Listeners

57,726 Listeners

112 Listeners

22 Listeners

3,003 Listeners

97 Listeners

18 Listeners

427 Listeners

8,960 Listeners

6,021 Listeners

1,930 Listeners

1,977 Listeners

19,831 Listeners

394 Listeners

163 Listeners

99 Listeners

27 Listeners

1,905 Listeners

18 Listeners

791 Listeners

86 Listeners

2 Listeners

937 Listeners

26,088 Listeners