
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


A mistrial.
Sean Diddy Comb’s legal team has just filed for another mistrial, alleging that the prosecutors knew that Cassie was lying on the stand and still allowed her to testify.
This entire fight centers around a 2016 balcony incident, in which Cassie and her friend Bona allege that Combs dangled Bona off the balcony. The defense argues that this incident never even happened.
This makes it sound like the defense is grasping at straws to get a mistrial.
However, the energy in the courtroom has been interesting lately. The defense has been taking some large “wins” in cross examinations. Some netizens believe that their biggest win yet was “taking down” the second victim to testify, Mia.
Netizens believe that the defense has completely dismantled her story and that she came off “unlikeable” on the stand. But the prosecutors argue that all the defense did was harass, argue, and further traumatize a victim on the stand. Prosecutors argue that the cross examination was so brutal and humiliating that it might deter future victims from testifying in criminal cases. So which one is true?
This is the testimony of Mia.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
By Stephanie Soo4.8
2520225,202 ratings
A mistrial.
Sean Diddy Comb’s legal team has just filed for another mistrial, alleging that the prosecutors knew that Cassie was lying on the stand and still allowed her to testify.
This entire fight centers around a 2016 balcony incident, in which Cassie and her friend Bona allege that Combs dangled Bona off the balcony. The defense argues that this incident never even happened.
This makes it sound like the defense is grasping at straws to get a mistrial.
However, the energy in the courtroom has been interesting lately. The defense has been taking some large “wins” in cross examinations. Some netizens believe that their biggest win yet was “taking down” the second victim to testify, Mia.
Netizens believe that the defense has completely dismantled her story and that she came off “unlikeable” on the stand. But the prosecutors argue that all the defense did was harass, argue, and further traumatize a victim on the stand. Prosecutors argue that the cross examination was so brutal and humiliating that it might deter future victims from testifying in criminal cases. So which one is true?
This is the testimony of Mia.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

13,225 Listeners

3,944 Listeners

24,239 Listeners

368,356 Listeners

20,541 Listeners

2,217 Listeners

8,575 Listeners

18,230 Listeners

186 Listeners

17,826 Listeners

9,969 Listeners

32 Listeners

58,263 Listeners

111 Listeners

19 Listeners

2,981 Listeners

89 Listeners

18 Listeners

424 Listeners

8,874 Listeners

5,922 Listeners

1,930 Listeners

1,953 Listeners

20,434 Listeners

5,242 Listeners

394 Listeners

163 Listeners

99 Listeners

22 Listeners

1,885 Listeners

18 Listeners

793 Listeners

85 Listeners

2 Listeners

26,005 Listeners