
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In these days of Zoom, Professor Amar’s testimony before The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States looks a lot like the old TV show, the Hollywood Squares, and Akhil is in the center square. This is fitting, because his proposal for 18-year terms of active en banc service on the Court is front and center in these hearings. Akhil and Andy review the work done in advance of this testimony, recapitulate the major arguments in the proposal, and look at the Q&A that followed in depth, along with the arguments of other panelists.
By Akhil Reed Amar4.5
375375 ratings
In these days of Zoom, Professor Amar’s testimony before The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States looks a lot like the old TV show, the Hollywood Squares, and Akhil is in the center square. This is fitting, because his proposal for 18-year terms of active en banc service on the Court is front and center in these hearings. Akhil and Andy review the work done in advance of this testimony, recapitulate the major arguments in the proposal, and look at the Q&A that followed in depth, along with the arguments of other panelists.

3,554 Listeners

669 Listeners

1,102 Listeners

2,011 Listeners

6,308 Listeners

32,346 Listeners

6,609 Listeners

7,210 Listeners

4,656 Listeners

5,816 Listeners

3,914 Listeners

3,344 Listeners

16,145 Listeners

744 Listeners

8,773 Listeners