
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In these days of Zoom, Professor Amar’s testimony before The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States looks a lot like the old TV show, the Hollywood Squares, and Akhil is in the center square. This is fitting, because his proposal for 18-year terms of active en banc service on the Court is front and center in these hearings. Akhil and Andy review the work done in advance of this testimony, recapitulate the major arguments in the proposal, and look at the Q&A that followed in depth, along with the arguments of other panelists.
By Akhil Reed Amar4.5
376376 ratings
In these days of Zoom, Professor Amar’s testimony before The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States looks a lot like the old TV show, the Hollywood Squares, and Akhil is in the center square. This is fitting, because his proposal for 18-year terms of active en banc service on the Court is front and center in these hearings. Akhil and Andy review the work done in advance of this testimony, recapitulate the major arguments in the proposal, and look at the Q&A that followed in depth, along with the arguments of other panelists.

3,543 Listeners

2,273 Listeners

1,116 Listeners

2,023 Listeners

6,311 Listeners

6,618 Listeners

7,234 Listeners

5,873 Listeners

578 Listeners

3,955 Listeners

3,367 Listeners

817 Listeners

16,576 Listeners

745 Listeners

8,461 Listeners