Today’s episode centres on one powerful guest voice: the anonymous listener who sent in a long, detailed letter critiquing yesterday’s show. Their message becomes the backbone of the entire discussion, driving the room into one of the most introspective conversations TDA has had in months.

The listener challenges the platforming of Stephanie, arguing that while her story is real, she is not representative of the wider transgender community. They compare it to inviting someone unqualified to speak for Black people, and warn that elevating an “outlier voice” can misinform the audience. They question editorial responsibility, consistency, and whether the show unintentionally allowed harmful generalisations to go unchecked.

Their critique forces the cast to unpack everything:
• how the interview was handled
• how much pushback is fair when someone is sharing trauma
• the difference between lived experience and community representation
• the difficulty of balancing sensitivity, curiosity and critical thinking on a live show
• whether TDA has done enough to include voices from the LGBTQ+ community
• and what fair, responsible platforming looks like going forward

The letter praises Sade specifically for providing structure, nuance and necessary counterpoints, and that recognition shapes the room’s reflection on how each host approached the conversation.

What follows is an open, honest, sometimes uncomfortable examination of method, intention and responsibility. E-Man breaks down why he rejected parts of the listener’s analogy. Brent calls for transparency and invites the writer to join the Discord to speak directly. The team revisit what was said, what wasn’t said and what they wish they asked. They debate balance, bias, empathy and whether the show should bring on additional trans guests to broaden understanding.

The guest may be anonymous, but their voice completely steers the episode. Their critique becomes the catalyst for one of the most layered, self-aware and community-driven conversations TDA has ever aired.

A necessary episode. A challenging one. And a reminder of how deeply the audience shapes this show.