May 07, 2019

012 - Dr. Andrey Sharapov (Data Scientist, Lidl) on explainable AI and demystifying predictions from machine learning models for better user experience

Dr. Andrey Sharapov is a senior data scientist and machine learning engineer at Lidl. He is currently working on various projects related to machine learning and data product development including analytical planning tools that help with business issues such as stocking and purchasing. Previously, he spent 2 years at Xaxis and he led data science initiatives and developed tools for customer analytics at TeamViewer. Andrey and I met at a Predicitve Analytics World conference we were both speaking at, and I found out he is very interested in "explainable AI," an aspect of user experience that I think is worth talking about and so that’s what today’s episode will focus on.

In our chat, we covered:

Lidl’s planning tool for their operational teams and what it predicts.

The lessons learned from Andrey’s first attempt to build an explainable AI tool and other human factors related to designing data products

What explainable AI is, and why it is critical in certain situations

How explainable AI is useful for debugging other data models

We discuss why explainable AI isn’t always used

Andrey’s thoughts on the importance of including your end user in the data production creation process from the very beginning.

Also, here’s a little post-episode thought from a design perspective:

I know there are counter-vailing opinions that state that explainability of models is “over-hyped.” One popular rationalization uses examples such as how certain professions (e.g. medical practitioners) make decisions all the time that cannot be fully explained, yet people believe the decision making without necessarily expecting it to be fully explained. The reality is that while not every model or end UX necessarily needs explainability, I think there are human factors that can be satisfied by providing explainability such as building customer trust more rapidly, or helping convince customers/users why/how a new technology solution may be better than “the old way” of doing things. This is not a blanket recommendation to “always include explainability” in your service/app/UI; I think many factors come into play and as with any design choice, I think you should let your customer/user feedback help you decide whether your service needs explainability to be valuable, useful, and engaging.

Resources and Links:

Andrey Sharapov on LinkedIn

Explainable AI- XAI Group (LinkedIn)

Quotes from Today’s Episode

"I hear frequently there can be a tendency in the data science community to want to do excellent data science work and not necessarily do excellent business work. I also hear how some data scientists may think, 'explainable AI is not going to improve the model’ or ‘help me get published’ – so maybe that's responsible for why [explainable AI] is not as widely in use." - Brian O’Neill

"When you go and talk to an operational person, who has in mind a certain number of basic rules, say three, five, or six rules [they use] when doing planning, and then when you come to him with a machine learning model, something that is let's say, 'black box,' and then you tell him ‘okay, just trust my prediction,’ then in most of the cases, it just simply doesn't work. They don't trust it. But the moment when you come with an explanation for every single prediction your model does, you are increasing your chances of a mutual conversation between this responsible person and the model..." - Andrey Sharapov

"We

...more