This week Eleanor Neale joins us to chat about forensics, and why it might not be as good as you think...
Find Eleanor on her YouTube channel:
http://youtube.com/EleanorNeale
You can WATCH the podcast over on our YouTube channel:
http://youtube.com/SciGuys
If you would like to support the podcast, please donate to our Patreon:
http://patreon.com/SciGuys
If you'd like to see more of us, follow our socials!
Facebook
http://facebook.com/SciGuysPod
Twitter
http://twitter.com/SciGuysPod
Instagram
http://instagram.com/SciGuysPod
References & Further Reading
Basics of Forensics
https://www.britannica.com/science/forensic-sciencehttps://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=zIRQOssWbaoC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=history+of+forensic+science&ots=wJZ2sXZM1X&sig=ME5kNe5qa4mWvb0f2Xig_ikUP4c#v=onepage&q=history%20of%20forensic%20science&f=falsehttps://science.howstuffworks.com/forensic-lab-technique.htmhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.sciencefocus.com/the-human-body/what-is-forensic-science/amp/History of Forensics
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4614-5690-2_462https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/forensic-investigation/origins-of-forensic-science/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9783527827688.ch1https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326051477_History_of_Forensic_Sciencehttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-watch/wp/2015/04/21/a-brief-history-of-forensics/%3FoutputType%3Damphttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-5690-2_462.pdfProblems with Forensics
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0162243919899467https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150512-can-we-trust-forensic-sciencehttps://science.sciencemag.org/content/360/6386/243.summaryhttps://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234561565.pdfhttps://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2019.01250.xhttps://innocenceproject.org/overturning-wrongful-convictions-involving-flawed-forensics/https://www.britannica.com/technology/lie-detectorhttps://www.apa.org/research/action/polygraph#:~:text=The%20accuracy%20(i.e.%2C%20validity),person%20may%20be%20non%2DanxiousFollow the Sci Guys
@notcorry / @jampkin / @lukecutforth