
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Show notes: http://optionalpha.com/show145
Is less more? Often we hear this phrase thrown about with the assumption that when investing you should do less, sit on your hands or trade further out, in order to generate higher profits and better returns. But is this really the case and does the math and data prove this to be the point? We wanted to put this assumption to the test with a couple backtested short straddles in IWM and EFA. No filters, no profit targets, no stop-loss orders; pure option selling strategies. Our goal was to see if trading options 60 days out was more effective or profitable than trading options more actively 30 days out from expiration.
By Kirk Du Plessis4.8
11521,152 ratings
Show notes: http://optionalpha.com/show145
Is less more? Often we hear this phrase thrown about with the assumption that when investing you should do less, sit on your hands or trade further out, in order to generate higher profits and better returns. But is this really the case and does the math and data prove this to be the point? We wanted to put this assumption to the test with a couple backtested short straddles in IWM and EFA. No filters, no profit targets, no stop-loss orders; pure option selling strategies. Our goal was to see if trading options 60 days out was more effective or profitable than trading options more actively 30 days out from expiration.

3,240 Listeners

3,358 Listeners

1,987 Listeners

592 Listeners

2,166 Listeners

682 Listeners

297 Listeners

813 Listeners

203 Listeners

376 Listeners

86 Listeners

304 Listeners

337 Listeners

829 Listeners

55 Listeners