
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Today, Hunter is joined by long time Capital Defender, Sharon Turlington. Today, the two discuss cases that bookended Sharon’s career in Missouri. Both cases involved an in the weeds evidentiary rule that prohibits testimony that points to the guilt of a person who is not on trial. In one of her earliest cases, this rule kept the jury from hearing that a third party ADMITTED TO COMMITING THE CRIME IN QUESITON. In her last case, it kept the jury from hearing that FIVE people pointed to another person who had far more evidence pointing his direction. Together with the episodes from the past two days, this episode highlights the many ways the deck is stacked against criminal defendants.
Guests:
Sharon Turlington, Long Time Capital Public Defender, Missouri
Resources:
The Cases
State v Malik Nettles ED74494 (1999)
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/mo-court-of-appeals/1163320.html
State v Kylr Yust WD84633 (2023)
https://law.justia.com/cases/missouri/court-of-appeals/2023/wd84633.html
Contact Sharon
Contact Hunter Parnell:
@PublicDefenselessPodcast
@PDefenselessPod
www.publicdefenseless.com
Subscribe to the Patron
www.patreon.com/PublicDefenselessPodcast
Donate on PayPal
https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=5KW7WMJWEXTAJ
Donate on Stripe
https://donate.stripe.com/7sI01tb2v3dwaM8cMN
*As a reminder, any statements made on the show do not reflect the views or policies of the Colorado Office of the State Public Defender*
4.8
7979 ratings
Today, Hunter is joined by long time Capital Defender, Sharon Turlington. Today, the two discuss cases that bookended Sharon’s career in Missouri. Both cases involved an in the weeds evidentiary rule that prohibits testimony that points to the guilt of a person who is not on trial. In one of her earliest cases, this rule kept the jury from hearing that a third party ADMITTED TO COMMITING THE CRIME IN QUESITON. In her last case, it kept the jury from hearing that FIVE people pointed to another person who had far more evidence pointing his direction. Together with the episodes from the past two days, this episode highlights the many ways the deck is stacked against criminal defendants.
Guests:
Sharon Turlington, Long Time Capital Public Defender, Missouri
Resources:
The Cases
State v Malik Nettles ED74494 (1999)
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/mo-court-of-appeals/1163320.html
State v Kylr Yust WD84633 (2023)
https://law.justia.com/cases/missouri/court-of-appeals/2023/wd84633.html
Contact Sharon
Contact Hunter Parnell:
@PublicDefenselessPodcast
@PDefenselessPod
www.publicdefenseless.com
Subscribe to the Patron
www.patreon.com/PublicDefenselessPodcast
Donate on PayPal
https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=5KW7WMJWEXTAJ
Donate on Stripe
https://donate.stripe.com/7sI01tb2v3dwaM8cMN
*As a reminder, any statements made on the show do not reflect the views or policies of the Colorado Office of the State Public Defender*
8,495 Listeners
3,491 Listeners
7,835 Listeners
14,537 Listeners
86,615 Listeners
25,101 Listeners
1,924 Listeners
10,121 Listeners
9,585 Listeners
2,412 Listeners
1,907 Listeners
5,611 Listeners
3,372 Listeners
15,220 Listeners
2,213 Listeners