
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Court of Federal Claims ruled that the VA violated the Trade Agreements Act by awarding a drug contract to a non-compliant supplier, rejecting the agency’s argument that high cost justified bypassing the law. The decision underscores that TAA imposes an outright sourcing prohibition and not a price preference. Here to explain what this means for federal procurement is Partner at Haynes Boone, Dan Ramish.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
By Federal News Network | Hubbard Radio4.1
4848 ratings
The Court of Federal Claims ruled that the VA violated the Trade Agreements Act by awarding a drug contract to a non-compliant supplier, rejecting the agency’s argument that high cost justified bypassing the law. The decision underscores that TAA imposes an outright sourcing prohibition and not a price preference. Here to explain what this means for federal procurement is Partner at Haynes Boone, Dan Ramish.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

22,031 Listeners

78,772 Listeners

43,984 Listeners

32,245 Listeners

38,582 Listeners

30,856 Listeners

8,487 Listeners

41 Listeners

8 Listeners

53 Listeners

12,081 Listeners

14,642 Listeners

4,685 Listeners

7 Listeners

9,564 Listeners

0 Listeners

10,284 Listeners

6 Listeners

3 Listeners

4 Listeners

5 Listeners

6,450 Listeners

415 Listeners