Spirituality in Reality

"A Modern Renaissance"

To survive requires an acknowledgement of reality, to thrive requires success in reality, to flourish requires mastery in reality.

The definition of Spirituality proposed at the beginning of this book - "the full aliveness of human flourishing within reality".

An individual to be fully alive and flourish requires freedom, freedom to pursue the fullness of their potential and happiness.

To achieve this I have proposed a framework that builds on Aristotle’s philosophy while aligning it with my vision of Safety, Freedom & Human Flourishing:

Updated Metaphysics: The Nature of Reality and Flourishing

1. Being and Aliveness: Expanding “Being qua Being”

Aristotle’s concept of “being qua being” — the study of existence in its most fundamental form — provides the perfect starting point for understanding spirituality as human flourishing. In this framework:

Reality is the foundation of flourishing: To flourish, one must engage fully with reality, acknowledging its laws, causes, and principles.

Aliveness is the active participation in being: Aligning with Aristotle’s focus on actualization, human flourishing can be seen as the process of moving from potential to actual in every facet of life — physical, intellectual, emotional, and contextual.

2. Substance, Form, and Human Potential

Aristotle’s hylomorphism (the union of matter and form) aligns beautifully the integration of safety, freedom, as prerequisites for flourishing:

Matter: The raw potential of human existence, such as the physical body and untapped mental capacities.

Form: The actualization of these potentials through purposeful action, self-awareness, and a connection to reality.

The priority of form over matter reflects the journey from survival (the mere material existence) to thriving (the flourishing of form through actualized potential), to Freedom through Mastery.

3. Purpose and Function (Teleology)

Aristotle’s teleological view that everything has an inherent purpose aligns seamlessly with the idea of spirituality as flourishing:

Human beings, as part of the natural world, have a purpose tied to their unique capacities for reason, creativity, and connection.

Spirituality is redefined not as adherence to a supernatural framework but as the fulfillment of one’s natural potential, aligning one’s life with reality and purpose.

Flourishing involves achieving harmony within oneself (internal safety) and contributing to the broader ecosystem of relationships, society, and nature.

Updated Epistemology: Knowing Reality for Flourishing

1. Reality as the Ground for Knowledge

Aristotle’s immanent realism emphasizes studying things that exist in the actual world rather than abstract ideals. This principle aligns with my focus on a spirituality rooted in reality:

Spirituality requires an intimate understanding of reality through direct observation and logical reasoning.

Knowledge becomes the bridge between acknowledging reality and thriving within it.

2. The Role of Reason in Flourishing

Aristotle’s view of inductive and deductive reasoning underpins the process of self-actualization:

Induction: Observing patterns in relationships, behavior, and attachment styles to understand what fosters safety and growth.

Deduction: Applying universal principles, like the importance of safety and freedom, to specific aspects of life.

Flourishing involves balancing practical knowledge (for actions that align with reality) with contemplative knowledge (understanding the deeper truths of existence).

3. Sensory Experience as the Foundation

Aristotle’s idea that all knowledge begins with sensory experience connects with the emphasis on engaging fully with the physical and emotional realities of life:

Attachment theory and the development of safety begin with sensory inputs — touch, sight, sound, and warmth —mirroring Aristotle’s view of knowledge acquisition.

Spiritual flourishing requires acknowledging and interpreting sensory experiences as part of a broader understanding of existence.

Conclusion: A Framework for Modern Metaphysics and Epistemology

This updated metaphysics and epistemology, inspired by Aristotle, frame spirituality as “full aliveness within reality.” They redefine the purpose of life as the integration of safety, freedom, and reason to thrive as an individual and contribute to the flourishing of others and society. This approach grounds human flourishing in the natural world, providing both a philosophical foundation and practical pathway for self-actualization.

A Morality Based on Safety and Freedom

1. The Foundation of Morality: Safety and Freedom as Prerequisites for Flourishing

Safety is the foundation of morality because it enables individuals to exist without constant fear, allowing their potential to emerge. Without safety, basic survival overrides the possibility of deeper engagement with reality.

Freedom complements safety by enabling individuals to explore, create, and actualize their potential. Freedom is not just the absence of restriction but the presence of opportunities to align actions with personal and universal truths.

Together, safety and freedom create the conditions for full aliveness, where individuals can thrive emotionally, intellectually, and socially.

2. Linking Morality to Full Aliveness

A Moral Framework Rooted in Reality: Morality is not derived from abstract ideals or divine commandments but emerges from the practical requirements for flourishing within reality. The goal is to nurture environments where individuals can thrive and contribute to the thriving of others.

Alignment with Teleology: Drawing from Aristotle, morality is about enabling beings to fulfill their inherent purpose. For humans, this purpose involves rationality, creativity, and relational connectedness — all of which require safety and freedom.

Spiritual Connection: A morality based on safety and freedom aligns with my definition of spirituality by emphasizing the importance of fostering aliveness — a deep, vibrant engagement with existence.

3. Moral Principles Anchored in Safety and Freedom

Do No Harm (Safety): Actions that create physical, emotional, or social harm undermine the safety necessary for flourishing. Morality begins with the commitment to protect others from harm, recognizing the interconnectedness of all beings.

Foster Autonomy (Freedom): Freedom respects the dignity of others to make choices and pursue their potential. Morality must support individual agency while ensuring this freedom does not infringe on the safety of others.

Promote Mutual Flourishing: True morality considers the collective as well as the individual. It seeks to create conditions where both the self and others can thrive, ensuring that safety and freedom coexist in balance.

Respond to Reality with Integrity: Morality requires a clear-eyed acknowledgment of reality, including the needs, limitations, and interdependence of individuals. This principle aligns with my emphasis on rationality and reason within a spirituality grounded in reality.

Cultivate Compassion and Empathy: Recognizing the shared human experience of seeking safety and freedom fosters empathy. This principle encourages moral actions that nurture connection and understanding, reinforcing the conditions for full aliveness.

4. The Moral Tension: Balancing Safety and Freedom

Freedom Without Safety: Freedom without safety leads to chaos, as individuals act without regard for the well-being of others or themselves. This lack of security undermines the stability needed for flourishing.

Safety Without Freedom: Conversely, safety without freedom becomes oppressive, stifling creativity, growth, and individuality. True flourishing requires both security and the freedom to explore and express.

5. Morality in Practice: Real-World Applications

Personal Morality: Internal safety involves cultivating self-compassion and silencing the Inner Critic, enabling individuals to flourish emotionally and mentally. Personal freedom involves embracing authenticity and aligning actions with values that support individual and collective growth.

Relational Morality: Relationships flourish when they provide safety through trust and freedom through mutual respect. This balance fosters connection and growth, aligning with attachment theory and Erikson’s insights into human development.

Social Morality: Societies thrive when institutions protect individual safety (e.g., laws, healthcare) while promoting freedom (e.g., education, equality). Policies must reflect the balance of these principles to create environments that support human flourishing.

6. Toward a Universal Morality of Flourishing

A morality based on safety and freedom transcends cultural and religious boundaries, as it speaks to the universal human condition.

By grounding morality in reality and human flourishing, it becomes a dynamic framework that adapts to diverse contexts while maintaining its core principles.

This morality is inherently spiritual, as it seeks to nurture the full aliveness of individuals and communities, enabling engagement with the deeper purpose of existence.

Conclusion: Morality grounded in Reality

A morality grounded in safety and freedom integrates seamlessly with the concept of full aliveness within reality. It recognizes that human flourishing requires environments that balance security with autonomy, fostering trust, creativity, and connection. By aligning moral principles with the realities of human existence, this framework provides a path to personal and collective thriving, embodying a spirituality that is both practical and transcendent.

Virtues of Safety, Freedom, and Flourishing

1. Trust (Safety in Connection)

Definition: Confidence in oneself, others, and the reality of existence. Trust emerges from secure attachments and a sense of reliability in one’s environment.

Role in Flourishing: Trust enables individuals to engage with others and the world without fear, laying the foundation for exploration and growth.

Expression: Trusting relationships, faith in one’s ability to adapt, and openness to new experiences.

2. Courage (Freedom to Act)

Definition: The ability to confront fear, uncertainty, and discomfort while pursuing one’s potential and values.

Role in Flourishing: Courage allows individuals to take risks, embrace challenges, and overcome obstacles, essential for self-actualization.

Expression: Facing vulnerability, advocating for oneself and others, and stepping into the unknown.

3. Resilience (Safety in Adversity)

Definition: The capacity to recover from setbacks, adapt to change, and persist in the face of difficulty.

Role in Flourishing: Resilience strengthens internal safety by reinforcing the belief that one can handle life’s challenges and grow from them.

Expression: Emotional regulation, problem-solving, and learning from failures.

4. Autonomy (Freedom of Choice)

Definition: The ability to make independent decisions and take responsibility for one’s life while respecting the freedom of others.

Role in Flourishing: Autonomy fosters individuality and self-expression, enabling people to align their actions with their values and purpose.

Expression: Self-reliance, boundary-setting, and authentic decision-making.

5. Compassion (Safety Through Empathy)

Definition: The capacity to understand and share the feelings of others, coupled with a desire to alleviate their suffering.

Role in Flourishing: Compassion strengthens relationships, builds trust, and promotes collective safety and well-being.

Expression: Acts of kindness, forgiveness, and active listening.

6. Integrity (Freedom in Alignment)

Definition: The quality of being honest and consistent in one’s principles, actions, and beliefs.

Role in Flourishing: Integrity creates internal safety by fostering self-respect and trustworthiness while ensuring external harmony through ethical actions.

Expression: Keeping promises, standing by values, and practicing authenticity.

7. Wisdom (Flourishing Through Insight)

Definition: The ability to apply knowledge, experience, and sound judgment to navigate complex realities and promote thriving.

Role in Flourishing: Wisdom integrates safety and freedom by balancing rationality and empathy, ensuring decisions benefit both the self and others.

Expression: Thoughtful decision-making, reflective practices, and guiding others with clarity.

8. Creativity (Freedom to Express)

Definition: The capacity to generate ideas, solutions, or expressions that reflect individuality and contribute to the world.

Role in Flourishing: Creativity enables self-actualization and the exploration of new possibilities, embodying freedom and aliveness.

Expression: Artistic endeavors, innovative problem-solving, and imaginative thinking.

9. Gratitude (Safety in Appreciation)

Definition: The practice of recognizing and valuing the good in oneself, others, and the world.

Role in Flourishing: Gratitude enhances emotional safety by shifting focus to abundance and fostering connection.

Expression: Thanking others, savoring positive experiences, and cultivating mindfulness.

10. Generativity (Flourishing Beyond the Self)

Definition: The desire to contribute to the well-being and growth of others, leaving a positive legacy.

Role in Flourishing: Generativity connects personal fulfillment with collective thriving, ensuring safety and freedom are passed on.

Expression: Mentorship, caregiving, community involvement, and creative contributions.

A Developmental Approach to Virtues

Much like Erik Erikson’s life stages, these virtues can reflect the stages of personal growth and flourishing:

Early Development: Trust and Resilience, as safety and basic coping mechanisms are established.

Adolescence: Courage, Autonomy, and Integrity, as individuals begin to assert their freedom and identity.

Adulthood: Wisdom, Compassion, and Generativity, as flourishing extends to relationships, society, and legacy-building.

Across All Stages: Gratitude and Creativity, which inspire continuous engagement with reality and aliveness.

These virtues reflect an aspirational framework for safety, freedom, and human flourishing within reality. By integrating these principles into life, individuals can strive for full aliveness, contributing to their own well-being and the thriving of others. This virtue-based approach provides a practical and philosophical guide for aligning spirituality, morality, and personal growth.

A Policy Framework for Safety, Freedom, and Human Flourishing

A society that prioritizes safety and freedom creates the foundation for human flourishing, allowing individuals to achieve their full potential while contributing meaningfully to the well-being of others.

Policies in education, ethics, and politics must be designed to nurture these conditions, embedding the principles of safety, freedom, and flourishing into the fabric of societal systems.

1. Education: Cultivating Flourishing Minds and Communities

Emotional and Social Learning: Policies should incorporate curricula that develop emotional intelligence, empathy, and resilience, fostering secure internal safety and trust among students.

Promoting Autonomy: Education systems should empower students to think critically, pursue their passions, and make informed decisions, cultivating freedom of thought and creativity.

Lifelong Learning: Policies should encourage continuous education that evolves with individuals’ needs, supporting self-actualization throughout life.

2. Ethics: Guiding Flourishing Interactions

A Moral Code Based on Safety and Freedom: Ethical guidelines in institutions and organizations should prioritize protection of the individual from harm, mutual respect, and the promotion of autonomy, aligning with the virtues of compassion, integrity, and trust.

Empowering Ethical Leadership: Leaders in all sectors should be trained and held accountable for decisions that balance safety and freedom, fostering environments where both individuals and communities can thrive.

Transparent and Inclusive Processes: Ethical policies must ensure that decision-making is participatory, representing all stakeholders to maintain trust and legitimacy.

3. Politics: Building Systems for Collective Flourishing

Safety as a Goal: Policies must defend access to basic safety needs — healthcare, housing, and protection from harm—creating a secure foundation for all citizens.

Freedom as Empowerment: Political systems should defend freedoms of speech, thought, and opportunity, ensuring that every individual has the space to pursue their unique potential without infringing on others’ safety.

Generativity: Political policies should prioritize long-term thinking, balancing current needs with the well-being of future generations, reflecting the virtue of generativity.

Global Cooperation: Flourishing must extend beyond borders, with nations working collaboratively to address global challenges such as, poverty, and human rights violations, ensuring safety and freedom for all.

Conclusion: A Flourishing Humanity

By aligning education, ethics, and politics with the principles of safety, freedom, and human flourishing, we can create a world where individuals and communities thrive in harmony. Such policies support the development of secure, self-actualized individuals who contribute to a just and compassionate world.

This vision integrates personal growth with collective well-being, embodying a spirituality grounded in reality and a morality rooted in flourishing.

I hope that through this book it has become clear that my goal of a Secular Spirituality founded on the definition of - “the full aliveness of human flourishing in reality” is an objective that any human being can achieve.

To achieve this does not require a belief in anything supernatural, mystical nor religious. Rather it relies on the deep instinctual systems of the nervous system for safety, the capacity for autonomy, and the ability to flourish generatively.

To survive requires an acknowledgement of reality, to thrive requires success in reality, to flourish requires mastery in reality.

I hope that we can bring more individuals to experience their “full aliveness of human flourishing in reality”.

None of us were born safe, but we can become Safe - we can become Free - we can Flourish

Thank you for taking this journey with me, I hope you have enjoyed it and will join me in a Secular Spirituality.

Chapter 6

Safety to Freedom

"Ability to provide safety"

As a human begins to truly build a self-actualized safety, it becomes possible to begin the process to Freedom.

Freedom within my framework supports and contributes to the safety of all parties. Just as a Safe Secure Caregiver provides safety and freedom to a child or young adolescent building the relationship of both with mutual trust, when we as self-actualized adults realize our safety we can confidently explore the world with freedom to develop our lives and those around us.

Freedom opens the process to develop the various life stages referred to by Erik Erikson as well as the virtues that contribute to what Aristotle referred to as “The Good Life”.

The Good Life of Aristotle is not one lived in isolation but rather in interaction with family, friends, society and community with virtue and ethics.

Why do I mention Aristotle?

Aristotle's philosophical system, founded in (384 to 322 BCE) represents one of the most comprehensive rational, ethical and moral frameworks in western thought, focusing on understanding reality through systematic observation and logical reasoning.

Aristotle established the foundations of formal logic and scientific reasoning. He developed syllogistic logic and introduced the principle of non-contradiction, which states that something cannot both be and not be at the same time in the same respect. His approach to knowledge combined:

* Empirical observation

* Logical deduction

* Inductive reasoning from particular cases to universal principles

Aristotle predates the modern religious beliefs, in fact a lot of his Ethics and Moral principles formed their basis. To say that morality comes from religion would be a great error since most of these were grounded in Aristotle.

I really appreciate his focus on reality in forming ethics and thus we are going to use Aristotle to develop the framework from Safety to Freedom and Flourishing.

Safety is the foundation upon which freedom rests. Without safety, freedom becomes an illusion — a desperate grasp at autonomy in a chaotic or threatening environment. Once an individual begins to cultivate self-actualized safety, they create the conditions necessary to explore freedom authentically, aligning their actions with their values and engaging fully with life.

This chapter examines the interplay between safety and freedom, emphasizing their dynamic balance as essential conditions for human flourishing.

The Interdependence of Safety and Freedom

Safety and freedom are often seen as opposing forces, but in reality, they are deeply interconnected. Safety provides the secure base from which individuals can confidently explore, create, and engage with the world. Freedom, in turn, allows individuals to transcend mere survival, pursue meaningful goals, and expand their potential.

True freedom cannot exist without safety, just as safety without freedom leads to stagnation. Safety ensures that freedom is not misused as a tool for coercion or domination, while freedom ensures that safety does not become oppressive or limiting. This interplay creates the fertile ground for growth and self-expression.

The Path from Safety to Freedom

As humans cultivate internal safety, they gain the confidence and stability to embrace freedom. This process mirrors the development of a child with a secure attachment: a safe caregiver provides both the stability and trust necessary for the child to explore the world. Similarly, self-actualized adults, having established safety within themselves, can confidently engage with the world, making choices that align with their values and aspirations.

Freedom is not simply about independence but about autonomy — the ability to act authentically, guided by one’s own principles, while contributing to the safety and well-being of others. This autonomy reflects maturity and the ability to navigate life’s complexities without compromising integrity or connection.

Freedom and Flourishing

In this framework, freedom is not an end in itself but a means to human flourishing. When freedom is aligned with safety, it enables individuals to:

Explore their potential: Take risks, innovate, and learn without fear of judgment or harm.

Engage authentically: Pursue goals and relationships that reflect their true selves.

Contribute meaningfully: Build relationships and participate in society in ways that enhance collective well-being.

This understanding of freedom reflects Aristotle’s "Good Life", which is not lived in isolation but in connection with family, friends, and community. True freedom allows individuals to engage fully with these relationships, fulfilling their purpose as social beings and contributing to a thriving society.

Autonomy as the Marker of Freedom

Autonomy reflects the integration of safety and freedom. It is the ability to make choices that are consistent with one’s values, free from undue external pressures or internal fears. Autonomy allows individuals to:

Navigate life’s challenges with integrity: Making decisions that honor both self and others.

Balance independence and connection: Being self-reliant while valuing interdependence.

Pursue self-actualization: Growing through exploration, creativity, and meaningful relationships.

The cultivation of autonomy mirrors the virtues of courage, wisdom, and integrity, which support individuals in acting freely while respecting the safety and dignity of others.

Safety and Freedom in Society

Just as individuals balance safety and freedom, societies must create environments that foster both:

Safety through justice: Ensuring that laws protect individuals from harm or coercion.

Freedom through opportunity: Providing education, resources, and support for individuals to pursue their potential.

Community as the nexus of flourishing: Encouraging connections and collaborations that benefit both individuals and the collective.

A society that upholds safety and freedom empowers its members to thrive, contributing to the flourishing of all.

Conclusion: Safety and Freedom are Foundations for the Good Life

Safety and freedom are not opposites but partners in the pursuit of flourishing. Safety grounds us, providing the stability to take risks and explore. Freedom empowers us, enabling authentic self-expression and growth. Together, they create the conditions for living Aristotle’s Good Life: a life of purpose, connection, and contribution within reality. By cultivating safety and embracing freedom, individuals can move toward full aliveness, enriching their own lives and the lives of those around them.

This is the fulfillment of Erik Erikson’s Eight Stages of Psychosocial Development, emphasizing how each stage contributes to self-actualization and the full aliveness of human flourishing within reality:

1. Trust vs. Mistrust

Key Objective: Develop a sense of safety and trust in the world.

Virtue: Hope

Self-Actualization: When you learn to trust yourself, you develop the foundational belief that the world is safe and your needs can be met. This enables you to explore, engage, and connect with others — a critical first step in flourishing.

2. Autonomy vs. Shame and Doubt

Key Objective: Develop independence and self-control.

Virtue: Will

Self-Actualization: Autonomy fosters confidence in one’s ability to make decisions and take action. Flourishing begins with the freedom to assert oneself and engage with reality, learning from successes and failures without excessive self-doubt.

3. Initiative vs. Guilt

Key Objective: Cultivate purpose through self-directed actions and creativity.

Virtue: Purpose

Self-Actualization: Initiative allows a person to take bold steps toward their goals and desires. When balanced, this leads to the courage to pursue aspirations, a vital aspect of thriving and flourishing.

4. Industry vs. Inferiority

Key Objective: Develop competence and a sense of accomplishment.

Virtue: Competence

Self-Actualization: Achieving mastery in your skills and tasks reinforces a sense of capability, fostering resilience and a belief in one’s ability to thrive in reality. Flourishing involves celebrating one’s skills and contributions to the world.

5. Identity vs. Role Confusion

Key Objective: Form a clear sense of self and personal values.

Virtue: Fidelity

Self-Actualization: A secure identity is essential for flourishing, as it allows individuals to navigate life with clarity, authenticity, and commitment to their goals and values. A strong sense of self is foundational to true aliveness.

6. Intimacy vs. Isolation

Key Objective: Build deep, meaningful relationships while maintaining autonomy.

Virtue: Love

Self-Actualization: Connection and belonging are critical aspects of flourishing. Intimacy enriches life with emotional depth and mutual growth, while healthy boundaries maintain individual freedom and aliveness.

7. Generativity vs. Stagnation

Key Objective: Contribute to the well-being of others and the world.

Virtue: Care

Self-Actualization: Generativity involves giving back, creating, and leaving a legacy. Flourishing at this stage means focusing on meaningful contributions that extend beyond oneself, enhancing the aliveness of both the individual and their community.

8. Integrity vs. Despair

Key Objective: Reflect on life with a sense of fulfillment and acceptance.

Virtue: Wisdom

Self-Actualization: Flourishing in the final stage involves embracing life’s journey, integrating its joys and regrets into a coherent whole. Wisdom enables peace, gratitude, and a deeper understanding of one’s place in reality.

It is our connection to those around us that fulfill the completion of Flourishing. We cannot flourish on our own, it is through our family, friends, community and legacy that we flourish.

It is at the end of a life that we truly answer the question, has it been a Good Life? What have I contributed?

What have I contributed to my life?

What have I contributed to my family?

What have I contributed to my community?

What have I contributed to the Earth?

What is the legacy that I leave?

The answers to these questions truly reveal the Flourishing.

To put this into perspective, here’s a short story illustrating an adult who has integrated Safety, Freedom, and Flourishing into their life:

The Morning on the Lake

Ethan sat on the edge of the wooden dock, his bare feet skimming the still, glassy surface of the lake. The morning mist lingered, and the air smelled of pine and dew. A soft laugh drew his attention as his wife, Claire, stepped onto the dock holding two steaming mugs of coffee. She handed him one, their fingers brushing in a moment of quiet connection.

“Perfect morning,” she said, settling next to him.

“It is,” Ethan replied, his voice steady and content. He looked out at the water, reflecting on how far he’d come.

At 50, Ethan had built a life that felt deeply aligned with his values. His career as an architect had flourished, not because of endless hours of work, but because he had learned to balance ambition with meaning. Years ago, he’d made the deliberate choice to specialize in sustainable design, creating homes and spaces that brought people closer to nature. His projects gave him a sense of purpose, and the trust of his clients allowed him the freedom to express his creativity.

At home, his family was his anchor. Claire, his partner of 25 years, was his greatest confidant and cheerleader. Their two children, now grown, often visited, drawn not just by love but by the sense of safety and openness Ethan had cultivated in their family. He had always made time for them—helping with school projects, showing up at soccer games, and having long talks about their dreams and struggles. Now, seeing them build their own lives filled him with quiet pride.

As the sun began to rise, Ethan heard the crunch of footsteps behind him. His best friend, Paul arrived, carrying a fishing rod and a wide grin. “I thought I might find you here,” Paul said, pulling up a chair beside the dock. The two had been friends since college, weathering life’s ups and downs together. Paul was the kind of friend who made Ethan laugh on hard days and who had sat with him in silence during moments of grief. Their bond, built on trust and shared values, was one of Ethan’s greatest treasures.

Ethan’s days weren’t without challenges, of course. Deadlines could loom, conflicts arose, and life sometimes felt chaotic. But his internal foundation of safety and freedom allowed him to face these moments with resilience and perspective. He had learned to quiet his Inner Critic, replacing it with a compassionate Inner Carer. When mistakes happened, he saw them as opportunities for growth rather than failures. He knew he didn’t need to be perfect, just present.

“I was thinking,” Ethan began, turning to Paul, “we should organize a community clean-up by the lake. Maybe involve the local kids, show them how to care for this place.”

Paul nodded, smiling. “You’re always trying to make the world better. Let’s do it.”

Ethan’s life was far from extravagant, but it was rich in meaning. He had safety in his relationships, freedom in his choices, and the flourishing that came from living a life aligned with his values. As the sun climbed higher and the mist began to clear, Ethan felt a quiet joy, a sense that he was exactly where he was meant to be, connected, purposeful, and alive.

Reflection on Virtues in the Story:

Safety: Ethan’s relationships with his wife, children, and best friend are secure, built on trust and mutual support.

Freedom: His career aligns with his passions, allowing him the autonomy to express his creativity and pursue meaningful projects.

Flourishing: Ethan’s life embodies generativity (giving back to the community), wisdom (balancing challenges with perspective), and gratitude (appreciating the small moments of joy and connection).

This story serves as a relatable and inspiring example of what it means to integrate safety, freedom, and flourishing into a life well-lived.

Here is an exercise to help you. reflect:

A Meditation on Freedom

“Anticipation of Greatness

I hold within me the ability to vision

I hold within me the capacity to act

I hold within me the discretion to learn

What shall I anticipate?

I Anticipate Greatness for it is within my grasp.”

Think on the words above, especially when the Inner Critic is active. Think on how this can shift your Inner Dialogue, how it would impact your decisions, behavior and actions.

When you become free to determine your mind, you determine your behavior, your actions and give those around you the freedom to do the same.

Give yourself the gift of Freedom, to Flourish.

I hope that you have enjoyed this Journey so far in exploring Safety Freedom and Flourishing.

In the final dialogue we are going to bring it all together to form an Updated Metaphysics, Epistemology, Moral and Ethical code for a Secular Spirituality.

Self-Actualized Safety

"Safety in the Real world"

No individual is born safe. Safety is not an innate condition but a state that must be cultivated — first by caregivers and eventually by the individual themselves.

From the moment of birth, every human being enters a world of unknowns, reliant on others to provide the security necessary for survival and growth. This dependency underscores the profound role of caregivers in shaping a child’s earliest experiences of trust, comfort, and stability. Yet no caregiver, no matter how loving or attentive, is perfect. Every person carries with them gaps in their sense of safety, shaped by moments of inconsistency, neglect, misunderstanding, or unmet needs.

The journey of life, then, becomes a process of filling these gaps and creating safety within oneself. For some, this realization comes early; for others, it is the product of years of struggle, self-reflection, and growth. The truth is that safety must eventually be cultivated internally — not as a reflection of the past but as an intentional act in the present.

Self-actualized safety is the ability to become one’s own effective caregiver, reworking the internal model and attachment patterns shaped in childhood. It is the integration of trust, self-compassion, and resilience, allowing an individual to create a stable foundation within themselves, independent of external circumstances.

A crucial step in this journey is recognizing the voice of the Inner Critic, which reflects the current state of the internal model. This voice often signifies where safety is still lacking, revealing unmet needs and areas where the self is still searching for external validation or protection.

By understanding this critical voice and reframing it into the voice of the Inner Carer, individuals can rewrite their internal working model, transforming it into one of security and self-trust.

This shift will begin the freedom and flourishing of the individual — not just as a standalone entity but as someone capable of offering safety to others, whether in close relationships, families, or society as a whole.

The purpose of life, then is to move toward this state of self-actualized safety: to flourish as a secure individual and extend that security outward, contributing to the collective well-being of others and the universe.

This is not merely a personal achievement but a shared responsibility, as every act of self-care, compassion, and safety radiates into the larger fabric of humanity, fostering a safer, more connected world.

Becoming a secure, rational, and self-actualized person involves cultivating self-awareness, emotional intelligence, resilience, and meaningful connections. Regardless of your attachment pattern, the following essential elements and real-life actions can promote personal growth and development:

Cultivate Self-Awareness

Practice Reflection: Dedicate time daily to reflect on your thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Journaling can help identify patterns and areas for growth.

Seek Feedback: Ask trusted friends, mentors, or therapists for constructive feedback about how you relate to others and manage emotions.

Identify Core Values: Define what matters most to you (e.g., honesty, kindness, growth) and align your actions with these values.

Foster Emotional Regulation

Learn to Self-Soothe: Practice techniques like deep breathing, progressive muscle relaxation, or mindfulness meditation to manage stress and strong emotions.

Label Your Emotions: Develop emotional literacy by identifying and naming your feelings, which can help you respond thoughtfully rather than react impulsively.

Pause Before Acting: Implement the “STOP” technique —Stop, Take a breath, Observe your feelings, and Proceed mindfully.

Build Healthy Relationships

Choose Supportive Connections: Surround yourself with people who demonstrate respect, empathy, and consistency.

Communicate Openly: Practice expressing your needs, thoughts, and feelings in a calm, clear, and honest way.

Repair Conflicts: Learn to resolve disagreements constructively by focusing on solutions rather than blame. Apologize when necessary and strive for mutual understanding.

Develop Independence and Interdependence

Strengthen Self-Reliance: Pursue activities and hobbies that bring personal fulfillment and remind you of your capabilities.

Balance Closeness with Space: Allow yourself and others the freedom to grow individually while staying connected.

Set Boundaries: Clearly define what is acceptable in your relationships to create a sense of safety and mutual respect.

Enhance Self-Worth

Practice Self-Compassion: Speak to yourself with kindness, especially during moments of failure or challenge. Remind yourself that growth is a journey.

Celebrate Achievements: Acknowledge and celebrate your accomplishments, no matter how small, to build confidence.

Affirm Your Value: Regularly affirm that your worth is inherent, not dependent on external validation or achievements.

Strengthen Rational Thinking

Challenge Cognitive Distortions: Recognize irrational thoughts such as catastrophizing, black-and-white thinking, and replace them with balanced, evidence-based perspectives.

Practice Problem-Solving: When faced with challenges, focus on identifying solutions rather than dwelling on problems.

Learn Decision-Making Skills: Use techniques like pros and cons lists or decision matrices to make thoughtful, informed choices.

Pursue Self-Actualization

Engage in Lifelong Learning: Continuously seek knowledge and skills that align with your interests and goals.

Contribute to Others: Find ways to give back, whether through volunteering, mentoring, or acts of kindness, to create a sense of purpose and fulfillment.

Explore Creativity: Pursue creative outlets, such as art, writing, or music, to express yourself and connect with deeper aspects of your identity.

Build Resilience

Accept Challenges as Growth Opportunities: View setbacks as lessons rather than failures, asking, What can I learn from this?

Cultivate Optimism: Focus on what is within your control and maintain hope during difficult times.

Practice Gratitude: Regularly reflect on and express appreciation for the positive aspects of your life.

Embrace Vulnerability

Acknowledge Your Humanity: Accept that imperfection is part of being human and that vulnerability fosters genuine connections.

Take Emotional Risks: Share your authentic self with others, even when it feels uncomfortable, to deepen relationships.

Learn from Rejections: Understand that not everyone will connect with you, and that’s okay. Each experience is an opportunity to grow.

Nurture Your Physical and Mental Well-Being

Prioritize Health: Eat nourishing foods, exercise regularly, and maintain a consistent sleep schedule to support overall well-being.

Practice Stress Management: Incorporate relaxation techniques, time management, and hobbies into your daily life to reduce stress.

Seek Help When Needed: Don’t hesitate to reach out to professionals, friends, or support groups when you’re struggling emotionally or mentally.

Focus on Meaning and Purpose

Set Meaningful Goals: Identify short- and long-term goals that align with your passions and values.

Connect with a Larger Purpose: Whether through contemplation, a practical philosophy, a personal mission, find something that gives your life deeper meaning.

Practice Presence: Engage fully in the present moment, appreciating the journey rather than fixating solely on the destination.

Daily Practices for Self-Actualization

Morning Gratitude: Start your day by listing three things currently in your life that you’re grateful for.

Mindful Check-In: Pause during the day to ask yourself how you’re feeling in the present and what you need.

End-of-Day Reflection: Write down one thing you learned, one thing you did well, and one thing you’d like to improve.

By committing to these steps and actions, anyone can move closer to becoming a secure, rational, and self-actualized person.

The Inner Carer will become your default position within the inner dialogue. You will start to realize that you are becoming your own Caregiver that is calm, consistent and supportive of your own goals. This shift is directly related to the shift that takes place in your own nervous system, as it becomes more resilient and balanced.

As this happens the door opens up to freedom and can be an extremely empowering experience. It is the first time that you begin to truly feel comfortable and confident within your being, not requiring the external validation of those around you to provide security. Rather you will start to feel a greater strength and stability rise within as you feel this confidence grow. It becomes the beginning of true autonomy, a desire to explore your world with confidence.

This is the beginning of Freedom.

In the next dialogue we will explore the true meaning of Freedom and how it leads to flourishing by growing not only the individual but also those around you and the community.

Transference of Safety

"safety in something"

As a survival mechanism, humans instinctively seek safety in something external when internal or relational safety is insufficiently developed.

This natural impulse, while essential for coping, often leads to the creation of surrogate safety mechanisms in the absence of secure attachment or self-actualization.

These mechanisms can manifest in various forms, such as allegiance to groups, gangs, religion, rigid belief systems, or material wealth. While these external sources of safety may provide temporary relief, they can also hinder personal growth if they replace the development of internal resilience, self-trust and self actualization.

The Surrogate Carer Effect reflects this transfer, where individuals look for stability and reassurance in external systems rather than within themselves or secure relationships.

This chapter explores the tension between the Inner Critic — a voice of fear and self-doubt born from insecurity — and the Inner Carer, which fosters self-compassion and internal stability. It also examines how intelligence, both intellectual and emotional, interacts with the search for safety, shaping behaviors and worldviews. From the emotionally intelligent yet devoutly religious individual to the hyper-rational person finding solace in intellectual constructs, humans are driven to find safety somewhere.

The journey toward flourishing involves recognizing and integrating these external mechanisms while cultivating safety within oneself — a shift from reliance on external stability to the empowerment of an actualized, secure, and self-reliant human being.

The Surrogate Carer Effect

The Surrogate Carer Effect reflects the profound influence of early attachment patterns on adult relationships. Individuals with unmet safety needs in childhood and adolescence often unconsciously seek surrogate carers in their adult lives - partners, friends, or authority figures who unconsciously replicate the dynamics of their original caregivers. For some, this manifests as a persistent need to be cared for, they avoid being alone or out of a relationship, continually seeking external validation and emotional support. These individuals may struggle with self-reliance, placing their sense of safety entirely in the hands of others.

Alternatively, individuals may repeatedly choose partners or carers who mirror a similar emotional availability — or lack thereof — of their original caregiver. For example, someone with an avoidant caregiver might unconsciously gravitate toward emotionally distant partners, perpetuating a cycle of unmet needs.

Similarly, those who experienced inconsistent caregiving may find themselves in tumultuous relationships, oscillating between clinging for reassurance and pushing others away in frustration. This cycle highlights how deeply entrenched attachment models shape relational patterns.

Understanding the Surrogate Carer Effect is crucial for breaking these cycles, enabling individuals to develop self-awareness, foster secure attachments, and ultimately build internal safety.

Safety in Religion

The search for Safety in Religion or Mystical Beliefs often emerges when individuals seek security, stability and guidance from an external, intangible parental figure such as God, the Universe, or another higher power. For many, the concept of a benevolent, all-knowing deity provides a profound sense of safety and order in an unpredictable world.

This form of surrogate safety mirrors the relationship between a child and a secure caregiver, offering comfort through the belief that someone — or something — greater is watching over them, guiding their path, and ensuring their well-being. These beliefs can help alleviate existential fears, providing a sense of meaning and belonging in times of uncertainty or distress.

However, this reliance on an invisible parental role can also perpetuate a dependency on external validation and control, delaying the development of internal safety and autonomy.

Individuals who grew up with inconsistent or a neglectful caregivers, faith in a higher power can serve as a substitute for the safety and stability they lacked. While this can be a source of resilience and hope, it may also lead to rigid belief systems or a fear of questioning authority, as challenging the framework risks dismantling their sense of security and identity.

Understanding the balance between finding comfort in external systems of belief and cultivating internal resilience is essential for personal development, enabling individuals to integrate their spiritual frameworks with self-reliance and autonomy.

Safety in Status

The pursuit of Safety in Status, Objects, or Money is another common strategy to secure validation and control in an unpredictable world. Individuals who lack internal safety, material possessions, wealth, or social status can serve as external markers of worth, offering a sense of stability and approval from others. By amassing objects or achieving high status, they create a protective shield, seeking to prove their value and earn validation from peers, family, or society.

These external markers become surrogates for their self-esteem and security that should ideally stem from self-actualization.

The reliance on external validation often originates from early attachment patterns where worth was conditional, tied to performance or behavior rather than inherent.

Individuals growing up in environments of scarcity or inconsistency can lead to an intense focus on acquiring wealth or status as a perceived safeguard against vulnerability. However, this external focus often results in a fragile sense of safety, easily disrupted by criticism, loss, or comparison. While financial stability and social recognition are practical and meaningful goals, they cannot replace the deep sense of internal safety required for true flourishing.

Achieving balance involves integrating the practical benefits of status and wealth with a foundation of self-worth and resilience independent of external validation.

The Inner Critic vs the Inner Carer

To move beyond the Transference of Safety and begin cultivating internal safety, individuals must confront the tension between their Inner Critic and their Inner Carer.

The Inner Critic represents the voice of insecurity, shaped by early experiences of inconsistency, neglect, or conditional care. It echoes doubts, fears, and self-judgment, perpetuating a reliance on external sources of safety. The Inner Critic thrives in the absence of self-trust, interpreting failures or unmet needs as personal shortcomings and reinforcing the belief that safety can only be found outside oneself.

In contrast, the Inner Carer embodies compassion, self-acceptance, and the ability to nurture one’s own emotional and physical needs. This voice reflects the qualities of a secure caregiver — calm, consistent, and supportive.

Cultivating the Inner Carer begins with recognizing the Inner Critic’s presence and challenging its narrative.

Instead of accepting the Inner Critic’s harsh judgments, individuals can ask: “What would a loving and supportive voice say in this moment?” This shift allows for the development of self-compassion, an essential step toward internal safety.

The journey to self-actualization and internal safety requires deliberate practices to quiet the Inner Critic and strengthen the Inner Carer:

Self-Reflection: Journaling practices can help identify patterns of self-criticism and replace them with affirmations of self-worth.

Emotional Regulation: Techniques like mindfulness with deep breathing help create a sense of calm safety within, reducing the need to seek external validation.

Reframing Failure: Viewing mistakes as opportunities for growth rather than proof of inadequacy empowers individuals to build resilience and self-trust.

Small Acts of Self-Care: Meeting one’s own needs —whether through rest, nourishment, or joyful activities reinforces the belief that safety and comfort can be cultivated internally.

Developing Authenticity: Aligning actions with personal values, rather than external expectations, fosters a sense of inner integrity and stability.

As individuals strengthen their Inner Carer, they gradually release their dependence on external surrogates of safety —be it people, religion, beliefs, or possessions — and transition toward a self-actualized state. Here they can engage with the world from a place of internal stability, curiosity, and confidence, embodying the flourishing of their full potential.

This is the essence of creating internal safety: a life rooted not in fear or external reliance but in a resilient sense of self that supports authentic growth and connection.

A Meditation of Safety for the Inner Carer:

“My Child come to me,

Feel my sure arms cradle you,

Listen to my heart beat with love for you.

Breathe with me in calm peace,

Gaze into my eyes and see us,

Fill your being with our connection.

Know that I am always here for you,

Know that you are loved,

Know that you are Safe.”

Think on the words above, especially when the Inner Critic is active. Think on how this can nurture your Inner Dialogue, how it would impact your interactions, how it would impact the way you hold a child if you were a parent, or how you would have experienced being a child with a caregiver that was secure, confident, calm, connected.

Give yourself the gift of Safety.

In the next Dialogue we are going to shift into how to create and self-actualize safety. It is my position that this is the first fundamental purpose for each individual. We all have gaps in our internal working model which we need to heal and repair so that we can develop a life of freedom and flourishing.

A Secular Spirituality is a publication that I would like to keep free and open to everyone so that we can build a community. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Lack of Safety

"Anxiety in another’s arms"

It begins with the rhythmic heartbeat, though sometimes it feels hurried or erratic.

Deep breaths rise and fall, but they are often overshadowed by sudden jarring noises — sharp voices, unfamiliar sounds, and moments of disconnection.

The surround is warm but has a sense of tension that gives way to an awareness of need — a need that lingers unmet.

Time passes with an awareness that space is constricting, and becomes unsettling.

The first breath brings coldness, loudness, and hardness, and though arms eventually hold the infant, at times they lack the surety to calm or soothe. Moments of distress often stretch longer, leaving behind a faint residue of unease.

Sounds have changed — the once steady heartbeat now distant and irregular. The familiar voice comes and goes unpredictably, sometimes absent when needed most. Hunger builds to an uncomfortable crescendo, and cries grow louder, but the relief is inconsistent, arriving late or in an agitated manner.

When the soft skin and nourishing nectar arrive, they sometimes soothe, but other times are accompanied by hurried movements or distracted hands. Sleep comes fitfully, punctuated by moments of discomfort that are slow to be attended to.

The bright lights and shapes overwhelm more than fascinate. Faces approach but feel unfamiliar, with smiles that flicker and fade. The touch is sometimes soft but often abrupt or absent, leaving sensations of fear and confusion.

Breath is shallow, punctuated by moments of unease. The arms that should bring safety feel uncertain, and the once-comforting voice lacks the warmth of connection. The favorite moments are fleeting, interrupted by longer periods of discomfort, tension, or loneliness.

When the world gets scary or overwhelming, safety is not always there.

The haven of safety feels elusive, fragmented, or unreliable.

What this story illustrates

Uncertainty and Inconsistency: The story captures the lack of predictable caregiving, leaving the infant in a state of heightened stress and uncertainty.

Unmet Needs: Delays or failures in addressing the infant’s physical and emotional needs highlight the absence of consistent soothing.

Loss of Trust in Caregivers: The unpredictable presence of warmth and comfort erodes the infant’s ability to rely on their caregiver, creating an early sense of instability.

Note how this story contrasts vividly with the secure version and helps show what is missing in a world where safety is not consistent or common.

The effect on the nervous system is that increased stresses modify into two main survival modes:

Stress Avoidance - a coping mechanism to suppress the nervous system by withdrawing, shutting down, dismissing the reality being faced.

Stress Anxiety - a coping mechanism to heighten the sympathetic response, make needs more vocal, more frequent, increase dependance and increase demands.

Disorganized - A combination of the two survival modes can also develop.

These adaptations form the behavior patterns of the Insecure Attachment styles - Anxious-Avoidant, Anxious-Resistant, and Disorganized/Disoriented.

Below are stories illustrating each insecure attachment style in the context of a toddler exploring a new space, similar to the Strange Situation Procedure.

These stories reflect how deficiencies in safety influence nervous system coping, attachment behaviors, and emotional regulation.

The Quiet Observer : (Anxious-Avoidant Style)

Two-year-old Max stood near the entrance to the playroom, his arms crossed over his chest. His caregiver, Sarah, sat on a bench nearby, scrolling through her phone. “Go play, Max,” she said without looking up.

Max glanced at the toys scattered across the room and the other children playing, but he didn’t move. Instead, he leaned against the wall, his expression neutral. A teacher walked over and knelt beside him. “Hi, Max! Do you want to try building with the blocks?” she asked, holding out a red cube.

Max hesitated, then took the block and set it down on the floor without engaging further. He stayed close to the wall, watching the other children but making no effort to join in. When Sarah stood to leave for a moment, Max’s eyes briefly followed her, but he made no noise or movement to stop her.

When Sarah returned, Max didn’t look up. He sat on the floor, pushing a toy car back and forth without much interest. “Having fun?” Sarah asked with a quick glance, but Max didn’t respond. To an observer, Max seemed indifferent, but his tense shoulders and tight grip on the toy car hinted at the effort it took to suppress his distress.

Analysis:

Nervous System Response: Max’s lack of visible emotion is a coping mechanism for underlying distress, consistent with the “masking” behavior noted in avoidant attachment. His nervous system is likely in a low-level fight-or-flight state, as evidenced by his withdrawal and guarded demeanor.

Caregiver Influence: Sarah’s disengaged responses teach Max that his emotional needs won’t necessarily be met, leading him to suppress them to avoid further rejection.

Behavioral Impact: Max avoids seeking comfort and doesn’t explore the environment confidently, reflecting a lack of trust in his caregiver’s availability.

Here’s a second story that illustrates Insecure-Avoidant Attachment as an individual approaches adulthood:

The College Drop-Off : (Anxious-Avoidant Style)

Jake, an 18-year-old, was packing for college in a rush. His father, Mark, sat nearby scrolling through his phone, occasionally glancing up. “You got everything you need?” Mark asked without much interest. Jake nodded, avoiding eye contact. They didn’t talk much as they loaded the car, and Mark didn’t ask how Jake was feeling.

When they arrived at the dorm, Mark helped unload the car silently. Jake hesitated as they stood by the door. He wanted to say something about being nervous, but he stopped himself. Growing up, Jake had learned that his feelings were often dismissed. Mark would say things like, “Don’t make a big deal out of it,” or, “You’re fine, stop overthinking.”

“Alright, you’re all set,” Mark said abruptly, giving Jake a pat on the back. “Call if you need anything.” Jake mumbled, “Yeah, sure,” but didn’t plan to call. As Mark walked away, Jake felt a wave of discomfort but quickly suppressed it.

Over the next few weeks, Jake avoided thinking about home. When he struggled with homesickness, he distracted himself with video games or hung out with his new roommates. He rarely reached out to his father, thinking, He wouldn’t care, anyway. When he faced challenges, like failing his first quiz, he told himself, I don’t need anyone. I’ll figure it out.

Analysis:

Emotional Distance: Mark’s dismissive attitude made Jake feel that expressing emotions wasn’t safe or productive.

Independence as a Defense: Jake learned to rely only on himself, avoiding emotional vulnerability or seeking support.

Avoidance of Close Relationships: Jake’s avoidance of calling home or opening up to his father shows how he downplayed the importance of emotional connection, even though deep down, he felt its absence.

This story highlights how an Insecure-Avoidant attachment style can lead to emotional suppression, a reluctance to seek help, and a focus on self-reliance, often at the cost of deeper connections and emotional well-being.

Lets now examine the next form of Insecure Attachment, starting with the toddler story:

The Clinging Tornado : (Anxious-Ambivalent Style)

Two-year-old Sophie clung tightly to her father, James, as they entered the playroom. Her small hands gripped his shirt, and she buried her face in his shoulder. “Come on, Sophie, let’s look at the toys,” James said gently, trying to coax her into the room.

Sophie whimpered, refusing to let go. When James sat her down near a table of blocks, she immediately climbed back into his lap, crying loudly. “I’m not going anywhere, Sophie. Look, I’m right here,” James said, patting her back. After a few minutes, she hesitantly reached for a block, keeping one hand on his leg.

When James stood to leave briefly, Sophie’s cries escalated into screams. She ran toward him, pulling at his pant leg, her face red and tear-streaked. “I’ll be back in just a second,” James reassured her, but she shook her head violently, refusing to let go.

When James returned, Sophie clung to him, her cries softening but her body still tense. She didn’t let go for the rest of their visit, refusing to engage with the toys or other children. Even in her father’s arms, she seemed upset, occasionally hitting his chest or pulling at his shirt in frustration.

Analysis:

Nervous System Response: Sophie’s intense clinging and difficulty calming herself indicate a hyperactivated sympathetic response. Her distress persists even when comforted, as her nervous system remains on high alert.

Caregiver Influence: Inconsistent caregiving has made Sophie unsure whether her needs will be met, leading to excessive dependency and difficulty trusting her environment.

Behavioral Impact: Sophie’s anxiety prevents her from exploring, and her mixed behaviors (clinging yet frustrated) reflect her struggle to reconcile her need for comfort with her mistrust.

Here’s a story of a teenager that demonstrates Anxious-Ambivalent/Resistant Attachment, showing how it contrasts with secure and avoidant styles:

The College Drop-Off : (Anxious-Ambivalent Style)

Mia, an 18-year-old, was preparing for her first year at college. Her mother, Rachel, hovered over her as she packed. “Are you sure you’re ready for this? I don’t know if I can handle you being so far away,” Rachel said, her voice trembling. Mia felt a knot in her stomach. She was excited about starting this new chapter, but her mother’s anxiety made her feel guilty.

On the drive to campus, Rachel kept asking, “Are you sure this is the right decision? What if something goes wrong? What if you need me and I’m not there?” Mia assured her repeatedly, “I’ll be fine, Mom,” but Rachel’s doubt lingered.

When they arrived at the dorm, Rachel refused to leave right away. She unpacked every box, fussed over Mia’s bedding, and kept offering unsolicited advice. “You’re going to call me every day, right? Promise me you won’t forget,” Rachel said, her tone almost pleading.

As Rachel finally left, Mia felt torn. Part of her wanted to explore her new independence, but another part worried about how her mother would cope without her. Over the next few weeks, Mia called her mom frequently, feeling obligated to check in. Rachel often sounded worried on the phone, asking detailed questions about Mia’s day and expressing concern about every small challenge Mia mentioned.

When Mia had a disagreement with her roommate, she called Rachel in tears. Instead of helping Mia problem-solve, Rachel said, “See? I knew this would be too hard for you.” Mia felt frustrated and overwhelmed but also dependent on her mother’s approval and guidance.

Analysis:

Inconsistent Emotional Support: Rachel’s overly anxious and intrusive behavior made Mia feel simultaneously smothered and uncertain about her ability to manage challenges independently.

Clinginess and Guilt: Mia’s internal conflict between seeking independence and feeling responsible for her mother’s emotional well-being is a hallmark of ambivalent attachment.

Difficulty Regulating Emotions: Mia’s heightened emotional reactions and reliance on her mother during stressful situations reflect the insecurity rooted in inconsistent caregiving.

This story shows how Insecure-Ambivalent/Resistant attachment can lead to anxiety about separation, dependence on reassurance, and difficulty developing autonomy, creating a cycle of emotional highs and lows in relationships.

Finally lets take a look at the Disorganized Attachment Style:

The Conflicted Explorer : (Disorganized/Disoriented Style)

Two-year-old Jonah hesitated at the doorway of the playroom, his caregiver, Megan, standing behind him. “Go on, Jonah. Play with the toys,” Megan said with a forced smile.

Jonah took a few steps into the room, then stopped abruptly. He turned back to Megan, his face anxious, and then darted toward the table of blocks. He grabbed a handful of blocks, dumping them onto the floor, but his movements were frenetic and uncoordinated. After a moment, he froze, staring blankly at the scattered blocks.

The teacher approached, crouching beside him. “Do you want to build something, Jonah?” she asked gently. Jonah flinched, dropping the block in his hand. He ran toward Megan, stopping halfway and standing still, his body stiff. Megan sighed. “You’re fine, Jonah,” she said flatly, but didn’t move to comfort him.

Jonah crouched on the floor, rocking slightly as he picked at the edge of his shirt. When Megan stepped out briefly, Jonah froze, his wide eyes darting around the room. He alternated between standing up and sitting down, his movements jerky and uncertain. When Megan returned, Jonah ran toward her but stopped short, staring at her with a mix of fear and relief. He approached slowly, then turned and ran back to the blocks, picking one up and throwing it across the room.

Analysis:

Nervous System Response: Jonah’s disorganized behavior reflects a chaotic nervous system response, with conflicting impulses to seek comfort and avoid it. His actions suggest both hyperactivation and dissociation.

Caregiver Influence: Megan’s inconsistent and possibly frightening responses have left Jonah without a reliable strategy for seeking comfort, leading to confusion and fear.

Behavioral Impact: Jonah’s erratic exploration and mixed behaviors (proximity-seeking followed by avoidance) reflect his inability to develop a coherent attachment strategy.

Here’s a story of a teenager illustrating Disorganized Attachment, characterized by conflicting behaviors and fear in relationships due to inconsistent or traumatic caregiving experiences:

The College Drop-Off : (Disorganized Attachment Style)

Jordan, an 18-year-old, was packing for college while his mother, Linda, sat at the kitchen table drinking wine. She occasionally called out, “Don’t forget who paid for this college dream of yours,” her tone sharp. Jordan worked silently, trying to avoid provoking her.

Linda had always been unpredictable. Some days, she was overly affectionate, smothering Jordan with attention. Other days, she would lash out over minor frustrations, yelling or giving him the silent treatment for hours. Growing up, Jordan learned to be hyper-vigilant, never sure what version of his mother he would encounter.

On the drive to campus, Linda alternated between long silences and sudden bursts of anger. “Don’t think you’re going to just forget about me now that you’re going to college,” she snapped at one point. Jordan nodded, not trusting himself to respond.

At the dorm, Linda insisted on staying longer than needed, but her presence felt more threatening than supportive. When Jordan hugged her goodbye, she whispered, “I don’t know how I’ll survive without you. Don’t let me down.” Her words filled him with guilt and unease.

In the following weeks, Jordan struggled to adjust to college life. He avoided calls from his mother but felt panicked when he missed her texts. He didn’t trust his new friends, assuming they might hurt or betray him like his mother often had.

When a professor offered help after he missed an assignment, Jordan froze, unsure whether to accept the kindness or assume there was a hidden agenda.

Analysis:

Fear and Confusion: Linda’s inconsistent and often threatening behavior left Jordan uncertain about whether relationships were safe, resulting in both avoidance and longing for connection.

Mistrust of Relationships: Jordan’s difficulty trusting others and his oscillation between avoiding and seeking his mother’s attention reflect the disorganized attachment style.

Emotional Dysregulation: Jordan’s mixed feelings of guilt, fear, and longing are typical of individuals with disorganized attachment, who often internalize conflicting emotions from their caregivers.

This highlights how disorganized attachment can create deep-seated fear and mistrust in relationships, leading to emotional confusion and difficulty navigating independence or intimacy.

These stories illustrate how deficiencies in caregiving and a lack of safety shape the behaviors, emotional regulation, and nervous system responses of infants, toddlers and adolescents laying the groundwork for insecure attachment patterns.

Deficiencies in care are often seen by the child as the fault of the child.

Lack of safety leads to poor attachment syndromes, lack of trust development, insecurity and development of the inner critic.

I am sure when you reflect on these stories it is possible to feel a connection to some of them either in our own life or having seen it in others. This is really the grounding of most of the population as life is rarely perfect, all parents and caregivers have their own challenges to contend with over and above the development needs of the child.

In sharing these stories my intention is not to lay guilt onto any parent, rather my intention is to point out that most of humanity just has a very poor starting point and it should not be surprising to find that most adults have unresolved attachment needs.

In the next dialogue we are going to explore how we cope by using what I call the Transference of Safety. I hope you will join me. Thank you for your support thus far.

A Secular Spirituality is a publication that I would like to keep free and open to everyone so that we can build a community. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

The Moment of Safety

"Safety in another’s arms"

It all begins with the steady, rhythmic heartbeat. Deep breaths rise and fall like a gentle wind, accompanied by the melodious resonance of a familiar voice.

These sounds, muffled and soothing, envelop the infant in a world of warmth and calm— a first experience of safety within existence.

The surround is warm, soft and floaty, no awareness of need exists. Time passes with an awareness that space becomes constricted yet comforting.

Just when space becomes too restrictive environments change and for the first time a new sensation of urgency sets in. A hunger to breathe.

A first panic, a first breath, a first moment of unsafety, coldness, loudness, hardness. Then somehow someone holds, calms and soothes these scary moments.

Sounds have changed, the heartbeat distant then near, the melodious voice comes and recedes. A strange emptiness builds of hunger and breath increases into a state of discomfort.

Then that heartbeat, calm melodious voice and a soft warm satin skin meet my lips with a natural delicious sweet nectar that soothes hunger until a return of safe satisfying pleasure of sleep.

Time passes with mostly pleasurable safe sleep, breast fulls of nectar, secure hands attending to any strange discomfort.

Glimpses of bright light, shapes and curious faces fascinate, bringing pleasures to the eyes. Soft caring voices and sounds bring pleasure to the ears.

Breath is deep, calm and comforted in safety. Favorite moments are being held close to carer’s warm soft skin, suckling and listening to her melodious voice, exploring her happy eyes, feeling her comforting touch.

When the world gets scary, overwhelming this is where safety resides.

This is the first haven of safety.

This is the first bond of pleasure, contentment and love.

This is the first safe other.

This is a brief description of the initial fundamental safety needs for an infant to survive and thrive. It is a reality based fundamental need for any infant and has been explored by such psychological giants such as Dr John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth in their research on healthy attachment theory.

According to attachment theory, infants have a survival instinct to seek out proximity to an identified caregiver or “attachment figure” in situations of perceived distress, alarm for comfort and/or pleasure.

Infants become attached to caregivers who are sensitive and responsive in their interactions with the infant, and who remain as consistent caregivers for some months during the period from infancy to two years of age.

These caregiver responses which are most often “Parental” lead to the development of patterns of attachment which in turn lead to "internal working models" that will guide the individual's feelings, thoughts, and expectations in later relationships.

Dr Bowlby explained in his three volume book series on attachment that all humans develop an internal working model of the self and an internal working model of others. The self-model and other-model are built off these early experiences with their primary caregiver most often the mother, and shape an individual's expectation on future interactions with others as well as interactions within interpersonal relationships.

The self-model will determine how the individual sees themselves, which will impact their self-confidence, self-esteem, dependency and their inner dialog.

The other-model will determine how an individual sees others and the world, which will impact their avoidance or approach orientation, loneliness, isolation, and social interactions.

In Bowlby's approach, the human infant is considered to have a fundamental need for a safe and secure relationship with it’s adult caregivers, without which normal social and emotional development will not occur.

As the toddler grows, it will use its attachment figure or figures to form a "secure base" from which to explore the world.

Mary Ainsworth, a close associate of Dr Bolwby used this feature in addition to "stranger wariness" and reunion behaviours, to develop a reality based research tool called the "strange situation" for developing and classifying different attachment styles.

In 1965, Ainsworth designed the Strange Situation Procedure as a way of assessing individual differences in attachment behavior by evoking the child's reaction when encountering stress within a real world situation.

On the basis of their behaviours and responses, the children in Ainsworth's study were placed into one of four classifications. Each of these classifications reflects a different kind of attachment relationship with the caregiver, and implies different forms of communication, emotional regulation, and ways of responding to perceived threats.

The four classifications are:

Secure Attachment, Anxious-Avoidant, Anxious-Ambivilant and Disorganised-Disoriented.

In this chapter we explore more deeply the Secure Attachment and will discuss the others in the next chapter.

Secure Attachment

A child who has formed a secure attachment relationship to its caregiver (most often the mother) will explore freely while the caregiver is present, using her as a 'safe base' from which to explore. The child will engage with the stranger when the caregiver is present, but will be visibly upset when the caregiver departs and happy to see the caregiver on his or her return.

It is important to understand that this safe secure attachment results from a total experience from birth - not just food needs - it is the total autonomic nervous system that is secured - touch, sound, taste, sight, interaction from the primary caregiver.

In a safe secure child the autonomic nervous system develops in a well balanced way - the sympathetic response (survival discomfort, threat, scared) is well balanced with the parasympathetic response (contentment, secure, happy) - the primary survival emotions develop in a coherent manner.

This safe secure attachment can be further supported by other close caregiver interactions - father, siblings, grandparents , nanny etc. It is more important to maintain coherence and consistency of care. The more coherent and safe these are the more the world will seem secure, safe and understandable.

The reason why I appreciate Dr John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth’s work so much is that it is a theoretical concept that has been tested and validated in the real world with real objective consistent follow up. This is rare in the area of psychology.

Children who participated in Mary Ainsworth’s studies had follow up sessions into adulthood to see if the child attachment classification could be detected within their own caregiving style, their relationships, intelligence, health and general wellbeing. This has proven valuable as Secure Attachment children are highly associated to be Secure Caregivers more likely to again transmit a secure base for their own children, to have better relationships, schooling and career success, as well as better wellbeing outcomes.

It is important to not imply perfection here, this is an rare situation. I am merely laying the foundation that safety is a primary for an infant, child, toddler to firstly survive , thrive and build a secure attachment with its first world - that of its primary caregivers and environment. This can create a safe and secure base for further development.

In Mary Ainsworth’s words “…maintaining a degree of proximity to Attachment figures is one that goes the whole way through, from infancy to old age. I think that the secure base phenomenon is something that is focal to the concept of attachment relationships at all ages.”

I would like to emphasize this point which is most often overlooked that an Attachment pattern is developed continuously from birth through till adulthood. I do not wish the reader to assume that the attachment pattern is limited to just the first few years of life. While the first few years are certainly the most impactful it is crucial to realize that life is not perfect and in the first few years a child could have certain caregivers that give it a secure base but then through other factors such as family breakup, lack of continuity due to life events etc the secure base can be undermined.

This is why my default position is that the majority of adults today operate from a framework of a lack of Safety. In fact just a general inspection of the world at large reveals that most individuals will speak of major challenges in their secure base. I will discuss this further in the next chapters but for now I wanted to make it clear to not think in absolutes, since each individual will have had a unique childhood experience.

The concept of safety is also supported by another great psychological genius, Erik Erikson who developed the life stage model of psychological development - during this first stage of life the child integrates the beginnings of basic trust vs. basic mistrust.

Erikson views this as the most fundamental stage of life, as a stage upon which all others build. We will explore other stages in later chapters.

The primary caregiver carries out, demonstrates and reflects her inner perceptions of trustworthiness, a sense of personal meaning on the child.

An important part of this stage is that the caregiving is stable and consistent. This helps the child develop trust that can transition into relationships other than parental. Additionally, children develop trust in others to support them, often called a sense of hope.

The successful development of this stage allows the child to develop a sense of trust, which "forms the basis in the child for a sense of identity." Failure to develop this trust will result in a feeling of fear and a sense that the world is inconsistent, unpredictable and fundamentally untrustworthy.

To illustrate and give you real life examples of how this looks in the world, here is a story illustrating Secure Attachment in a younger toddler, around two years old, exploring a new space for the first time:

The Playroom Discovery

Two-year-old Leo clung to his father’s leg as they entered the brightly colored playroom for the first time. The room was full of toys, books, and a few other toddlers exploring and playing. A cheerful teacher greeted them, crouching to Leo’s level. “Hi, Leo! Would you like to play with the blocks over here?” she asked, pointing to a nearby table stacked with colorful shapes.

Leo glanced at the teacher, then buried his face in his father’s knee. “It’s okay, buddy,” his father said, kneeling down to Leo’s level. “I’m right here. You can check it out whenever you’re ready.” Leo peeked out, his eyes darting toward the blocks and back to his father.

After a few moments, Leo shuffled closer to the block table, still gripping his father’s hand. He picked up a red block and turned it over in his small hands, his father watching calmly from a few steps away. The teacher sat nearby, stacking blocks into a tower. “Look, Leo!” she said with a gentle smile, pointing to her creation. “Do you want to add this blue one?”

Leo hesitated, then took the blue block from her hand and added it to the tower. His father gave him an encouraging nod. “Nice work, Leo! That looks great,” he said. Buoyed by his father’s praise, Leo reached for another block, growing more engaged in the activity.

As the minutes passed, Leo ventured a little farther from his father, experimenting with the blocks and even handing one to another toddler who wandered over. Occasionally, Leo glanced back to his father, who smiled reassuringly. When the teacher brought out a new toy—a rolling car track—Leo’s excitement grew. He darted back to his father, tugging on his sleeve. “Daddy, look!” he said, pulling him toward the new toy.

“You go try it, and I’ll be right here,” his father said, sitting down in a nearby chair. Leo hesitated, then walked back to the track, casting quick glances over his shoulder to ensure his father hadn’t moved.

When it was time to leave, Leo ran back to his father, hugging his legs. “Did you have fun, Leo?” his father asked as he lifted him into his arms. Leo nodded, smiling. “Blocks!” he exclaimed. His father chuckled, “Yeah, you did great with those blocks.”

Analysis:

Secure Base: Leo’s father remained a calm, consistent presence, allowing Leo to explore the new environment at his own pace while providing reassurance when needed.

Proximity and Exploration: Leo initially stayed close to his father, then gradually ventured farther as he gained confidence, occasionally seeking visual or physical reassurance.

Emotional Regulation: Leo managed his initial hesitancy with support from his father and teacher, learning to feel safe in a new and slightly stressful situation.

This story parallels the Strange Situation test, demonstrating how a securely attached child balances exploration with seeking comfort and reassurance, adapting to a novel environment through trust in a caregiver.

Lets take this further to show how from this beginning the child builds upon their safety in their development. Here’s a brief story illustrating Secure Attachment in a toddler at a playground:

The Playground Adventure

Three-year-old Ellie ran toward the playground, her tiny sneakers crunching on the gravel path. Her mother, Lisa, trailed a few steps behind, smiling as she watched Ellie’s excitement. “I’m climbing the big slide!” Ellie announced, her voice full of determination.

As Ellie approached the towering slide, she hesitated, glancing back at her mother. Lisa gave her an encouraging nod and said, “You can do it, sweetie. I’m right here if you need me.” Ellie turned back to the slide, reassured by her mother’s calm presence.

Ellie climbed the ladder, her hands gripping tightly as she reached the top. For a moment, she froze, looking down at the long slide. “Mommy, I’m scared!” she called out. Lisa walked closer but stopped at the base of the slide. “You’re doing so well! Take your time. I’m here if you want to come down another way.”

Ellie’s face softened. “Okay,” she said, sitting down at the top of the slide. After a deep breath, she pushed herself forward, squealing with delight as she slid down. Lisa clapped and cheered, scooping Ellie up in a warm hug at the bottom. “You were so brave!” she said.

Buoyed by her success, Ellie spent the next hour exploring the playground, running between the swings, the sandbox, and the climbing ropes. Each time she tried something new, she looked back to see her mother watching. If Lisa waved or gave her a thumbs-up, Ellie grinned and kept going. When she felt unsure or overwhelmed by a group of older kids near the monkey bars, she ran back to Lisa, nestling close for a moment before venturing out again.

As they walked home hand in hand, Ellie chattered about her adventures. “I was scared, but I did it! You saw, right?” Lisa nodded, “I saw. You were amazing, Ellie.” The little girl beamed, feeling proud and secure, knowing her mother was always there for her.

Analysis:

Secure Base: Ellie’s mother provided a calm and supportive presence, encouraging exploration while remaining available for reassurance.

Emotional Regulation: Ellie was able to manage her fear with her mother’s gentle guidance, developing confidence in her abilities.

Autonomy and Connection: Ellie explored independently but consistently checked back with her mother for affirmation, a hallmark of secure attachment.

This story captures the balance of independence and reassurance characteristic of a securely attached child, highlighting how a caregiver fosters safety and freedom simultaneously.

Finally here’s a story of a teenager that illustrates Secure Attachment as individuals move through adolescence and approach adulthood:

The College Drop-Off

Samantha, an 18-year-old, was packing up her belongings to leave for college. Her mother, Lisa, helped her carefully sort through clothes and mementos, offering words of encouragement. They shared laughter about old photos and joked about how Samantha might have to learn to cook.

The morning of the drop-off, Lisa drove Samantha to campus. Samantha was nervous but also excited. Lisa sensed her daughter’s mixed emotions and said, “It’s okay to feel a little scared. Remember, you’ve got this, and I’m just a phone call away if you need me.”

When they arrived at the dorm, Lisa helped Samantha unpack and set up her room. They hugged tightly before Lisa left, and Samantha felt a pang of sadness but also a deep sense of reassurance. Her mother’s words echoed in her mind: “I believe in you.”

Over the next few weeks, Samantha adjusted to her new life. She called her mother occasionally to share her experiences, from making new friends to figuring out her schedule. Lisa listened attentively but never pushed too hard, giving Samantha space to grow while staying available for support.

When Samantha faced a stressful exam, she remembered her mother’s advice: “Take a deep breath. You’ve worked hard, and you’re capable.” This reminder calmed her, and she aced the test.

Analysis:

Secure Base: Lisa provided emotional support and encouragement while allowing Samantha to explore her new environment independently.

Confidence in Relationships: Samantha felt comfortable sharing her feelings with her mother without fear of judgment.

Self-Assured Independence: Because of the secure attachment, Samantha had the confidence to tackle challenges, knowing her mother was there if needed.

This story illustrates how secure attachment fosters resilience, healthy communication, and emotional regulation in real-life scenarios.

I hope that through these stories it becomes clear in a very real world situation how the self identity of a human is fundamentally developed and supported by caregivers in their early life, creating a deep resilience in the nervous system.

It is important to see this as not purely resting in the mind, but as integrated into the entire body. The brain, nervous system, hormonal system etc all become imbued with stability and integration leading to this secure base.

It is from here that further development can proceed into the full aliveness of human flourishing in the future life stages of an individual. We will explore those in future chapters.

Before we get there, let's explore what it's like if safety is not a given, which in my opinion is far more common within the population. That will be our next dialogue.

A Secular Spirituality is a publication that I would like to keep free and open to everyone so that we can build a community. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

This is a Secular Spirituality:

I have always been a healer, a seeker of philosophy, truth, medicine, art and ways to live a life of harmony.

Just like any human I have been perplexed by life’s difficult questions, contradictions, explored beliefs, meditated on the grand ideas, tried to escape difficulties or embrace fleeting pleasures, all to understand. To find safety.

As human beings we are vulnerable creatures, no human is born safe and without risks of suffering, disease and death, we need to be made safe in order to survive, thrive, flourish.

This book is an explanation of my discovery to the power of safety, what it means and why it is a primary to freedom, human flourishing and a secular spirituality.

I seek to share my view in as simple manner as possible, brief and to the point. This is not an intellectual exercise in debate and comparison, today’s readers can easily explore other opinions and texts and find their own solution.

Here is mine.

Chapter 1

Existence Exists

“Reality is, no matter your wishes or beliefs”

A book on spirituality often brings to mind an exploration of beliefs, philosophy of ideas and the like; so at the outset of this book it is important to state my definition.

This chapter begins with Aristotle’s axiom on the primacy of reality, existence exists. The Spirituality I define is not mystical, of another world, supernatural or immaterial, nor religious, it comes from something real.

The word 'spirit' comes from the Latin root 'spirare' meaning "to breathe", which became the word 'spiritus' meaning “breath". As breath, spirit is considered a fundamental reality of being alive. A human cannot be considered alive without breath, spirit is this aliveness.

To be alive is not a belief, it is a reality. To breathe is not a belief, it is a reality. Aliveness encompasses every facet of a human being and is demonstrated in their ability to survive, thrive and ultimately flourish.

This book is not an exploration of beliefs, rather it is an exploration of what is required to survive, thrive and flourish in reality.

The first breath of life in the real world signifies the first moment a human participates actively to survive. It is the first active impulse to exert an individual will to be within existence.

Every moment thereafter requires breath to nourish and maintain an inner connection to the outer reality. The atmosphere of life presses its reality into our being in a dynamic dance between the gases of respiration. This rhythmic exchange is the first acknowledgment of existence and the fact that we exist within it.

To survive requires an acknowledgement of reality, to thrive requires success in reality, to flourish requires mastery in reality.

The definition of Spirituality I propose therefore is -

“the full aliveness of human flourishing within reality”.

Reality is often portrayed according to subjective terms, however reality can never truly be subjective. This would make it a contradiction in terms.

Reality is. Reality can be known, experienced and acknowledged by multiple random sources. A man, woman, child and a horse can all take a bite out of the same apple, walk around and enjoy the shade of the same tree, feel the heat and pain from the same forest fire. The relative subjectivity of the senses of one does not cancel the objective truth of reality.

So let me be clear and state that for each concept we explore within this book I will present its grounding in reality. I am not going to rest on a belief or faith of any kind to validate any aspect, this is a Secular and Reality based Philosophy. Practical implementation and real life actions can be taken that objectively lead to increasing the aliveness of an individual.

An individual to be fully alive and flourish requires freedom, freedom to pursue the fullness of their potential and the happiness of a flourishing life.

Safety is the primary to freedom and human flourishing, and so this is what we will discuss in the next dialogue.

I hope you will join me in this journey.

A Secular Spirituality is a publication that I would like to keep free and open to everyone so that we can build a community. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.