Recorded on Sunday 21 October 2013 at the Battle of Ideas festival at the Barbican in London ‘Ideas are the cogs that drive history, and
understanding them is half way to being aboard that powerful juggernaut
rather than under its wheels’. AC Grayling
Society seems woefully lacking in Big Ideas, and we seem to crave new
thinking. In Britain, great hopes rest on the legacy of the Olympics,
but however inspiring the sporting excellence we all witnessed, is it
realistic that a summer of feel-good spectacle can resolve deep-rooted
cultural problems, from widespread disdain for competitition to
community fragmentation? In America, Mitt Romney has pledged to pit
substantial ideas against the empty ‘yes, we can’ sloganeering of Barack
Obama, with his running mate Paul Ryan dubbed the ‘intellectual’
saviour of the Republican Party, but can they really deliver? Europe,
once the home of Enlightenment salons, is now associated more with EU
technocrats than philosophes. Looking to the intellectual
legacy of the past is considered out of pace with an ever-changing
world. We seem estranged from ideas associated with important moments in
history - the Renaissance, the Enlightenment, the American and French
Revolutions. Can even a basic idea like free will survive the challenges
of neuroscience and genetics? When the internet offers information at
the click of a mouse, what’s the point of pedagogy?
Some contend intellectual life has rarely been healthier; after all
today’s governments appoint economists, philosophers and scientific
advisers to positions of influence, and the fashion for evidence-based
policy puts a premium on academic research. Nevertheless, the emphasis
is on ‘what works’ utility and short-term impact rather than open-ended,
risky ideas. Often data is passed off as Truth, and Socratic dialogue
replaced by rows over conflicting evidence. The scramble for the next
Big Idea seems to have replaced the creative and painstaking development
of ideas. It’s as though serious ideas can be conjured up in
brainstorming sessions or critical-thinking classes. But think-tanks
kite-flying the latest outside-of-the-box, blue-skies-thinking speak
more to pragmatism and opportunism than following in the tradition of
Plato. Ideas become free-floating, divorced from their origins, and take
on any meaning one cares to ascribe to them. Hence freedom can mean
protection, its defence leading to illiberal regulations; equality can
mean conformity and sameness; tolerance becomes a coda for indifference,
and individualism denotes little more than selfishness.
Where apparently novel concepts catch on, from sustainability to
fairness, identity to offence, they are often little more than
fashionable sound-bites. Other ideas are even described as dangerous;
those who espouse the ‘wrong’ ideas branded as modern-day heretics. But
can we ever hope to approach the truth if we stifle dissent? Is
intellectual life on the wane? Is it conservative to cling to old ideas,
or if we don’t stand on the shoulders of giants, are we doomed to stand
still ? Might truth seeking be more important than the Truth?Speakers:Andrew Keenentrepreneur; founder, Audiocafe.com; author, Digital Vertigo: how today's online social revolution is dividing, diminishing, and disorienting usProfessor Ivan KrastevChairman of the Centre for Liberal Strategies in Sofia; permanent fellow at the Institute for Human Sciences in ViennaDr Ellie Leereader in social policy, University of Kent, Canterbury; director, Centre for Parenting Culture StudiesRob Riemenwriter and cultural philosopher; founder & president, Netherlands-based Nexus Institute; author, Nobility of Sprit: a forgotten ideal and The Eternal Return of FascismChair:
Claire Fox
director, Institute of Ideas; panellist, BBC Radio 4's Moral Maze