Are dancers athletes? It's a question that's everywhere now — but back in the 1950s, Gene Kelly already had a very specific answer. In this episode, we dig into a rare piece of dance history where Kelly draws a surprising line between dancers and athletes. His language is careful, intentional, and honestly… both shocking & illuminating. What he says — and what he doesn't say — might change the way you see movement altogether.

We'll unpack what this means for dancers today, how we talk about physicality and performance, and why language matters more than ever in the dance world.

Watch this podcast on YouTube for the full effect!

Check out my series: Why Dance is a Sport | Part I

Check out my ⁠Return to Dance docuseries!⁠

Support my Instagram — where I post daily dance inspo, insights and fun! ⁠@backtogreat

Transcript, Gene Kelly's words:

"Now all these men, dancers and athletes alike, possess something very much in common, skill and physical movement. And more important than that, physical movement and rhythm. Now just as the dancer, the athlete does not exist who doesn't move with a certain rhythm. His timing is based on the same elements as the dancers.

There are just two differences. The athlete, after having trained his body and learned to move rhythmically in whatever the demands of its court may be, must change his rhythms to meet the spontaneous requirement for the instant. He's also playing to win a game, and the ultimate thing is the competition. Now the dancer, after having learned to control his body rhythmically, goes even further and with the use of music, tries to express something to the onlooker. Now this could be done all with a deep emotion or with a light one or it could be just a story told visually.

In short, we could say that the athlete uses his body skills and controls in a competitive manner but the dancer must have something to say…

Mickey Mantle throwing a ball is dancing. And even though he is not doing it to music, it's still a beautiful, rhythmic thing to watch."