Arxiv Papers

Arxiv Papers

By Igor MelnykScience
Download on the App Store

Arxiv Papers episodes

  • [QA] Do Large Language Model Benchmarks Test Reliability?



    The paper highlights the lack of reliable benchmarks for large language models, proposing "platinum benchmarks" to minimize label errors and revealing persistent model failures in simple tasks.


    https://arxiv.org/abs//2502.03461


    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ArxivPapers


    TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@arxiv_papers


    Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arxiv-papers/id1692476016


    Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/arxiv-papers


    7 min
  • Do Large Language Model Benchmarks Test Reliability?



    The paper highlights the lack of reliable benchmarks for large language models, proposing "platinum benchmarks" to minimize label errors and revealing persistent model failures in simple tasks.


    https://arxiv.org/abs//2502.03461


    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ArxivPapers


    TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@arxiv_papers


    Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arxiv-papers/id1692476016


    Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/arxiv-papers


    10 min
  • Detecting Strategic Deception Using Linear Probes



    The study evaluates linear probes for detecting AI deception, achieving high accuracy in distinguishing honest from deceptive outputs, but concludes that current methods are insufficient for robust defense.


    https://arxiv.org/abs//2502.03407


    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ArxivPapers


    TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@arxiv_papers


    Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arxiv-papers/id1692476016


    Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/arxiv-papers


    24 min
  • [QA] Evaluation of Large Language Models via Coupled Token Generation



    This paper argues for controlling randomization in evaluating large language models, showing that coupled autoregressive generation can yield different rankings than vanilla methods, despite fewer required samples.


    https://arxiv.org/abs//2502.01754


    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ArxivPapers


    TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@arxiv_papers


    Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arxiv-papers/id1692476016


    Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/arxiv-papers


    9 min
  • Evaluation of Large Language Models via Coupled Token Generation



    This paper argues for controlling randomization in evaluating large language models, showing that coupled autoregressive generation can yield different rankings than vanilla methods, despite fewer required samples.


    https://arxiv.org/abs//2502.01754


    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ArxivPapers


    TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@arxiv_papers


    Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arxiv-papers/id1692476016


    Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/arxiv-papers


    11 min
  • [QA] Should You Use Your Large Language Model to Explore or Exploit?



    The study assesses large language models' effectiveness in decision-making tasks, finding they struggle with exploitation but assist in exploring large action spaces, outperforming simple linear regression in exploration.


    https://arxiv.org/abs//2502.00225


    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ArxivPapers


    TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@arxiv_papers


    Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arxiv-papers/id1692476016


    Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/arxiv-papers


    8 min
  • Should You Use Your Large Language Model to Explore or Exploit?



    The study assesses large language models' effectiveness in decision-making tasks, finding they struggle with exploitation but assist in exploring large action spaces, outperforming simple linear regression in exploration.


    https://arxiv.org/abs//2502.00225


    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ArxivPapers


    TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@arxiv_papers


    Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arxiv-papers/id1692476016


    Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/arxiv-papers


    17 min
  • [QA] Harmonic Loss Trains Interpretable AI Models



    This paper presents harmonic loss as a superior alternative to cross-entropy loss, enhancing interpretability, convergence speed, and performance in neural networks and large language models across various datasets.


    https://arxiv.org/abs//2502.01628


    YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@ArxivPapers


    TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@arxiv_papers


    Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/arxiv-papers/id1692476016


    Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/arxiv-papers


    8 min

About Arxiv Papers

From the publisher's feed

Running out of time to catch up with new arXiv papers? We take the most impactful papers and present them as convenient podcasts. If you're a visual learner, we offer these papers in an engaging video…

More shows like Arxiv Papers

Exchanges by Goldman Sachs

Exchanges

968 Listeners

Odd Lots by Bloomberg

Odd Lots

1,964 Listeners

The TWIML AI Podcast (formerly This Week in Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence) by Sam Charrington

The TWIML AI Podcast (formerly This Week in Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence)

438 Listeners

The Daily by The New York Times

The Daily

111,734 Listeners

All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg by All-In Podcast, LLC

All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg

10,100 Listeners

Hard Fork by The New York Times

Hard Fork

5,569 Listeners

UnHerd with Freddie Sayers by UnHerd

UnHerd with Freddie Sayers

217 Listeners

Unsupervised Learning with Jacob Effron by by Redpoint Ventures

Unsupervised Learning with Jacob Effron

51 Listeners

Latent Space: The AI Engineer Podcast by Latent.Space

Latent Space: The AI Engineer Podcast

102 Listeners

BG2Pod with Brad Gerstner and Bill Gurley by BG2Pod

BG2Pod with Brad Gerstner and Bill Gurley

477 Listeners