In January 2020, Airline Economics in partnership with KPMG, published its annual Aviation Industry Global Leaders Report, which assessed the general state of the industry based on interviews with a variety of industry leaders. Now that the aviation landscape has changed dramatically with the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic continuing to ravage the industry, Airline Economics and KPMG are returning to those same leaders for their reaction to the current crisis in a series of podcast interviews.
In this latest podcast, Joe O’Mara KPMG’s Head of Aviation Finance, speaks to Richard Moody, Global Head of Transportation financing at Deutsche Bank. Moody shares his views on the impact of the pandemic on the aviation industry, whose fortunes now rest on government policy, which makes this crisis unique.
“The decisions being made at that macro, governmental level are having direct implications on aviation,” he says. “In many ways the industry is not master of its own destiny; it’s relying on policies, procedures, regulation, etc., driven by governments and politicians, and the industry has to adapt to that. In addition there is the unknown of how long it will be before a vaccine becomes widely available.”
The crisis has often been compared to 9/11 for its direct impact on aviation but this is global crisis that cuts much deeper on an industry that is far larger and far more connected than it was in 2001.
“The big difference between this cycle and where we are today versus the financial crisis and even 9/11 is the sheer scale of the industry today and its global reach. The interconnectivity – the ecosystem – between all airlines, OEMs, lessors, banks and other industry participants is deeper than it’s ever been before. And so what we’re seeing is that you are not isolated just because you are an OEM, lessor or a bank. What happens in this industry more broadly, has implications for all industry players.”
“Restrictions in terms of people buying tickets, getting on planes, and flying has widespread repercussions across the industry. The interconnectivity of this ecosystem has enhanced the impact and affected a wider spread of the industry more holistically. And don’t forget as well that, in the last 10 to 15 years, we’ve become much more of a consumer-oriented society. People are more curious; they want to travel more; they want new experiences and they have the disposable income to do so . There’s been the invention of products like Airbnb that have encouraged people to explore more. You cannot ignore the interdependencies of all of the different constituents of the aviation and aerospace industry from manufacturing, financing, maintenance all the way through to the impact on tourism and business travel.”
Moody examines how the extreme distress in the airline sector and the shutting off of cashflows has necessitated government support, which has been significant and predominantly in the form of subsidies or loans and guarantees. With this lens, Moody discusses the change in the traditional view of a flag carrier. “There has been about over $160 billion of government linked support to the industry The traditional notion of a flag carrier that might be government-owned or government supported was that the airline was regarded of such strategic importance that it would always be supported in some capacity. This crisis has shown that that’s not necessarily the case anymore. This notion of a flag carrier that can rely on government support is a historic view. But, similarly, there is the realisation by some governments that airlines and the interrelated jobs they create are so significant that they have to be supported in some way. In the US there has been the CARES program, which has supported jobs, but you also have Singapore, where its government has provided a multibillion support programme for SIA given the strategic importance of the airline and the aviation industry to the economy. Other examples include Finland, Iceland, Germany and others who have provided some sort of support. It’s clear that this support is and will be hugely linked to the importance of having an airline in terms of the connectivity of that country globally and also the importance of employment and the knock on effects to the economy if that airline were to file for bankruptcy. What is surprising though is that government support seems less prevalent in the APAC and the African regions where perhaps it is needed the most.”
Deutsche Bank has a variety of aviation finance deals across the product spectrum in its portfolio, from revolving credit facilities through to letters of credit and more traditional aircraft financing such as structured products like Japanese Operating Leases etc. When dealing with clients, the bank’s approach has been to cooperate and collaborate to find a way through the crisis together.
“Our approach has been to acknowledge that we’re all facing this together. At the beginning of the crisis, even though we didn’t realise its magnitude at the time, we believed that the moral thing for us to do was to continue to support transactions when those less able to do that had asked for deferrals or other concessions,” says Moody. “There are certain borrowers and clients who are very aligned with their banks and lenders. Ultimately, the industry will come through this and survive and, despite the significant level of cancellations, airlines and lessors are still going to require significant amounts of capital. When borrowers come back to the market and airlines start taking aircraft again, and when the market needs leverage for sale-leasebacks, they will come to the financing community. And how those borrowers behaved during this period, will have a large bearing on whether those institutions decide to provide capital in the future.”
The capital markets have been used extensively by airlines and lessors to help shore up their liquidity positions, which Moody sees as a consequence of the government support for airlines that will eventually expire and suggests that the relative value in aviation investment compared to other sectors may be eroded at the time when borrowers are looking to refinance those deals.
“Clearly the unsecured and EETC markets are open but the big question is when will the ABS market come back in a significant way and what will it look like when it does return. In the interim, this is leaving a big gap for more flexible capital like credit funds that would have traditionally been provided by banks,’ says Moody. “The availability of bank finance will be dependant on the institutions involved, what they have in their books and what they’re battling through at the time.”
Moody sees institutional investors and hedge funds circling and waiting for the opportunity to enter the space but equally there are those banks that may be seeking to exit the sector altogether, although there isn’t the evidence of a major withdrawal trend just yet. He also notes that the COVID crisis has masked the future regulatory changes that still exist in the form of increased capital allocation for the sector via the BIS requirements and also increasing lending agendas that include ESG considerations, an area that is not that easy to meet.
He further comments on the future of the aviation ABS market, which had been prolific for the past three years in particular. He predicts that until that market comes back in a significant way, there will be a back-to-basics approach for structured aviation financing and when the aviation ABS product does come back it will be for lower leverage deals, very clean and robust structures, higher pricing and a collateral pool of stronger lessees based on their survivability. The same back-to-basics philosophy will be shared by the bank and other financing markets as well, says Moody.
“There will be a total recut of the ABS market. The level of leverage you get all the way through to the C notes will be significantly altered. And the E note market that we know today may never come back, or at least will not for some time yet.”
Deutsche Bank has been working on the aviation ABS 3.0 structure, which Moody says will require more input from all the participants from lessors, investors to rating agencies, to try and build a structure that works. “It’s in no one’s interest to try to launch a structure and risk an unsuccessful issuance. It will be well into 2021 before we see a large aviation ABS deal. And the first to come to market will be very clean, very uncontentious in terms of structure, with younger, predominately new technology assets and very good lessees. They will also be issued more for internal financing purposes with the equity strip being held by the lessor rather than being sold to an equity buyer.”