BE BOLD with BOULDEN

Today, we are honored to have John M. Pierce as our guest, a titan in the world of trial law, and the founder of John Pierce Law. He's been described as "one of the most esteemed jury trial lawyers" and has a track record of securing multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements in complex business disputes. John has been at the forefront of defending civil liberties. He has represented high-profile figures like Rudy Giuliani, Kyle Rittenhouse, Tulsi Gabbard to advocating for defendants involved in the January 6, 2021 events at the United States Capitol.

Amidst the tumult of the past four years, John recognized a glaring void in the legal landscape – a shortage of attorneys dedicated to fighting for constitutional rights. In response, he founded the National Constitutional Law Union (NCLU), a groundbreaking initiative aimed at empowering individuals and combating government overreach and tech tyranny head-on. Through the NCLU, John envisions building a nationwide network of litigators to safeguard the rights of all Americans for generations to come.

John has represented over twenty defendants facing charges from January 6th. He has a unique perspective on these court cases and the Department of Justice’s handling of discovery information.

The NCLU if funded by donations of those looking to support their amendment rights by fighting for those that may have theirs violated. Their focus is has been on hot topics like: self-defense, cancel culture, right to life, election integrity, health freedom, and religious liberty.

During the conversation we touch base on the state of our union, and what can be done to reclaim the spirit of 1776.

Four years ago today, the Trump administration announced Proclamation 9994, which declared a national emergency. This began a rapid shut down of states, businesses, and two years of tyranny and loneliness for millions. The adage, “hindsight is 20/20” is being rolled out by many as history attempts to be rewritten. The Trusted News Initiative colluded to stop disinformation which only stopped the free press and replaced it with a new global form of state media. Friends, families, communities, and relationships were torn apart with the polarization of those who offered an alternative view.

Early on there were studies showing the spike protein shared a genomic sequence with HIV. This pre-print study was soon removed from google and search engines as the TNI took control of information. President Trump repeatedly blamed China for the virus and those that shared that perhaps it escaped from a lab as part of gain of function research were shouted down as anti science. We were told it was a bat zoonotic infection from a market in Wuhan. Those that claimed it should be handled like a bad flu were told they were careless.

The origin story, efficacy of measures to stop the spread, how it transmitted, what data and protection “vaccines” offered, the treatment protocol, long-term effects, and public health messaging all drastically changed since the roll out and orchestration of approved talking points. The New Normal was the Big Lie.

Four years later and it becomes more clear by the day. The narrative we were told was repeated as a known lie. The newest guidelines state to treat Covid no differently than the flu and RSV. The same protocols exist. Even Dr. Anthony Fauci now admits that 6 feet for safety was an arbitrary number with no science. As I reflect on where we were, I never want to repeat the takeover by feeble minded tyrants. I’ll never forget, and I hope you will not.

And, in other top headlines, RFK Jr. is making some questionable choices for his campaign.

Buzzwords wield significant power in both societal and political discourse, serving as potent tools that shape public opinion and influence decision-making. These catchy phrases and slogans have permeated various aspects of our lives, from marketing and advertising to social media and political campaigns. While buzzwords can be effective in capturing attention and conveying messages succinctly, they often come at the cost of critical thinking and nuanced understanding of complex issues. Instead of fostering informed dialogue, buzzwords frequently manipulate the ability to think clearly about pressing societal and political matters.

In politics, buzzwords are commonly used to frame issues in a simplistic and emotionally charged manner, catering to the short attention spans of the electorate. Politicians and pundits strategically deploy buzzwords to rally support, demonize opponents, and shape public narratives. However, this reductionist approach to complex issues obscures the underlying nuances and challenges inherent in policy-making. As a result, citizens may be swayed more by the emotional resonance of buzzwords than by a comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand.

The pervasive use of buzzwords in political discourse contributes to polarization and tribalism, further eroding the capacity for reasoned debate and compromise. By reducing complex issues to polarizing slogans, politicians and media outlets reinforce existing divisions within society, making it increasingly difficult to bridge ideological divides. This trend not only stifles meaningful dialogue but also perpetuates a cycle of distrust and cynicism towards political institutions and the media.

In society at large, buzzwords infiltrate discussions on topics ranging from social justice and environmental sustainability to healthcare and education. While these buzzwords may initially spark interest and engagement, they often fail to prompt deeper reflection or analysis of underlying systemic issues. As a result, important societal challenges may be oversimplified or trivialized, hindering efforts to address them effectively. In this way, buzzwords in both society and politics have a profound impact on our ability to think critically and engage in meaningful discourse, ultimately shaping the course of public debate and policymaking.

This false sense of understanding can lead to a superficial engagement with important issues, where individuals mistake familiarity with buzzwords for genuine comprehension. Continuing to rely on these words will reduce our ability to have sincere empathy and understand complex issues.

In today's episode, we have the honor of hosting Gavin Wax, a leading conservative activist and commentator, as we delve into the heart of populism and its representative, Donald Trump.

Gavin is not just another conservative voice; he's the Executive Director of the National Constitutional Law Union and the dynamic President of the New York Young Republican Club. With his insightful perspectives and tireless efforts, Gavin embodies the essence of the youthful conservative movement.

We explore the phenomenon of populism and its growing influence, with Donald Trump emerging as a powerful symbol of the populist majority. Gavin sheds light on how Trump's leadership resonates with millions, tapping into the frustrations and aspirations of everyday Americans.

But as we navigate the political landscape, it's clear that both Republicans and Democrats are adrift without strong leadership and a clear vision for the future. Gavin discusses this vacuum and offers insights into how conservatives can step up to the plate, providing principled leadership grounded in conservative values.

Join us as we engage in a thought-provoking conversation with Gavin Wax, exploring the rise of populism, the legacy of Donald Trump, and the path forward for conservatives in an uncertain political climate. Tune in now and be part of the conversation shaping the future of our nation!

At the young age of 24, Victor Nieves done more in his life than most can say at double his age. He published his first book at the age of 22, Conservative Prudence: Fighting for America the Right Way (https://www.amazon.com/Conservative-Prudence-Fighting-America-Right/dp/B0B37B74HV). In that same year he amassed a loyal following on social media networks totaling over 100 million views. He is a contributor at the Gateway Pundit, and host of the Victor Nieves Show, which airs on FM radio stations on Saturdays and Sundays, later published to podcast.

Victor majored in political science at University of Central Missouri and is an avid student of the constitution. He has spent hours looking over the framers documents and dedicates time to reading the declaration and constitution regularly. Victor is a scholar of liberty, and I have not seen someone speak about the constitution with this type of passion since my conversations with Michael Badnarik.

The current generation often is painted as apathetic and jaded to government. Older generations paint Generation Z as out of touch with conservative politics and mindless foot soldiers for socialism. Victor paints a much different canvas, and illustrates a future that is bright with possibilities for our country.

My interview with him was a reminder to ignite the flames of liberty. Victor reignited my flame, and hope he energizes you as well.

Truth is objective. Facts link to answers that do not care about the outcome of feelings. We teach about the importance of feelings in order to assist emotional and physical wellness. Feelings are rooted in both subjective/objective truth, which blur the line of what is factual.  Subjective truth is relativism at the core. It is an intellectual vacuum that ideological movements exploit to advance their goals and agendas.

Early memories of positive and negative experiences impact who we are as individuals. They shape our culture, worldview, and inform our sense of self. Most remember times with family that were special and memorable. Seldom are these linked to politics or a political figure. The lack of core memories around political issues should inform us that self-discovery is more important than getting caught in governmental arguments and frustrations.

Society has stopped discovering and lost the spirit of personal responsibility and accountability. Relativism undermines the social fabric by creating entitlement and victimhood. A classless society appeals to those who blame others for their problems. When nothing is certain and everything is relative the country may seem nihilistic and full of despair.

We need to rediscover America and the Constitution with excitement.

Attorney General Letitia James has had the tables turned. Investigative financial journalist, Mel Witte has published an extravagant expenditure sheet that raised eyebrows after publishing. James is best known as bringing the charges that may cost former President Trump over $450 million in the judgement against him. A public advocate for the past 4 years and former council member, James has kept clear of scandal. Over the past five years the Attorney General has created quite the expenditure list. Over $384k in hotel stays, airfare, car rentals, meals, reimbursements and much more.

According to Witte, the financial statements included lavish stays in Beverly Hills, with reimbursement of $65,000 in campaign consultants, which is vague in description. One of the years after winning, there was a single year of $300,000 in consulting fees, with a 2 bedroom apartment in Brooklyn receiving the funds. While James may not have broken laws, there does seem to be a tie to ghost donors.

In 2022 there were donors from all over the country, with 62% coming from out of state to an attorney general in New York. Over 3 million dollars came in from 32,593 individual receipts. A landslide of donations poured in just as James began her charge press against Donald Trump.

On today’s show we discuss what these numbers may mean for the justice system and the corruption in both political parties.

You can follow Mel Witte on X: @villgecrazylady

Mark Twain understood that fiction would stick to what is possible while truth would embrace the impossible. As artificial intelligence and augmented virtual reality becomes more widely accepted and embraced we are at a crossroads not seen since Greek mythology. Theseus was a sailor who replaced parts of his ship throughout his storied voyagers. After many years he had replaced every single piece of his boat. At what point in time did his ship change from the original to the replaced?

In society there are storytellers who are altering reality with fictional tails that many believe and share with their friends and family. Dinesh D’Souza’s film, 2000 Mules, relied on fictional reality. True the Vote has presented that “mules” coordinated to collect and deposit ballots in Atlanta in November 2020 and January’s runoff in 2021. In the film they use cell phone pings to create a convincing story. Two weeks ago they were unable to provide any evidence for the story they shared with D’Souza and the viewers of the film.

Google’s artificial intelligence named, Gemini, is distorting reality. In a story published by Peter Hasson, Gemini was discovered writing fake reviews of content critical of google. The AI was using real people as the name’s of the reviewers, but fraudulently writing on their behalf. Knowing that AI can augment the perception by lying to the public about content, we are now with Theseus. Which part of the internet is untarnished? Can we trust what we read and see by those we know?

As Google Glass, Apple Vision Pro, and Facebook’s Metaverse become augmented reality, have we stopped having a human experience? At what point did we cross a line to transhumanism? Was it inevitable? We are living now in a fictional reality.

A decisive victory was handed to Donald Trump in South Carolina’s primary over the weekend. Trump received 451,905 votes to Nikki Haley’s 298,674. The vote represented a 20 point margin and shows that Donald Trump has successfully held off challengers for the 2024 nomination. Or does it?

Looking at the data closer shows the Republican presumptive nominee may have an election crisis ahead. In major cities voters have chosen the alternative. 40% of voters rejected Trump in South Carolina. However, not so fast… Nikki Haley pushed for democrats to vote for her, and  they accounted for over 10% of her vote. Roughly a quarter of Republicans are rejecting Donald Trump in SC, and more up to 30% claim they will not vote for him if he is convicted.

The numbers show Trump has a major hurdle to overcome. He must energize the base behind a candidate that has been tarred and feathered publicly for the past decade. The base is not unified. In order for Trump to offset the loss in voters, he must hope that the same is true of democrat support for Biden. This seems to be possible according to interviews with individuals I’ve spoken to over the past several months. The democrats and republicans are in crisis.

President Biden is hoping you forget about the border, your finances, and your ability to move out of your current situation and up to something better. The needle for inflation has risen for the second straight month and the fed seems to have no answers.  The numbers show trouble. Trouble for you, trouble for me, and trouble for our country. Who will unite the base first and overcome?

The 21st century has been marked by unprecedented political polarization. The quest for one's political identity has become an increasingly daunting endeavor as aligning with a political party can feel taboo. Yet, amidst the cacophony of discordant voices and divergent ideologies, there exists an opportunity for introspection and discovery. Our guest today has been hosting shows on this topic for several years. Brian Eskow is still searching for his political ideals as he publishes “Searching for Political Identity”.

In the pursuit of defining our political selves, introspection serves as the foundational cornerstone. Our conversation begins with critical race theory and how it is a topic that requires careful thought. We delve into the essence of convictions, and lay the groundwork for a more profound understanding of where we stand amidst the tumult of contemporary politics.

In our quest for political identity, it is imperative to foster an environment of open-mindedness and empathy. The willingness to engage with dissenting opinions and entertain alternative viewpoints lays the foundation for intellectual growth and mutual understanding. By embracing the diversity of thought, we enrich our own perspectives and cultivate a more inclusive discourse.

During our conversation we discovered that context plays a pivotal role in shaping our political identities. The socio-cultural melee in which we find ourselves immersed, as well as the global currents that sweep across nations, exert a profound influence on our worldview. By acknowledging the dynamic interplay of local and global forces, we gain a more nuanced understanding of political dynamics.

Amidst the cacophony of discord, it is all too easy to succumb to despair and disillusionment. Yet, beneath the veneer of division lies the potential for common ground and shared purpose. By transcending the rhetoric of divisiveness and embracing the ethos of cooperation, we can forge pathways toward collective progress and social cohesion. Perhaps, we will wind up in a different locale than where we began.

As we navigate the labyrinth of contemporary politics, let us remain steadfast in our commitment to authenticity, integrity, and the pursuit of a more just and free society.