Between the Briefs

What’s it going to take for legal companies to wholeheartedly embrace legal technology? Social proof, as Ted Theodoropoulos, CEO of Infodash, puts it. In this episode of Between the Briefs by Steno, hosts Adrian Cea and Joe Stephens, pick Ted’s brain about the tech reckoning the legal landscape is confronted with, today. 

What You’ll Learn:

• Why "Innovation Theater" still dominates big law and why that’s dangerous
  
  
• Why change management is critical to successful AI adoption, not the tools
  
  
• How Gen AI is forcing conversations about business models that should have happened years ago

• The “social proof” strategy for legal tech vendors to sell successfully 

• The how and why of practical AI integration that doesn’t replace the human touch 

• How managed service organizations (MSOs), private capital, and emerging regulatory pathways are quietly restructuring legal service delivery

The legal landscape has essentially reached the point of no return. And, that’s a good thing. 

Highlights:


00:00 Introduction & Meeting Ted Theodoropoulos

02:03 Ted’s Podcasting Story & The Legal Innovation Spotlight

04:18 Innovation Theater is a Real Thing in Legal 

12:14 Why Law Firms Resist Standardization

18:00 Building Social Proof is the Only Way for Legal Tech Adoption

20:26 Why Does Anyone Need an Intranet? 

22:38 Measuring Success Beyond Page Views and Usage Data

28:06 How Venture Capital Is Reshaping Legal Tech Competition

32:06 Blending Generative AI with Human Legal Expertise

35:58 The Advantage of Vertical Focus Over Horizontal Expansion

39:00 Podcasting Lessons: Adapting Communication Style for Maximum Engagement

41:18 Ted’s Hot Take: The Business Model Reckoning & Why Law Firms Must Invest 10% in Tech

46:12 The Consolidation Wave Legal Can’t Ignore 

47:19 Key Takeaways: Trust, Focus, and Structural Innovation in Legal Tech


Quotes:

1. "There's been a lot of innovation theater in legal where innovation titles were handed out, but firms weren't fully committed to innovating, especially at a foundational level. Until you've got buy-in at the top, which is now starting to happen because AI has really forced their hand.” 
2. "The reason that law firms are so resistant to change and tech adoption is the bespoke nature of legal work. It's historically been an artisan craft. You can take lawyers in the same firm, in the same practice, and they are going to do things completely differently, with their own precedent documents that they use as starting points. They have their own little org structure, how they leverage paralegals, their own processes, how they engage with clients."
3. "I always say, law firms don't buy tech - they buy social proof. You have to build that book of social proof before you'll really get at-bats with the biggest firms. Most vendors have to work their way up the ladder incrementally and eat table scraps in the beginning until they build. And you have to build that book of social proof before you'll really get at bats with the biggest firms."
4. "Buying the tech is the easy part. It's the change management discipline that has to come along with the tech that is going to ultimately determine whether something becomes shelfware or generates great ROI for the firm.”
5. "I think the number one attribute is focus. Vendors who come into this space with a horizontal focus don't do well, it's the ones who jump all in because that legal resume is so important. If you're in it long enough and become a student of the industry, you become an advisor beyond just whatever it is your technology does.” 
   
   

Between The Briefs is handcrafted by our friends over at: fame.so

In this special episode of Between the Briefs, Adrian Cea sits down with Dylan Ruga, Carly Savar, and Joe Stephens to unpack Steno’s new Attorney Work Styles Framework - a quiz that reveals whether you’re a Research Commander, Strategic Architect, Courtroom Dynamo, or Narrative Weaver.


What You’ll Learn:

• How the four attorney archetypes work and why none of them is “the best”
  
  
• Why a Research Commander’s strength in precedent can become a limitation without strategy
  
  
• How Strategic Architects see three to four steps ahead and keep cases moving

• The real-world pressure (and burnout risk) behind being a Courtroom Dynamo
  
  
• Why Narrative Weavers win hearts and how to avoid falling in love with the wrong story

• Where hallway settlements actually happen and why soft skills matter in court

• How lawyers evolve across archetypes as their careers change

• The value of pairing opposite styles to build stronger legal teams

• Why the most effective lawyers blend story, law, preparation, and adaptability

The result of the quiz is less about personality typing and more about awareness, growth, and building better legal teams.


Highlights:

00:00 – Introduction

01:15 – Breaking Down the Four Archetypes

03:22 – Carly: Why I Wanted to Be a Courtroom Dynamo

04:28 – Dylan: From Sports to Strategy in the Law

05:33 – Joe: Teaching, Trials, and 11 Ironmans

11:20 – Working With Different Styles (And Friction)

15:03 – Which Archetype Do Top Lawyers Usually Land In?

22:58 – Downsides: When Your Strength Becomes a Weakness

26:42 – Clients, Conflict, and Totally Different Perspectives

32:32 – Why Work Styles Matter When Building Legal Teams

38:29 – Avoiding Echo Chambers (And Finding Honest Feedback)

40:56 – Final Thoughts: AI, Soft Skills, and the Future of Lawyers

Quotes:

1. “Someone once described being in trial to me as, you know, having to make a decision, a pretty important decision every ten, fifteen, twenty seconds all day for as long as the trial goes on.” - Joe Stephens
2. “Being a strategic architect is great if everything works out the way that you hope it'll work out, but it never does.” - Dylan Ruga
3. “So, having that difference of opinion, I think can be really fruitful. And I think it's really important sometimes for lawyers to seek that out, just making sure that there is someone out there checking on you and making sure that what you're saying, and what you're thinking is coming through the way you think it is.” - Joe Stephens
4. “We don't lose sight of what the case law is while we're telling the stories that matter. It's who can think ahead, who can articulate what matters and go back to the fundamentals and make sure we're actually citing good law. I think that's going to rule the day…” - Carly Savar

Between The Briefs is handcrafted by our friends over at: fame.so

“We’re going to be okay” - sometimes that’s all we need to hear. In the latest episode of Between the Briefs, Christina Natale, Director of Legal Strategy & Solutions at HIKE2, sends this message to all lawyers living in the age of AI. Her mantra is simple - AI cannot practice law the way lawyers do. But it can change how it is practiced.

What You’ll Learn:

• How to map your current workflow before selecting technology

• Why niche, single-purpose tools often outperform comprehensive case management platforms 

• The strategic discovery phase that prevents failed implementations 

• How to translate complex technology concepts for non-technical legal teams 

• Why workflow mapping reveals opportunities for AI and automation beyond initial assumptions 

• The business case for junior associates learning technology literacy alongside

This episode is the playbook you need to get legal AI/ tech right in 2026. 

Highlights:


00:00 Introduction 

01:57 From Complex Litigation to Legal Operations: Christina's Career Journey

03:37 Case Management Solutions for Every Firm Size

05:30 What’s So Special About Operations? 

10:57 Map Your Workflow Before Selecting Technology

14:07 Start with Niche, Single-Purpose Solutions First 

17:04 When Your Team Gets Overwhelmed, Implement Technology

23:52 Translating Complex Technology Concepts for Legal Teams

27:33 Hike2's Full-Stack Approach: Strategic Advisory Through Implementation

32:33 Vetting and Recommending the Right Tools for Your Firm

37:18 Why Junior Associates Need Technology Literacy as Core Competency

41:01 The Future of Legal Operations: Agentic AI and Human Judgment

44:38 Christina’s Hot Take: AI Cannot Replace Lawyers 

46:16 Key Takeaways & Final Thoughts

Quotes:

1. “If I'm gonna be back in the weeds and I really love and want to litigate at a high level and service my clients, how can I do that if we're not leveraging technology in a way that makes our lives easier and takes some of the tedious or repetitive tasks that are really important?”
2. “There has to be a better way and understanding it from that level of depth of knowing what we mean when we say law firm operations are managing cases, what really goes into the day to day, what resources our teams need.”
3. “I do think that innovation is critical to our profession. I think that it makes us better at serving our clients. I think that we're going to get to a really good place where we can hopefully find that and optimize that.”
4. “I've mentored law students since I've graduated. And, you know, the questions are always like, I don't know what I want to do, like what type of law do I want to practice, et cetera. And like almost any lawyer you know, or anyone who's come from being a lawyer into some transition could tell you that they're not doing anything that they thought they'd be doing when they were in law school. I don't mean this in a negative way, they're probably not doing anything they learned in law school.”
5. “I don't think we'll ever be in a place where AI is capable of practicing law in the way that we think of. I keep seeing stuff on Reddit every day. It's like, look at all these people who are using AI to fight traffic tickets and break their leases and they're winning. But as lawyers, I do think again, and especially in more complex matters and matters that require expertise and experience, there's no substitute for that. There really just isn't.”

Between The Briefs is handcrafted by our friends over at: fame.so

Employment law stands at the cusp of transformation in the age of AI, but poor hiring strategies could cost you everything. In this episode of Between the Briefs, hosts Adrian Cea and Joe Stephen sit down with Adam Maxwell, litigation partner at Schoenberg Finkel Beederman Bell Glazer LLC, to explore why employment law compliance shouldn't stifle business growth, how to navigate non-competes across state lines and the critical softer skills that separate good lawyers from exceptional ones.

What You’ll Learn:

• How to identify and close compliance gaps before they become costly liabilities:
  
  
• Why credibility, not perfection, wins cases and mediations

• The strategic framework for evaluating non-competes in a patchwork regulatory environment
  
  
• How to screen clients early by establishing candor as a non-negotiable condition
  
  
• The business development principle of selective growth over rapid expansion
  
  
• Why AI efficiency gains should reduce client costs, not firm profits

If you’ve been looking for actionable insights to stay ahead of compliance gaps before they become costly litigation, this is the conversation for you. 

Highlights:

00:00 Introduction & Meeting Adam Maxwell 

00:01 From Accidental Law Student to Litigation Partner

00:06 Employment Law in a Highly Aware Workforce

00:10 AI's Role in Legal Literacy and Client Preparation

00:06 Growth Exposes Compliance Gaps

00:08 Balancing Compliance Requirements With Business Innovation

00:10 Cryptocurrency Fraud, Limited Remedies and Recovery Challenges

00:14 Why Building a Book of Business is an Underappreciated Career Essential

00:16 Are Non-Competes in Flux Today? 

00:21 How to Build an Employment Law Case Effectively

00:24 Why Emotional Intelligence Wins Cases

00:27 Deposition Mastery Requires Credibility Over Perfection

00:30 Selective Client Intake & Recognizing Red Flags Early

00:33 The Client Screening Process & When to Say No

00:36 The Billable Hour vs. AI Efficiency: Passing Savings to Clients

00:39 Adam’s Hot Take: Fire Fast, Hire Slow

00:40 Key Takeaways & Final Thoughts

Quotes:

1. “The business of law in a law firm environment for associates and for partners is in developing a book of business. So it's developing your own clients and there's a variety of advantages to that. You can sort of control what matters you work on, and what the demands of your practice are."
2. “In my view, the moment that a judge or a jury thinks that a witness is just reciting lines, they have lost credibility and credibility wins cases and loses cases. So the strategy that I use is to focus less on memorizing answers and more on understanding the themes. What you need to know is your story.”
3. “It's important to be able to be selective about your cases, and that changes in the trajectory of your career, right? When you first start trying to build a book of business, you're eager to take whatever, and solve whatever problems. But in my experience, most of the time, those cases where you're reluctant to take them at the beginning are the cases that are the biggest problems."
4. "It's not about being perfect, it's about being credible. And what they will not forgive is a lie, and they will not forgive being deceptive."
5. "A lot of what I do and what lawyers do is they separate the emotion from the facts and from logic. And so, you know, a lot of it is disassociating emotions, and giving advice that is not based on emotions."

Between The Briefs is handcrafted by our friends over at: fame.so

We’ve all heard that AI can make lawyers better at their jobs. But now there’s data-backed research to prove it. And now, there’s research to prove it. In the latest episode of Between the Briefs by Steno, hosts Adrian Cea and Joe Stephens welcome Daniel Schwarcz, Professor at University of Minnesota, to discuss the groundbreaking paper, “AI-Powered Lawyering” and its empirical findings on how certain AI tools are reshaping legal practice. 

What You’ll Learn:

• How retrieval-augmented generation transforms legal research
  
  
• Why reasoning models like O1 Preview outperform traditional language models for legal analysis
  
  
• The critical distinction between efficiency gains and quality improvements
  
  
• How to identify tasks where AI adds meaningful value versus areas requiring caution
  
  
• Why relying on AI without domain expertise creates ethical liability

• The emerging labor market realities for junior attorneys
  
  

Every lawyer needs proof - this study is all the evidence you could need about AI use in today’s legal landscape. 


Highlights:


00:00 Introduction & Meeting Professor Daniel Schwarcz

02:05 AI-Powered Lawyering: Reasoning Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation

03:27 How Significant are Productivity and Quality Gains? 

08:19 Research Trade-Offs & Developing AI Use as a Skill 

11:22 Retrieval-Augmented Generation & Its Role in Legal Research

13:51 How Reasoning Models Enhance Legal Analysis Rigor

15:30 Why Empirical Evidence is Crucial in the Age of AI

19:12 Critical Ethical Considerations When Deploying AI Legal Tools

22:14 Why AI Effectiveness Varies by Task: The NDA Drafting Paradox

29:55 AI in Legal: We Don’t Know What the Future Holds  

34:58 Daniel’s Hot Take: The Labor Market Disruption

40:15 The Future of Legal Practice: Automation, New Business Models, and Opportunity

45:30 Key Takeaways and the Path Forward for Legal Professionals


Quotes:

1. “We found significant improvement in efficiency, but where we really saw differences in how human lawyers who had these tools performed was in the quality of their work. Not only were the folks who participated in our study performing and providing us with legal work really quickly relative to those without AI, but they were providing better work.”
2. “These tools are really powerful right now in terms of helping many younger lawyers with very common tasks and tasks that require a significant amount of intellectual rigor and analytical depth. Our participants in general reported increased personal satisfaction in completing the tasks with AI compared to not AI. They felt it was empowering.”
3. “What the empirical evidence does is it grounds us in where we are now and where we were a few months ago. And that’s really important because there’s a tremendous amount of hype around AI and a tremendous amount of skepticism around AI.”
4. “AI can give you answers that seem really good, but they may not always be really good if you are not an expert in the field. The ideal world where AI is most useful is for people who are already experts, who already understand a problem, who are using AI to help them produce an answer.”
5. “Do I worry that AI in five years, ten years is going to really change the practice of lawyering and maybe even make certain jobs completely automated? Yeah, I do. We are trying to see if we can get an AI system that can provide effective legal advice to small business startups. That would do everything that a lawyer would do.”

Between The Briefs is handcrafted by our friends over at: fame.so

What does it take to land some of the biggest personal injury verdicts in history? Tyler Barnett, an accomplished attorney at Yuhl | Carr LLP, spills the beans in the latest episode of Between the Briefs by Steno. Tune in as hosts Adrian Cea and Joe Stephens sit down with Tyler to explore the critical elements required to build a thriving boutique practice. 

What You’ll Learn:

• How to filter cases with precision and why turning down over 95% of incoming cases could be a good thing 
  
  
• Why establishing attorney-led client relationships from intake is non-negotiable
  
  
• The psychological framework for jury connection and why storytelling plays such a big role 
  
  
• How to conduct investigations proactively before filing suit.
  
  
• Why video deposition records matter more than transcripts and the credibility they bring
  
  
• The responsible AI strategy for litigation and the importance of developing custom AI models
  
  
• How trial functions as the great equalizer in litigation
  
  
• The imperative to prioritize craft mastery over technology adoption

This episode is a masterclass in creating the perfect success formula to winning (for your clients and for yourself) in personal injury law. 

Highlights:

00:00 Introduction & Meeting Tyler Barnett

01:50 What Drives a Personal Injury Attorney

02:25 Why Being Selective About Clients is a Good Thing 

03:20 When Red Flags Matter: Learning from High-Value Case Mistakes

06:18 From Criminal Courts to Civil Practice: Tyler's Professional Evolution

09:45 Trial Strategy: Collaborative Approaches and Jury Psychology

12:23 Why Video Depositions are More Valuable Than Transcripts

13:42 AI in Legal Practice: Responsible Integration and Custom Frameworks

16:48 The Real Consequences of Judicial Sanctions and AI Hallucinations

17:59 Technology's Impact on Human Skills and Grit

21:28 Teaching Younger Attorneys Active Listening

23:02 Why Every Case Is Not Worth Millions

24:24 Client Intake Guidance: What to Look for in Your Attorney

26:10 Pre-Filing Investigation: EDR Data, Witness Interviews and Due Diligence

28:00 AI, Contingency Fees & The Economics of Modern Litigation

30:21 Managing Expectations Between Client Consent and AI Transparency

32:07 Why Trial is the Great Equalizer

34:23 Building Investigator Relationships: Twenty Years of Trust

35:38 Humanizing Case Narratives and the Importance of Storytelling

38:28 Tyler’s Hot Take: Mastering Your Craft Above All Else

39:27 Closing Thoughts 

Quotes:

1. “I've always hated bullies and institutional hypocrisy, and I wanted to be able to fight for victims of those two things, especially the people that couldn't fight for themselves. I like being my own boss and I like being able to pick the cases that I'm going to pursue so I can dig into the people that I believe are deserving.”
2. “I turn down about 95 plus percent of the cases that come in the door. Obviously what I'm looking for at first is whether or not the case has merit. The relationship that I'm going to have with the client is going to be long and involved, and I need to gauge what kind of person this client is.”
3. “In order to develop that relationship and that trust, the attorney needs to be hands on from the beginning. Ultimately it comes down to them trusting you, and you have to start in the beginning at earning that trust. The only way to do that is by directly communicating with the potential client before the case is taken on.”
4. “AI is only as good as what you feed it, and you have to know what you're feeding it so you can trust the outcome. People want AI to generate something and it's really not work product. You just have to be careful and you can't just rely. Knowledge comes from experience and not from technology.”
5. “The courtroom is the grand equalizer. It doesn't matter how big that defendant is. It could be General Motors or Philip Morris, but there's only one person on their behalf that can be speaking at a time in that courtroom. That is the perfect example of what can be accomplished in a courtroom.”

Between The Briefs is handcrafted by our friends over at: fame.so

Contrary to popular belief, AI won’t replace lawyers. But it’s important to remember that lawyers who use AI are a formidable opponent. In the latest episode of Between the Briefs, Adrian Cea and Joe Stephens sit down with Kella T. Parks, Managing Member at Parks Ziegler, to explore how AI and modern technology are reshaping law firm economics, why legacy systems are costing you more than you realize and the concrete strategies to future-proof your practice.
What You’ll Learn:

• How to transition from billable hours to alternative fee arrangements using AI efficiencies
  
  
• Why digital court reporting and AI-powered document review can reduce paralegal costs by 80-90% while improving accuracy
  
  
• The three-step framework for law firms beginning their technology transformation
  
  
• How to build a modern law firm using KPIs and business metrics across five key areas: financial, operational, marketing, employee satisfaction, and client satisfaction
  
  
• The critical gap between technological fluency and business acumen in newly licensed attorneys
  
  
• Why "AI will replace lawyers using AI, but not AI itself" and how to future-proof your practice

This conversation reveals all the perks of embracing technology - a reminder that it can transform your profitability, client service and quality of life tomorrow.

Highlights:

00:00 Introduction & Meeting Kellam T. Parks 

01:44 From Philosophy Major to Tech-Forward Law Firm Pioneer

03:00 The Competitive Edge: Building a Paperless Practice

04:25 Cloud-Based Systems and Digital Court Reporting Revolutionize Litigation

07:55 Hiring the Right Tech-Forward Talent 

09:32 AI-Powered Document Reviews Reduce Paralegal Costs by 85-90%

13:17 Three-Step Technology Foundation for Modern Law Firms

18:09 Multi-Channel Marketing Strategy for Legal Services

20:40 Tech Skills vs. Business Acumen in New Associates

23:45 The Business of Law: Mindset, Fulfillment, and Strategic Planning

31:02 Avoiding Shiny Object Syndrome + Making Smart Tech Investments

34:37 AI Will Replace Those Who Don't Adapt

38:13 The PCRO Prompting Framework: Precision in AI-Powered Work

42:44 Kellam’s Hot Take: Lawyers Are Missing the AI Revolution

43:55 Key Takeaways: Modernizing Legal Practice for the Future

Quotes:

1. "I started my own firm in 2012, in large part, because I wanted to embrace modern technologies and sort of figure out a more modern way to practice law."
2. "We're a technologically forward company. If you're not comfortable with technology and learning new things and being willing to experiment and take the time to learn, this is not the right fit for you. We tell them right away, this is what we're about, and we actually do paid time at the firm to walk them through and see that."
3. "Step one is find somebody that knows what they're doing to protect yourself and educate you on the basics. Step two is be curious - I'm a YouTube junkie and I follow thought leaders in AI and technology space. Step three is join groups and get coaching, because no elite athlete is where they are without coaching."
4. "AI isn't gonna replace lawyers necessarily, but lawyers that use AI are gonna replace lawyers that don't. Document review, contract drafting, simple wills - there's no way AI isn't gonna completely replace lawyers doing that. Your value will shift to litigation, personal connections, and strategy rather than basic document creation."

Between The Briefs is handcrafted by our friends over at: fame.so

Moving from receptionist to federal magistrate judge is the kind of journey we see on the silver screen. For Allison Goddard, U.S. Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of California, that’s just life. And, for us on Between the Briefs by Steno, it's proof that embracing serendipity, maintaining genuine human connection and leveraging emerging technologies can fundamentally reshape legal practice and judicial efficiency.

What You’ll Learn:

• How to establish authentic relationships with litigants in settlement conferences 

• The role of facilitating psychological safety in in settlement cases

• Why "baby rattlesnake" lawyers (mid-level associates with full venom but no regulatory control) require different mentorship strategies

• The art of “balanced advocacy” that acknowledges opposing perspectives

• How AI functions as a thought partner rather than a decision-maker for judges and attorneys

• Why mandatory AI disclosure requirements are counterproductive 

• The "authenticity imperative" for legal professionals over the next AI-driven decade

• How transparency and approachability in judicial opinions strengthen public confidence in the judiciary

From candid insights on building credibility with litigants to the critical importance of maintaining human-centered legal practice as technology transforms the profession, this episode uncovers it all. 

Highlights:

00:00 Introduction & Meeting Judge Allison Goddard

02:44 From Receptionist to Federal Judge: An Unconventional Path

04:36 Understanding the Magistrate Judge Role and Settlement Strategy

10:50 Private vs. Public Law: The Ebbs and Flows 

17:24 Building Authentic Relationships to Facilitate Settlement

20:23 Recognizing the "Baby Rattlesnake" Phase in Legal Practice

24:08 AI as a Thought Partner: Practical Applications for Litigation

27:16 Why Mandatory AI Disclosure Requirements Backfire

32:33 Preventing Complacency: Maintaining Human Oversight of AI Tools

36:32 The Future of Legal Practice: Authenticity as Competitive Advantage

40:31 The Judiciary's Role in American Society and Public Trust

41:19 Judge Allison’s Hot Take: Authenticity Will Reign Supreme

44:15 Key Takeaways & Final Thoughts

Quotes:

1. “When I first got on the bench, people would say, how is your stress level? It must be so stressful to be a judge. And I would say it's like kindergarten because I don't have the stress of being on the receiving end of nasty emails about a discovery dispute.”
2. “I call the mid-level associate the baby rattlesnake phase because, I don't even know if this is true, but it's the myth here that baby rattlesnakes have all the venom, but none of the ability to regulate it. And that's kind of like that band of lawyers - where you haven't had enough experience to recognize what's important and what’s not.” 
3. “I think if you're going into deposition these days and you've got a client that you're defending and you haven't at least done that, it's going to become kind of malpractice not to be prepared that way.”
4. “I think that the most important quality that successful people are going to have over the next 10 to 20 years is authenticity. And I think we're going to have to find a way to be our real selves. Which also means that we have to work on being better selves.”
5. “Well, I'm from a big family in Tennessee and there were no lawyers in my family but I always had a strong sense of right and wrong and justice. And I, also think all of my siblings will tell you, I was always pushing against power. So that was something that I always did from a young age.”

Between The Briefs is handcrafted by our friends over at: fame.so

In the latest episode of Between the Briefs by Steno, Adrian Cea and Joe Stephens sit down with Scott C. Pappas, Managing Partner at Omnus Law to unpack the ins and outs of building an innovative firm that is revolutionizing the legal industry through their metaverse-based workplace, transparent billing structure, and commitment to attorney well-being.


What You’ll Learn:

• How to build a successful remote-first law firm using metaverse technology for lawyer collaboration
  
  
• Why the traditional billable hour model is being challenged by client demands for transparency and value-based billing
  
  
• How ‘grace’ and ‘kindness’ are key to building a sustainable law firm culture in a virtual environment
  
  
• How to leverage AI responsibly in legal practice while maintaining high-quality client service
  
  
• Why law firm innovation requires both technological advancement and cultural transformation
  
  
• The importance of work-life balance in attorney retention and how to structure a firm that prioritizes well-being
  
  
• How to transition from traditional practice models to more flexible, technology-driven approaches without sacrificing quality
  
  
• The future of legal practice management and why big law firms may need to adapt or risk shrinking
  
  

If you’re interested in being a lawyer of the future, this episode offers a compelling vision of how technology and human-centered practices are reshaping the future of law.


Highlights:


00:00 Introduction & Omnus Law's Innovation

02:00 From Financial Motivation to Finding Purpose in Legal Practice

05:48 Founding Autism Behavioral Wellness: Legal Impact Beyond Practice

10:25 Why Lawyers Should Dedicate Themselves to Their Purpose

14:20 Revolutionizing Remote Work Through the Metaverse Platform

19:50 Building a Culture of Grace and Kindness in Virtual Law Practice

22:35 Transforming Legal Billing & Solving the $3000/Hour Problem

26:26 Practical Steps for Law Firms to Embrace Innovation

31:02 Prioritizing Attorney Wellbeing in Modern Legal Practice

34:12 Future Growth and International Expansion Plans

39:30 Scott’s Hot Take: The Future of Big Law and Client Expectations

Quotes:

1. "If you live like a lawyer when you're a student, you're going to live like a student when you're a lawyer. I will tell you, the novelty of the money wears off when you're miserable at your desk."
   
   
   
2. "I'm not positioning lawyers for success at Omnus. I'm positioning them for fulfillment in the practice of law. So what does that mean? It's practicing great law, but being able to enjoy a great life outside of the law."
   
   
   
3. "A lot of people feel that in order to be a great lawyer, it has to involve great personal sacrifice. And you could be committed to the practice, but at what point did it require us to give up everything else around us to thrive as a lawyer?"
   
   
   
4. "Law firms traditionally don't bill well - they may bill a lot, but we've institutionalized practices that allow us to communicate in real time any changes in scope of the engagement, any changes in budget, any changes in personnel handling the matter. The billable hour incentivizes the wrong behavior. Our process is really designed to minimize the friction between attorneys and clients."
   
   
   
5. "A lot of law firms talk about change, but are really reluctant. When we think about innovation, innovation isn't an act - innovation is a mindset. I would encourage those law firms to start their own innovation lab, looking at every operational process that's manual in their law firm and seeing what can be automated."

Between The Briefs is handcrafted by our friends over at: fame.so

In this episode of Between the Briefs, Adrian Cea speaks with Judge Frank Szymanski, a longtime juvenile court judge in Detroit. Frank shares how trauma shapes behaviour, why courts must ask “what was done to them?”, and how mindfulness-based interventions in schools and courts cut costs while improving outcomes. From yoga to evidence-backed meditation programmes, his focus is simple: deliver peace first, and better decisions follow.

With decades of experience in law and education, Judge Frank Szymanski has become a leading voice in conscious justice and youth rehabilitation. As a juvenile court judge, author of Identity Design: Design the Identity You Need to Get the Life You Want, and a motivational speaker, he blends legal insight with human development. Beyond the courtroom, Frank works with schools, community programmes, and mindfulness organisations to build systems that prioritise prevention over punishment. His ongoing mission: bring peace to chaotic lives and teach both citizens and professionals to train the mind daily, because, as he says, “our minds deserve the same care as our teeth.”


Highlights:

[00:00] Intro

[00:53] From teacher and hockey coach to lawyer and judge

[05:00] Discovering the real goal: bringing peace to chaotic lives

[07:00] Writing Identity Design and the power of ownership and service

[10:00] Why yoga became his bridge between anger and calm

[13:00] Visiting the Enlightened Sentencing Project in St. Louis and witnessing transformation

[16:00] Teaching meditation to juvenile offenders and seeing real results

[18:00] Presenting mindfulness to skeptics: the toothbrush analogy

[21:00] The science behind 80% negative thoughts and emotional regulation as a superpower

[23:00] Case study: how a Florida school turned an F into an A through daily mindfulness

[25:00] Preventing incarceration by building peace early in schools and communities

[29:00] The biggest misconception about juvenile court: “what was done to them”

[33:00] Why empathy, listening, and service make better lawyers than knowing the law alone

[37:00] Judge Frank’s “7–60 Mad Minute” mental training plan

[39:00] Closing thoughts and how to connect with Judge Frank


Quotes:

• “When a kid comes into juvenile court, the question is not just what have they done, you gotta ask, well, what was done to them.”
  
  
• “These people that are in this courtroom, they need to experience some peace because their lives are so chaotic and so traumatic. My whole drive ever since I became a juvenile court judge has been to find ways to deliver some sort of sense of peace.”
  
  
• “I tell people, when you get control of your emotions, that’s like a superpower. That is amazing. And this is what meditation can do for us.”
  
  
• “We brush our teeth every day. Why don’t we do something every day for our mind? Isn’t our mind a lot more important than our molars and our bicuspids?”
  
  
• “We spend thousands of dollars on these kids that nobody paid attention to helping until they were already carjacking somebody or they murdered somebody… I wanna put juvenile judges and courts outta business because if all the schools start doing these things, they won’t want to go out and carjack somebody.”
  
  
• “You gotta know the law, but the main thing you need to know if you’re gonna be a lawyer, it’s a people business. And to be a great lawyer, you have to be a great listener.”
  
  
• “There’s an old saying that if you’re too busy to take 10 minutes to meditate, then you should take 20.”

Between The Briefs is handcrafted by our friends over at: fame.so