Plaintiff Steve Otis has filed a Second Amended Complaint in the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:25-cv-01652-LAP) against Sean “Diddy” Combs, Garren James (also known as Brett Taylor), and Cowboys4Angels, through his attorneys at Eisenberg & Baum, LLP. The filing outlines allegations made by Otis that stem from actions he claims were personally experienced and others he believes occurred based on information and belief.


The complaint positions Combs, James, and Cowboys4Angels as defendants in what appears to be a civil case involving alleged misconduct and coordination among the named parties. While the specific factual allegations and legal claims are not included in this introductory section, the filing indicates Otis intends to hold the defendants accountable under federal jurisdiction in New York, marking a continuation of prior versions of the case through this amended complaint.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.637615.43.0.pdf

Plaintiff Steve Otis has filed a Second Amended Complaint in the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:25-cv-01652-LAP) against Sean “Diddy” Combs, Garren James (also known as Brett Taylor), and Cowboys4Angels, through his attorneys at Eisenberg & Baum, LLP. The filing outlines allegations made by Otis that stem from actions he claims were personally experienced and others he believes occurred based on information and belief.


The complaint positions Combs, James, and Cowboys4Angels as defendants in what appears to be a civil case involving alleged misconduct and coordination among the named parties. While the specific factual allegations and legal claims are not included in this introductory section, the filing indicates Otis intends to hold the defendants accountable under federal jurisdiction in New York, marking a continuation of prior versions of the case through this amended complaint.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.637615.43.0.pdf

Summary of the Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss:

1. Introduction:
   • The memorandum begins by outlining the grounds for dismissing the Second Amended Complaint. The defendants, Sean Combs, Love Records, and Combs Global Enterprises, argue that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The defendants seek to have the case dismissed in its entirety.
2. Legal Standards for Dismissal:
   • The document likely explains the legal standards for a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This rule allows a defendant to seek dismissal of a complaint if the plaintiff fails to state a claim that is legally sufficient.
3. Arguments for Dismissal:
   • Failure to State a Claim: The defendants argue that the plaintiff, Rodney Jones, has not provided sufficient factual allegations to support his claims against them. The memorandum likely points out that the claims are speculative or lack the necessary detail to establish a plausible claim for relief.
   • Lack of Specificity: The memorandum might argue that the complaint lacks specificity regarding the alleged misconduct of Sean Combs, Love Records, and Combs Global Enterprises. This could include failure to allege how each defendant was involved in the purported wrongdoing.
   • Insufficient Legal Basis: The defendants could argue that the legal theories under which the plaintiff seeks relief are flawed or do not apply to the facts as presented. This might involve challenging the legal validity of the claims or the appropriateness of the chosen legal theories.
4. Discussion of Relevant Case Law:
   • The memorandum typically cites relevant case law to support its arguments. This includes precedents where similar claims were dismissed due to lack of specificity or failure to state a claim. The defendants use these cases to argue that the court should apply the same reasoning to the current complaint.
5. Conclusion:
   • The defendants request that the court dismiss the Second Amended Complaint with prejudice, meaning that the plaintiff would not be allowed to file another complaint on the same grounds. The memorandum concludes by reiterating the arguments for dismissal and emphasizing the insufficiency of the plaintiff's claims.

to contact me:

[email protected]

The Dubin family’s connection to Jeffrey Epstein runs deep and has been clouded by controversy for decades. Glenn Dubin, a billionaire hedge fund manager, and his wife, Eva Andersson-Dubin, a former Miss Sweden and physician, were both longtime friends of Epstein. Eva dated Epstein for years before marrying Glenn in 1994, yet even after their marriage, the Dubins maintained close ties with him—hosting dinners, traveling on his jet, and continuing to socialize with him long after his 2008 conviction for soliciting a minor. Epstein was also known to have been close with their children, reportedly describing the Dubin family as like “family” to him.

However, those ties later drew intense scrutiny. Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre alleged that she was trafficked to Glenn Dubin when she was a teenager, an accusation Dubin has vehemently denied. Additional reporting revealed that Epstein had allegedly referred massage therapists to both Glenn and Eva Dubin, a detail found in Epstein’s own business records. The Dubins insist they had no knowledge of Epstein’s criminal activities and considered him merely a friend, but the sustained closeness between them—particularly after his sex offense conviction—has raised ongoing questions about their judgment, credibility, and what exactly they knew about the man at the center of one of the most notorious sex-trafficking networks in modern history.


to contact me:

[email protected]

In this filing, Sean Combs opposes the government’s motion seeking permission to withhold the identities of certain witnesses in the civil RICO case, arguing that such secrecy is unjustified and prejudicial. Combs’ legal team contends that the government’s vague claims of witness safety concerns lack any factual foundation or evidence of real threats from Combs or his legal team. They argue that the government's request to conceal witness identities, even during the early stages of discovery, violates basic principles of due process and fairness, as it would prevent Combs from meaningfully preparing his defense and testing the credibility of key accusers.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.248.0_1.pdf

In the Appellant's Reply Brief for United States v. Sean Combs, case number 24-CR-542 (AS), the defense challenges the district court's decisions on multiple grounds. First, they argue that the court erred in denying the motion to suppress evidence obtained during a warrantless search, asserting that this violated Combs' Fourth Amendment rights. Second, the defense contends that the court improperly admitted hearsay statements under the co-conspirator exception, allowing prejudicial evidence to influence the jury.

Furthermore, the defense criticizes the jury instructions regarding the conspiracy charge, alleging they were misleading and contributed to an unfair conviction. They also dispute the sentencing decision, claiming the court failed to consider mitigating factors and imposed an excessively harsh sentence. Consequently, the defense seeks to have the conviction overturned or, at a minimum, to have the case remanded for resentencing.





to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

gov.uscourts.ca2.234342fd-2384-426f-a4a4-aeca250ee12d.35.0.pdf

In the case of Anthony Tate v. Sean Combs et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-8810-LAK, the plaintiff, Anthony Tate, has filed an amended complaint against defendants Sean Combs, Daddy’s House Recordings Inc., CE OPCO, LLC (doing business as Combs Global and formerly known as Combs Enterprises LLC), Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings, Inc., Bad Boy Productions Holdings, Inc., Bad Boy Books Holdings, Inc., Bad Boy Records LLC, Bad Boy Entertainment LLC, Bad Boy Productions LLC, and unnamed organizational and individual defendants referred to as Does 1-10. The amended complaint includes a demand for a jury trial.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.632026.24.0.pdf

Raffaele Imperiale, once one of Europe’s most powerful narco-bosses and a key figure in the so-called “super cartel,” has officially turned state witness — becoming one of the highest-ranking Camorra figures to flip in decades. Arrested in Dubai in 2021 and extradited to Italy, Imperiale began cooperating with prosecutors in late 2022, offering to reveal the inner workings of his transnational drug empire and its connections to other major syndicates, including the Kinahan cartel. His cooperation reportedly includes extensive details on smuggling routes from South America through Dutch ports, European laundering channels, and the involvement of corrupt customs officials. Italian investigators have described his testimony as “devastating” to multiple networks operating between Italy, Ireland, Spain, and the UAE.

In exchange for leniency, Imperiale surrendered millions in assets — including an artificial island in Dubai known as “Taiwan,” multiple villas, and artwork including two stolen Van Gogh paintings recovered from his possession. His cooperation has already led to new indictments and cross-border intelligence sharing between Europol, Italian authorities, and the Dutch National Police. In 2024, he received a 15-year sentence, dramatically reduced from the life term he once faced. Prosecutors believe Imperiale’s turn as a pentito could unravel a generation of organized crime alliances that linked the Camorra to global cartels and money-laundering networks stretching from Dubai to Amsterdam.


to contact me:

[email protected]

Reports linking the Kinahan cartel to Zimbabwe suggest that Christy Kinahan Sr. and his network have been attempting to use the country as a base of operations for laundering money, acquiring property, and facilitating international travel. Investigations revealed that Kinahan has made multiple visits to Zimbabwe, leaving digital traces such as Google reviews for Harare hotels and local businesses, implying direct physical presence. Local media and anti-corruption groups allege that certain Zimbabwean political figures have provided protection to Kinahan, allowing him to operate discreetly. Sources claim he has maintained offices in Harare under associates’ names and cultivated relationships with business intermediaries in the gold and aviation sectors.


to contact me:

[email protected]

​Sean "Diddy" Combs, the former music mogul, has been served with a superseding indictment that introduces new allegations of forced labor and sexual misconduct. Filed in the Southern District of New York, the indictment accuses Combs and his associates of coercing employees to work extensive hours under threats of physical, psychological, financial, and reputational harm. Notably, it alleges that Combs used physical violence and intimidation to compel one employee into engaging in sexual acts with him. These new charges supplement existing accusations of sex trafficking, racketeering, and transportation for prostitution, with the trial set to commence on May 5, 2025.


In this episode, we get a look at that indictment and what was added to it.


to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.169.0_2.pdf